Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Given how WF timestamps comments, it would be helpful to have a “delay deliver” feature much like outlook. I tend to require focus when working in WF (therefore am working at off hours). I would like to give the impression that i am working within standard business hours
I deleted a custom field. However the custom field was not deleted from the library. How can I retrieve the data for the deleted field.
AEM Forms doesn't get as much Reddit airtime as Sites or Assets, but the 2026 release cycle has shipped some notable changes including a genuinely new interaction model. Here's what's actually landed, verified against current Adobe documentation.1. Conversational Forms (Early Access) chat-style form completionThis is the most novel addition: a Conversational Forms component that can be dragged onto an AEM Sites page with no coding required. Instead of a traditional multi-field form layout, users answer questions one at a time in a chat-style interface closer to talking with a virtual assistant than filling out a form. It's currently Early Access, so treat it as something to pilot, not something to bet a production critical-path form on yet. Worth watching for use cases like lead qualification or intake forms where a conversational flow genuinely improves completion rates over a long static form.2. Edge Delivery for FormsForms now has its own Edge Delivery approach authors can build for
Good morning,I've been reading several articles this morning and feeling a bit lost on the report type and how to build a report to allow project owners to see the pending proof approvals in current and on hold projects they own. Seems like a Proof Approval report is the way to go but then it's challenging to get the filtering to only show proofs in projects the logged in user owns plus group those results by the project. Seemed like a Document report would work better and this long post, Solved: Proof Approval Reporting Examples - Adobe Experience League Community - 539604, is a document version report and I do see some text mode in it but it does note to contact someone to get the text mode. Any insights would help. Thanks!Mary
Hello Guys, We have oneTrust implemented with one of our client and By default we have “Pending” as Default Consent in WebSDK Extension within Launch. Now, Within one of the Rule, we check whether C0002 is added to OneTrustActiveGroups object and then accordingly we either opt-in or OptOut. Below is the custom code written for the same:(function () { if (typeof window.alloy !== "function") { console.warn("Adobe Web SDK (alloy) not available"); return; } var groups = String(window.OnetrustActiveGroups) .split(",") .map(function (s) { return s.trim(); }) .filter(Boolean); var allowed = groups.includes("C0002"); window.alloy("setConsent", { consent: [{ standard: "Adobe", version: "2.0", value: { collect: { val: allowed ? "y" : "n" } } }] }).then(function () { console.log("Adobe consent set to:", allowed ? "IN" : "OUT"); });})(); Now how do we handle pending interact calls with this scenario since when user is accepting the cookies
We are seeing more clients asking about progressive modernization instead of full replatforming.In several Adobe Commerce projects, the discussion is no longer only about storefront replacement, but also about how Adobe Experience Platform (AEP), App Builder, and event-driven architecture can coexist with existing PaaS implementations.Some common questions we are evaluating internally:How are teams introducing AEP capabilities without disrupting current Commerce operations? Are you using App Builder primarily for integrations, custom APIs, or operational workflows? What are the biggest architectural challenges during phased modernization? How are you handling legacy custom modules during transition planning? Are clients already preparing for ACCS readiness through composable services?Would love to hear how other teams are approaching:phased migration strategy event-driven integrations operational governance data synchronization patterns AEP adoption challengesInterested in learning fro
Hi Everyone,We have following set up.Marketo Measure, AEP - on one organization Marketo Engage - On another organization due to organizational policies so we can’t use Native integration.We are trying to integrate datasets from Marketo Engage to Measure via AEP by importing the datasets and then sending them over to Measure. We don’t have any errors in dataflows. However, when we are looking at data in Measure, Email clicks are completely unattributed causing attribution scores to drop drastically.Does anyone here has similar setup and has been able to achieve this configuration successfully?@nloportoAny help/guidance or thoughts welcome!Best,Isha
I am trying to build a custom widget for external links in a new content fragment editor RTE and store those values into an anchor tag. I have tried both the options to use getwidget and getcustombutton options, but looks like the getcustombutton options is deprecated. I am able to run the build with my custom code using getwidget function and don’t see any errors in the console logs. Also, I don’t see an option to view the pop-up using the curly brace option. Can someone help me with the limitations with extensibility options?
Hi Adobe Experience League Community,We are currently refining our digital experience architecture, specifically focusing on how media assets and high-resolution visual content are delivered across various web and mobile touchpoints.When dealing with large volumes of rich media content, maintaining low latency, fast page load speeds, and efficient caching layers without sacrificing visual quality is a common challenge during peak user traffic.- For teams managing large-scale digital asset repositories, what are the recommended strategies or caching configurations to optimize media delivery and reduce asset loading overhead?- Are there specific performance monitoring approaches you rely on to track asset rendering bottlenecks across different client viewports?Would appreciate any expert insights or best practices from fellow developers and content architects!
When I replace a Custom Action for a new one in Journey I need to update email template if I use in that Email Template some parameters from Custom Action?
