Adobe Workfront Fusion

I’ve created a scenario that automatically creates a Jira ticket when the issue status is set to In Progress. The scenario runs, however I need to create it for individual teams to ensure only their issues are adding to their Jira boards. I currently have a filter in place between the watch events and read a record for the teamID, however I’m hesitant to run the scenario because there’s a chance it would pull every other request that is newly In Progress to the incorrect board. Does anyone have any experience/feedback on this or if the recommendation is to create a new Webhook with the teamID as a filter in the first module rather in between the two? 

I noticed the new Functions area in Fusion and was intrigued. Although we don’t have a current use for the section, I can imagine that it can be extremely useful in the future.I’ll be honest: I’m a “refugee” from magazine publishing. I’ve got giant sucking-chest-wound-sized holes in my knowledge base. At this point, I’m trying to think through “unknown unknowns” when it comes to using such cool-looking new functionality. So, for people who didn’t yoke themselves to a dying industry for most of their careers, what are you most excited to do with this new functionality? And has Adobe considered a “cookbook” in the way that it has with Fusion?-j (wishing I had a degree in data science)  

I’m working on a Power BI dashboard for some of our business partners.  I’m told that delays with these projects frequently stem from the partners failing to approve proofs in a timely fashion.  In addition to project info, I am hoping to show folks info on current tasks and any pending proof approvals.I know that proofs use a completely different API than does Workfront.  My thought is to create a custom form for documents and populate it with reviewer/status info obtained from a Workfront Proof module (that way I wouldn’t have to hassle with making a Workfront Proof API call in PBI).  I tested the back end of this idea--pulling reviewer names/roles/approval status, aggregating those values, and updating a custom field attached to my document with the aggregated text--and it worked.I’m now trying to figure out the best way of isolating the population of objects I need for the front end of the scenario.  For my initial test, I’m hoping to pull documents with pending approvals for proje

We are looking to drive custom notifications and other actions once a task’s Can Start {canStart} updates;Examples of actions when a task can start moves from false to true:  Add note and task assignee informing them their task can begin Review documents and add reference information to updates from previous tasks Review fields on other tasks and update downstream tasks as appropriate     Currently, there does not appear to be a way to watch this field, record or event which watches the system canStart field on a task.  

Hi,Is there a way to search for a WF Planning user in Fusion, given that user’s ID? I am trying to get the name and email from a user, based on the ID provided in the Created By field of a Planning record. I know I can search for a user details via this API internal/user?name=<user_name>  but as far as I could tell, it does not allow me to search by ID. Thanks in advanceJoao

Hi all,We have a lot of projects where assignments change often and sometimes entire teams are changed on a project, and thus people are unassigned tasks and others are reassigned. The challenge we’re facing is that when users are no longer assigned to tasks in a project, they remain in the “people” section (projectUsers), so the project still shows up in their dashboards and reports. I thought I saw a scenario to remove users from the projectUsers when no tasks were assigned to them in that project, but I can’t find anything now and I’m having a tough time working through my own scenario for this. Has anybody created a scenario to do this and would be willing to share your blueprint? Thanks!-Steven

I keep getting a “Forbidden resource” pop-up when opening Fusion scenarios recently: Is anyone else getting this?  I can still run/edit the scenarios, but I can no longer access the Incomplete Executions tab.  Last week I got an email about an incomplete execution; the scenario in question runs once daily, so I was able to able to go into the History tab and look at the most recent entry to find the issue.  My concern is with scenarios that have instant triggers--if any runs have an incomplete execution, it may be harder to identify them using just the History tab (some scenarios have hundreds of executions per day).I wanted to check if anyone else has seen this behavior in their Fusion instance.

I'm able to link manually SharePoint folder by clicking Add new --> SharePoint Graph API. How to create SharePoint linked folder by Fusion?

Hi! I’m trying to map an array into the planning update records module, I run into a validation failed error when I map an array, but it works fine when I pass it as individual IDs. I also tried creating a JSON and updating the record with the planning Custom API module, but that also throws the same error. How can I go about this? 

I recently refreshed my SB01 and then discovered that all my Fusion scenarios connected to SB01 or Preview are broken. Has anyone else encountered this, and how do you restore the connections without having to rebuild the webhooks and api calls? 😭

It is just me or do the log files seem to be even slower to process and post? I am looking at a history screen with 9 runs that have yet to process the history - all of them are at least 15 mins old. Makes it hard to diagnosis issues... just sayin

Logged into Fusion this morning to see a new banner message: “Important Update: From April 15, your current login/password combination for Adobe Workfront Fusion will stop working as we complete our migration to Adobe IMS. Please contact your Adobe Admin Console administrator or your Support team to be assigned.”I currently use an email and password for a service account in our WF instance (created prior to our migration to Admin Console) to log into Fusion.  Does this mean I will need to be provisioned under my own WF account?  Also, most of my scenarios use a connection created for the service account.  Will those continue to work unaffected?  I’m assuming the change is purely for login purposes and would not effect existing scenarios or my ability to edit them?

