Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I recently created an SDR within the AA workspace project. The thinking is that users should be encouraged to use the AA workspace tool as much as possible, as compared to generating an excel based SDR that has to be stored externally. Some examples of what I built 1) a picture of the different sections of the SDR - 2) a picture of the different panels, one for each variable (props illustrated) indicated its number, its name and whether or not the variable is enabled 3) an overview of a specific variable details. I get that there are some items in this example that might not be easy to automate, like the BRD reference number with a hyperlink, but I think it would be great to have a tool in the AA admin areas that would generate an SDR template within Workspace grabbing all the information it can from the AA admin area report suite traffic and conversion variable screens. UX: The admin would click a button, the script wo
It would be helpful to have the option to display the updates in order by the last update made. When reply is added to an older update, it is difficult to search for because the original post is displayed way down the update feed. When a reply is made to an older comment, it would be nice to have it move to the top, truly in order of last update, be it original or a response.
Dear AEM Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for July 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles!Take a look:An
The new green pop-ups at the bottom of the screen when task status is modified, such as if you click work on it the pop-up says “You’ve started working on this. The status is now in progress.” or when you remove your assignment it says “You’ve stopped working on this, the status is now new” are persistent and must be manually dismissed by users even after navigating to other objects. While having the pop-up is helpful for confirmation, we need the ability to have those auto-dismiss after a few seconds or at least have it disappear when moving to a different object in Workfront.We have users who are moving quickly through the system who now feel disrupted by having to click another item to dismiss after already clicking to change the task. They often move on quickly until these pile up at the bottom of their screen, then have to dismiss each individually. Which a large volume of work as is, any extra clicks are cumbersome to users. Thank you so much!
Dear Adobe Campaign Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Campaign.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for July 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for Adobe Campaign. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any campaign-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating exceptional campaigns with Adobe Campaign.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles! Take a lo
Hi! for clients (even sometimes for us) is confusing to see this numbers in AJO journey canvas:It would be great if somewhere in node card mention which numbers corresponds to previous execution (for example, yesterday) and which ones to actual execution. Regards.
I recently started receiving incessant in-app notifications when a team to which I'm assigned receives a work request. They look like this: [Person] wants your team, [Team], to work on this task. Many members of our department are assigned to multiple teams, causing each of us to receive dozens of notifications per day--even per hour--for new assignments that rarely apply to us. I'm told there's no way to opt out of these in-app notifications. Please add a way to opt out of certain notification types--or at least turn these off again (as they have been since we started using Workfront a year and a half ago).
Just like we can delegate project/task/issue approvals, and with 22.3 can delegate task/issue assignments, PLEASE have the ability to delegate proof approvals! There are other ideas for this with 'Not Planned' labeled, hoping power in numbers can help sway this bc this is something WF really needs. Hoping it is part of near-future proof enhancements.
