Product Communities

Hi, where I can find SMS tracking logs? I used Twilio and I have clicks in my Last 24hs report but I can't find any SMS tracking logs dataset  

Hello! When in a Project's Task list, I am looking for a way to highlight when a child task is missing a predecessor. My users sometimes forget to add predecessors and I want to give them a Task View that highlights when that happens so they can easily see it & fix it. I am not sure if there is a column rule I can configure? or if this is a text mode solution? 

Hi everyone, I have a question about creating workflows in AEM (and automating repetitive tasks in general).  Our process to create a workflow in AEM is: Navigate to Sites > {your product's v1 folder}Select the icon for the page to be reviewed (if you need more than one page reviewed, additional pages can be added later from within the workflow). Various buttons become visible in the toolbar above, including "+Create".Click Create in the top (far left) nav. The button expands, revealing several options.Click Workflow. The Create Workflow window opens.Select Workflow Model - type 'E' or scroll to find EDP Sequential Workflow or EDP Daily Workflow. The applicable fields are displayed (workflow title, keep workflow package, package title, change summary, date, approver, publisher, etc.)(Fill out the various fields for your workflow.)If you have multiple pages to review (or your product is available to multiple countries /

Hey guys, has anyone managed to get the automatic click tracking of Target activities, played out through Web SDK, to work?   We are applying the "data-aep-click-label" label to our CTAs   The click is triggering a "decisioning.propositionInteract" call as it should, but we are constantly seeing this error in our dataset. "The message cannot be validated due to the format error: #/_experience/decisioning/propositions/0/items/0/id: [1214107:12] is not a valid URI reference."   Now, looking at the schema, the field indeed requires a url-reference formatted string in events[0].xdm._experience.decisioning.propositions[0].items[0].id     but this is what the Web SDK is implicitly sending, so no changes from our end, and surely not a URL-style value. Any idea whether this has to somehow be configured? As mentioned, all we do is add the label and Web SDK should do the rest.  

Hi everyone! Looking for some advice and best practices on onboarding teams to the proofing process. A lot of us are experienced WF users, but using the proofing process is new to our team. We have our designers owning the proofs and setting up the workflows (due to volume of work) on most projects. All of us are finding the process to be pretty complicated and glitchy. We are trying to use automated workflows that include all the relevant users/roles/etc. pre-set to make it very simple for us. What are some things you all did to make the process easier and more straightforward for the teams? What tips, tricks and workarounds do you use to make the system work for your team? Some specific issues we are struggling with are:- Controlling access to the proofs when it is not a user's turn. (Private stages only seem to hide the comments, not the proof itself)- Dealing with the "Workfront" stage that is created whenever a user looks at a proof.- Creatives needing to make a dec

Lets say if the events are batch based, and attribute required in the personalization is not part of profile schema, but event schema. And those attribute cant be added into profile as there could many such attribute. In such case if journey is built using read audience or qualification, then how to access attributes from event schema for those audience ? computed attribute is not an option here, bcz these cant be stored as profile attribute due to growing nature of event attribute list.

Is journey orchestrator a separate sku and not part of journey optimizer ? I havnt used adobe campaign, but is that JO part of ACC suite ? The UI of JO seems exactly same as AJO. When do we use JO, instead of AJO ? 

Hi all,I have a request from a manager for a report that shows the status of each phase of their ongoing projects. Each project is divided into these phases, with a parent task named 'Phase 1: XXX', Phase 2: XXX' etc., and all the related tasks are under it. The ask is to have a report with these columns, and to have the Phase column show the progress status (or percent complete) for each phase:Project NamePhase 1 StatusPhase 2 StatusPhase 3 StatusPhase 4 StatusI think this can be done, but I'm new to text mode reporting and stuck as to how to call out a parent task from a project report. Usually I hunt around the Community or documentation to find something close to what I need and then try to patch it into doing what I want, but I'm stuck here. I am aware of the API Explorer, but haven't had a chance to practice in it yet. Any help would be hugely appreciated, I'm trying to convince some folks they can get good project info within Workfront and we don't need to revert

Have a quick question - that -  My Journey Starts with a read audience and I have added the Day of week check [ Tues|Wed|Thurs|Friday] . Now the question is Concern about the weekday checks- right now when the check returns weekend/monday, it looks like it ends the customer journey.  What would be best possible Solutions  for this - Problem Statement  : 1. Added the Days of week chek only in [ Tues|Wed|Thurs|Friday]  days - is this sufficient 2. If the days are from Sat to Monday - then the customers will be out of the journey - then how to handle it .     

Hosted in partnership with Rachel Small @rachel_small and Bill McCandless of Kyndryl, this session provided an overview of how Kyndryl’s in-house creative team took a self-taught approach to building a Workfront model that could support a $7B global business. They designed and scaled a content operations framework using native Workfront features like project templates, custom forms, reports and dashboards to balance speed, visibility, and governance.  Access the on-demand resources here: Kyndryl Slide Deck PDF   Workshop Recording  Taking what they learned from other Workfront customers, this is a great story of how powerful (and generous) the Workfront Community is. If you are interested in sharing your story or use case, please send us an email at csatscale@adobe.com. Additional FREE Workfront events are happening this month, so be sure to check out the Events page on Experience League to see the full list and to register. 

so I have around 2000 page with some components and i want to replace these components with a newly created components, in that case should i handle this manually or what do you recommend?

