Product Communities

Hey all, I’m trying to build a Fusion automation to connect appropriate projects to records in Workfront Planning but the Planning Update Record module isn’t an append, it replaces any values currently in the field. What I’m trying to do is add a new project to the connected project field of a given record, while retaining the existing connected projects.Whether this was clean or not, my idea of a workaround was to re-map all of the existing connected projects plus the new one, so I’m using the Planning Get a Record module to pull in the pertinent information on the specific record type I need to connect the project to. This is outputting a “Project” array that contains as many collections as there are currently connected projects, with each collection containing the External ID.Then in a Planning Update Record module, I’m mapping the Project array external ID to the Project (Connection) field by using the array index number, plus the new project’s external ID as seen below.  This func

We have been attempting to connect Workfront and Campaign Classic V8 with Fusion and we established the connection.    The issue we seem to be having when using Adobe Campaign Classic Read a Record module, is that when selecting any resource, we get this error message.   I have been working with the Campaign Classic admin to see if we can troubleshoot the access limitations and just been hitting a roadblock at this time.     Does anyone have any experience with this and know how to correct this?   This appears to be something on the Campaign Classic side that is limiting access and I am not familiar with the application and hoping I could help provide the admin over there some possible solution to review.   Thanks!  

I have the below network request { "events": [ { "xdm": { "eventType": "web.webpagedetails.pageViews", "web": { "webPageDetails": { "URL": "https://www.xyz.com" }, "webReferrer": { "URL": "https://www.xyz.com" } }, "device": { "screenHeight": 800, "screenWidth": 1280, "screenOrientation": "landscape" }, "environment": { "type": "browser", "browserDetails": { "viewportWidth": 1265, "viewportHeight": 150 } }, "placeContext": { "localTimezoneOffset": -330, "localTime": "2026-05-08T09:54:09.711+05:30", "ianaTimezone": "Asia/Calcutta" }, "timestamp": "2026-05-08T04:24:09.714Z", "implementationDetails": { "name": "https://ns.adobe.com/experience/alloy/reactor", "version": "__VERSION__+2.34.2", "environment": "browser"

If the JSON is not flat is it possible to use Data Prep??

We have Workfront contributors that will view a monthly report that contains a proof link, where they can view a document proof. For these users, all User notification settings set to off. However, when they click to view the Document Proof, Workfront is adding them as a “Reviewer” to the Document Proof and automatically subscribing them to receive Daily Summaries for that project. We tested resolution by keeping them as Reviewer with Proof notification settings disable. However, next month when they view the report again, it auto-defaults to start sending Daily Summaries. This is an issue, as these particular users cannot get bogged down with the details within those daily summaries for each project, and we need to control this scenario to protect their inbox.Has anyone else experienced this and/or found a resolution? I saw a past post in Experience League, but it was marked as “resolved” due to inactivity on comments, but with no resolution.

I'm struggling to find an efficient way to debug Recommendations. With at.js, I used mboxTrace, which provided a very clear "Recs Box" showing exactly which criteria were used, which entities were returned, and why certain items were excluded.Now that I'm using Web SDK and the AEP Debugger, I find the debugging process much more difficult. I can see the network calls, but I miss that high-level summary of the Recommendations logic.What I've tried: Using the AEP Debugger Extension to look at Edge Traces. Digging through the interact response payloads in the Network tab. My Questions: Is there a way to get a visual "Recs box" similar to the old mboxTrace functionality in at.js? In the AEP Debugger, where exactly should I look to see the Criteria details and Exclusion reasons for a specific Recommendations activity? Are there any third-party tools or specific "Edge Trace" configurations that make the JSON output more readable for Recs-heavy implementations? How do you effectively

Hi ,We are working on profile capping in a recurring journey. Profile capping should also work on a recurring journey which means the counter should get reset to zero .But from the adobe documentation i came to know that , When profile cap is defined on a recurring journey, the counter does not reset after each recurrence.The counter applies only to the selected journey version. The counter resets to zero when the journey is duplicated or when a new version is created. After a reset, the entering profiles take the nominal path again until the counter limit is reached.So, is it possible to reset the counter so that in a recurring journey profile limit will work . ThanksUsha

