Product Communities

I am implementing AJO Push Notifications using AEP Mobile SDK + Edge Network and facing an issue with push profile persistence.What is working: Push token and ECID are visible in AEP Assurance → Push Debug → Client Edge streaming validation is successful Hits are received and processed in Assurance Events are visible in AEP → Customer → Profiles Issue: All steps mentioned in the tutorial have been followed: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/platform-learn/implement-mobile-sdk/experience-cloud/journey-optimizer/journey-optimizer-push#create-push-credentials 

I do not see that available in the dool or documentation but maybe somehow its possible?

HelloWe’ve identified a critical issue regarding how AJO campaigns handle Offer Decisions. Currently, it appears the Offer Decision is executed at the publish date rather than the scheduled delivery date.For example, if a client prepares and publishes a newsletter on Friday for a Sunday 9:00 AM send out, AJO captures the offer snapshot on Friday. Consequently, offers that are valid on Friday but expired by Sunday before the send out are still appearing in the newsletter. Is there a way to ensure offer logic is evaluated at the time of sending instead? There is no API to publish a campaign on certain date.In this document https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/orchestrate-journeys/create-journey/publish-journey is says that when something changes in offer decision then journey needs to be published/unpublished but i am not talking about offer decision changes instead the offer changes. Thanks,Arpan

Hello AEM Community,We have an AEM 6.5.21 setup (Author, Publish, Dispatcher) running in our digital platform to serve content. Today we’re using the default AEM user/group administration to provide access for developers and support teams. To improve security and streamline access management, we want to integrate Azure AD SSO and map Azure AD groups to AEM permissions.We’re evaluating SAML 2.0 vs OIDC for best compatibility with AEM 6.5.21, and we’re looking for guidance from anyone who has implemented this in a similar architecture.What we’ve explored so farMany available guides seem outdated. Our current draft approach is SAML: configure the TrustStore (certs) and set up the Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler.What we’re looking forRecommended approach for AEM 6.5.21: SAML vs OIDC (pros/cons, supportability, common patterns). Granular steps / configuration considerations for Azure AD SAML with AEM: TrustStore / certificate handling IdP metadata / SP configuration details t

Hi, We have a requirement to render PDF from Adaptive form on AEM 6.5.The rendered PDF should have the data from the Adaptive form as well. Currently I am using the below code window.guideBridge.getDataXML( { success: function(result) { var formData = new FormData(); formData.append("dataXml",result.data); var url = "servletpath?data=" + result.data + "&path="+path;to fetch the formdata from the adaptive form. This script is trigged on clicking a button in Adaptive form.A custom servlet is called from this script, which uses formservice.outputservice to render static PDFs along with data. The issue that we are facing is that the application is placed behind SI proxy and the request is then redirected from SI proxy server to AEM load balancer. In this case, the SI prxy server is appending url /abc/def/ to access all the pages on AEM.As a result, the AF are available on <SIProxydomain>:

Hi Community,I’ve noticed that in Adobe Target I can no longer select Adobe Analytics as the reporting source, whereas I used to be able to in the past. I can’t figure out what has changed or how to restore this option.Could you please help me understand how to fix this?Thanks in advance!

Please help me to understand pros/cons between MSM site structure options as below:Option 1:/content/mysite/language-masters/en → /content/mysite/us/en/content/mysite/language-masters/fr → /content/mysite/fr/fr Option 2:/content/mysite/language-masters/en_us → /content/mysite/en_us/content/mysite/language-masters/en_gb → /content/mysite/en_gb

Hi All, Adobe Analytics is not listed as a reporting source. Kindly share the steps to enable it. Thank You.

Hi Community, We are currently using com.day.cq.wcm.msm.impl.actions.ContentUpdateActionFactory.cfg.jsonto exclude certain properties from being updated during the rollout process.This configuration is working as expected.However, while this exclusion behavior is acceptable for content pages, authors do not want the same behavior to apply to Experience Fragments. In other words, the excluded properties should continue to be ignored during rollout for content pages, but should still be updated for Experience Fragments.Is there a way to control or customize the rollout process separately for Experience Fragments and content pages?Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance,Praveen KM

Hello, I am Have kept collect user agent and client headers settings in datastream. Assuming this will collect device type information correctly forexample desktop vs mobile or tablet. However I do not see that.  I have more no-values and I believe the desktop is falling into this, not sure why or what additional settings needs to be done in either datastream or data view

Grok and I have been trying to crack this nut for an hour now. (I asked the AI Assistant and….let’s just say there were many 👎🏻s) Figured I’d ask the hive mind and--if I figure it out before anyone else does--I’ll post it here for everyone else.The ask: I want to be able to determine the ID of an approval attached to an issue. The only pieces of data I have are the approvalProcessID (which I know because I have Fusion apply an approval process to these issues) and currentApprovalStepID. No matter what I do with that currentApprovalStepID, I just cannot get to the approval. If I try to use that to search for the APPROVAL object, I get a 400. If I try searching via the ARVSTP object, I get scolded that it’s “...not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal”There has to be something that both Grok and I are missing here. Any thoughts?

Here record count for bottom x axis is default name or we can change this ( no of projects) by any method. 

One of our teams would like have their task start and end dates update based on the predecessor task completion. If the predecessor task is completed late, they’d like to see the start and end dates for their task update to reflect the completion date of the predecessor task so that they can prioritize their tasks accordingly. For example, if the predecessor task is due 2/9 but not completed until 2/11, they’d like the start date of their task to be 2/12 instead of 2/10 (when the task constraint is “As Soon as Possible”). This would not be a universal rule but only applied to specific template tasks and/or for specific teams based on the way that they work. They do have a report that sorts tasks by Handoff Date, but this does not fully meet their needs.

Verifying On-Time Delivery logic in Workfront: same-day date comparisonsWe are implementing an On-Time Delivery KPI where work is considered on time if the Actual Completion Date is the same day or earlier than the Planned Completion Date.However, even when both dates appear as the same day in the UI (with different times), comparisons using <=, DATE(), DATEDIFF(), and DATENOTIME() sometimes return late.Is this expected due to Workfront storing DateTime values in UTC?What is the officially recommended approach for calendar-day-based SLAs in Workfront?What is the way to compare only date without time ?

I need to see a report of Tasks and Requests that do not have hours logged by every assignee on each task/request so that we can see what Tasks/Requests are missing hours for which assignees.There’s a thread here that identifies a way for an individual user to see their own Tasks that have not been assigned hours, but I can’t seem to find anything that shows how to see multiple users who do not have assigned hours. Any advice is appreciated.

Does anyone have any links to what the various graphs in the Fusion performance dashboard actually mean? I can interpololate some of them, and others are obvious, but it would be nice if there was some explanation, I’m hesitant to use them to do any evaluating of anything without it.Executions waiting to be processed: Feels obvious, scenarios with data that are waiting to startPool Utilization: No ideaExecutions per scenario: Feels obvious, tracks the number of times a scenario was ranDuration of executions: Feels obvious, length of time that scenarios were running