Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Rename “Last month” to “1 month ago” in order to enable proper sorting in rows with “2 months ago” & “3 months ago”, Additionally create more “X months ago” to cover at least last 13 months so that trending can be done. Same with week ago would be optimal! Reason? Since person containers are affected by the selected reporting date range, the segment can be evaluated over the panel range rather than independently for every month row. This is a problem when trending monthly numbers over a longer timespan than 3 months (also the 3 backwards monthly date ranges defy sorting in the right order which messes up bar charts due to “Last month”). Creating custom date ranges allows both proper sorting & meaningful bar charts. However this means each month a new one must be created. Better as suggested to have the X months ago made available in Workspace.
Managing and retiring segmentations in Marketo can be an unnecessarily time-consuming process.Today, when a segmentation needs to be unapproved, archived, or deleted, administrators must manually remove every dependency listed in the Used By section. This often requires opening each individual asset and disconnecting the segmentation one at a time.For email assets, the process can be even more complex. Administrators may need to remove dynamic content, create drafts, reapprove assets, and perform additional cleanup before the segmentation can be detached. In larger instances with many programs and emails, this can become a significant administrative burden.My suggestion is to enhance the existing Used By functionality. Since Marketo can already identify every asset that references a segmentation, administrators should be able to select some or all dependencies and authorize Marketo to remove those references automatically.A potential solution would allow administrators to:View all segm
I made the following observation:In the Designer (FormDesigner.exe) for interactive forms, the preview window remained blank.Although the AcroRd32.exe process was launched in the background and the temporary PDF was created in %TEMP%, it was not displayed.A quick analysis revealed that the Windows Update KB5121003 had been installed the day before.Once it had been uninstalled, the problem was resolved.Is this behaviour known?
I am trying to fetch the last update date(Activity Date) for any updates done by the project owner in a Project by building an Automation in Fusion. I am using Journal Entry to get the activity date by the Project Owner. However I am not very sure how to get the last update date. The module which I have currently built is returning the first update date(Entry Date) for the Journal Entry by the Project owner. Can you help me how to sort the Entry date by descending order as I am not getting the Option in the Fusion interface to sort the Entry date.
Workfront Fusion — Native Adobe Storage (ESM) supportWorkfront Fusion now natively supports Adobe Storage (ESM)Workfront Fusion now connects directly to Adobe cloud storage (Enterprise Storage Management, ESM). Browse and upload assets inside Fusion, automate store lifecycle and access, and generate presigned URLs for secure read/write integrations with external systems.OverviewThis release adds native Adobe Storage support in Fusion using the same ESM layer that powers the Workfront/Frame.io unified review and approval experience and is shared across Frame.io, Document Cloud, and Creative Cloud. You’ll see a new Storage navigation menu for browsing and uploads, plus Adobe Storage modules you can use in scenarios to manage stores, collaborators, and presigned URLs.What’s newStorage navigation — A new Storage menu item in Fusion to browse ESM stores and upload files without leaving the app. Store lifecycle — Create, discard, restore, and delete ESM stores from scenarios for automated pr
A quick question: is there a baseline for comparison for click through rate?
My local instance of AEM 6.6.2 (6.5 lts sp2) runs on a Windows computer. I’m using Java21. When I install a content package with DAM assets, my local file error.log will be flooded with following error message: java.nio.file.InvalidPathException: Illegal char <:> at index 39: /content/dam/940x530.jpg/jcr:content/jcr:lastModifiedBy at java.base/sun.nio.fs.WindowsPathParser.normalize(WindowsPathParser.java:204)According the Internet, the method function WindowsPathParser is internal used by Java’s Path.of()How can I fix this?