Hello Community 👋🏻 I use Velocity Scripts in our conference emails to pull in data points from an integrated system so that I can get creative with the content displayed. I usually only work with text content scripts and today I’m trying to create one for an image but I cannot get it to work. Intent: I want to show this image if someone has NOT filled out a quiz that’s part of our registration process. i.e. the Data point is Oktane Lab Profile (oktaneLabProfile) and IS EMPTY. Script: This is what Gemini gave me after I asked for help fixing the script.## Determines whether Quiz image is shown or not#if( !$lead.oktaneLabProfile || $lead.oktaneLabProfile == "" )<img src="https://pages.okta.com/rs/855-QAH-699/images/Hero-Oktane-Identity-1072x400.png?version=0" alt="Find your Oktane identity" />#end Use: I inserted the token into an image module that I’m using for this section (so that the formatting/styling is used vs just adding a simple image into a text module for example). Pre
What is Context7?It's an open-source MCP server from Upstash that pulls current, version-specific docs and real code examples for a library straight into your AI assistant's context - instead of the model relying on whatever it memorized at training time.Where I use it:Inside Cursor and Claude Code, whenever I'm generating code against a fast-moving SDK — so the assistant reasons against today's API surface, not the one that existed at its training cutoff.Here's the real example:Asked Cursor to implement session caching with Upstash Redis — it generated hmset, which looked correct but was already deprecated.Added Context7 via MCP, and Cursor pulled the latest SDK docs and switched to the correct hset API.AI can write code. MCP helps it write code with current context.Key takeaways:AI assistants hallucinate silently on deprecated APIs — that's the dangerous kind Training-data cutoff is the biggest hidden risk in AI-assisted development MCP turns "probably right" into "verified against c
Description - Implementing the Analytics CNAME involves creating a subdomain for our website, which is then utilized to place cookies in a first-party context. However, during SEO crawling, these subdomains are scanned as well. To prevent Google from crawling these subdomains, we need to make adjustments to the robots.txt file located within it. Yet, as end users, we lack the capability to perform this task on our own and require assistance from Analytics Engineering to handle it on our behalf Why is this feature important to you -Search engines like Google allocate a crawl quota to domains, determining the time and resources dedicated to indexing a website. If these crawlers expend their resources on redundant URLs, like CNAME subdomains, there's a potential for vital content on our site to go unnoticed during indexing. This poses a risk of missing out on organic traffic if the crawlers neglect new or updated content while focusing on less crucial areas. How would you like t
Hello,We are using targetData fields added in a workflow transition, as described in the Adobe documentation.Use workflow data | Adobe CampaignThe delivery is configured with:Recipients: Specified by the inbound event(s)Action: PrepareThe fields are available in the transition and work during personalization, for example:<%= targetData.nombreProducto %><%= targetData.importe %>However, when we open the delivery Preview and select a specific recipient, recipient fields are displayed correctly, but targetData values return undefined.Is it possible to preview the real targetData values associated with a specific recipient before sending the delivery? Is any additional configuration required in the delivery form or preview?Thank you.
Hi,I have a carousel component under that authored the list component. My requirement is when I author list component each item in list has to be considered as individual item in carousel. So, from BE I am resolving the list items and rendering it on html. But after changing the HTL I am not able to see the list component under the carousel in editor and also authoring features are not working. Can anyone please tell me the reason why it is not working?
Analytics has always had a lot of tools to answer questions. However, what has been lacking is a coworker that collaborates with you on the problem.Introducing agentic analytics in Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker! This isn't just another agent to query and forget; it's an intelligent partner that retains context, reasons through each step, and accompanies you from the initial question to the root cause.This represents a significant shift towards complex analysis, worked side by side.See it in action here:
Am adding below code in my custom Container component to test the data-sly-resource where i do need to use to add a component re-use based on dialog check box. <sly data-sly-test="${container.enableButton}"><sly data-sly-resource="${'test-button' @ resourceType='/apps/core/wcm/components/button/v2/button', decoration=true}"></sly></sly>OR<sly data-sly-test="${container.enableButton}"><div data-sly-resource="${'test-button' @ resourceType='/apps/core/wcm/components/button/v2/button'}"></div></sly>what i have observed is the component is being rendered twice on the page, even when i add it to OOTB core components and test. Is there anything that i need to add in dialog level for the deletion of the component after uncheck of checkbox in dialog.Is this a bug in framework of sightly ?
We would like to submit an enhancement request for the Journey list UI in Adobe Journey Optimizer.At the moment, the available filters in the journey list do not provide enough granularity to efficiently manage and analyze journeys at scale. We would like to request two additional filters: A filter by schedule type, so journeys can be filtered by cadence such as daily, weekly, monthly, once, and similar scheduling options. A filter to identify which journeys are included in the active journeys metric, so users can easily distinguish journeys that count toward that metric from those that do not. This second filter is especially important because not all journeys with a Closed status continue to count toward the active journeys metric. It would be very helpful to have a clear way to see which journeys are still contributing to that count.Having these filters would make the Journey list much easier to use for reporting, operational monitoring, and cleanup tasks, and would improve visibi
We are migrating from AEM on AMS to AEMaaCS. We have already configured Azure based Oauth for authors. kindly confirm AEMaaCS supports Oauth based login for author.
