Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
A simple toggle button on the timesheet page to enable/disable completed tasks/issues.
Large Language Models (LLMs) crawl and ingest origin-level URLs like /content/yoursite even when those URLs are rewritten or hidden from human users. Especially this is happening for home page URLs. How can we identify from where this is happening and how can we minimize this?
Enhancement idea to add WF Boards filter (on the left hand side) to allow to filter by custom field.We have a board with advanced input filter (in the board configuration) that pulls in cards from a custom field that is a user field. While this pulls in the right cards, it doesn’t allow the left hand side filter to filter by the custom user field. The idea is to allow a left hand side filter to be setup, similar to how assignment would work. This would allow users to just see their own cards. Let me know if any questions.
I know that there are some neat new tools available in Fusion--chained scenarios and functions being front of mind. And, to be honest, the documentation which follows these new releases isn’t great. Many of us want to use these new tools, but parsing through these texts is difficult when we’re juggling all the things most Workfront/Fusion admins do in the day-to-day operation of the system.Having some video tutorials along with the documentation (which used to be the norm with Workfront) should be a minimum ad. But what would be nice would be a webinar demo of these new features. Seeing how these tools are being used in addition with the documentation would be a huge help for many of us second/third career “accidental IT” admins.
Hi all, I know this question was raised in past multiple times but - from my perspective - wasn’t fully answered yet. I read through the exisitng posts here in the experience league but am still confused.First: I am aware about the differences between hit and visit segments and that fallout analysis handles dimension items as an visit (or visitor) segments.The question came up, when we comared visit numbers from a freeform table with a fallout analysis:As you can see in the fallout analysis it says 5.734 visits. When I create a visit segment which contains the same URL as the fallout I get the same number when populating a time dimension to it. But now the confusion: when I breakdown the single dimension items and take a look at the exact same dimension item, which is filtered in the visit segment / fallout, I get lower visit numbers? There are no other filters applied in the panel. Any ideas? Thanks you all in advance!Best, Paul
Is there any way for us to view the logs for all the events shared by the Adobe Event Forwarding service? Thanks,tyrese
First, the new business rule feature is extremely helpful as it greatly enhances the user experience and strengthens various processes tremendously. Idea: Allow for multiple business rules with the same object and operation (trigger)Current Behavior: System will not allow multiple business rules on same object and trigger Benefits of this idea: Allows enterprises to create multiple simple rules instead of extremely large and complex formulasEnables quicker implementation with simpler testingMultiple administrative team usage - ability to separate business rules by different areas in an organization (limits risk from other teams impacting your rules)Description and title could be customized for each rule for ease of understanding, expansion and correctionsMove from potential large formula chaos to simplified manageable and searchable lists of rules _____________________________________________________________________&nb
👉 Calling all AEM practitioners in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond ‼️👋We're thrilled to announce the launch of the AEM User Group - Bay Area chapter! Hosted by seasoned AEM experts KrishnaKalyan Gorthi and Mrinal Kumar, this is a community dedicated to passionate AEM users who come together to share best practices, collectively problem solve, and network.This chapter will host in-person and virtual meetings, so there is no shortage of ways to connect with your peers. 🙌Sign up here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aemug-bay-area/
Hi Team,I am unable to connect Claude to Marketo MCP server.This command didn’t work, the error I get is can’t connect to MCP server. { "mcpServers": { "marketo": { "type": "http", "url": "https://marketo-mcp.adobe.io/mcp", "headers": { "X-Marketo-Client-Id": "YOUR-CLIENT-ID", "X-Marketo-Client-Secret": "YOUR-CLIENT-SECRET", "X-Marketo-Munchkin-Id": "YOUR-MUNCHKIN-ID" } } }} Kindly help with the issue. Thanks,Deepthi.
Hello Everyone, I have a business requirement, where another application will call the Fusion webhook with payload which also included the url of a webpage. I need to create a interactive proof using that url. while investigating the proof API call(https://rest.proofhq.com/api/v1/upload) for upload and creating proof https://myhost.my.workfront.adobe.com/attask/api-internal/PROOF .
Hello togehter,We see an unusually high volume of traffic with the source set to “None” in an Adobe form. For me It is currently unclear why this traffic is not attributed correctly. Based on the Marketing Processing Rules, do you see any issues that could cause “None” traffic? Thanks and kind regards robin
Hi, it'd be super helpful if we could clone reports in Advanced BI Analytics.
Hi everyone,I'm a CS graduate with no prior experience in Adobe Journey Optimizer or Adobe Experience Platform, but I'm planning to prepare for the AD4-E606 Adobe Journey Optimizer Developer Expert certification.Could anyone recommend a beginner-friendly learning path, study resources, hands-on labs, and exam preparation tips? I'd love to hear how others approached the certification and what topics deserve the most attention.Thank you!
