Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I have converted a legacy report builder into new report builder and have found that there is no way to show in the excel which is scheduled to email what segments have been applied to the data block. Displaying of the filter and report suite name are also not available. My excel has a number of brands and this was a sense check that data was being pulled. Please think about adding this back in.
I am certain I saw this in my instance last night and now I cannot find how I found it.What I am looking to achieve is from within a Portfolio, using the Milestone View and it be grouped by program.Please can someone help?!
Hello- I have a list of 12 campaigns that a marketer is looking to get some metrics for within CJA. Looking across all 12 campaigns: People who didn’t open any email the selected campaigns People who opened only 1 email during the past 12 months People who had 2 or more opens during the past 12 months We have a unique email open metric that de-dupes at the person level and we keep the first instance based on the delivery label. How do I look across multiple campaigns to see if someone only opened one or two?
Hi Team,We are working with a SharePoint website and have encountered an issue where Adobe Analytics scripts are being blocked by the Content Security Policy (CSP). Although we have already whitelisted the Adobe script, the browser console still shows an error indicating a CSP violation.Has anyone faced a similar issue, and could you advise on how to resolve this? Any guidance on proper configuration or best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!
I have a couple of email templates in my instance, within design studio, that appear with all the options greyed out - I am unable to preview, edit or clone these templates.Although I am still able to create an email using these particular templates, once I do so I am also unable to select the modules tab in the email editor. I was wondering if anyone has come across this previously, or might know why this could occur?
Hello,How to add the bounce email address for a email delivery in a Campaign workflow?
Adobe Tags does not currently allow for multiple development library configurations - are there any methods that individuals are using to allow for multiple individuals to work at the same time within the same property and whilst ensuring that the latest instance of the Adobe Tags? Is there Thanks,Ty
Why is this feature important to you?Tracking milestones is a critical component of project management within my organization. While the Milestones Dashboard is a great visual tool, its full potential is not being realized due to current limitations in how the data is presented and grouped. How would you like the feature to work?I’d like to see greater customization options within the Milestones Dashboard.Specifically: - Program-level grouping: Currently, the view only displays milestones at the project level. It would be extremely helpful to group and filter projects under specific programs to better manage larger initiatives. - Team visibility: Include the ability to view which team members are assigned to each milestone or associated task, to improve ownership visibility and resource planning.- Expanded milestone assignment: Enable multiple tasks to be assigned to a single task and make them visible in the dashboard view for better granu
When proofing a document I wanted to tag another approver and get their opinion about something on the artwork. However, it will not let me tag them, giving me the message “Your sharing permissions allow you to mention only people already added to the proof.”If they are an approver, wouldn’t they already be added to the proof? It seems that I can tag them in the updates (Unless it is an outside user, than I am unable to tag them at all - but I can add them as an approver)We used to have no problems tagging people that had Workfront accounts on our system so I’m not sure which update changed this, but would like to know how to fix it please.
Hi Team,We are migrating all our assets to a separate AEM Cloud instance from a 3rd party DAM.Our sites instance is setup in another program while the assets is on a different program, We want to use our current components such that they are able to pull and render the assets remotely.Following https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/assets/dynamicmedia/dynamic-media-open-apis/integrate-remote-approved-assets-with-sites# we are able to leverage image v3 component to fetch assets remotely.However in our custom component we were not able to do so. The previous DAM image URLs were represented in these custom components as simple textfields.We modified and added the below properties - Changing sling:resourceType from textfield to fileuploadsling:resourceType="cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload"enableNextGenDynamicMedia="{Boolean}true"fileReferenceParameter="./fileReference"fileNameParameter="./fileName"On adding these values we are abl
Hi All, I created a user report and added a ‘Direct Reports’ column using the following text mode: displayname=Direct Reportslistdelimiter=<br>listmethod=nested(directReports)type=iteratevaluefield=namevalueformat=HTML The column displays correctly within the Workfront report and successfully shows all direct report names. However, when exporting the report to Excel, the Direct Reports column appears blank. Please advise whether this is a known system limitation, or if the issue can be resolved by adjusting the text mode configuration? Any guidance or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Best regards,Lyon Lye
When exporting a large number of records with a large number of fields, Marketo will often complete the export, with a UI confirmation, but the download will not work. This appears to be a silent failure of the “download now” button. Sometimes large exports download without issue, and other times they don’t download, no matter how long you wait. The UI should provide an error or otherwise indicate when a download can be completed successfully.
