Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hi all,struggling a little bit to set up the Visitor ID sync between parent frame and iFrames by configuring whitelistParentDomain and whitelistIframeDomains. Background: we have two domains, domainA.com and domainB.com .both domains run their own Launch property both use the same AdobeOrgID both track into the same Adobe Analytics Report Suite third-party (demdex) cookies are disabledNow, we want to make sure the ECID is synched across outer frame and iframe for a stitched view on the visitor.Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (whitelistParentDomain is added, so it should be able iframes from the same domain, open for discussion if needed)Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config Data Element “whitelistIframeDomains”:return [ "www.domainB.com"]; iFrame Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (note that the consent is disabled by default / for testing, but don’t work with consent enabled for both, either)iFrame Launch property Experi
Hi everyone,We're trying to understand the best approach for making Salesforce Opportunity Product (Opportunity Line Item) data available in Marketo.Currently, Opportunity information is available in Marketo only when there is an Opportunity Contact Role associated with the Opportunity. In our Salesforce org, this is typically the Logistics Contact, but that contact is not relevant for our marketing use case.Our goal is to make Opportunity Product information available in Marketo, such as:Primary Product Product 2 Product 3 Solution Group Other Opportunity Product fieldsso that Marketing can build Smart Lists and Smart Campaigns based on these values.Our questions are:Is there any way to sync or expose Opportunity Product (Opportunity Line Item) data to Marketo without relying on the Logistics Contact or another Opportunity Contact Role? Does Marketo support syncing Opportunity Product data directly, or is a custom solution (such as Salesforce Flow, Apex, or Custom Object Sync) require
Là nguồn tham khảo thời tiết dành cho cộng đồng Việt Nam, ThoiTietHomNay.org cung cấp các bản tin dự báo chi tiết, dữ liệu môi trường và những thông tin hữu ích liên quan đến khí hậu. Website hướng đến việc hỗ trợ người dùng đưa ra quyết định phù hợp trước những thay đổi của thời tiết.
Currently, collections on Content Hub can only be shared with people who also have log-in credentials for the portal. This doesn’t cover all business cases in day to day work, though.You want to be able to make CH collections public for anyone with the link as well.Why? Here are some examples:Agencies with short-term contracts don’t need accounts to access a specific subset of assets for a project. Sales or Product Management can share a collection of product data assets with a customer who can download directly A link to a collection with corporate assets can be shared on the intranet for everyone to access, even people who don’t usually use CH A Marketing colleague can share a collection of campaign assets with Sales regardless of their ability to log into CH or notThere should be an option to make collections public, which is linked to admin rights. Not everyone should be able to make any collection public for everyone with the link, but admins at least should be able to do it.
Hi @Asheesh_Pandey , @jachlt , @Parvesh_Parmar , @SantoshRa5 I’m looking for guidance on how to backtrack and analyze excluded identities during exports in AEP. Currently, we don’t have any mandatory fields or consent labels configured, so I’m unsure what might be causing these exclusions.Are there other factors or checks we should be considering that could lead to identities being excluded? Additionally, how can we effectively trace back and understand why certain identities are not included in the export?Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciatedhttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/dataflows/ui/monitor-destinations#dataflow-runs-for-batch-destinationsThak
Hi All, I am getting the below issue - For the same commit id in Adobe Git, I got the deployment failed the first time but succeed the second time. Build #1 - 22:27:04,861 [main] [INFO] Downloading from digital-mvn-build-dependencies: https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/cantire/_packaging/digital-mvn-build-dependencies/maven/v1/io/netty/netty-bom/4.2.15.Final/netty-bom-4.2.15.Final.pom22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:[ERROR] Non-resolvable import POM: The following artifacts could not be resolved: io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final (absent): Could not transfer artifact io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final from/to central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): status code: 429, reason phrase: Too Many Requests (429) @ line 1169, column 25 @ 22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR] The project com.projA.aem:projAweb:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (/build_root/build/projA-aemcs/pom.xml) has 1 error22:27:05,127 [main] [ERROR] Non-resolvable import POM: The foll
DescriptionI wish there were a more comprehensive panel for Engageable Profiles in Adobe Experience Platform. Why is this feature important to youPrimarily, it would provide organizations with a deeper understanding of profile usage.Recently, our organization faced an issue that resulted in nearly one million profiles becoming engageable due to an error. Identifying the root cause required us to use Query Service to identify the journey, then open the journey to determine the associated audience, and finally analyze the audience to understand how those profiles were ingested.This investigation process was very time-consuming. Having an out-of-the-box monitoring capability for Engageable Profiles would significantly simplify troubleshooting and usage analysis. Important monitoring could include:New engageable profiles by day Which journeys are triggering new profile engagement, allowing users to display a sample of the newly engaged profiles Which namespaces are being used by those jour
The new CDN rules are blocking anything that ends with .php, contains /wp-content, or contains /wp-config.We want to extend the ACS-Commons Error Handling currently being used for 404. 404 and 500 friendly pages are being redirected but the 406 is not working.
