Welcome to the Adobe Workfront Community! Connect with peers to ask questions, share best practices, explore release updates, and contribute ideas that shape the future of Workfront.
Recently active
A helpful and efficient update that would help reduce the number of fusion scenario runs and modules needed after an Adobe Workfront Watch Event (instant) would be simply to include numberOfChildren as an Event Filter option for Task events webhook configuration. We are looking to drive automation once a task status changes but looking to limit the run on only actual tasks, not parent tasks. We are able to work around but see double the number of runs necessary and need to add extra modules to read the task after the webhook. This would be similar to this idea where the option to filter by that field for task objects: Fusion Watch module for a task canStart update | Community
Hi Team, I'm working on a usecase where I need to create a Interactive Proof for a Web URL and need some ideas and suggestion on how to achieve this. I have a field attached to an object(TASK) where we will enter the URL of the webpage that needs to be proofed and I need to develop the fusion scenario that will automate Interactive Proof for that URL entered. Any suggestions and ideas are appreciated. Thanks for your time!!!
I have built out a scenario in Fusion and I can fetch and read the note/update and notify those not tagged. But, I would like to update the note/update to add tags. I’m able to create a new note/update that will add tags but I don’t want to create a new one I just want to update the original with tags.Is this possible?Thank you in advance for your insight.
Set team or scenario notification options for IMS organizationsIMS organizations can now enable or disable each notification type independently at the team level — the same fine-grained controls previously available only to non‑IMS organizations. Scenario-level notification settings continue to override team settings when present.OverviewTo give teams finer control over the notifications they receive, administrators and team managers in IMS organizations can now choose which situations trigger Fusion notifications. Instead of a single on/off switch for all notifications, you can toggle each notification type independently:Notify on warning — Send a notification when a scenario execution logs a warning. Notify on error — Send a notification when a scenario execution fails. Notify when scenario is disabled — Send a notification when Fusion auto‑deactivates a scenario (for example, after too many consecutive errors).Scenario-level notification settings still take precedence over team-lev
We're using the Workfront - Convert Approved Issue to Project template and trying to determine the best architecture in Fusion.We have:1 Request Queue 9 Request Forms 30+ Project TemplatesEach request form should map to the appropriate project template(s) when the issue is converted to a project.Would you recommend:One scenario with filters/routers/switches to determine the correct template? Multiple scenarios dedicated to each request form?Looking for insights on what is easiest to maintain and scale over time. Thank you!
Salesforce Platform : Migrate from OAuth Username-Password to Client Credentials Flowhttps://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=000886201&type=1 As per Workfront Customer Support’s Technical Support Engineer :Adobe Workfront Fusion currently does not document native support for the OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials flow in the Salesforce connector. The documented authentication method is interactive authorization rather than client-credentials-only authentication. Further their suggestion, we post this as new idea. We would like our request to add client credentials flow authentication method to Salesforce connector to be considered. Salesforce connector does not support custom domain for sandbox environment as well. It will only have url as test.salesforce.com.
Restrict webhooks by Adobe IMS authorization and browser originRestrict webhooks by Adobe IMS authorization and browser originWe’ve added two new security controls for custom webhooks: Allowed Origins (CORS) to restrict browser-based calls to specific domains, and Adobe IMS Bearer token validation so webhooks accept requests only when callers present a valid Adobe IMS access token.OverviewCustom webhooks can now enforce two common security requirements:Allowed Origins (CORS) — Specify which browser origins may invoke the webhook from client-side JavaScript. Requests from other origins are blocked by CORS, preventing untrusted web pages from calling your webhook. Adobe IMS authorization — Require requesters to send an Adobe IMS access token in the Authorization header (Bearer <token>). Fusion validates the token before accepting the webhook payload, enabling secure server-to-server or user-scoped calls using Adobe Identity Management.How to configure Allowed Origins and IMS author
Hi everyone,I'm exploring a Fusion use case and would love to hear if anyone has tackled something similar.When creating a proof, users often enter important instructions in Email Notification → Add Custom Message. The challenge is that once the proof is created, those instructions aren't easily accessible within the proof itself.Ideally, we'd like to build a Fusion scenario that:Detects a newly created proof. Retrieves the custom email message. Automatically posts that message as the first comment in the proof.This would preserve review intent and project-specific instructions directly within the proof, even if the original email is deleted or lost.My main question:Does the Workfront Proof API expose the value entered in Email Notification → Add Custom Message → Message?If so, has anyone successfully used Fusion to retrieve that value and create a proof comment from it? I'd also be interested in hearing what modules, API calls, or overall framework you used.Any insights or examples wo
Hi everyone,I'm brand new to Workfront Fusion and recently completed the Fusion training courses. Our team is trying to connect Workfront Fusion to our Workfront Preview environment so we can build and test scenarios before moving them to Production.I've successfully created an OAuth application and generated a Client ID and Client Secret, but I'm getting stuck during the authentication setup. When I use the Preview domain, I receive an error indicating the application can't be found, and I've also run into issues determining the correct domain and redirect URL to use for the Preview environment.I'm sure I'm overlooking something simple, but after spending quite a bit of time troubleshooting, I'm stuck and would appreciate any guidance from someone who has successfully connected Fusion to a Workfront Preview instance.Any tips, screenshots, or examples of a working setup would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help!
