Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hi everyone,I wanted to bring up an idea and see if there is interest from the European Workfront community.I’ve noticed that we currently don’t have a dedicated Workfront User Group chapter focused on Europe. I think there could be a great opportunity to create a European chapter - even starting as a virtual group - where Workfront users, admins, and practitioners can connect, exchange ideas, share best practices, discuss challenges, and learn from each other. 🙂Would anyone here be interested in joining or helping shape a Europe-focused Workfront User Group?I’d be happy to help organize, coordinate, and support getting this started if there is enough interest. It would be great to bring together people from different countries and organizations to share experiences and build a stronger Workfront community across Europe! 😎If this sounds interesting, let me know in the comments - would love to hear your thoughts!
I am looking for guidance on a personalization use case involving AEP Edge Audiences and Adobe Target, specifically around extending personalization beyond the current session and supporting a TTL-based return visit scenario.Current Architecture* Adobe Web SDK* Adobe Experience Platform (AEP)* Adobe Target* Edge Segmentation enabled in the Datastream* ECID as the identity* Same domain journey User Journey1. User lands on Homepage (`abc.com`).2. Homepage contains a "Get Started" banner/blade.3. User clicks the banner and navigates to a quiz page (`abc.com/quizpage.html`).4. User completes the quiz.5. Upon quiz completion, a custom event is sent via Web SDK.6. AEP audience qualifies based on quiz completion attributes.7. Business requirement is to hide the "Get Started" banner on the homepage for quiz-completed users. What We Successfully AchievedPOC – Same Page PersonalizationWe created an AEP audience using quiz completion attributes that only become available when the quiz completion
Hi Community,I have to replace complete array with new values of array on every batch ingestion, but on every batch ingestion new items gets appended to this array in target dataset instead of replace. I have used upsert_array_replace in a calculated field and my dataset is profile and upsert enabled. Below is the structure of my target and source array, it has a primary identifier as "key" and "comm_details" array object to replace. Calculate Field : upsert_array_replace (_tenant.comm_details) -- Source Dataset Field : _tenant.comm_detail[*] -- TargetI have already gone through documentation. https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-platform/overwriting-the-array-object/m-p/566290https://experienceleague.adobe.com/sv/docs/experience-platform/data-prep/functions#arraysCould
I've been experimenting with different ways to reduce repetitive operational work, and I'm curious about other people's experiences with AI agents.Our team still jumps between project tools, email, spreadsheets, and chat just to keep work moving. Even after trying a few automation tools (and recently looking at platforms like WorksBuddy), I keep wondering whether AI agents actually reduce the workload or simply create another layer to monitor.For those who've used AI agents for things like updating project status, managing follow-ups, summarizing meetings, or syncing information across different tools—has it genuinely saved time?Where have you seen the biggest impact? And where do AI agents still struggle enough that you'd rather handle the work yourself?I'm especially interested in real-world experiences rather than feature lists. Has anyone found a workflow where AI feels like a reliable teammate instead of another tool that needs constant supervision?
Hi, We currently have problem to install large package through SOAP call which contains our custom schema definitions - currently XML package definition is a little bit bigger than 1.2 MB. In logs we can find messages likeSRV-810019 The server process 'web@default' (pid=xxxxx) has unexpectedly crashed. It will be restarted. (iRc=-53) when package was a little bit larger than 1MB then we had no such problems Any advice ? Thanks in advance
There are two toggles in the Target Activity QA Link UI:Match audience rules to see experiences → This is toggled OFF by default Show default content for all other activities → This is toggled ON by defaultWe share preview links with business partners of all technical levels, and users are constantly perplexed that after previewing a draft activity, they can no longer see any live activities.I’ve explained they can use the Target QA bookmarklet or manually clear the at_qa_mode cookie, but the better solution is for me to remember to toggle the second option off before sharing links.But it’s not sticky, so that’d be helpful: toggle it off once per activity and it should retain that state instead of defaulting back to ON. Better yet would be a global setting in the Admin panel, like there is for the VEC settings.
I do not see any option to change between HTML & JSONWhen I add image from AEM Assets in HTMLHow to add that html to JSON?
Greeting Adobe Community! I am observing the following error code UPINGT-030024-424 An error occurred while processing the batch. Please contact support. and here are the details of the error - “The XID cannot be generated for code userId.XID generation failed for nsCode = {code}, nsId = {id}” I am getting similar error messages in the AJO Push Profile Dataset while testing push notifications for different fields where all ingestions are failing due as XID cannot be generated. Has anyone faced the same? Any guidance and support would be really appreciated. Thanks,Sambit
We observed that after a subscriber clicks the one-click unsubscribe link in an AJO email, and a streaming audience (consent = N) triggers a journey whose Update Profile action sets a custom attribute (optin = false), the consents.marketing.email.val field reverts from N back to Y simultaneously with the Update Profile action's execution — even though the action is configured to update only the custom optin field and never references the consents field at allaccording to this post: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-cloud-kcs/kbarticles/ka-26352“Specific field values do not seem to update properly after running through an Update Profile node in a journey.” -- this is not the case for us, as the optin field gets updated with update action, however the consent field got reverted back to origin state although we haven’t had interacted or manually changed it from somewhere else.
It seems it was possible using VEC extension in Chrome, but Chrome no long has this as an option.So...for a Target user, who knows nothing about CSS or Code can a user change the :hover effects of a text link or a button with text?Is there anything in the existing UI that could do this. I have found the basic RTE options that can style the text but nothing about adding button/link states.Our customer base/AEM editors should be able to do with without getting a developer involved to write inline CSS as this is Marketing tool not a Developer tool. Any ideas more than welcome!