I am trying to map an array variable to the Planning Module but no matter what I do, I get an error "Array of objects expected in parameter 'F6914a6c02f21335b7b794d35'." I have tried to just have the ID numbers, the "id: xxxxxxx" and plenty of other things to get this to work but I don't know what it wants and I can not find any documentation on Planning Module specifics.  When I put the variables in one at a time in the without mapping, it works (but I will never know the set amount of objects so I need the array). If anyone has any ideas, I would appreciate it. My Variable Expression:The Variable Output:Planning Module Input: Error:     

Hi,Let me explain what I’m trying to do.We have a custom user typeahead field. When that field is populated with someone’s name and the ticket is raised, I want the ticket status to change to CLIENT REVIEW. Once the status changes, the approver should be the person whose name is entered in the typeahead field (the name could be different for each ticket). After that person approves, the ticket status should move back to NEW, where the default approval process (applied to all requests) should start.My Fusion scenario works up to fetching the user ID from the typeahead field, but I’m unable to set the approver based on that field.Can you confirm whether this is possible? Regards,Diksha G.

Hi All We would like to integrate Writer agent with Workfront using Fusion. if anyone already done it please provide some suggestions. ThanksSamyuktha 

With the recent UI changes to Fusion, it is now less clear when a route is disabled.The previous UI showed a red circle with a line through it to indicate a disabled route, the new UI just greys out the connecting line between modules.For enabled routes, the color of the connecting dots depends on the modules that link connects. Particularly between a router and a Tools module, the color change for an enabled vs a disabled route is very slight.This will make it more difficult to quickly see that a route has been disabled. Please bring back the red circle with the line through it.

As an enterprise organization, managing, tracking and auditing changes in our Fusion scenarios that are driving business automation and processes is required.    We currently manage this manually on spreadsheets and such but this is a challenge to ensure its always updated. Idea!   Incorporate the ability to Check Out and Check In a Fusion scenario to better track and control changes.   Other options could include simply include requiring admin update comments (modal form to capture?) upon activation of any scenario.What are we looking for?  Ability to identify which scenarios are being worked on Ability to require updates and comments related to changes that are being made Ability to limit turning on scenarios that have not been checked in (risk control) Ability to better report on changes by who, when and what update notes were included

Is there a way to identify document move from 1 folder to another in fusion?

Has anybody been able to successfully create a connection in Fusion with Power BI?Last night I attempted to create a connection.  A dialog box opened up indicating I needed approval from my organization’s admin.  I filled out the request, and overnight I received an email from Microsoft confirming that my request for access to Workfront Fusion PowerBI Connector was approved.I tried again just now to create the connection--a pop-up window opens, but the login authorization doesn’t work; I get a message: “An error occurred.  Connection failed.”Has anybody else seen this?  I wanted to check before filing a ticket.

I am looking for the endpoint to use to bring the existing ProofHQ combined proof into the project in Workfront. I am creating the proof successfully but not having any luck adding it into the project via Fusion.

Hi All, I am currently trying to use the SharePoint Online module "Get a Folder" with "Enter Manually" selected in the Enter Site, Drive and File IDs field. However, I am unable to format the "Folder Path" field correctly. I have tried multiple ways of retrieving the path of a folder in SharePoint with no success. Are there examples of anyone using this module successfully or documentation I could be pointed to?  Thanks.Padraic

Airtable has deprecated API keys in favor of Personal Access Tokens for some time now and PAT are the recommended way to connect through the Airtable API.  https://airtable.com/developers/web/api/authenticationI am requesting that Fusion allow connections to Airtable using a PAT rather than Client ID / Secret and OAuth login.We currently have a technical email account setup with access to Airtable but due to our companies Entra policies this account cannot login through SSO to Airtable.  Because of this I cannot get through the login screen to grant access to Airtable when setting up a connection in Fusion.  I can however have a PAT setup from our system admin of Airtable for this account.Please add the ability to use a PAT when setting up an Airtable connection using the standard out of the box Airtable connector.

We have a workflow that incorporates multiple rounds of reviews as tasks. We are trying to automate the closure of these tasks when rounds aren’t needed and approvals are obtained earlier than what we planned for. What I’m struggling with is the Parent Task status. Since the projects are set for the parent tasks to be a summary of the child tasks, when the child tasks are closed (status of not needed which equates with complete) the parent task is updated to Complete, which is ultimately fine but not the preference. We’d like it to update to “not needed,” which equates with Complete. Is there a way to edit this task status via Fusion? I’ve tried with a basic scenario without success, but not sure if there is any other option.