Many thanks to Senior Product Manager Mayank Gaur and Computer Scientist Priyank Modi for showcasing the power and possibilities of AEM Dynamic Media! If you weren’t able to attend live – or want to revisit any part of the session – we’ve compiled a summary, session materials and additional resources below! Session SummaryThe session focused on how AEM Dynamic Media helps organizations move from managing assets to activating personalized, governed digital experiences at scale. Using a coffee product launch example, the presenters demonstrated how Dynamic Media enables automated image and video optimization, AI-assisted asset activation through the Content Optimization Agent, secure and governed delivery controls, and scalable personalization through Dynamic Media Templates. The event also covered reporting capabilities, upcoming roadmap enhancements, and customer Q&A. Session MaterialsSlide Deck PDF Webinar Recording Consolidated Q&A Additional ResourcesEvaluate Dynamic Media
Description - When using the My Tasks widget, would like the ability to see completed tasks. Why is this feature important to you - My creative team like seeing completed tasks so they can quickly jump back to things if needed from this page.How would you like the feature to work - Allow this widget to pull in completed tasks from a preset Workfront filter or a custom filterCurrent Behavior - Currently does not display completed tasks as seen in the compare and contrast example below. Trying to use a filter that pulls in tasks from last week, this week and next week that are both not complete and complete, the widget does not seem to pull in completed tasks. My Tasks with custom filter: A report with the same custom filter:
Are you integrating AI into your AEM or Edge Delivery Services environment (or planning to)? Wondering how to do it without introducing security risks or governance gaps into your production architecture? This webinar took place on June 24, 2026. AEM Champion Krishna Kalyan Gorthi (@gkalyan) will cut through the noise to share practical design patterns, real-world implementation guidance, and proven strategies for adopting AI responsibly in AEM environments. You'll get concrete, actionable takeaways you can bring directly back to your team. What You'll Learn:Where and how AI fits into AEM and EDS architectures for maximum impact How to proactively address risks like prompt injection, data leakage, and untrusted outputs Real-world implementation patterns across application code, OSGi configuration, and dispatcher for secure AI adoptionThe slides from this session have been attached to this post. This article will be updated as soon as the recording has been uploaded to Experience Leagu
Description Ensure that standard enumerated field values (such as Loyalty Tier or Subscription Status) populate as selectable dropdown menus within the OCM Audience Builder rather than requiring manual string entry. Why is this feature important to you Forcing stakeholders to manually type exact string values from memory introduces a massive risk for human error. A simple typo or accidental trailing space causes the query to fail silently and return zero profiles. To prevent this teams are forced to maintain external data dictionaries or have architects pre build standardized audiences which adds administrative overhead and severely impacts the usability of the OCM canvas for everyday campaign operators. How would you like the feature to work When a user clicks on an attribute with predefined values in the OCM segment builder the UI should immediately present a dropdown menu of the available enumerated values identical to the standard AEP Segment Builder experience. Current Behaviour T
Description Introduce the IP warming plan activation toggle natively within the Orchestrated Campaign Module (OCM) email configuration screen to match the functionality currently available in standard AJO Campaigns. Why is this feature important to you When migrating to Adobe Journey Optimizer and standing up a brand new instance systematically warming IPs is a foundational deliverability requirement. The absence of this feature in OCM forces architects to use complex workarounds like exporting OCM audiences into the AEP Audience Portal and wrapping them in segment definitions just to safely throttle email volume in a standard scheduled AJO campaign. This completely disrupts the unified orchestration workflow and adds unnecessary build time. How would you like the feature to work Include the standard IP warming plan activation toggle directly within the Email action configuration of the OCM canvas allowing the system to natively handle safe message throttling without forcing practition
Is there a way to display the legacy document approvals that are pending with the new unified approval process? We have reports (document approval) that are in play. And we have switched over to unified approvals on documents.I am hoping to combine it as one report, but wanted to check if it is possible.
Recently, I believe after the latest release, when you now go to Share a Project, you have to double click in the full share link to copy it.Previously you could just click the ‘Tick’ and it would copy it. Not sure if this is a bug or a change on the feature, but please revert it to how it used to work for efficiency.