Adobe Express connector now available in Workfront FusionWe’ve added a new Adobe Express connector so you can automate common Express workflows—like listing tagged documents, creating variations, exporting renditions, and checking operation status—directly from Workfront Fusion integrations and automations.OverviewThe Adobe Express connector exposes the primary Express API surface so you can programmatically interact with Express documents and tagged elements from your Fusion scenarios. The connector maps the Express API endpoints into modules that make it easy to include Express operations in integration flows, automation canvases, and scheduled jobs.Connector capabilities (API endpoints)Tagged documents — List all documents that contain tagged elements so you can discover assets to process. Tagged document details — Retrieve metadata and the tagged-element structure for a specific document to inspect editable regions and element IDs. Generate variation — Create new document variatio
Is there a way in Fusion to generate a report of all scenarios that have turned off/errored out in the past week or so?
Is anyone using Fusion to connect Frame IO and their Workfront projects?
Product update:mTLS support for custom webhooksTo meet stronger security requirements, you can now use mutual TLS (mTLS) with custom webhooks. Add a client certificate and private key to a webhook so Experience League integrations and automations authenticate to the receiving service using client-side TLS credentials.OverviewCustom webhooks now support Client certificate authorization. When you configure a webhook to use a client certificate, Fusion will present that certificate and private key during the TLS handshake so the remote service can verify the client. This provides an extra layer of security for server-to-server webhook delivery when the endpoint requires mTLS.How to configure mTLS for a webhookOpen the Add a hook dialog for the webhook you want to create or edit and check Show advanced settings. Under Authorization type, select Client certificate. In the Credentials field, click Add. This opens the Create a key dialog. Give the key a descriptive Key name (for example, “My
I have created a Fusion scenario that removes deactivated users from their Home Team. The issue is that they still have Other Teams. I tried everything I could think of and kept getting errors to set their other teams to null. Does anyone know how I can accomplish this?Maybe I need to come at this from the Team side and remove any inactive users versus using the user update scenario to do it. It’s just that I have the user one accomplishing other actions so I was hoping to get the user profile corrected using the same scenario.
Product update: Workfront Planning v2 connectorWorkfront Planning v2 connector now availableWe’ve released a new connector that exposes the expanded capabilities of the Workfront Planning API version 2 so you can automate and integrate Workfront Planning resources directly from Experience League integrations and workflows.OverviewThe new Workfront Planning v2 connector adds modules that map to the Planning API v2 surface so you can programmatically manage Workfront Planning workspaces, record types, records, fields, and access workflows. The connector also includes user and permission queries and a generic custom-call module so you can call any remaining endpoints not covered by the dedicated modules.What you can do with the Workfront Planning v2 modulesCreate, read, update, and delete workspaces, record types, records, and fields. Retrieve user-level info such as authorization ID and permissions. Request access to a resource and view pending access requests. Make custom API calls to a
Hi all! I’ve created several Fusion scenarios to create tasks based on a cadence and while everything is working as expected, the only portion I can’t figure out is adding planned hours to each of the tasks. I have a project I use to store the tasks and their planned hours and right before the create tasks module I have a search module to go through that project and match the task name and output the planned hours (work required), but when I map the planned hours section in the create task module the planned hours don’t get added. For context the tasks are being created on a Simple duration type with a Fixed Dates constraint and are initially unassigned. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
I think this has already been submitted somewhere, but it would be great to have a feature where you can join branches of a scenario (router paths) back to the main scenario. For example, I have a form with a multi-select dropdown for brands; the selected brand determines who owns the issues, then other people are notified based on other form fields - those additional users are universal, but we need to create new issues for each brand. Some issues will only have one brand selected, some will have multiple that require duplicate issues to be created with different owners. It would be great to be able to check if multiple brands are selected, and if so iterate through the brands, creating new issues for each in a branch (if only one brand is selected, continue with the main scenario), then have that branch rejoin the main scenario and iterate through the issues to set the rest of the “universal” users based on the shared fields.