Hi there,recently we have had huge spikes in our SFDC to Marketo sync which has lead to significant delays in receiving key data points such as contact sales requests from customers, additionally this impacted our business reporting. We only noticed the issues after it was highlighted to us that some very costly high pri leads were not assigned to sales reps due to these data delays and we realised we have no effective way to view these sync backlogs in Marketo. We have no access to see: The size of the sync backlog in detail The source of the backlog What records are in the backlog How long it will take those records to sync The current metrics under the “Sync Throughput and backlog” & ‘Sync backlog trend” are not detailed enough. In order to see in detail what was happening regarding our sync we had to have a call set up with a Marketo field engineer, this should not be needed and this data should be available to us within Marketo. Thanks, Diarmuid
I’m curious if we can create a Business Rule that if anyone “Edits a custom form” on a Project that a notification goes out. If that’s possible, how would I write that?
How are you all documenting your analytics requirements to pass to developers? We release new features/products on our website and app monthly, and are currently using the same drawn-out and tedious process to request our analytics implementation work that we’ve been using for years. We (the analysts using Adobe Analytics) receive designs of the experience in Figma from Product, screenshot those screen by screen and outline what variables/events need to set on each screen/with each interaction in a PPT, and then a technical specifications document gets created by someone on the more technical side (using trackState, etc.) in a PDF. That document is then passed to IT for development. There has to be a more efficient way. I’d love to hear how all of you are handling this process when you’re pushing multiple analytics implementations across multiple platforms monthly.
I’m looking for suggestions for validating an issue property against a list of valid values in Fusion. I considered importing the valid list from a CSV file, but I haven’t been able to determine how to compare the property value to the list and confirm that it is valid. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Description - It would be really nice if sections and custom fields edit and/or view capabilities could be controlled via a specific user, team, or group on a custom form. Why is this feature important to you - We are working on a way to have multiple people with edit permissions on a form be able to edit only one field or one section of a form, unique to each user/role, while the other fields and sections can either be only viewed or do not display at all. This is all based on the specific user that is viewing the form.How would you like the feature to work - This feature would allow us to control which sections or fields a specific user could edit or view. Different users would look at the form and for each user, a different section or field would be editable, view only, or wouldn't appear. This would greatly reduce the number of forms that we would need to create.Current Behaviour - You can set display logic based on field values in the
It would be better to have a feature so that we can tag a person by searhing their email address.The problem is that we have global team members working from regions like China & Italy.Now for example, an Italian person wants to tag a Chinese person named 雨琪 曹 (email address: chi.cao@xxx.com) in comment.At this moment, it is not possible. And it is not easy for an Italian person to tag using @雨琪 曹 as they don’t know this language.But as everyone’s email is in English, so it would be better if we can have a feautre in Workfront to search user for tagging by their email address.By the way, this searching by email feature is available in proofing comment.
Hi - my users got a pop-up recently that shows the following:Support Ending for Intel-based AppsThis version of “Workfront Proof” will not open in a future release of macOS. Learn how to update to an Apple silicon version. Will Adobe be updating Workfront Proof to ensure we can continue using the app?If yes, has Adobe shared timelines or any other info?Appreciate any knowledge that is shared. Thank you!
Planning your next AEM EDS implementation? AEM Sites or Edge Delivery Services (EDS)?Explore the complete differences in architecture, content authoring, deployment pipelines, performance, developer experience, and migration considerations to choose the right solution for your digital experience platform. Click here to Read More
The sling:configs node is created and the enabled property is set to true for the node com.adobe.cq.wcm.core.components.internal.DataLayerConfig for the given site. The PDFs are loading from the Adobe embed component that cretaes PDFs using iframes. How to fetch events int the data layer?
Personalization often starts with a simple customer moment, but turning that idea into working template logic can take time. You may need the right field path, helper, condition, date format, and fallback behavior.AI Assistant for Personalization Expressions helps reduce that friction by turning plain-language intent into AJO personalization template logic you can review, preview, and apply.Instead of starting with syntax, you can start with the outcome you want for the customer:Use the customer's renewal date, add one year, and format it as MM/dd/yy. If the renewal date is missing, do not show the date.AI Assistant for Personalization Expressions helps translate that request into template logic you can review, validate, and use in AJO.What AI Assistant for Personalization Expressions Helps WithAI Assistant for Personalization Expressions is available from the AJO personalization editor through AI Assistant. It helps when you know the customer experience you want, but need help writing
I am trying to add a hyperlink to a text value in SMS Beta, but I am unable to find any helper function that supports this use case.Could you please help me understand how to achieve this?For example, I would like the text "UpdateInstance" to redirect users to www.google.com when clicked in the SMS.Please let me know the recommended approach for implementing this in SMS Beta.Regards,Nikhil N
Enhancement SummaryRequesting a product enhancement in Adobe Tags to support the ability to transfer, copy, or promote selected components from one library into another library within the same property. This capability would allow users to move changes such as data elements, rules, extensions, and related configurations between libraries without manually recreating or porting them.Current StateAdobe Tags currently allows teams to create and manage libraries as part of the publishing workflow. However, when changes are created in one library, there does not appear to be a native way to push or transfer those changes into another existing library.As a result, teams are required to manually recreate or port data elements, rules, and other configuration changes from one library to another. Business ProblemThe current manual process introduces unnecessary operational risk and inefficiency.Manual porting between libraries can result in:Missed data elements or rules Inconsistent configuration
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
