Adobe Workfront Fusion

We are curious if anyone has done the following in Fusion with Outlook: Receive a new email to a targeted email address in Outlook When the email hits the inbox, have Fusion read the email and download all attachments and once downloaded have the attachments move to targeted project folder We have a use case where we might also need to have a new folder created and then have files uploaded from the outlook email Can Fusion read metadata off the email to create a folder?   

Hi,Is it possible to automate the step below when a new issue is created?Our process: There is a particular type of issue (queue topic), whenever it is created, we create a copy of a SharePoint Excel template and attach it to the issue. The copy file lives in SharePoint. After creating the copy using Fusion, how do I link that file to the new issue? Any suggestions?

Hello! I have a scenario that has stopped working as intended on proofs. It shows no errors within the scenario so I know it’s active and running, but it doesn’t do what it used to and I’m a novice at Fusion so I can’t seem to figure out what’s happened. Anyone know a good resource to use to troubleshoot? 

Is anyone using Fusion to connect Frame IO and their Workfront projects? 

Hi all—looking for some ideas/best practices here!I’m exploring how to automate task completions in Workfront based on proof decisions. From what I understand, this requires the document to live at the task level. If that’s the case, I’m curious how others are handling version control across multiple rounds of edits.Do you typically reuse the same task for each round, or create new tasks for each version? Trying to avoid things getting messy while still enabling automation.Example of what I’m trying to achieve:Design R1 – Designer uploads file to the task and marks complete Creative Review R1 – Proof is created and routed for approval Approved → completes Creative Review and moves to execution Changes Required → completes Creative Review and moves to Design R2 → Creative Review R2 This cycle would repeat until final approval.Would love to hear how others are handling this—especially if you’ve found a clean way to manage versions + automation together. Thanks in advance! 

Hi all, working on making a connection between Workfront Core (Sandbox instance) and Workfront Proof. I'm trying to set up the connection module in Fusion, but I'm consistently getting a Request Timeout error when I attempt to authenticate.I've double-checked the credentials and endpoints, and everything seems to be configured correctly from my end. I've attached a screenshot for reference in case it helps identify the issue. 

Has anybody been able to successfully create a connection in Fusion with Power BI?Last night I attempted to create a connection.  A dialog box opened up indicating I needed approval from my organization’s admin.  I filled out the request, and overnight I received an email from Microsoft confirming that my request for access to Workfront Fusion PowerBI Connector was approved.I tried again just now to create the connection--a pop-up window opens, but the login authorization doesn’t work; I get a message: “An error occurred.  Connection failed.”Has anybody else seen this?  I wanted to check before filing a ticket.

Hello community - I am new to Fusion and looking to use Fusion to create a report (or notification if report isn’t an option) that is a list of a users current proofs they are a “reviewer” only on. I don’t see any templates remotely close to this so starting here to see if anyone has done something similar or has any recommendations to get this to work.  So far looking to do the following: watch event for new proof Read the record of the proof to pull role filter by the role “reviewer”  Create report (or notification) What am I missing? 

Summary:The native `workfront-maestro:createRecord` Fusion module does not fully abstract field IDs for linked/connection fields (many-to-many relationships), despite Workspace and Record Type being correctly selected by label from the UI. Expected behavior:The native module should handle the internal field key mapping automatically — developers should never need to know or use raw field IDs like `F69d64ac7f0097169d4b252c8` or construct objects with `_id` suffixed keys like `{"F69d64ac7f0097169d4b252c8_id": "Rc69..."}` manually. Actual behavior:For linked/connection fields, the module exposes `fieldID_id` suffixed keys in the nested object spec. Developers must manually construct payloads like:`[{"F69d64ac7f0097169d4b252c8_id": "Rc69..."}]`This defeats the primary value proposition of the native module over a Custom API Call, which is to abstract away raw field and record IDs. Impact:Teams building automations with linked fields are forced to hardcode field IDs into their Fusion scenar

I posted something about this a while ago. However, the problem just keeps getting worse. I’ll trigger a scenario I’m working on by performing an action. The automation will run. And regardless of it runs successfully, it errors out, or returns a warning, I’m waiting for minutes before I can see what’s actually happening. I’m not the only person on my instance who is experiencing this. My colleague in a different business unit has to deal with the same latencies.Yeah, I know that if you trigger individual modules when building, you get an almost instantaneous turnaround with execution data. Yeah, I know I manually start an automation, I’ll get execution data almost instantaneously. However, I’m in the midst of building a complicated automation which requires it get triggered from inside of Workfront. Every time I run it, I have to wait between three to five minutes before I get any data back. And even when I get a failure pop up on my screen, I’ll go to the scenario where I’m still wai

Hey all, I’m trying to build a Fusion automation to connect appropriate projects to records in Workfront Planning but the Planning Update Record module isn’t an append, it replaces any values currently in the field. What I’m trying to do is add a new project to the connected project field of a given record, while retaining the existing connected projects.Whether this was clean or not, my idea of a workaround was to re-map all of the existing connected projects plus the new one, so I’m using the Planning Get a Record module to pull in the pertinent information on the specific record type I need to connect the project to. This is outputting a “Project” array that contains as many collections as there are currently connected projects, with each collection containing the External ID.Then in a Planning Update Record module, I’m mapping the Project array external ID to the Project (Connection) field by using the array index number, plus the new project’s external ID as seen below.  This func

