Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
With our consolidated B2C, B2B & B2P instance/sandbox currently in production which includes Salesforce and Marketo account data via the native Marketo connector as well as batch ETL ingestion from our datalake. The result of this is duplicate account profiles with multiple/different primary & external source keys. Currently we have two options to manually correct for these duplicate account profiles: Option 1: Fix the Mapping Change the mapping on the Marketo side so that the “primary key” field (account key) for accounts brought in from Marketo uses the same format as the Salesforce/account data brought in via other sources. Example: If Salesforce/S3 uses 001xxxx...@salescloud.redhat as the account key, configure Marketo’s field mapping to use the same convention instead of the out-of-the-box 001xxxx...@<OrgId>.salesforce. This aligns the account keys from Marketo and Salesforce/S3, allowing AEP merge policies to recognize them as the same account and unite/stitc
In Planning, connected fields have Record Filtering Rules. When you are in a table and you click to select from the connected records in that field, you are only shown the ones that meet the criteria for those rules. Great feature! However, it does not apply to a Request Form built for that table. The filtering does not apply. AI Coworker confirmed this and said the best workaround was to manually filter your data set. That’s not good enough. I badly want to be able to apply filtering rules to connected fields/records in Planning. It seems like an oversight that we can’t do this now.
Pretty self-explanatory. I have a batch smart campaign that I need to run every hour on a daily basis with no end date. Since "hour" is not a frequency option, I had to create 24 recurring batch smart campaigns to achieve this result. I'd much prefer to manage this through on smart campaign, as opposed to 24!
Hi! I am diving into Journey Canvas and seeing some difference in numbers between other tools, and was wondering if anyone can help explain why.I am analyzing PDP behaviour. On the right-click, I choose ‘Show top 3 nodes immediately after this node’ and it populates numbers for pages after a PDP. But when I use the Next or Previous Item tool, and follow similar steps for pages after a PDP, the numbers are different. The container, time frame, and primary metrics are all the same. Can anyone explain why these might be different? I am assuming it’s how the segments are built?
Description - Would love to have the option to pin and unpin a certain update to the top of the updates thread. This would allow for easy visibility on the most up to date items, etc. Would also love the option to filter updates by date, time, etc. to quickly search through and locate a certain update. Why is this feature important to you - This would increase productivity within the Workfront platform tremendously and would avoid confusion and clearer communication with cross-functional partners looking for information via updates. How would you like the feature to work - A button that says "Pin" next to "Reply" and " Like" - Once pinned there would be an option to "Unpin" For the filter, some sort of filtering option at the top right of updates then you can click and customize certain date, time, latest comments, etc) Current Behaviour - Updates are ordered in the time in they are posted, and all replies and updates are not able to be customized at thi
When I attempt to add events to my project in the developer console, the creative cloud content logs do not appear as an option. When I go over to the admin console, I am able to manually download the content logs. Any ideas on how I can get the content logs to appear in the developer console so that I can connect them to Sentinel?
Hi team, I am trying to configure permissions for a user so that they have create access but not delete access. I have granted the following privileges: - jcr:versionManagement- jcr:modifyProperties- jcr:read- jcr:addChildNodes- crx:replicate- jcr:lockManagement- jcr:nodeTypeManagement With these permissions, the Create button appears and works as expected in Admin View. However, the same permissions do not work in Assets View — the user is unable to create assets there. Note: If I replace the above privileges with jcr:all, it works correctly in both Admin View and Assets View. However, jcr:all also grants delete access, which I need to avoid. Could you please advise which additional privileges (or paths) are required for create functionality to work in Assets View without granting delete permissions?Thanks,Asmit
I uploaded a PDF to AEM Assets with Dynamic Media enabled. A thumbnail is automatically generated, but the crop doesn't look good. I uploaded a custom image rendition in the required dimensions, however AEM continues to display the Dynamic Media-generated thumbnail instead of the custom rendition.How can I configure AEM/Dynamic Media to use my custom thumbnail image for the PDF asset and override the default generated thumbnail?
Hi All,I just wanted to confirm is there any upper limit w.r.t size when we are moving data with AEM Bulk Import tool. I think there is no limit and we can move TB’s of data in one run but still wanted to confirm.
Hi,In the image properties, we have the Review Status (dam:status) and Approval Target (dam:activationTarget) fields.When I set:Review Status = Approved Approval Target = Deliverythe image becomes available in the Delivery tier as expected.However, when I change:Review Status = Rejected Approval Target = Content Hubthe image is no longer available in the Delivery tier. This is not the expected behavior. The image should be rejected only for Content Hub and should remain available in the Delivery tier.Has anyone encountered this issue before? If so, could you please share the resolution or any configuration changes required to achieve the expected behavior?Thanks,Salma
Hi,We are using aem 6.5 and aem forms as well. (running on windows servers)we have requirement from client to generate a file and not to save it on dam, instead if it can be copied to an external shared folder location. Do you know if this is a good practice to save a file on shared location from Production and how to achieve this (with respect to permissions) I have seen this link: Share assets using a link | Adobe Experience Manager, but I am not sure if this will be accepted, as the older systems are already using the shared location to access the file.