Description - We can duplicate modules in Fusion. It's frustrating that we cannot do the same with filters. Why is this feature important to you - We all know what it's like when you're working on a Scenario and then you realize you need a filter to be on the other side of a module. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to move this like a module. Instead, you have to rebuild it. And, depending upon the complexity of the filter, it can be a pain. (I'm encountering this right now.) How would you like the feature to work - Just like you can clone a module, you should be able to copy/paste a filter. Current Behaviour - It doesn't do that and it's extremely annoying.
Product update: View and compare scenario versionsThis post introduces a new Review changes experience that makes it easy to see exactly what changed between two versions of a scenario so you can confidently restore older versions when needed. OverviewYou can now open a side-by-side comparison of any two versions of the same scenario to view detailed differences before you restore a version. The Review changes view highlights additions, removals, and edits (colored green and red) and groups changes by logical sections (Scenario, Scenario settings, Modules, Flows, Router routes, Error handlers, and Orphan groups). Restoring a version creates a new version, so all restores are reversible.How to compare scenario versionsClick Scenarios in the left panel and open the scenario you want to inspect. Click the More icon at the bottom of the screen, then choose Previous Versions. From the list of previous versions, click View changes for the version you want to compare. The Review changes panel
Does anyone know if there is a way to create a Fusion scenario that could add/remove users from a Proof Group?Thinking if we create a request queue that has proof group name, a field for the user they want added, and another field for any user they want removed. Then create a Fusion scenario to make those user updates to the Proof group. Is this possible? and if so what modules would we need to accomplish this?
Has anyone worked with WorkFocus.io? We’re in the process of implementing Fusion within our Workfront environment and have purchased 40 hours of consulting support. We’ve outlined several automation scenarios we’d like to build and are hoping to learn from others’ experiences (see screenshot)A few questions for those who have worked with them:What was your overall experience like? How many Fusion scenarios were they able to help you set up within your allotted hours? Did they recommend or require purchasing additional hours? Did they provide training or explain what they were building behind the scenes? Did they conduct a discovery session and help estimate the effort required for each scenario upfront?Because Fusion consulting can be a significant investment, we want to make sure we're planning our time and budget appropriately. Any feedback, advice, or lessons learned would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
I’m probably not the only “Accidental IT” guy who now works in Fusion for a living. And for those of us “People who have liberal arts degrees who are trying to catch up with people with real degrees,” some of the newer and more code-y aspects of our job may be a little bit of a challenge. (“Work in publishing,” they said. “You’ll have a job for life,” they said...)The thing which trips me up is that I’ll play with the JSONata exerciser and something which works perfectly fine there...doesn’t in Fusion. While Claude was trying to work with me on that, I asked it to come up with some pointers for future use. I really don’t like having AI write simple things if I can do it on my own. So, I had it come up with this helpful one-sheet for me when it comes to working with JSONata expressions. I’m including it here in case anyone else may find it useful.-j WORKING WITH JSONATA IN WORKFRONT FUSIONHow Fusion deviates from canonical JSONata (jsonata.org)===========================================
A lot came out last week. Here's a quick breakdown for anyone who hasn't dug into the release notes yet.Unified Review and Approvals connector This is the headline. A native connector for Workfront's approval workflow, create and update approval stages, add participants, send reminders, make decisions, retrieve approval status, and even get suggested approvers. Previously you'd need custom API calls to automate any of this. Now it's native modules, which means cleaner scenarios and easier maintenance.I'm planning to use this as part of a content supply chain automation :- Fusion watches for an approval decision in Workfront, then automatically triggers the downstream action in AEM without anyone manually checking the outcome. Will share more once it's built.New Fusion API endpoints Fusion now has a significantly expanded API for managing Fusion itself. You can programmatically list, clone, and export scenarios, pull execution history, manage connections, data stores, folders, and webho
Per this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/allow-machine-to-machine-oauth-app-credentials-to-establish/idi-p/773411#M27023 and this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/having-trouble-using-oauth2-configuration-to-establish-fusion/td-p/658811 it does not really seem like this is something we can achieve at the moment. I just wanted to check was anyone able to establish Server to Server auth between Fusion and Workfront? Thank you in advance.
Workfront Fusion does not account for Daylight Savings Time, which is confusing when mangaging Scenarios and evaluating Cycles/Executions, especially because Workfront does account for DST.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
