Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
When i convert an internal lookup field to multi-select I am no longer able to group by that field in a report. Is there any way to have multi-select internal look up and group by that field?
Hi, I am trying to build a report including a parent task and it’s parent task to the subtask as well as the indicator ready to execute. Can someone tell me what the workaround is to add multiple parent task levels? Thanks you
Documentation says it refreshes every 4 hours. Does anyone know what that looks like? Is it midnight, 4am, 8am, 12pm, 4pm, 8pm? And would it be your instance's time zone?
We are currently on AEM 6.5.2 LTS and i see the RUM script loading on the publish url. We need to make the script opt in based on if the performance cookies are allowed on one trust cookie consent. How can we control the script thats being loaded by Adobe dynamically? any help will be appreciated.Thanks,~Sandy
We have been provided with the following details for SMTP setup. Host: abc.xyz.com Port: 25 TLS: STARTTLS supported (TLS 1.2/1.3) Auth: None - we have allowlist 172.193.80.67I’ve followed this article : https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/cloud-service/networking/examples/email-service and setup the portForwards properly with portOrigin being 30002 and port destination being 25. Also put in the host properly. Also, since the requirement is for dedicated egress IP address we have also enabled the same.This is how the com.day.cq.mailer.DefaultMailService.cfg.json looks like : { "smtp.host": "$[env:AEM_PROXY_HOST;default=proxy.tunnel]", "smtp.port": "30002", "from.address": "aem-noreply@xyz.com", "smtp.ssl": false, "smtp.starttls": true, "smtp.requiretls": false, "debug.email": false, "oauth.flow": false}Now using a servlet, I’m trying to send an email to a user in order to check if the connection is successful.Getting error as :24.07.2026 03:09:51
Marketo Engage users who have significant investment in email assets build in the legacy email designer need a “push button” way to convert old email assets to the format used by the new email designer. Adoption of the New Email Builder is being hampered because New Email Designer assets are fundamentally different asset types, and switching to the new email editor for organizations that have significant investments in nurture programs are akin to doing a full Marketing Automation migration, which is not to be desired.
I am using unarvhiver step to extract zips, but thers is not trace of extracted folder , so how can I find the name.
We are facing issue on AEM as Cloud Service Publish instance where request payload is empty when triggered path based POST servlet. Request is reaching servlet as enabled in dispatcher but in servlet logs we are seeing headers as Content-Type as null, Content-Length as 0 and No request payload found which is causing servlet to fail.On Author the servlet is working fine.Any suggestions in this regard will be helpful
Hi! I can't find anywhere the total amount of campaigns (Action campaigns) supported by ajo. Journeys limit is 200 but what about Campaigns? Thanks!
Your Adobe Journey Optimizer experience could win you $50. 🎁We're gathering feedback from Journey Optimizer customers, and we want to hear from YOU, whether you're in the platform daily or driving the strategy behind it.Two short surveys are live now:✅ Practitioners: Tell us how you use Journey Optimizer's channels, capabilities, and workflows day to day (~5 min)✅ Decision Makers/Leaders: Share what drove your investment in Journey Optimizer and the business impact you've seen (~4 min)👉 Practitioner Survey: https://lnkd.in/gMqTBS85👉 Decision Maker/Leader Survey: https://lnkd.in/g9aJv--cYour input directly shapes what we build next. Every completed survey is entered into a random drawing for a $50 gift card.
When I publish a document with an image on the front cover, it is supposed to set it to front and center, but instead it takes up the entire page: The image itself is not that large. Guides seems to be expanding it. Here is the source: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE concept PUBLIC "-//Emerson//DTD DITA Concept//EN" "mmiconcept.dtd"><concept id="GUID-9e62db09-26b4-4e6e-9ec3-9fc68b449cda-enHYPHENus" outputclass="frontcover"> <title>G-SeriesPDSFront</title> <conbody> <image align="center" height="3in" href="GUID-0b554440-e72e-4261-bec9-8efa22a822d0-enHYPHENus.png" id="image_mpl_bdw_jz" outputclass="front_center" placement="break" width="4in"> </image> <image href="GUID-b4720b3e-04db-4a4a-8ac8-1d6a401fe5bd.png" id="image_1" outputclass="brand_logo"> </image> <section id="section_1" outputclass="pds-frontpage"> <title>Exceptional reliability and safety</title> <ul id
When creating Layout Templates in the New Workfront Experience, we're currently limited to only being able to pin Main Menu Items or Dashboards. Ideally, we should be able to pin specific Objects on a layout template (Project/Portfolio/Report/Document/etc.).
Custom Forms are an important use-case. Many users have a need to see and/or input the Custom Form, but do NOT need to make four or more mouse clicks to get there. The current Layout Template "Tabs" feature exists, but can only incorporate "Dashboards." This proposal is to add a "Quick Pin" that allows System Admins to create/edit a Layout Template to attach a specific Custom Form. This means that a specified user could have a default view that is directly and specifically to a Custom Form.
Description -Enable any URL to be added as pin on the layout template page.Current Behavior -Currently, from the layout template, we can only pin dashboards or standard pages also accessible trough the "Waffle Menu".Why is this feature important to you -This has introduced the need for admins to go in to every new user and manually pin a specific board to their home page.How would you like the feature to work -At the layout template page, allow users to enter a URL to the pins.