Hi Community,I know written something disgusting here, which is returning 4 answers. In this example, the project holds 4 documents, and I’m only interested in proofs that don’t contain the word “Quote”. Two documents are not proofs (so want to ignore these), and the two proofs contain four proof versions between them.I’m not sure if I’m getting an answer per document. The actual answer I’m looking for with this example is “No”, as the first proof version was created after the estimate date. This proof doesn’t contain “Quote”. Screenshot, shows the results.Code:displayname=Within Deadline?listdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(documents).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF(IF(!ISBLANK({ID})&&!CONTAINS("Quote",{name}),{project}.{DE:C+D Creative Deadline},"")<=(IF(!ISBLANK({ID})&&!CONTAINS("Quote",{name}),{entryDate},"")),"Yes","No")valueformat=HTMLResultsIf you’ve read this far, thanks for your time 😊Matt
The latest change to the UX on visualisations on the legends is poor.You can now no longer read them, if your dimensions and metrics used are now longer in name than a few letters.We regularly use multiple segments/dimensions to trend or use custom build segments for our needs and now trying to do some quick analysis is, quite frankly, not quick any more as you can’t read the legdends. Adobe, please put a fix in for this.
Please expose the Expense object type (EXPENSE / objCode: EXPNS) via the Workffont Claude connector, including fields such as description, amount, actualAmount, expenseType, plannedDate, billingRecordID, and projectID — this would allow us to pull full financial breakdowns programmatically rather than having to access the Workfront UI manually.Second, we need the ability to create and update Notes/Updates on projects and tasks via the connector — specifically, support for the Note object type with create and update operations, so we can post weekly status updates, comments, and log changes directly from the AI assistant without switching to the Workfront interface.
We are going to be relying heavily on the MCP connections so being able to have visibility of their status is key. Can you please check if their status can be included on the adobe status page.
adaptTo() 2026 takes place from 28–30 September 2026 in Berlin.The schedule for this year's conference is now available. Following a record number of more than 70 submissions, we have put together a program covering AEM, Edge Delivery Services, open-source projects, case studies, and technical deep dives.https://adapt.to/scheduleTickets for adaptTo() 2026 are still available. Loyalty Tickets for returning attendees remain available until 3 July 2026.https://adapt.to/ticketsTiming reminder: To allow arrival on Monday morning without missing content, we’ve adjusted the times this year.Registration starts Monday at 11:00.Conference begins Monday at 12:00.– adaptTo() Conference Team
We would like the option to customize standard and event emails in Workfront, similar to how reminder emails can be personalized. This would include editing the subject, body, and HTML, not just the subject line.
When I try and add an asset to a content template in AJO I get this red warning symbol. When browsing for the images we can see them but as soon as you choose it, it then fails. This is a new AJO instance and we cannot get it to work with any AEM Cloud assets. We also have Assets Essentials which works but don’t want to use that as all of our assets are in AEM. Steps to replicateAdd image block Browse asset Browse through AEM DAM (can see assets) Add asset Error I assume this is a permission issue somewhere but cannot find the root cause.
SetupAJO B2C Landing Page with a native Form (appType=AJO_B2C). The form's target dataset uses an XDM ExperienceEvent‑class schema (capturing email opt‑in / consent). The streaming inlet behind the form is XDM pass‑through (no Data Prep mapping stage).GoalCapture each form submission as an ExperienceEvent. Since ExperienceEvent requires _id and timestamp, I've added both as hidden fields on the form.ProblemThe hidden _id / timestamp fields still require a value, but the form designer only lets me set a static "Default value" (optionally sourced from URL parameter / cookie / referrer). There's no native generator, so I'm stuck between two bad states:No default → the form doesn't render/submit correctly. Static default → every submission carries the same _id (events overwrite each other in the dataset/Profile) and the same timestamp (frozen, doesn't reflect the real submission time).I also confirmed that a timestamp default in MM/DD/YYYY format fails form validation — it must be ISO‑8601
Add the ability to pin or favorite linked SharePoint files or folders within Workfront (Documents area) to enable quicker access to frequently used external items, improving efficiency within the Workfront–SharePoint integration.
Current BehaviorThere is no auto-number or sequential ID field available when configuring a Planning record type. Unique identifiers must be entered manually or generated externally and written back via automation.Desired BehaviorA native auto-number field type in Workfront Planning, with configuration options for:Number of digits (e.g. zero-padded to 5 digits: 00001) Format: numeric only, alphanumeric, sequential, or random Optional prefix and/or suffix (e.g. NRD-00001 or 00001-PRINT) Starting count (configurable, not locked to 1)The field value would be system-generated on record creation and read-only after assignment.Business ImpactAuto-generated sequential identifiers are a baseline requirement for any operational record-keeping use case — job ticketing, production requests, vendor orders. Without this, teams either maintain a manual counter (error-prone, breaks under concurrent edits) or build a Fusion scenario to replicate what should be a native field configuration. We’ve encou
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