I'm trying to retrieve Marketo assets (emails, forms, snippets, etc.) filtered by workspace. While the Folders API works for most assets using folder-based  filtering, I'm facing two issues: 1. Landing Page Templates: They don't appear in the folders API response and aren't folder-based. The /rest/asset/v1/landingPageTemplates.json?workSpace=<name>  parameter returns templates from all workspaces instead of filtering by the specified workspace.2. New Editor Assets: Folders with folderType: "Email Acrite" (New Email Editor) return "Invalid folder type" error (code 711) when queried via /rest/asset/v1/emails.json?folder={...}, even though these folders appear in the Folders API response. What's the correct approach to retrieve these assets filtered by workspace? Is there an alternative API endpoint or method I'm missing?  

Hello, I have a user who seems to have all-but-Admin rights to AEM Assets, and has access to Content Hub. He is however unable to share Collections. When he creates a Collection, the only option for who has access is “Only you and admins can view and edit”. He says he has previously been able to create a collection and give public access, but this was only to one Collection. We’ve not been using Content Hub for too long so not sure what I might be missing!Thank youLana 

Yelahanka has become a preferred choice for homebuyers seeking a modern lifestyle with peaceful surroundings in North Bangalore. The area is known for its planned development, wide roads, and green environment, which together support comfortable daily living. Residential growth in this region has been steady, driven by improved infrastructure, good connectivity, and rising demand from families and professionals. Buyers exploring upcoming projects in Yelahanka can find well planned developments that focus on quality construction, smart layouts, and long term value.New housing options in Yelahanka are designed to match current lifestyle needs, offering better ventilation, functional spaces, and essential amenities. Many new apartments in Yelahanka are part of gated communities that provide safety, open spaces, and community living benefits. These homes suit families looking for convenience, comfort, and easy access to schools, hospitals, and daily essentials.For buyers interested in inde

Hi all,we are registering API client ID’s in an api.yaml (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/open-api-based-apis) and deploy them with a config pipeline.The documentation describes that for secrets can be used placeholders (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/operations/config-pipeline) Something like shown here seems not to work: kind: "API"version: "1"data: allowedClientIDs: author: - "${{MY_AUTHOR_CLIENT_ID}}"We added the values as secrets with “Service Applied: All” in cloud manager configuration but it only works with specific values directly in the api.yaml.Do you know if this not supported kind: API?Best,Mark

Hi community,  We want to share details about a critical issue affecting AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 and AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 customers who perform offline compaction using oak-run.  --- What is happening  After running offline compaction via `oak-run compact` followed by two rounds of online garbage collection (GC), AEM instances were throwing SegmentNotFoundException (SNFE) and becoming inaccessible.  Who is affected  Customers on AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 or SP2 who have run offline compaction with an oak-run jar that does not include this fix. This was a blocker for all customers upgrading to AEM 6.5 LTS SP1/SP2.

Is it possible using custom form validation to only allow a particular field to be edited by only 2 users?I tried it on 1 user but it isn’t a valid expression. IF($USER!="609974980022b44f8ff9fc5e51b8516f", "You are not authorized to edit this field.") or maybeIF {$$USER}.{emailAddr} = "john.Doe@mscdirect.com", true)Any help is appreciated.  

When using the Target Admin API, I’m creating new JSON offers. My requests are returning a ‘201 Created’ response, but when looking at the Target UI, I’m not seeing the offers in the default workspace. I can confirm that the API has access to the correct workspaces, and response shows the offer created in workspace: default. The response also shows an OfferId that looks accurate.Additionally, some time has passed (>60 minutes), and no offer has appeared yet. Should the Offers be accessible from the Target UI after creation with the API?

Hi everyone - I’m building a task report for my team. Most of the fields I am referencing are related to the project and task however there are a few fields I need to reference from the converted request. I haven’t been able to figure out how to pull in the converted request reference number. The best I can do is the request name. I tried to see if I could pull it in by tweaking text mode but I’m still learning and don’t really know what I’m doing.  Any assitance or guidance is appreciated. 