Restrict webhooks by Adobe IMS authorization and browser originRestrict webhooks by Adobe IMS authorization and browser originWe’ve added two new security controls for custom webhooks: Allowed Origins (CORS) to restrict browser-based calls to specific domains, and Adobe IMS Bearer token validation so webhooks accept requests only when callers present a valid Adobe IMS access token.OverviewCustom webhooks can now enforce two common security requirements:Allowed Origins (CORS) — Specify which browser origins may invoke the webhook from client-side JavaScript. Requests from other origins are blocked by CORS, preventing untrusted web pages from calling your webhook. Adobe IMS authorization — Require requesters to send an Adobe IMS access token in the Authorization header (Bearer <token>). Fusion validates the token before accepting the webhook payload, enabling secure server-to-server or user-scoped calls using Adobe Identity Management.How to configure Allowed Origins and IMS author
Hi, We have a Salesforce custom object that is linked to both Leads and Contacts, and we'd like to sync it with Marketo.At the moment, the object is not visible in Marketo Salesforce Object Sync.I've reviewed the Salesforce Object Sync setting instructions in the Adobe documentation here: Enable or Disable Custom Object Sync and the post Syncing a new custom object from SalesforceI have a question and would appreciate any guidance:From the related post that said- “It’s not necessary to disable global sync to add a new custom object or refresh the schema. Instead, refresh scheme directly, which should be safe without disabling global sync.” How can I refresh schema directly? when I click on “Refresh Schema” I get disable global sync notification pop-up which restricts any further action Thanks in advance for any help!
Business requirement is to use direct domain to send out transactional emails from Adobe Campaign V8. In Control Panel, it throwing a warning says its Apex domain and sub-domain should use.
Currently, when publishing a page, AEM provides the capability to publish referenced content together with the selected page ("Publish with References"). This behavior is useful in many cases; however, it can also introduce a significant governance and security risk. Recently, this issue resulted in an actual information leakage incident in our production environment. Some of these referenced pages were not yet approved for public release, resulting in unintended exposure of information.To prevent similar incidents, we would like to request an enhancement that allows administrators to configure whether referenced pages should be included in the publish candidates.We believe this enhancement would help many AEM customers improve content governance and reduce operational risk.
Hi Adobe Community,We are designing a personalization architecture for our company’s website and mobile app using Adobe Experience Cloud, and I would appreciate hearing how others have implemented a similar solution.Our current ecosystem includes:Adobe Experience Platform (Real-Time CDP) Adobe Experience Manager (Content Fragments / Experience Fragments) Adobe Target Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO)Our objective is to build a scalable content matrix that supports omnichannel personalization across website, mobile app, email, and push notifications.Our current thinking is:AEM serves as the central content repository where reusable Content Fragments/Experience Fragments are managed. Customer profiles, audiences, and behavioral data are managed in Real-Time CDP. Adobe Target delivers personalized website and app experiences. AJO orchestrates personalized customer journeys across email, push, SMS, and in-app messaging.However, we still have several architectural questions:How should the conte
Hi everyone,I'm working on a scheduled Data Distiller job that computes an eligibility flag for entities and writes the results to a Profile-enabled dataset.One of the output attributes is a timestamp that should represent when the entity first became eligible.The desired behavior is:If an entity transitions from not eligible → eligible, set the timestamp to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP. If the entity remains eligible in subsequent scheduled runs, preserve the original timestamp. If the entity becomes ineligible, reset the timestamp (or set it to NULL).Conceptually, the logic would be similar to:CASEWHEN current.isEligible = TRUEAND (previous.isEligible = FALSE OR previous.isEligible IS NULL) THEN CURRENT_TIMESTAMPWHEN current.isEligible = TRUEAND previous.isEligible = TRUETHEN previous.EligibilityTimestamp ELSE NULL ENDMy questions are:Is it supported to read the previous state from a Profile-enabled dataset and write the updated results back to the same dataset within a scheduled Data Dis
i have created the configuration to enable persisted queries for my endpoint but when I am in the query editor, there is a message stating that they are not enabled. What could I be missing?
The native sync currently hinges around the core objects of Lead/Contact/Account/Opportunity. I do come across use cases more and more frequently though where the Account-Contact Relationship in SFDC manages more complex relationships between a contact and multiple accounts. Use cases range from external consultants / influencers on more than one company, several sites in different countries within a customer being logged as separate accounts and a stakeholder playing a role in more than one, etc. The set-up in SFDC prevents the contact being entered more than once to indicate their role in every account effectively, so is really great in avoiding unnecessary duplicates. It would be great if the data model in Marketo would also incorporate this added complexity.
Previously, when using a Typehead field we were able to reference a child field of the Typehead within a calculated field.An example would be the Typehead field referencing a particular project, and then a calculated field being able to pull through the ID of that project using the notation: {DE:typeheadproject:ID}. This doesn’t seem to work for internal lookup fields which we have now been directed to use? Can you please let me know what the new notation is to reference these child fields from an internal lookup field?
LOVE the new UI Beta. The ideal next step for the UX is to enable Marketo users to be able to copy/clone flow steps and smart list filters from within the same smart campaign or smart list. This will help save us significant time in building smart lists and workflows.
!!NOT the same as being able to apply segment to calc. metrics!!Goal:Segment Visitors based on calculated metrics (such as AOV)Problem:Calculated metrics is NOT available in Segmentation console.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.