We have been attempting to connect Workfront and Campaign Classic V8 with Fusion and we established the connection.    The issue we seem to be having when using Adobe Campaign Classic Read a Record module, is that when selecting any resource, we get this error message.   I have been working with the Campaign Classic admin to see if we can troubleshoot the access limitations and just been hitting a roadblock at this time.     Does anyone have any experience with this and know how to correct this?   This appears to be something on the Campaign Classic side that is limiting access and I am not familiar with the application and hoping I could help provide the admin over there some possible solution to review.   Thanks!  

Fusion currently supports Google forms only. MS Forms would be a great addition.

If i delete a folder in Fusion with contents, doe everything get deleted, or doed the content get placed in uncategorized?

Workfront used to offer Bootcamp trainings for Admin and Fusion for a fee. Now I am only seeing “Manage Connections and Workflows in Adobe Workfront Fusion” offered OnDemand but it requires an Enterprise Learning Subscription. Are the bootcamps no longer offered?

Has anyone successfully connected Workfront with Aprimo DAM using Fusion? Our use case is to upload final files from Workfront in the DAM, but we’re running into issues - especially files over 20MB. Would love to pick your brain if you’ve successfully done this integration! 

In the Workfront UI, converting an Issue to a Project establishes a native resolving/resolvable relationship, and the Issue status is automatically driven by the Project status.In Fusion, the Convert object module:Immediately resolves the Issue Removes it from active queue visibility Does not allow control over timing of resolutionUsing Create a record:Allows delayed resolution But does NOT create the native resolving object relationship Prevents automatic status synchronizationRequest:Enhance Fusion to support:Creating a Project from an Issue using a template Establishing the native resolving/resolvable relationship Allowing control over when the Issue is resolved (not forced immediately)This would enable automation scenarios that match the native Workfront UX while preserving queue visibility and lifecycle control.Business impact:Prevents automation of intake workflows Forces manual conversion Creates inconsistency between UI and Fusion behavior

I am not able to connect my gmail with fusion, I have followed all the steps mentioned in fusion documention and updated google console, then also it is throwing this error. Please help me get through this.  

Thank you to all of you for joining **L821 – Take-off with Fusion! Go from 0 to Integration in 90 Minutes** at Adobe Summit 2026. Below you'll find everything but the deck from the session.   To revisit the exercises at your own pace we’ve included the .json’s here that were used in the exercises and behind the scenes to populate the firefly generated images.  These can be imported into your Fusion environment by creating a new scenario-->going to the … menu at the bottom of the Scenario designer screen -->selecting import .json. Lab DocumentationFollow the full step-by-step walkthrough here:L821 Lab Workbook ## Questions?Drop them in the comments — the community and our team are happy to help. 

Requirements - Security requirement to have logs from Workfront and Fusion to be sent back to NAB (user, sys logs – no PII data). Simple Explanation of the Workfront & Fusion Logging RequirementNAB needs to make sure that anything happening inside Workfront and Workfront Fusion can be tracked for security and audit purposes.To do this, logs from both systems must be sent back into NAB’s internal monitoring tools.What kind of logs?User activity logs – e.g., who logged in, who made changes, what actions were taken System logs – e.g., system events, automation runs, errors, integration activity BUT importantly: No PII (Personally Identifiable Information) must be included in these logs.Why do this?Helps NAB detect unusual or suspicious activity Helps with security audits Ensures compliance with NAB’s internal security policies Allows NAB to troubleshoot issues quickly

I keep getting a “Forbidden resource” pop-up when opening Fusion scenarios recently: Is anyone else getting this?  I can still run/edit the scenarios, but I can no longer access the Incomplete Executions tab.  Last week I got an email about an incomplete execution; the scenario in question runs once daily, so I was able to able to go into the History tab and look at the most recent entry to find the issue.  My concern is with scenarios that have instant triggers--if any runs have an incomplete execution, it may be harder to identify them using just the History tab (some scenarios have hundreds of executions per day).I wanted to check if anyone else has seen this behavior in their Fusion instance.

Hi All,I keep getting a 404 error when testing out the Box make an api call module. I’m trying to copy a folder currently in box, into another folder in BOX.  Here’s what I have:URL: folders/(folder id)/copyMethod: PostHeaders:Content-Typeapplication/jsonQuery String:{   "name": "Project Test Copy",   "id": "(new parent folder id)"} Can anyone see where I’m making errors here?  

Hi everyone, I have a scenario that attaches a couple of custom forms to an issue. It was working fine cca 4 hours ago, but all of the sudden I start getting the following error:The operation failed with an error. [422] APIModel V22_0 action assignCategory does not support argument named alreadyAttachedThe original module being used is Misc Action, with the following setup  And I also tried using a Custom API Call as such   Both modules give me the same error message. I’m really at a loss here, especially since this was working today without issues.Any ideas what can be the issue or how I can fix this? Thank you