 ⚠️The issue: When I start the new RB in Excel, all commands like "Copy data block" are available - until I use them once or manage my requests. After that only two commands remain, the others like copy/paste/delete, etc. are gone.That happens in all Excel-sheets with different request-setups. I have installed the newest version of RP and i'm using Office 2021. (Of course, I've tried to select cells with requests & refresh hub.) The Screenshots show the before / after situation when the Hub's commands disappear after the first action:                 -> Do you have any idea why the commands don't appear/reload? Many thanks for any hints & tips! 😊 

Say I have a set of current profiles in and enterprise database.  I could load all those profiles as a batch job.  However, after that load, all the new profiles and updates are ingested via streaming processes.  I need the streaming because using AJO I need to enable streaming evaluation.  Now if I load the initial profiles as a batch load and ongoing changes (new or updates) as streaming, will AJO be able to use the profile attributes for streaming evaluation?

On our site, we have a prop (c5) for the entry page type (eg 'product page', 'search', 'home' etc..) and an evar (v5) collected at the same time. Evar5 expires on visit.1. When I bring the prop (c5) as a row and the conversion rate as a metric, I am seeing some results which seem to make sense.However,  even if the numbers make sense-ish, my understanding is that the report is invalid as a conversion rate is a visit  context metric, it could not be applied to a hit context (like a prop). Is that correct? 2. This brings my second question. If I use evar5 (allocation most recent: last / expire: after visit / enable merchandising : disabled) as a row, and bring in conversion rate as a metric, I am also getting some conversion rate data. My understanding is that this report would also be invalid because evar5 has enable merchandising set to disabled, therefore there is no way for Adobe to tie orders back to that specific entry page. 3. If I bring my evar5 (entry page ty

Editing a content fragment on the New Content Editor, the content reference field doesn't accept external link unlike on old editor. Previously, I was able to type in an external URL starting with https://, but on the new editor I'm not able to click Add after typing it in. Will I need additional Single Line Text field just for the external URL, or is it a configuration change?

Hi Team, Question that I noticed there is limitation for AJO Journey if existing profiles entered the journey and max duration for staying in the journey is 91 days. However, my Cadence of program is 3 years' time to finish and exit to the ending point of journey for sending out email on bi-monthly basis. what's the recommended you would advise as the best practice?

The new feature to create a source connector to Azure Blob using a Service Credential is great.  When will that be available for the Azure Blob Destination connector.  As an alternate, is there a way set up a destination to an Azure blob store using the ADLS Gen2 connector?  That connector does accept a Service Credential and Gen2 sits on blob storage.

I got the case like this: 1. I got some processes using DQ based on dataset XY1 - not enabled for profile2. It writes data to Dataset XY2- hourly. Enabled for profileIt would be max 100-1000 records every time3. Streaming audiences would use data based on data from XY2Would it work? 

I have field with dropdown options and i want to see grouping based on that field. 

Hi there, I would like to write "Adobe Real-Time CDP Business Practitioner Professional (AD0-E602)" certification, which Voucher should I buy to schedule this exam.  Thanks,Siva Akurati

We just migrated from AEM 6.5 on premise to AEM as a Cloud Service. The fileupload no longer features the ability to search. Where it used to say "Type to search" now just says "Select Path". This feels like a step back in AEM functionalities. I know the "fix" is to replace the fileupload with pathfield, but the UI is different and it doesn't allow for file uploads directly. So you still end up loosing some features.Not sure how to request a feature but I think the fileupload should be fitted with an assetpicker search like before. Happy to hear any suggestions here as now we have a team of authors complaining that they need to swim across multiple folders to pick a featured image. To be clear, I'm talking about cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileuploadHere is how it's used on page v3<filegranite:class="cmp-image__editor-file-upload"jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"sling:resourceType="cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload"allowDrop="{Boolean}false"allowUpl

Author: Baubak Gandomi This is the first post in a two-part series about the importance of measuring efficient functional tests in platform engineering and in complex products. Baubak Gandomi is a Test Architect with Adobe Customer Journey Management. Code coverage is often a KPI used to show progress in projects. Especially when the quality of a legacy product needs to be brought up to speed. It is often expected to help detect holes in our certainty regarding the infallibility of our products and their associated tests. We think that although it seems quite clear in its results, it is quite misleading if used on its own to represent the efficiency of your tests. This is actually a very good measure and it allows us to find lines in the code that are not tested. But I feel that it does not give a clear picture of the state of the tests, and leads to false assumptions when you generalize this for tests that are not unit tests. The main focus of this article is functional testing.