Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
We all know Outlook blocks images by default, yet there’s no native way to preview without images in the Marketo UI. Turns out it’s super-easy to add a toggle to Email Editor 2.0:Only takes a little Email 2.0 template code high up in <head>:<meta class="mktoBoolean" id="enableImages" mktoname="Enable Images" true_value="http:" false_value="'none'" default="true" /> <meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="img-src ${enableImages}"> And this <style> right after:<style>:root:has(meta[http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy"][content="img-src 'none'"]) { --images-disabled: "images";}:root:has(meta[http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy"][content="font-src 'none'"]) { --webfonts-disabled: "webfonts";}:root:has(meta[http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy"][content="img-src 'none'"]),:root:has(meta[http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy"][content="font-src 'none'"]) { body:before { font: small-caption; display: inline-block; padding: 6px; content:
Hi,I am currently showing a calculated field of Active Milestone(s) on a project report. I have had a request to only show the first Milestone that is active if there are more than one. Could someone help with the syntax for that? My current syntax to show the active milestones is:Edit=Text Modedisplayname=Active Milestone(s)listdelimiter=<div>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({project}.{status}='CPL'&&{taskNumber}=1,"Complete",IF({canStart}&&{status}!='CPL'&&!ISBLANK({milestoneID}),{name}))valueformat=HTML Thanks!Heather
Marketo Engage is in the process of migrating to the Adobe Federated Email Service (FES), a centralized email-sending solution designed to streamline and standardize email delivery across Adobe's various teams and products. Over the next couple of months, all Marketo Engage subscriptions will be on FES, making email delivery more reliable, stable, and easier to support at scale.What do you need to do?If you do not have a Branded Return-Path configured during the initial set up of the purchased Dedicated IP, or a Branded Return-Path SKU, no actions are needed. Users who have a Branded Return-PathFor those who had a Branded Return-Path configured during the initial setup of a purchased Dedicated IP, or a Branded Return-Path SKU, you must update the MX record for that specific Branded Return-Path domain.Note: this is not the Branded Domains for your links.Ask your IT team to update the MX record for your branded return path using the values listed below for your pod. If you're unsure whic
Hi everyone,I’m running into an issue trying to call an AEM fragment directly. My approach: I retrieve the fragment ID manually via a Lookup activity, then pass it into the Fragment Helper function as a context attribute sourced from the dataset lookup in email.This works perfectly fine for AJO fragments, but the same method doesn’t work for AEM fragments.Has anyone else run into this, or know what might make this work for AEM fragments specifically? Any pointers would be appreciated.Thanks in advance!
Hi Team,I know we have the Recipient Time Zone feature in Marketo, which I believe determines the send time based on the recipient’s location or IP information.However, we’re looking into whether there is a way to go beyond time zone-based sending and determine the best time to send an email for each individual contact based on their historical engagement data—for example, when they are most likely to open or engage with our emails.I’d really appreciate any guidance on whether Marketo has a way, functionality, or recommended approach that could help us achieve this.Thanks in advance for your help!Regards,Akshat
The latest change to the UX on visualisations on the legends is poor.You can now no longer read them, if your dimensions and metrics used are now longer in name than a few letters.We regularly use multiple segments/dimensions to trend or use custom build segments for our needs and now trying to do some quick analysis is, quite frankly, not quick any more as you can’t read the legdends. Adobe, please put a fix in for this.
We have a Google DV360 Destination. Whenever an Audience is activated to this Destination, we’ve noticed that there is no mapping step. What data from AEP is actually being shared from AEP to the Destination? Our understanding is that no PII is shared with a DV360 Destination.We have multiple identifiers set up in AEP. Our CRM ID is set up as the Primary identity. This ID will only have a value for clients. Prospects will not have a CRM ID. Subscriber Key is another unique identifier. GAID, which is derived from the _ga cookie, a Google Analytics first-party cookie. We do NOT have Apple's IDFA or Google's GAID set up.We don't believe any hashed email IDs are being shared. Again, there is no mapping step that shows email addresses mapping. We also don't believe Phone Numbers are being shared for the same reason.We don't have Adobe Audience Manager device identifier (AAM UUID) set up in the platform.
For certain use cases we have been using DMWOAPI links. One of these was adding them to the product information in google merchant center. It seems that Google is unable to retrieve these links and gives an error message.We had to swap the DM links to normal published DAM links from our domain. Is that the ootb way DMWOAPI should work? I saw somewhere that creating a custom domain for the DM links would be a solution, however that would mean manually replacing all our existing links.If anyone faced a similar issue and has other ideas, I would really appreciate.Thanks!
