Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
What is the best way to deliver an AEM Form via an Experience Fragment into Adobe Target for personalization? What specific client library or CSS requirements are needed so the form renders and submits correctly?
Description - After a thorough implementation, we decided to use the Request Queues built directly in the projects. The functionality is great. We have a project template set up with Queue Topics, Groups, Forms etc. The issue is that when creating requests directly in a project there is no Autosave or Drafting functionality that we know of. Our users are becoming increasingly agitated by having complex requests easily deleted at the unfortunate click out of the request window or accidental refresh of the page. Why is this feature SO VERY important to you - Our current solution is to submit requests without auto-routing to a traffic team so the work can be saved. Leading to needing to save as you go, something that is antiquated in this day and age, especially knowing that autosave exists in many other places in Workfront, including the Global Request Queues area. How would you like the feature to work - simply autosave as you go with a Drafts section built into the Reque
Hi All, Has anyone else experienced issues with the Countries/Regions dimension in Adobe Analytics for their organization?I understand Adobe uses Digital Element for IP-based geolocation, but in our case the country attribution doesn't seem accurate, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to explain the data to senior leadership.For context, we're a UAE-based bank, and we're seeing some unusual patterns: Kazakhstan accounts for ~12% of total visits, which initially made us think it could be bot traffic. However, what's surprising is that ~14% of our campaign forms are also being submitted from Kazakhstan, making it difficult to dismiss as bots. Singapore contributes ~16% of visits, yet only 0.2% of campaign leads come from there. This raises a few questions: Has anyone observed similar inconsistencies with the Countries/Regions dimension? Could this be related to VPNs, proxy networks, mobile carrier routing, or geolocation database inaccuracies? How have you validated or improv
Es un mundo lleno de comunidades digitales. Exploraré esta de Adobe con el objetivo de mejorar mis habilidades como Tecnólogo y Business Aministrator.
Workfront Watch Event modules secured by default with authTokenEffective August 23, 2026, all Workfront Watch Event module subscriptions — including existing ones — will be protected by authToken-based verification by default. This ensures payloads delivered to your Fusion scenarios can be validated as originating from Workfront.OverviewTo improve webhook security, Fusion will be enabling authToken validation by default for the Watch Event modules. The authToken is a shared secret included with every webhook delivery so your receiving endpoint can verify the request before processing it. This change applies to both new subscriptions and any Watch Event modules you already have in active scenarios.What’s changingAll Workfront Watch Event module subscriptions will include an authToken with delivered payloads by default starting August 23, 2026. Fusion will automatically apply this security setting to existing Watch Event module webhooks — no manual migration or reconfiguration is requir
Hi,We need some guidance on handling non-English job titles in Marketo.We have a non-English landing page with an embedded Marketo form, and the form labels/input fields will also be in the local language. Currently, we have automation that derives Job Function and Job Level from the Job Title field when the title is entered in English.The challenge is that visitors on these localized pages may enter their job titles in non-English languages (for example, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, German, etc.). Since our existing mapping logic only recognizes English job titles, these records are expected to default to "Other" for both Job Function and Job Level.Could you please advise on recommended approaches for handling this scenario?Thanks,Deepthi.