Lets assume that I createglobal ruleset: max 3 email per week sales xyz rulest: 2 emails per week Customer already got 3 emails per week but these campaigns were not assegned “sales xyz rulest”. If I create new campaign with “sales xyz rulest” and then global ruleset automatically excludes that customer from the sendout? How global and custom rulesets coexists?
hello internet friends ! just some Q about analytics / target stitchings. I have come to understand that this is accomplish via the SDID. also it seems that SDID is fresh generated by hit (analytics, target or perhaps both). my Q is this...does the Visitor API initialziation instantiate the SDID? If so does it ultimately matter if/when/how the mbox calls are execute on the page in relation to SDID initialaizions? also are the SDID sets 1:1 or many:many are there any docuementations on this?
Hi Team,We have a client who has an AJO license, but currently all their customer journeys, campaigns, data, and related assets are built and managed in SFMC . The client is interested in migrating everything from SFMC to AJO and wants to explore whether AI Agents can be leveraged to accelerate or automate this migration. As a services organization, we would like to understand the feasibility and approach.Could you please help us understand the following:How can AI Agents help in this migration scenario? What capabilities can AI Agents provide during the migration process? Which activities can be handled by AI Agents, and which will still require human intervention? Please outline the responsibilities of AI-driven automation versus manual effort. What are the key considerations before committing to the client that this migration is achievable? Are there any technical limitations, dependencies, risks, or prerequisites that should be evaluated upfront? What are the recommended steps f
We are unable to access Marketo - Just wondering if it is down ?
I’m probably not the only “Accidental IT” guy who now works in Fusion for a living. And for those of us “People who have liberal arts degrees who are trying to catch up with people with real degrees,” some of the newer and more code-y aspects of our job may be a little bit of a challenge. (“Work in publishing,” they said. “You’ll have a job for life,” they said...)The thing which trips me up is that I’ll play with the JSONata exerciser and something which works perfectly fine there...doesn’t in Fusion. While Claude was trying to work with me on that, I asked it to come up with some pointers for future use. I really don’t like having AI write simple things if I can do it on my own. So, I had it come up with this helpful one-sheet for me when it comes to working with JSONata expressions. I’m including it here in case anyone else may find it useful.-j WORKING WITH JSONATA IN WORKFRONT FUSIONHow Fusion deviates from canonical JSONata (jsonata.org)===========================================
Description -Why is this feature important to you -Basic formatting (e.g. Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) to assist with interacting with and responding to commenters How would you like the feature to work - Include the formatting in the commentsCurrent Behaviour - There is no formatting (e.g.Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) in the proof commenting
It would be really useful to be able to italicise/bold/superscript copy in a comment that we want to include as new copy in a document that is being reviewed. At the moment, we need to type out the copy that is to be inserted and then add separate notes to design to let them know what is to be italicised/bold/superscripted. Also, it would be good to be able to add more that one format to the copy, e.g. italicised and bold
The Bulk Assignments function in Workload Balancer ceased working for two users (one is a System Admin and the other a Group Admin). The functionality remains in tact for the other two System Admins and Group Admin who use it. Key info to note:Nothing was modified in the system setup or configuration The System Admin (myself) who has lost the functionality can’t assign any role in any project. The Group Admin who lost functionality only experiences with specific job roles. All of the System Admins and Group Admins use company provided Mac computers and everyone has installed the most recent Mac system update. (I hoped that may have been the differentiating factor, but no.)Anyone experienced this before? Any advice on solving or troubleshooting the problem?
Hello - I need to create a report where I can show the no. of projects and tasks assigned to each user in the group.Also need the list who have nothing assigned to them.How should I go about that?
Does it work for outbound channles in journeys?
Hi everyone,With Adobe Analytics 1.4 APIs deprecating (Aug 2026), the Processing Rules “view” endpoint will no longer be available, and currently there’s no equivalent support in 2.0 APIs.To help with this gap, I built a lightweight Chrome extension called AA Processing Rules Exporter.The extension extracts Processing Rules directly from the Adobe Analytics UI and downloads them in the same 1.4 API JSON format.This can be useful for: Processing Rules documentation Debugging mappings Managing rules across multiple report suites The extension is fully open source and runs locally in the browser.Extension Link: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/plcmmgiheecgepcmpkibmffodanlemhoGitHub Repository (Open source): https://github.com/abhishekDhami/AA_Processing_Rules_ExporterWould love any feedback or suggestions 🙂
I’ve been trying out the Adobe Reactor API and was wondering if others have had the same experience with the revision media-type parameter in the accept header. It might be me, just misunderstand its functionality. The documentation states: All GET requests to the Reactor API require an Accept header to determine what data is returned by the system. In most cases, this value will be application/vnd.api+json;revision=# (where # is the revision number of the resource you want to retrieve, e.g. 1).However, when I make a request for a single rule (https://reactor.adobe.io/rules/{RULE_ID}) that have multiple revisions, and I use the header Accept: application/vnd.api+json;revision=6. I get a 406 not acceptable.The only value that seems to work is revision=1. So my question is: is the revision parameter actually functional, or am I misunderstanding something?Another question I have, is about the format of the Accept header. It seems standard to allow optional whitespace between the media ty
Computed Hours in AEP License usage is always same from May 27, may I know what's the reason
Hello,In the reports area, if you toggle on the option to “use shareable folders, you can’t see which reports are on a dashboard. You can only see that information if you have that toggle off. It’s not an option to add that column either when you have that toggle on. I think it would be helpful to see what dashboards the reports are on as well as the shareable folder as columns. Thanks!Mary
Wouldn’t it be great if we could customize the summary panel for Workfront Calendars? I’ve tried to update the Summary Panel settings within Layout Templates, but it doesn’t appear to apply to calendars. Ideally, I would like to customize what fields pull into the calendar summary panel at the calendar level, rather than via a Layout Template.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