New: A faster way to see what broke — Failed Executions Logs in the Insights dashboardWhen multiple scenarios fail across your org, tracking down how many, which ones, and why used to mean opening scenarios one-by-one. The new Failed Executions Logs widget surfaces every failed execution across every scenario in a single table so you can triage incidents fast, at scale.OverviewThe Failed Executions Logs widget lives on the new Insights page (which now also contains the Performance widget). It aggregates failed executions across your organization into a single, filterable table so you get the full picture quickly — no more stitching together results from individual scenario pages.What’s newCentralized failure list — See every failed execution across every scenario in your organization in one table. Powerful filters — Filter by team, scenario, type, error message, and date range. Each filter supports "only these" or "everything except these" to help narrow or exclude results quickly. Rea
Hello Adobe Workfront Support Team,We would like to submit a product enhancement request for Adobe Workfront Request Queues.Current situationWe have one Request Queue project containing multiple Queue Topics. Occasionally, users need to copy an existing issue from one Queue Topic to another Queue Topic within the same project.The copied issue must retain its existing information, including: Issue name and description Custom forms and custom-field values Documents Assignments Updates, where permitted Primary Contact Relevant permissions The standard Copy to functionality allows users to select the same or another project, but it does not provide an option to select a destination Queue Topic. The Copy and Submit as New process requires users to open the copied request form and manually select the destination Queue Topic before submitting it.Requested enhancementPlease consider adding a native option that allows users to: Select an existing issue. Click Copy to. Keep the s
Hi, We have scheduled Excel reports using Adobe Report Builder. Recently, we migrated these reports to the new Report Builder, and we were receiving the reports successfully through the new Report Builder until yesterday.However, we did not receive the reports today. I checked the Report Builder and noticed a “Delivery Error” status. It also shows that the workbook was sent, but we have not received it yet.Could you please let me know if there is any known issue with the new Report Builder or advise us on how to resolve this issue?Thank you for your help.Screenshots for your reference: Regards
Hi everyone,I'm currently facing an issue with an Adobe Target activity and wanted to check if anyone has come across something similar.The activity is working as expected in the Development environment, but it is not delivering after moving the library build to Production. We have verified that the correct build has been published to Production.What makes this a bit confusing is that the issue is happening only for one market property. The other market properties are working fine with their respective Production builds.Has anyone faced a similar issue where an activity works in Development but does not deliver in Production for a specific property? Are there any additional configurations or checks that we should look into?
Hi all, Does anyone know if we’re able to add an image within the notes section of a specific task? I have a list on onboarding tasks which need to be completed and would like to save evidence for each task once the item has been actioned.
Hi Adobe Team, https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/support?support-tab=my-cases&case-id=E-002435848&org-id=231F22CE527850C40A490D4D%40AdobeOrg#homeWe're currently using the Adobe Target MCP tool (get_a4t_report) to pull A4T report data programmatically. The tool works well for retrieving activity-level metrics, but we'd like to request one enhancement:Request: Add a metric parameter to get_a4t_report so users can specify the counting method — e.g., visits, visitors, or entries — rather than having it hardcoded to entries.Current behavior: The tool always returns data based on metrics/entries with no option to change it.Desired behavior: Allow an optional metric parameter (e.g., metric: "visits") so we can retrieve visit-based or visitor-based reporting depending on the activity setup.This would make the tool significantly more flexible for teams who measure activity performance on a visit or visitor basis rather than entry-based.Please let me know if additional context or a u
Hi everyone, We’re currently exploring options to process Zoom Webinar poll responses in near real time and use them to trigger MQL qualification in Marketo. Current ChallengeToday, our MQL process depends on receiving the Zoom webinar polling results after the webinar has ended. This creates a delay between when an attendee responds to a qualifying poll and when that response can be processed in Marketo for MQL qualification. Our business requirement is to identify and qualify an MQL as soon as a participant provides a qualifying poll response during the live webinar, rather than waiting for the webinar to conclude. What we’re trying to determineDoes Zoom Webinar provide a way to access individual poll responses in real time while the webinar is still in progress? If not, are there alternative approaches for capturing poll responses as they occur? Can Zoom APIs or webhooks be leveraged to capture or retrieve poll responses during the live webinar? Has anyone implemented middleware or
Has anyone upgraded to the Planning API v2?What is your most valuable result/use case after doing so? We’re working to estimate LOE against budget and trying to decide if there’s bang for the buck there. Was it a huge lift to upgrade/implement? I’m told we have little to nothing on v1, so hoping this means it will be fast and somewhat easy.