I built a document report that includes the Current Version » Proof Decision field.  I added a filter to include only those documents where this decision field is not blank.In addition to the expected decision values--approved, approved with changes, changes required, pending--I’m also seeing a “-” value:  Does anyone know what exactly this “-” value reflects?  I don’t work a lot with proofs themselves (I’m just reporting on them), so I’m not sure what conditions might produce this value.The API Explorer just lists the field as a non-groupable string, but it doesn’t specify possible values.Thanks.

It is pretty straightforward when using first known or last known allocation with session expiration in Adobe CJA. It is less clear when a custom lookback window is used, because of both the forward and backward nature of these allocation types. Example, if a user had the following sequence, what would be the first and last known values assuming the followingDay = the date in January Chart date range is Jan 1 - Jan 31 Custom lookback window is 7 days for both the last known and first known properties.Day Value on Event First Known Last Known 1   C C 5 C C B 9 B C B 14   B A 18 A B A  Does custom lookback essentially work as custom look-forward for ‘last known’? Is the above correct?

how do i create a cohort segment for users who first came to the site on a specific date? SAy users who first came on 2 specific days in february. I want to know how often they return each month since then. (the date of my cohort would be from Feb until July)

I want to analyze the visitor journey from time of entry up until, and including, the point of conversion.Right now I have Visitor container where pageview exists THEN e3 (form conversion) exists.The conversion happened in visit 6. The issue I’m facing is that setting the segment to “Before sequence” only shows visits 1-5After Sequence shows the converting visit but everything after it which I don’t care about. How can I add logic to cap it at the point of conversion or the converting visit? 

If i delete a folder in Fusion with contents, doe everything get deleted, or doed the content get placed in uncategorized?

Has anyone else had any issue with their Condition Presets resetting back to nothing selected in the preset? Sometimes it happens in the source language and sometimes in one of the target languages, but not the others?When it happens in the source language, it had existed and the settings were saved, then a few months later it is zeroed out.

Hi all, I am relatively new to AEM. I apologize in advance for the long message. I am an admin/owner for our AEM account at my job. My question pertains to my users who aren’t admins themselves, specifically our design team. They are currently uploading folders from their computers to a specific folder in AEM and we need for them to be able to add an existing metadata profile to that folder they uploaded so they can then enter the appropriate metadata info. Are there ways for users to do this, or do they need to be admins?I have created a custom folder metadata profile in Tools > Folder Metadata Schemas. Through Folder Metadata Schema Forms I am able to select this custom profile I created and then apply it to any folder in our AEM space. When I ran some testing with one of my users, they were able to access Folder Metadata Schema Forms through Tools, however they didn’t have the ability to apply the schema to a folder (presumably because they aren’t admin level). Is there a way for

I have created the below config file and installed it into RDE:config/api.yamlkind: "API"version: "1.0"metadata:  envTypes: ["rde"]data:  allowedClientIDs:    author:      - "YOUR_APP_BUILDER_CLIENT_ID" This is working fine for Content fragment OpenAPI. However it seems to be throwing “IMS Client ID not allowlisted. Allowlist the Client ID using the Configuration Pipeline.” for  Sites/Pages Management API (/adobe/sites/sm/ and /adobe/sites/pm/). Is there any API specific configuration that needs to be installed?Thanks in advance!

I’m looking to send an automated email to anyone who fills out a form. I want the email to be sent 2 days later (but only during the week), and I don’t want internal employees to receive the automated email.In the smart list is the trigger “Fills out form”, and below is what I have for the flow steps. Is this the right setup (of course with my company’s email domain filled in)? Should I leave “Do nothing” for the choice 1 section?  

Hi All,I need a help/clarification on feedback webhook data storage. I have enabled webhook option in API triggered campaign and setup streaming HTTP API endpoint to store the feedback in AEP custom dataset. I’m using custom identity type as per my requirement for API triggered campaign.Below documentation shows the payload triggered after message execution.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/configuration/feedback-webhooks Since I used custom identity during Campaign setup, I understand the identityMap in the payload will contain the custom identity and not email. If so, how do I capture the additional information like email address - to which email is triggered to - and if it sends email only in that feedback payload, then how do I get it work to send the custom identity which is the profile identifier for me.The webhook is working and I see the feedback data in the custom dataset but it is populating with neither email identity nor custom identity. I t