Our AEM as a Cloud Service site is currently experiencing heavy bot traffic and repeated bot attacks. We are evaluating Akamai Bot Management as an edge security layer and need confirmation on the supported architecture for AEMaaCS with Adobe Managed CDN �.Questions :Can Akamai Bot Management be placed in front of Adobe Managed CDN as a customer-managed CDN layer for AEMaaCS? �Is the recommended approach to keep Adobe Managed CDN and add Akamai in front, rather than replacing Adobe Managed CDN entirely? �Are there any restrictions, supported headers, or configuration requirements for this setup? �
Dear AEM Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for August 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles!Take a look:
Dear Adobe Campaign Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Campaign.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for August 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for Adobe Campaign. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any campaign-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating exceptional campaigns with Adobe Campaign.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles! Take a
Am I able to bulk remove a property from a field. Heres an example use case:I have an expiration date set for 75 assets. Licensing has been reworked to give us universal rights in perpetuity so we no longer need an expiration for those. Am I able to select all 75 assets and remove the expiration date or do I have to do that 1 by 1?
SUMMARYTwo related asks, the second building on the first:1. An email level or template level switch that disables click tracking for every link in an email at once, equivalent to isOpenTrackingDisabled for the open pixel.2. Allow that decision to reference a person field, so link rewriting is suppressed per recipient at send time rather than fixed per asset.TODAYOpting a link out of click tracking is a per link operation only. It requires either unticking "Track Link" on each individual anchor in the Email Designer, or adding the mktNoTrack class to each anchor in the HTML. Adobe Support has confirmed there is no email level, template level or REST API setting that disables click tracking for all links at once, and that no such capability is on a published roadmap.WHY THIS MATTERSUnder the CNIL recommendation applicable since 14 April 2026, and the Italian Garante deadline of 28 October 2026, click measurement for campaign performance purposes requires consent in the same way open mea
Description - Did you know that Requesters cannot "Add Image" in an Update? I didn't, until a requester asked me why that was missing for them! Why?? Why is this feature important to you - Consistency of user experience, and there is no reason that a Requester should not be able to use this same functionality with UpdatesHow would you like the feature to work - Same as it works for every other access levelCurrent Behaviour - Requesters cannot use the "Add Image" when making an Update
Canvas Dashboards are more than just another reporting option in Adobe Workfront. They offer a powerful way to visualize, understand, and take action on your work. However, since they function differently from traditional reports, many teams either avoid using them or never fully realize their potential.Watch the on-demand webinar for an interactive, practitioner-focused session featuring Skye Hansen, Lead Functional Architect at Merkle, and Matt Mitchell, Principal Product Manager at Adobe. Discover how to use Canvas Dashboards effectively with clear, practical guidance, without getting bogged down in configuration details.Skye and Matt will explain how Canvas Dashboards fit into the broader Workfront reporting landscape, highlight their advantages over other report types, and show you how to build dashboards that people actually use.Specifically, you’ll learn:How Canvas Dashboards integrate with the Workfront reporting landscape and the unique capabilities they offer beyond standard
On the Adobe Experience League documentation, I found some Permission items (Report Suite and Analytics Tools) with Description: “Not used”. I’m wondering if this means it is/going to be a deprecated feature? Because I can still see some of them on my Report Suite Manager settings.For example “Traffic Management” still shows up as a feature for me to use, but:Adobe documentation:Product profile permissions for Analytics Tools | Adobe AnalyticsProduct profile permissions for Report Suite Tools in Adobe Admin Console | Adobe Analytics Thank you in advance
Hi Team,We have a requirement to replace existing hardcoded /content/dam asset references in RTE and Text Components with Asset Delivery URLs (URN-based).Since the content has already been migrated to AEM Cloud, we are looking for the recommended approach to:Map existing DAM paths to Asset Delivery URLs. Update existing content containing /content/dam references. Follow AEM Cloud/Adobe best practices for this conversion.Could you please share your recommendations on the preferred architectural approach and any considerations we should keep in mind?