Hello,I am trying to work on allowing the Adobe Creative Cloud on our network and am looking for the minimum required list just to authenticate via the Creative Cloud and use Premiere Pro. Our network & security teams are very strict on what gets whitelisted and will question if there are 10+ domains added to a request.What is the bare minimum to just allow us to log into creative cloud and use Premiere Pro?Thank you
Currently, the only time the pre-defined sorts in a view (ie: sorts specified and saved in a view) are utilized is in a report (ie: View = Report Default). a) If you change the view on the report - from Report Default to another view - and the newly selected view has its own sorts defined, the report uses the sorts from the Report Default view; the report does not use the sorts defined in the selected view. b) Pre-defined sorts in views are not utilized when using views in a project. All of the above was confirmed by Workfront Support. Would like the system to use the sorts defined in the selected view, both in reports and in the project. Thanks
Are you tired of chasing your marketing ops team for every audience, or new to the team and want to get hands-on fast? Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker lets you build audiences yourself without being the data expert.Here are two easy ways to get started.1. Directly ask Coworker to build it.Give it the targeting criteria you already have in mind, a high-level campaign goal, or both and Coworker will strategize with you.Try simple natural-language prompts like:"Build an audience of recent cart abandoners." "Build an audience of homeowners in California." "Build an audience for a new member welcome campaign." "Build an audience for Black Friday Sales, recommend a target strategy first." "Build an audience for a member upgrade nudge campaign, targeting silver loyalty members close to upgrade with recent engagement."Coworker acts as your thinking partner: surfacing reusable audiences, relevant attributes and events, and explaining its recommendations so you can make informed choices. Ask follow
We have migrated assets to AEM Assets and need to maintain and expose relationships between related assets.Historically, these relationships are stored in AEM using the following properties:Related Derived: ./jcr:content/related/derived/sling:members/sling:resources Related Others: ./jcr:content/related/others/sling:members/sling:resources Related Source: ./jcr:content/related/sources/sling:members/sling:resourcesThe relationships are visible in AEM Assets Author, but we would also like users to see the related assets when viewing an asset in Content Hub, ideally from the Asset Details page. Could you please advise:Does Content Hub currently support displaying AEM’s native Related Assets relationships (Source, Derived, Others)? Can the existing relationship properties above be exposed or configured on the Content Hub Asset Details page? If native related-asset relationships are not supported by Content Hub, what is the recommended approach for representing these relationships — for ex
Hi! We have a requirement where marketing email journeys can send between 10:00 AM and 7:00 PM, but no email should be delivered after 00:00.We are considering: Email Retry Period: 6 hours Quiet Hours from 00:00 Quiet Hours behavior: Discard message Question: if an email is sent before 00:00, goes into delay/retry, and Quiet Hours starts while it is still retrying, will Quiet Hours + Discard stop those retries?Or will the retry continue independently until the configured retry period expires?Is there any native AJO option to define an absolute expiration such as: discard any unresolved email at 00:00? Thanks
We have migrated assets to AEM Assets and need to maintain and expose relationships between related assets.Historically, these relationships are stored in AEM using the following properties:Related Derived: ./jcr:content/related/derived/sling:members/sling:resources Related Others: ./jcr:content/related/others/sling:members/sling:resources Related Source: ./jcr:content/related/sources/sling:members/sling:resourcesThe relationships are visible in AEM Assets Author, but we would also like users to see the related assets when viewing an asset in Content Hub, ideally from the Asset Details page.Could you please advise:Does Content Hub currently support displaying AEM’s native Related Assets relationships (Source, Derived, Others)? Can the existing relationship properties above be exposed or configured on the Content Hub Asset Details page? If native related-asset relationships are not supported by Content Hub, what is the recommended approach for representing these relationships — for exa
Currently the Percent Complete roll up at the Program level only takes into account Projects that are in "Current" status. This does not make much sense as you are completely ignoring all projects that have been fully completed and marked as such. If all projects under a program have been marked as complete status, then the Percent Complete at the Program level should show 100%
What options exist today to identify which users are licensing and downloading Adobe Stock assets at the individual level across our enterprise, including assets that appear in reporting without an associated user name? (not directly related to AEM but I don’t see any groups about Stock specifically)We require auditing and user-level attribution for stock asset usage, and the current Admin Console reporting does not appear to provide this consistently#stock ,#license,#reporting
Would love to have a button in WF that takes me to a text mode cheat code library vs. searching community or using AI. Any Workfront user could submit a cheat code and it gets added to a database behind the scenes. This would help all users be able to have quick access to effective text mode that works. This would speed up being able to implement solutions for reporting for businesses.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
