Product Communities

Great turnout for our July roundtable — 27 attendees and 82 chapter members and counting (23 new members since our June 1 meeting!). We had folks register and join from across the country, plus one respondent all the way from London, spanning system admins, Fusion developers, marketing operations leaders, and end users.Our main topic was a live demo of the Workfront MCP Server and an overview of current Workfront AI capabilities, presented by David Kershaw of Techmera. David walked us through the three AI paradigms available in Workfront today, then showed the MCP Server in action against a live instance.AI Assistant. The in-Workfront chatbot. Best for summarizing what's on the current page, answering documentation and configuration questions, and (usefully) helping with calculated fields without the hallucinations you'd see from a generic LLM. AI Collaborator. Embeddable AI agents that plug into workflows. The Content Reviewer is generally available today — think of it as an AI teamma

We have just gotten access to the Adobe storage and included (free) frame.io integration. We’re not happy about the need for users to create and login to a frame.io account to see proofs for review.I think ideally, a user with a WF account should not be asked to create a separate account and login, it should just use their WF credentials.For our guest approvers in WF, I could be wrong, but it seems that they are now being asked to sign in/ create a frame.io account and receiving an email to set up a separate account in Workflow? I’m curious what others are seeing? I’m especially curious about what people are seeing who have a frame.io license on the same enterprise as Workfront. is it the same, do you not get asked to log into frame? etc etc.

Can anyone confirm that the menu bar layout will be changing for all users in the July 16, 2026 release?It’s mentioned on this page:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/product-announcements/product-releases/release-26-q3/26-q3-release-overview#other-enhancements And this page shows screenshots of the new layout, which matches what’s in Preview:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/basics/navigate/global-navigation-overview I just want to make sure it’s clear that the ‘waffle’ menu (the grid of nine dots in the upper right) is now being replaced by the ‘Main menu’ icon on the left, underneath the Workfront logo.  The new ‘waffle’ menu in the updated layout only contains links to Admin Console and other broader Adobe account areas. Do I have this right?  My users are sensitive to layout changes like this, so I want to make sure my communication is clear.   

Hello Team, We would appreciate your guidance regarding the Adobe Analytics Data Repair API. Our requirement is to replace all data for Exit Links, regardless of any condition.We used the following variable in our payload: "pageeventvar2": {      "action": "set",      "setValue": "data repair"} After executing the API, the results indicated that only the Custom Link values were updated (as expected), while the Exit Link values remained unchanged. Could you please advise whether there are any additional parameters, limitations, or specific configurations required to update Exit Link data through the Data Repair API? https://developer.adobe.com/analytics-apis/docs/2.0/guides/endpoints/data-repair/json-body Thank you for your support.

Hi all,I'm running into a limitation in Adobe Campaign and I'm curious how others handle this.It seems that I can only load one coupon code per email delivery. In my use case, I would like to include two different coupon codes in a single email, each with its own validity period.Has anyone implemented something similar?Any ideas or workarounds (e.g. data model, delivery setup, or workflow approach) would be very helpful.Thanks in advance!

RequestWe would like the ability to easily add a mailto link within the AJO content editor, avoiding having to form the link structure manually. ReasoningThe users of the content editor are often not technical This is fairly standard functionality for a WYSIWYG editor It is present in your other email products WorkaroundWe know how to create one manually, e.g.mailto:emailme@example.com?subject=I%20would%20like%20more%20information%20on%20your%20product 

Hi Team,I am facing an issue with favicon loading.Previously, I only had the following code in my application, and it worked as expected:<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" href="favicon.ico"/>As part of an update, I wanted to use a favicon.png file since most modern browsers support PNG favicons. I replaced the ICO file with the following, and it worked correctly:<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/png" href="favicon.png"/>However, for backward compatibility with older browsers, I included both the PNG and ICO files:<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/png" href="favicon.png"/><link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" href="favicon.ico"/>I expected modern browsers to load favicon.png and use favicon.ico only as a fallback for browsers that do not support PNG favicons. Instead, the browser always loads favicon.ico, and the PNG file is ignored.Is this the expected behavior? If both favicon types are specified, should the browser always prefer the

Hi Adobe Community,We're currently implementing a preference center/unsubscribe landing page using AJO campaigns with URL parameter encryption enabled via the Key Registry.**Current Setup:**- AJO email campaign uses the encrypt() helper in personalization editor- Email links include encrypted parameters: ?pid=v1.towEToq9cGLgo9x4...- Landing page is built using AJO Forms (not custom HTML)- Form is tied to an AEP profile-enabled dataset for capturing preferences**What We're Trying to Achieve:**When a user clicks the email link and lands on the form page:1. The encrypted pid (profile/identity) should be captured from the URL2. Assigned to a form hidden field automatically3. When the form is submitted, the pid should be mapped to a profile    identity namespace (Email or CRM ID)4. Form submission data should stitch to the existing profile in AEP    for preference updates**Our Questions:**1. **In AJO Forms Designer** - Can we configure a hidden field to    automatically capture and map URL

Hi all, hoping someone can help with an embedded Marketo form issue. CORE ISSUEWe embed a Marketo form in a Next.js site. It renders correctly with the fields from the first approved version. But when we edit the form (e.g. adding hint text to a phone field) and approve the draft, the change never appears, even 2+ hours later. The form status shows "Approved" and the "Updated at" timestamp reflects the approval, but the definition served to the page is still the previous approved version.The only thing that makes the change show up is cloning the form, deleting the original, and re-embedding the clone (new form ID). Because embed IDs are referenced throughout the site, that isn't a viable workflow. WHAT WE OBSERVEGET {lp-domain}/index.php/form/getForm?...&form={id} keeps returning the PREVIOUS approved version. We polled from T+1min to T+2h; every response was stale. EVIDENCE (server-side cache)The getForm response carries the header cached: true, and the payload matches the prior

In the Bulk Lead Extract documentation, I see that the updatedAt and smartListId filters are not available for all subscription tiers. I am building a Marketo integration that will enable users to import their lead data into our platform, and some of my design relies on the updatedAt and smartListId filters. I was wondering if it is free of cost for anyone to enable these filters on their subscription (even the lowest tier), or if it is dependent on their tier.