Hello. When we use an Email Program with time-zone feature enabled, the smart list is calculated at the time of program launch / approval and the emails are sent to everyone at once. Then they are delivered by time zones even to those who has unsubscribed or has been marked as marketing suspended after the email was sent but before it was delivered (this period can be up to 24h long). The support team has advised that this behaviour is expected and as a fix we should adjust the messaging to “unsubscribe will be applied within 24 h”. I’d like to request a feature to prevent all non-mailable people from delivering a time-zone sent email, including unsubscribed, marketing suspended, email invalid or block listed. Reasoning:although legally we can protect ourselves with the 24h notice, this still creates a bad customer experience as often these emails are delivered just hours after the unsubscribe request. It can create a feeling of frustration and lead to reporting the sender as spam. a
Hi,I am working on an AEM servlet/workflow that needs to bulk move assets using the Asset Manager Granite API. Key Requirement:The solution must reliably handle the movement of 300–500 assets in a single execution without errors such as repository exceptions, session timeouts, or failed moves. Performance and stability during high‑volume moves are crucial.I am looking for guidance on the following points: Feasibility Is it supported and recommended to move 300–500 assets at a time using the Granite Asset Manager API via a servlet? Are there any known limits, pitfalls, or configuration considerations when moving assets at this scale? Best Practices / Algorithm What is the recommended approach or algorithm for bulk asset movement to avoid errors? Should assets be moved in batches, and if so, what batch size is considered safe? Are there recommendations around session handling, save frequency, or throttling to ensure stability? Destination Path Validation Before moving assets, the
This is the script that Im testing Your appointment time: {%= formatDate(context.journey.events.1697323153.timestamp,"dd/MM/yyyy HH:mm") %} But Im getting this error: Invalid syntax Invalid syntax Error in parsing PQL expression "formatDate(context.journey.events.1697323153.timestamp,"dd/MM/yyyy HH:mm:ss")": line 1:10 mismatched input '(' expecting <EOF>. Error beginning at position: Line 1, Character 24Can someone help!
In all Sandboxes, prod and test, we sometimes need to clean up the environment. Meaning f ex deleting old Journeys, not used Journeys and Journeys used for testing. Today it is only possible to delete Journeys one by one. It would be better if there where a option where you could select several Journeys and batch delete them with one click. Deleting one by one seems unnecessary and time consuming.
How long do draft requests remain in the draft folder? I wasn’t sure if there was a time limit for how long they will remain in the draft folder?
**This is an AEM Assets idea and is being temporarily moved to AEM Sites** We have a legal/compliance requirement to store all our iterations/versions of our documents. In addition to retaining them for an indefinite period, we need to be able to view the various iterations/versions & markups (created via Adobe Acrobat) that have been created during the document creation & approval process of the document. I loaded a couple iterations of a document that had 7 iterations/versions created in another content management tool (again, markups created via Adobe Acrobat) and tried to access the prior iterations in the timeline preview but do not see the markups in the preview. I double-clicked on the current document and do see there are markups, but you can’t select them or hover over them to see the actual markups. We need an easy way to view all iterations/versions of a document and be able to see the markups made from version to version.
We have a legal/compliance requirement to store all our iterations/versions of our documents. In addition to retaining them for an indefinite period, we need to be able to view the various iterations/versions & markups (created via Adobe Acrobat) that have been created during the document creation & approval process of the document. I loaded a couple iterations of a document that had 7 iterations/versions created in another content management tool (again, markups created via Adobe Acrobat) and tried to access the prior iterations in the timeline preview but do not see the markups in the preview. I double-clicked on the current document and do see there are markups, but you can’t select them or hover over them to see the actual markups. We need an easy way to view all iterations/versions of a document and be able to see the markups made from version to version.