The older version of the API, 1.4, allowed us to download a JSON of the processing rules in a suite. Since these are instrumental in transforming data into eVars, Props, and Events, they are an essential part of maintaining the data quality of a suite. The newest version of the API, 2.0, does not currently support accessing the processing rules, and it's been stated on Github that, as of this idea submission, processing rules access is not even on the roadmap. Unless Adobe is going to eliminate these rules (and the eVars and Props that are driven by them), a mature multi-site installation of Adobe Analytics, esp. across mobile and web, relies on a constant overview of processing rules for maintenance, QA, and to aid site and mobile app developers.Please make sure that processing rules are accessible via the APIs, not just in version 2.0, but in all future versions. Leaving 1.4 up is not a complete solution, as Adobe may deprecate it at any point.
Building a Decisioning rule or a ranking formula is only half the job. The harder question is always the same one: will it actually behave the way I think it will?Until now, the honest answer was “let’s find out in production” — you’d wire the rule into a decisioning strategy or a campaign, push it out, and watch the results trickle in. That’s a slow, nervous way to work, and it’s an expensive one when a subtle logic error means the wrong offer reaches the wrong profile.Simulation changes that. You can now test any rule or ranking formula against sample or AI-generated data before you put it to work — right inside the authoring experience, in a few clicks, with no hand-built data and no guesswork. This post walks through both: simulating a rule to confirm it qualifies the right profiles, and simulating a ranking formula to confirm it orders your offers the way you intend. The UsecaseConsider a common scenario. You’ve authored a rule that should only apply to profiles whose favorite cat
Has anyone managed to create a smart collection in Content Hub?I can not find an OOTB method of creating a smart collection in Content Hub - is this being developed?It used to be possible to publish a smart collection from AEM Assets to Brand Portal but I can see this integration is not possible with Content Hub. Thanks
At the request of some other posters here in the Community, here are some learnings from my first build of a custom Workfront to Jira integration using Fusion. All comments reference Jira Cloud, and reflect my candid, hopefully amusing, learnings from this trial project. Why did we not use the native Workfront to Jira integration? This article is what I send out to our internal teams when they ask if I’ll configure it for them. https://www.putitforward.com/how-to-integrate-workfront-and-jira#toc-challengeswhenconnectingworkfronttojira Also: Per Adobe Support, the connection user must be a full admin account and I operate on the principle of least-privilege. Unmonitored accounts should never be administrator level. (That’s my soapbox, and I’m staying on it.) 20/20 Hindsight – What would I do differently? Build a bigger POC – When I did my initial feasibility assessment, I thought I’d be able to use the existing connectors included in Fusion that are pre
There appears to be a short window during system startup where the OSGi Management Console (/system/console) can be accessed using default or static credentials (e.g., admin:admin).This window can allow unauthorized users with network access to gain admin rights if they know or guess the password, before the usual authentication/authorization mechanisms and custom user configs are fully in place.What are best practices to completely prevent unauthorized access to /system/console during (and after) startup?
Description: We would love to see additional fields directly visible on a card when looking at a board rather than clicking into each card. Why is this feature important to you: This could help with quicker prioritization, understanding capacity, and organizing the work within a board without as many clicks/steps. How would you like the feature to work: Unlock the Visible on Board option for custom fields for at least a few (understanding only so much fits on a card) like maybe having a space below the assignments/due date/status that allows for up to 2 or 3. Current Behaviour: Visiblity on card only functional for pre-built fields Thank you!
Test
While I tried to filter users, I set the option EmployeeCode, and selected “Is Any Of” and pasted 1000 user employee codes, it broke the page. It should not be like that, if it cannot process the filter it should show a warning or say something instead of being unusable, even when reloading the browser did not work.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.