Hello All,We're implementing purchase tracking into AEP for our airline website and testing it in our acceptance environment. Looking for advice on the right setup before we go to production.Our setupGTM Custom HTML tag that POSTs to the Edge Network API (/ee/v2/collect), not Web SDK Datastream → AEP service → event dataset based on our "Web Event" schema (XDM ExperienceEvent, Profile enabled) eventType: commerce.purchases, ECID in identityMapWhat works / what doesn'tcommerce.order, commerce.purchases and productListItems land in the dataset fine Our custom booking fields (_tenant.booking.*: base fare, taxes, ancillaries, pax counts, route type) are droppedWhat we found so farOur payload had the custom fields nested as xdm.data._tenant. We fixed it to xdm._tenant. The web event schema doesn't contain any booking fields. Our booking data lives in a separate schema based on XDM Individual Profile, with its own dataset, fed from our backend systems.Simplified payload:{ "events": [ {
Journey canvas is now available in Adobe Analytics. Build a flexible graph of any combination of events, dimensions, and segments, and watch the data update as you drag nodes into place. You can see exactly where people move forward and where they fall out, without stitching together multiple visualizations to get the full picture.Learn how to configure a Journey canvas in Analysis WorkspaceWe’d love to hear from you:Which customer journey are you most excited to map first? Where do you hope Journey canvas will save you the most time? Have you already tried it? What did you learn about where people drop off?Leave your comment below and our team will do their best to reply. If you see a question you know the answer to, we’d love for you to jump in from your own experience.Have questions about another story from this issue? You can see the full list of discussion threads here.
I am setting up an Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) to Shopify OOTB batch connection. The source dataflow connection was configured successfully, but the connection fails during the “Add data” step in the connection setup.Error Message:The following error is displayed:The request could not be processed. Error from flow provider: The request could not be processed. Failed to read from the source connector. Error code: 'InternalError', message: 'Error while reading single record for table: ...'Expected Behavior:The Shopify source connection should successfully read the source data and allow the batch connection to proceed through the Add data step.Actual Behavior:The connection configuration fails when attempting to read data from the Shopify source connector.Impact:This is blocking the setup of the AEP to Shopify batch connection and preventing data ingestion.Troubleshooting Performed:Source dataflow connection was created successfully. Issue occurs specifically at the Add data step. Err
When adding targeting rules in an action (email), I want to try these rules in the simulation content and it does not work. When I tried it at first it was working fine, but now shows the same template for every audience and they have to be different because i configured them to be different in each tier.
Hi, We are currently on AEM Cloud using Guides, we use both native pdf publishing and DITA-OT Pdf publishing using Antenna House. The Problem: Can we produce single/multi topic output pdf using Dita-OT + Antenna House ?
Problem StatementCurrently, Workfront hour reports and views provide visibility into who updated an hour entry, but there is no native field to easily identify the user who originally created/entered the hour entry and the timestamp.Why This MattersAudit trails require knowing the exact origin and timestamp of an hour entry. Without a "Entered By" and a "Timestamp" field auditing and troubleshooting time tracking discrepancies become unnecessarily difficult.Example: We have integrations that enter hours from Salesforce to Workfront, which a user can later update. So, it is important to have both the information (entered/updated). I can use a Journal Entry but that is a waste of time and becomes difficult to explain to process owners.Proposed SolutionAdd the following native fields to the Hour Report: "Entered By": Displays the user who initially submitted/generated the hour entry record (independent of who last updated it). "Date Created / Timestamp" (Journal Date): Displays the exac
Hi there,I was wondering if there’s an expression I can referent to count the number of profiles coming in from previous node and if it’s more say 1000, go to Others path? In short, any alternate to Profile Capping which we have been testing.Thanks!
What exactly causes a custom Sling HTML rewriter pipeline to be selected in AEMaaCS publish, and are there Cloud-specific cases where page HTML bypasses the rewriter chain? Pipeline config: /apps/<folder>/config/rewriter/<pipeline> in ui.appsTransformer type: sample-transformerSymptoms: OSGi registration OK, config OK, but no request-time custom transformer logs
As a marketing operations manager, I want to de-dupe my database when a duplicate record is identified via CRM sync by merging the identified record with duplicates in the database, and leveraging rules prompted in a callable agent to determine.Winner/loser criteria based on create date, last modified date, last marketing touch in the activity log, etc. Rules for competing scores and/or lifecycle stages Concatenation rules (combining notes) for merged records.
With the new Unified Approvals integration, when a Workfront project is created, a corresponding project is automatically created in Frame.io.Is there a native field or API-accessible reference that stores the associated Frame.io project URL?Our goal is to display a clickable link to the corresponding Frame.io project within a Workfront report.
Hi all,I know it is possible to use a user wild card on a single drop down field in Workfront. Eg.DE:Dropdown = $$USER.IDDE:Dropdown_Mod = inIt will direct the report filter to filter of the drop down field based on the name of the logged in users.Has anyone done text mode filter to try the manager? If the logged in user is the manager of a value in the drop down list, that is when the drop down contains names of users. I know a bit of a different use case but it is aligned with a different process.
When using the 'updates' function or tab, it would be useful for our teams to be able to utilize this space in a fashion similar to email. IE- to add colored text to responses, in order to differentiate between users. Also, it would be helpful to allow certain updates to be 'pinned' to the top of the page so they don't get lost. OR to categorize them as "bulletins or job notes" of some kind to set them apart from the back and forth threads.
We get a lot of the busy projects with multiple comments and updates posted daily. Some system comments or Summaries or updates are super important and we want to be able to PIN them and Highlight or have a way to view Important notes only.
In the current email builder, when you want to send a sample, it keeps a dropdown list of Previous Recipients that you’ve sent samples to recently.In the new email builder, it doesn’t seem to have that functionality. It’s just an empty field to enter in the email address with no dropdown.It would be great if it could remember previous email addresses that we’ve sent proofs to recently, and let us pick from that (in addition to typing in a new address if needed).Thank you!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