I’m working with this expression to bring some Task data onto a Project report. Each project will have multiple tasks that meet this criteria (ie multiple children under the Bottling parent). Is there a way to tell the report to put the outputs in a certain order - ideally sorted by the Planned Start Date. Right now it seems to put them in an unpredictable order, maybe affected by the task status or latest update…I can’t figure out exactly what it’s using to reorder the outputs. displayname=Itemslistdelimiter=<br>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF(CONTAINS("Bottling",{parent}.{name}),CONCAT({plannedStartDate}," • ",{name}," • ",{DE:SKU#}," • ",{DE:Estate Bottling Volume}," ",{DE:Estate Bottling UOM}))valueformat=HTML
Hi, I configured a webhook for whatsapp and I see responses in Email Tracking but I can’t see actionNodeID or journeyID or campaignID associated with the Whatsapp node or journey/campaign used. Thanks.
We have recently started using Fragments in our Adaptive forms. I noticed that when I create a new fragment, the jcr property (fd:version) defaults to 1.1. However, fragments from the Core form component examples project are set to 2.1. What controls this version assignment? creating a fragment with 1.1 version does show it under /assets. Additionally, after creating a fragment, the components available are all sourced from fd/af/components/. How can I configure this to point to my project instead? I also do not see a template being selected during fragment creation, so I’m unsure how the allowed components are determined.Thanks,Abhishek
Successful organizations don’t treat planning, execution and reporting as separate activities; they connect them. In this session, join Workfront Expert, @Madalyn_Destafney as she shares how to leverage Workfront Planning alongside Workfront Workflow to create a connected operating model that moves seamlessly from planning into execution, with real-time visibility through Canvas Dashboards. If you weren’t able to attend live — or want to revisit any part of the session — you can access everything below: Slide Deck PDF Webinar Recording During the session, Madalyn shared use case ideas and demonstrated how Workflow continues to power execution. She then showed the power of Canvas Dashboards to bring both together to see the full picture. Whether you’re just getting started with Workfront Planning or looking to mature how your organization plans, executes and reports on work, this session will provide practical guidance that you can apply immediately. Huge thanks to Madalyn sharing h
Hi All,We are trying to render a dynamic URL in an email button based on the contextual event attribute:context.journey.events.`1116xyz`._tenant.applications.applicationType. The attribute applicationType is a string datatype and contains values such as:"1"/"2"Based on this value, we want to display different URLs in the email CTA button.The logic implemented is( replaced with dummy values ):{% let AppType = context.journey.events.`1116xyz`._tenant.applications.applicationType %}{%#if AppType = "1"%} <a href="https://www.google.com/">Accept my Offer</a>{%else if AppType = "2"%} <a href="https://onboarding.xyz.com/">Accept my offer</a>{%/if%}If we click on validate. Validation successful.When we attempt to save the email content template in the journey, the validation fails with the PQL parsing error and the journey cannot be saved. Invalid syntax Invalid syntax Error in parsing PQL expression "context.journey.events.`1116xyz`._tenant.applications.applicatio
Description - Once an issue has been approved, we convert it into a project, and I would like to lock the comments (updates section) in my issues (nobody can enter a new comment) once it has a resolving project related to it. Why is this feature important to you - once the issue is approved, we follo up everything in the converted project but many time requestor does not know and he/she comment in the issue instead of the project this causes confusion in the Requestor because, he does not know that the latest updates are in the project or the executor do not see the comments because He is now working in the project. It results in lost the conversation chain and often gets missed. How would you like the feature to work - A feature where it detects the issue has a resolving project and lock any new comment. Current behaviour - only technical method to achieve this is by revoking users' sharing permissions from the issues. Yet, this action wo
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.