Hi All, i am silling to put one click Subscription code which is usally paste in SMTP tab of delivery in PB and use that PB in SMTP tab of delivery kepping rest of logic same ( for web app and typology for one click unsubscription) is it possible , i tested received mail but unsubscribe option to right side of sender email is not visible in received mail. Thanks in Advance for Help
I’ve created a new utility: AEM Dispatcher Rewrite Tester 🛠️Working with Apache rewrite rules in AEM Dispatcher can sometimes mean spending way too much time figuring out why a rule isn’t behaving as expected.This tool makes it easier to:✅ Test your rewrite rules quickly✅ Check whether your rule is valid✅ Identify errors in your rewrite configuration✅ Experiment with rules without repeatedly testing them on your Dispatcher setup✅ Get a better understanding of how your rewrite rules behave🎯 The goal is simple: make troubleshooting AEM Dispatcher rewrite rules faster and easier.👉 Give it a try:https://www.aemcq5tutorials.com/tools/aem-dispatcher-rewrite-tester/I’d love to hear your feedback! 🙌If you work with AEM Dispatcher regularly, let me know what additional features or improvements you'd like to see in this utility.Feel free to share it with other AEM developers who might find it useful.
In the Notifications UI, you can drill into SFDC and LaunchPoint errors one-by-one:But unfortunately there’s no bulk export, making it harder to track trends & fixes. Hacker’s delightConveniently, the underlying endpoint /data/inboxRecord/retrieve supports get-everything requests, not just get-summaries and get-single-details. That is, though the UI lists only summaries – you click a summary to load its details – it’s easy to get the whole notifications “inbox” for offline crunching. Just open your browser console, click any notification in the list or the details pane[1], and run this JS:{ const sanitizer = new Sanitizer({ removeElements: ["br"], attributes: ["class","id"], dataAttributes: true }); const currentURL = new URL(document.location.href); const notificationsInboxURL = new URL(currentURL.origin); notificationsInboxURL.pathname = "/data/inboxRecord/retrieve"; const payload = new URLSearchParams([ ["sort", JSON.stringify([{ property: "
When you want to set values for a picklist field in Admin you have to do them 1x1 In Forms with the “Advanced Editor” option we can paste in values We need this in field admin too
We have an external system that needs to periodically access AEM Assets metadata multiple times per day. It’s only for assets matching certain pre-defined criteria (specific metadata values and folder structure) What's the recommended approach for this use case? Are there specific APIs, connectors, or export you'd recommend?
Hi there!Is there a way to verify whether a record already exists in Salesforce before syncing it over?For example, when a new record comes into Marketo (and it may have been purged from Marketo in the past) — Marketo checks Salesforce to see whether the record/email ID already exists, and syncs only if it does not.Thank you!
I would like to provide feedback regarding the new Marketo UI experience. The Classic UI offered a highly intuitive and user-friendly design, particularly through the use of distinct colors and visual indicators for different actions and functionalities. These visual cues significantly improved usability and helped users perform tasks such as QA, campaign management, and navigation more efficiently.In the new UI, many of these distinguishing visual elements appear to be reduced or absent. As a result, the interface feels more uniform, which can make it more difficult for users to quickly identify actions, workflows, or important sections during day-to-day operations.I would encourage Adobe to consider preserving or reintroducing some of the key usability features from the Classic UI, especially the color differentiation and visual clarity that many users relied upon. For a large number of existing users, the Classic UI remains more intuitive, efficient, and user-friendly than the curre
Hello, is it possible to determine which notifications our Marketo users receive as an admin? If they are also an admin user would they simply be able to override any changes made by a different admin? Is this adjusted within Marketo directly or the Adobe Admin Console? How would I go about making this update, and will it notify the users who are impacted?
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a powerful enterprise content management system, but setting up a local development environment can be challenging. Traditional installations require significant manual configuration, consume considerable system resources, and often lead to "it works on my machine" scenarios.
Users are experiencing a glitch when clicking on the three dots in the Documents section of Open Summary. It takes them back up to the top and the choices pop-up is hovering somewhere in the middle.
Assume that you would like to use journey data once again in AEP. I see that there are two ways to update AEP: Sent data from journey: Custom Action → AEP Streaming API Update Node What are the differences in you use-cases? What you prefer?
Someone mentioned this earlier, to be able to hover over a request queue and it would show a description of what that request queue is for. Totally agree. But would love to be able to use that “What request so you want to submit?” area as a search bar. What if the user doesn’t know which request queue they should select. They know what they want, but they don’t know what team it should go to. Search “Email” “Paid Media” and it populates the Digital Marketing request queue. Or maybe type “Photo” or “Creative” and it maybe a couple options show up, rather than the entire list. More often than not, I have people submit generic requests to the wrong team because they don’t know where they should be routed. A search feature would be so useful.
When looking at your score, from the Unified Reviews AI Collaborator, there is no way to download the Fixes and Considers, you must stay on that screen. There needs to be a way to download those recommendations, instead of forcing us to keep that screen open the whole time.
We have recently implemented send time optimization (STO) and want to understand the optimal send time for each profile. Has anyone successfully used the ‘send time rank’ or ‘send time optimization’ scores on an individual's profile to understand their optimal send time? At this stage we are really just looking for insights to help us understand our customers and when they would be most likely to open/click emails.
Hi everyone,I’m exploring how teams use Adobe Journey Optimizer when a customer’s experience depends on a mobile plan or connected device.For example, a customer buys a device with a data plan. That creates several useful moments for communication: purchase, SIM or eSIM activation, first connection, low data balance, renewal, and service interruption. The connectivity platform knows when these events happen, while Journey Optimizer could use them to send timely, relevant messages.I work with Spenza, a connectivity platform for connected devices. We’re interested in how teams would design this workflow; I’m not describing an existing Spenza–Adobe integration.For those who have built similar journeys:Which service events would you send to Journey Optimizer, and which would you keep in the operational system? How would you link a SIM or device event to the correct customer profile? Would you use a journey event for most lifecycle messages, or an API triggered campaign for immediate servic
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