Meta data creation is THE key step when feeding new assets into a DAM. Especially when uploading multiple assets, the creation of meaningful titles, descriptions and tags takes a long time or needs to be done with an excel sheet. An AI agent/tool that helps creates this data by reading/viewing the file and it’s content or what an image shows, would be extremely helpful.The agent should ideally also be able to do other things as well, e.g. translate the description and enter it into a specified field (e.g. translating the EN description to FR and adding it into the “French description” field).The Bulk Rename feature in Assets View already works pretty good, but it’s only for the actual file names, not for titles. This is like a mini version of what I’m imagining. Other DAMs already have this, if required, I can provide an example.The AI generated titles and descriptions are well noted, alas, there is no easy way to copy them to the actual title field with just a click or to see a sugges
Hi, this is my use case:Build a AEP read-audience of profiles who were sent any of three-specific emails that will be used within a AJO journey as an exclusion list so that the next day after audience evaluation anyone not in the audience will be sent Direct Mail i.e. next day the data sent to mail house for all profiles never sent the email. ‘Sent email’ is defined as anyone that was not excluded at run time due already being suppressed, any sort of failure, soft or hard bounce, etc. So ‘sent’ can incorporate Message Event Feedback Dataset status ‘sent’, ‘delivered’, ‘status’.Questions about the Message Event Feedback Dataset status enumerations: is the following correct? Sent Definition: The message was successfully dispatched from Adobe’s delivery infrastructure to the external channel provider or carrier network. Relates to: Email, Push, SMS, WhatsApp, Direct Mail (all standard outbound channels). Delay Definition: Message delivery is temporarily postponed and the system is activ
The business I am working in is currently migrating to Adobe Experience Cloud utilising AEP and AJO as core products. We have discovered the OOTB AJO email seed list capability is not fit-for-purpose. This because the seed list can only be associated with one test profile at each email surface configuration.Our business context:We already have a total of 16 email surface configurations across four brands including consumer, business, marketing, and transactional email communications. There are multiple lines of business within the business, multiple projects on the go at once, and multiple product and marketing campaigns regularly launching. At any given moment we have thousands of email communications in-market. It is difficult to keep track of what is in-market, and all of the personalised email variations. Marketing & Product want to be able to see all of the email variations in-market, especially when an email incorporates dynamic content. They want the capability to regularly
Hi,I am looking at a solution to export all comments that have been made on all proofs of the projects in my event portfolio to extract learnings for my team. Are there any options with excel exports in bulk or any Fusion scenarios that you have found helpful? Additionally an export of all comments in update sections would be great as well. Thank you!
Scenario: We have a request form has several display logic fields such as if {Field 1} has a value of “A” selected then display {Field 2 } and have the user populate {Field 2}. The display logic is much larger and more complex but the general idea where there is multiple fields impacted.Our issue is that if someone copies a previous request or changes the response on field 1 in this use case, then field 2 still holds data. This is an issue as we use calculated fields to help advanced logic and scoring based on field entries and these unexpected hidden values are causing issues with the output of the calculated field. Is there a way in a calculated field to have some display/visibility logic like ….&& {DE:field 1}.visible=true… or something like that? Additionally, is there a way to simply have fields that are hidden cleared out upon submission?
Tracking approver decision counts across proofs (in Workfront AND in ProofHQ/Proofing Tool) to manage the 6-decision/month threshold before contributors shift to light access — that’s a genuine reporting gap.Currently, there is no visibility into Proofs that were generated in Workfront Poof Tool. We need to be able to report from Workfront on the user level to track/count decisions that will count towards a user’s decision threshold before they are automatically moved from a contributor to a light user.
I’m trying to build a PROJECT report that includes the request form details in Project Details AND request form details from the sub request section within each project. Is this possible?
The Workfront Skill Exchange sessions are now available to watch on demand. As you work through the recordings, you might find you've got questions for our speakers, and we'd love for you to ask them. We've created discussion posts for each of the sessions and encourage you to leave your questions in the appropriate thread to chat with our presenters directly. Don't be shy! These folks have been in your shoes and are here to share their experience, so you don't have to learn things the hard way! Here's a handy list of all the sessions and speakers: Workfront Product Keynote: Angela Zhang, Adobe LEARN TRACK Build for the Bot: Designing Workfront for Automation & AI — Kaylee Richard (@KayleeRichard), Accenture Streamlining Planning with Workfront AI: From Spreadsheets to Smart Workspaces — Autumn Earle (@AutumnE ), Perficient Reporting Hidden Gems: 10 Tips That Will Save Time and Impress Leadership — Daniel Clarke (@Daniel_Clarke), EMMsphere Mastering Workfront Admin Basic
Hello! We have been advised that due to updates to tracking laws in two EU countries, we would like to exclude email open tracking for those two particular countries. We have an incredibly high volume of email sends, and would like to find some way to do this without having to create two versions of the same asset. Basically, there’s a box in the email designer that you can check to disable open tracking, but we just want it to be disabled for France and Italy. We don’t want to have to create specific emails for those two countries if we’re also sending EU or global emails. Is there a possible way to do this through tokenizing? How can we tell an email asset to check the box sometimes, but not others? Thanks. :)
Hello, We have 119 groups that need a report shared with them. I wanted to know if there is a work around to get this report share with all the groups but the limit is 100 users/groups.
We have a project within WorkFront where all the subtasks under one of our task buckets are complete but the main task is stuck at 90% - which means we cannot “complete” the project. See attached image. Anyone know why this would occur or what the fix would be?
I’m looking for a way to be able to export multiple PDFs in one go if possible. For example, I’ve got 20 briefs submitted into a queue and I would like to be able to export the issue details into 20 PDF documents but without having to go into each request manually. Anyone have any ideas on a way to do this?Thanks!