Hi all, hoping someone can help with an embedded Marketo form revalidation issue. CORE ISSUEWe embed a Marketo form in a Next.js site that is under development. It renders correctly with the fields from the first approved version. But when we edit the form (e.g. adding hint text to a phone field) and approve the draft, the change never appears, even 2+ hours later. The form status shows "Approved" and the "Updated at" timestamp reflects the approval, but the definition served to the page is still the previous approved version.The only thing that makes the change show up is cloning the form, deleting the original, and re-embedding the clone (new form ID). Because embed IDs are referenced throughout the site, that isn't a viable workflow. WHAT WE OBSERVEGET {lp-domain}/index.php/form/getForm?...&form={id} keeps returning the PREVIOUS approved version. We polled from T+1min to T+2h; every response was stale. EVIDENCE (server-side cache)The getForm response carries the header cached: t

Many thanks to Aman Kumar Gupta (Senior Product Manager) and Siddharth Sahni (Senior Engineering Manager) for sharing their expertise on Content Hub! Thank you to the team for helping in the Q&A as well!If you weren’t able to attend live - or want to revisit any part of the session - you can access everything below. Session MaterialsSlide Deck PDF Webinar Recording Stay tuned for the consolidated Q&A from the session! We’ll posted it in this thread.Additional ResourcesContent Hub blogs: Unlocking Content Hub Extensibility Custom Workflows in Content Hub  Session SummaryThis session covered three pillars for AEM Assets Content Hub: Making content easy to find, Real to use for your business workflows, and Safe to govern. Key capabilities demoed included AI (semantic) search, custom sorting, on-the-fly generation of channel-specific dynamic renditions (e.g., Instagram/LinkedIn crops) from Search bar of Content Hub, auto-updating Smart Collections for managing multiple brands, an

Hello Target Users,I have a scenario where i have to show different experiences for mobile and non-mobile users within the same activity. So i am using multiple audience in configure option to solve that (screenshot attached).But this seems to working only for non-mobile users, mobile users also seeing the same experience as non-mobile users. Am I missing something? or is there any other way to create activity for this scenario?Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone,I have a requirement where the email content remains the same, but the CTA link needs to change dynamically based on the lead's country using a Velocity Script in Marketo.However, I'm getting an error when I deploy the campaign.Requirement:Same email template for all recipients. Change only the CTA URL based on the lead's country. Example: US → www.youtube.com Canada → https://example.com/ca India → https://example.com/in Behavior:✅ Email Preview: Works as expected.   ❌ Smart Campaign Send: Fails with a Velocity Script error.Velocity Script:#set($country = ${lead.Country})#set($url = "www.google.com")#if($country == "India")    #set($url = "example.com/in")#elseif($country == "United States")    #set($url = "www.youtube.com ")#elseif($country == "Canada")    #set($url = "example.com/ca")#else    #set($url = "www.google.com")#end${url}HTML: <td valign="top" align="center" style="text-align: center; padding: 12px 20px; color: #1570EF; font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial

Hi everyone,I'm facing a 404 issue with a custom Sling Servlet and the AEM Dispatcher. The servlet works for one placement of the component but returns a 404 for another, even though they share the exact same resource type.Environment:AEM as a Cloud ServiceServlet registered via @SlingServletResourceTypes with selectors = "customselector", extensions = "json"Dispatcher module with a standard filter.any configurationScenario:The servlet is registered for the resource type path/components/componentname and handles requests with the selector customselector and extension json (e.g., ...componentname.customselector.json).Placement A (Works): The component is placed inside an Experience Fragment (XF) used in the site header.Request URL: /content/experience-fragments/.../componentname.customselector.jsonResponse: 200 OKPlacement B (Fails): The exact same component (same sling:resourceType) is placed inline on a standard content page.Request URL:/content/path/us/en/pagepath/_jcr_content/root/c

I have created a Fusion scenario that removes deactivated users from their Home Team. The issue is that they still have Other Teams. I tried everything I could think of and kept getting errors to set their other teams to null. Does anyone know how I can accomplish this?Maybe I need to come at this from the Team side and remove any inactive users versus using the user update scenario to do it. It’s just that I have the user one accomplishing other actions so I was hoping to get the user profile corrected using the same scenario.

Hello the amazing Adobe Community, I am looking to understand a metrics.We have form conversion set as Segmented “Visit Container” with event## to fire when user submit a form Then create a calculate metrics using that Visit Container Segment + the (Visit) metric is our Form Conversion We want to understand why when we have last touch channel broken down and when we sum the form conversion for each of the channel it doesn’t add up to the “Deduplicate total within the workspace” example using dummy numbers. Can someone explain what is causing this? We understand that visits and sum should have slight difference of approx. 5% but for our form conversion calculated metrics its >15% difference between workspace number and total number. Explain in technical term is also welcome. I want to understand Adobe logic. Channel Visits Conversions Adobe Total 370,123 9,723 SEO 108,351 2,052 SEM 125,824 3,878 Direct 158,885 5,819 SUM 393,060 11,749