I am working with a local AEM as a Cloud Service SDK environment and would like to enable HTTPS access for the local author/publish instance.Currently, the instance is running on the default HTTP port (e.g., http://localhost:4502). I would like to understand the recommended approach for running the local Cloud SDK on HTTPS, similar to production environments.AEM as a Cloud Service SDK (Local) Operating System: Windows/Mac/Linux (update as applicable) SDK Version: 2026.6.26908.20260625T154911Z-260600
From Gut Feeling to Grade Point: How AJO Measures Service QualityHow we grade every service behind Adobe Journey Optimizer — and what happens when a grade slips. When you're running customer journeys that depend on Adobe Journey Optimizer, you're trusting that the platform underneath is holding up its end—every trigger fires, every send lands, every integration behaves the way it should. That trust is something we take seriously, and we've built a system to hold ourselves accountable to it in a very concrete way: the Service Scorecard.The Service Scorecard gives every service that powers AJO an automated grade, refreshed twice a day, across four dimensions that together define what “healthy” means: how well we respond when incidents happen, how thoroughly the code is tested before it ships, how much reliability margin we're maintaining against our own commitments, and how quickly we act on reported issues.This is part of a wider effort across Adobe Experience Platform to apply one con
I am frequently getting the below warnings in my error log whenever I access any page. Anyone know how to fix this. I am using AEM 6.5 and using editable templates for pages.*WARN* [40.77.167.42 [1787899933431] GET org.apache.sling.caconfig.resource.impl.def.DefaultConfigurationResourceResolvingStrategy Ignoring reference to /conf/ahn/settings from /conf/sites/settings - Probably misconfigured as it ends with '/settings'
Two of our GTW integrations are showing errors: The standard procedure of double clicking that line, hitting “Log Into GoToWebinar” just redirects to a Marketo login page. Even if we are logged in that GTW account. Anyone seeing that too and knowing a trick? Did something change on the GTW side?Thanks!Michael
Hi Community,We're working on a use case where we need to surface ExperienceEvent-derived values at the profile level so they can be activated to a destination specifically Adobe Campaign Classic for email personalization.Can we use Computed Attributes to aggregate ExperienceEvent data (e.g. last purchase date, total orders in last 90 days, last product viewed) onto the profile, and then have those values flow through standard Audience Activation to ACC as regular profile fields?Specifically looking to validate:Whether Computed Attributes are fully supported in the ACC destination activation flow Whether the aggregated values appear as mappable fields during the audience-to-destination mapping step Whether there are any limitations or gotchas with Computed Attributes in this context (e.g. lookback window limits, supported aggregation functions, refresh latency)Our current stack:AEP (Real-Time CDP) Adobe Campaign Classic as destination Azure Data Lake Storage as intermediaryAny guidanc
Hello All, I wanted to add a custom styles dropdown to the latest content fragment RTE Editor Tiptap. I see no documentation regarding that, is it possible to add our custom dropdowns here. Any information or leads plz let me know.Thanks,Sujan
Thank you to Karthik Muralidharan, Director, Strategy and Product Marketing, for the insightful presentation and demo on Adobe Brand Visibility! So many exciting things coming to the Generative Engine Optimization space!If you missed out, or want to replay the session, check out the links below:Slides Webinar Recording Check out the product yourself: play.bv.nowFeel free to use this space to keep the conversation going! Add your thoughts, follow-up questions or takeaways here and maybe let us know what feature you’re most excited about.If you missed it, check out the session we did in July with Darrel Smith from WK Kellogg and Emily Kellman-Kessel from Adobe.com. They shared their experiences of marketing in the world of AI. Also, save the date for September 22, for our next AI Search and Discovery Forum session – registration link coming soon!
I have enabled integration between d365 crm and marketo engage - but the inbound sync is working between d365 and marketo.The outbound flow to D365 seems to be just queued in the pending list - and not syncing back to d365 - what could be the issue
Happy to see the flow details of a smart campaign is now available in REST API. Much appreciated for considering our enhancement request and implementing it. Thank you very much on behalf of our company Ingram Micro. Few things to enhance it further. The Wait step details are too lengthy and it’s “bit tricky” to identify which option is the configured one through API. The “value” key can be considered for the identification, however it would have been great if there is any specific key that explicitly denotes which option is configured like “configured: true”, since instead looping through each “value” key, developers can depend on that explicit key. Sample Response for reference:{ "success": true, "errors": [], "requestId": "1234", "warnings": [], "result": [ { "id": 1234, "name": "Testing", "description": "", "flowId": 1234, "flow": { "steps": [ { "id
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.