Hi there!I’m looking for a hands-on Senior Marketing Automation Specialist to own the day-to-day operations of our Marketo Engage instance, supporting two of The Freeman Company’s brands.This role will be the execution engine behind our owned-channel campaign activity, partnering closely with campaign marketing teams to build, launch, and report on Marketo programs across email, digital, and events.The position is eligible for a hybrid schedule, generally requiring work in-office and/or on-site at events 2–3 days per week. The ideal candidate will be located in Philadelphia, PA or Dallas, TX.If you’re interested, or know someone who may be a great fit, please feel free to reach out or applyhere.
How do you identify reports impacted by a field change?As I work to modernize our decade-old Workfront instance in preparation for Planning, Fusion, and future AI capabilities, I'm finding it increasingly difficult to identify which reports are impacted when a custom field is updated, consolidated, or retired.We currently have more than 700 reports, and I haven't found an efficient way to identify which reports reference a specific field.For example, we recently consolidated several legacy Yes/No fields into a single multi-select field. The new design is cleaner and easier to maintain, but now I need to identify all reports that: Filter on any of the retired Yes/No fields Display those fields as columns Group by those fields Use those fields in chart configurations Include them in prompts or other reporting logic Today, the only approach I know of is manually reviewing reports, which is not realistic at this scale. Questions for the community: Is there a way to report on report
A new feature that would be great to have is the ability to test marketing channel rules as you’re creating/saving them. Similar to what we have for classifications, where you can put in a test string and it will show how that string would be classified. It would be great to have this with marketing channels. How it should work:There should be an option to run a test where you can manually put in a URL, referrer, and other components (based on what components you’ve used to set up your rules). Either have it show up with all of the fields you’ve used and the option to populate them/leave them blank, or have dropdowns where you can select which fields you want to enter info for.Then have it run what you’ve entered against all of your rules and tell you which marketing channel it would get classified into. Why it’s important:Right now when making marketing channel processing rules, there isn’t currently a way to test them. It can be hard to mentally go through all of the rules and figure
In Adobe Analytics Segments we can use "equals" and "does not equal" to compare a variable against specific values.i.e. Page Name (evar1) does not equal “test”This is fine when you only have a few specific values to compare against. It would also be useful be able to compare the values of dimensions as a whole. The specific scenario that comes to mind is segmenting page views where Page Name and Previous Page name are not the same, but this could also work for a number of other scenarios.I.e. a segment that saysHitPage Name (evar1) does not equal Previous Page Name (evar2)
Current problemMy organisation uses centrally managed Analysis Workspace projects that are shared with a large population of Adobe Analytics users. These projects are commonly shared with broad product-profile groups using Edit copy, allowing users to work from a governed starting point without changing the original project.Within the Share dialogue, there is a checkbox labelled “Set as landing page for recipients”.If a project is shared with a large product-profile group, selecting this option and clicking Update can make that project the default landing page for every recipient in the group.This is a potentially high-impact action, but it is presented as a standard checkbox alongside lower-impact project-sharing settings. The interface does not provide a prominent warning explaining the scale of the change, clearly confirm which users will be affected, or offer an effective organisation-level method of reversing the action. Why this creates a governance riskIn a large organisation, A
Hi ,I am working on a requirement where a custom sling model needs to exclude pages that are unpublished/hidden from navigation, while recursively walking a page tree vis listchildren(). The issue driving this: page that are hidden in nav, unpublished and have a redirect configured still showing up in the list. so we need to explicitly hide unpublished pages, not just hidden ones. To fix this, I check cq:lastReplicationAction/cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish on each pages’s ValueMap to filter unpublished ones. Resource contentResource = childPage.getContentResource(); if (contentResource != null) { ValueMap properties = contentResource.getValueMap(); isHidden = properties.get("hideInNav", false); isPublished = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction", String.class); isPublishedDispatcher = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish", String.class); } if (isHidden || (St
Hi All,I’m trying to add custom styles to the table plugin in an RTE. Below is the structure I’ve used: <table jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" features="*"> <tableStyles jcr:primaryType="cq:WidgetCollection"> <style-one jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-bordered" text="Bordered Table"/> <style-two jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-striped" text="Striped Table"/> </tableStyles></table>But I don’t see the style options in the table edit options. Has anyone implemented similar functionality and can guide here?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.