Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hello, I was wondering if keeping Active Triggered Campaigns in the Archive folder requires deactivating them to enhance system performance, or if their presence there doesn't impact performance.Also, if deactivation is needed, is it manual as support said they cannot do bulk deactivation. Thank you
We have Cloudflare as CDN and the SSL cert is updated there. When I update the SSL cert in Cloud Manager Domain Mapping the cert status shows as deployed and go live button shows up. Since this is only updating the expired cert, DNS configure is not required, so I click on go live button and press on ok.The status doesnot change to verified. 1. Since the cert is already updated in Cloudflare, is it not required to update the cert in Cloud Manager?2. If it is required to also update the cert in cloud manager, how do I change the status from deployed to verified?
As of September 25, 2025, Adobe Admin Console (AAC) introduced support for IP-based Access Control . To ensure a smooth transition, Marketo Engage’s IP-based login restrictions have remained available, giving organizations time to adjust to the differences between the legacy feature and AAC’s new capabilities. The full transition to AAC was initially planned for completion by the end of Q1 2026. However, based on customer feedback, Adobe has extended support for the legacy feature and moved the transition target to the Q1 2027. This extension allows additional time to deliver enhancements in AAC that will provide stronger parity with the legacy experience. Please note that Marketo Engage's IP-Based API Access feature operates independently of Marketo Engage’s IP-based login restrictions that are being replaced by Admin Console’s IP-based access control. It will continue to function as-is for a foreseeable future. For questions, please contact Adobe Support or your Adobe account team.
I need to get the active users per day/month
Hi all, I wanted to ask the community if there are more efficient ways to test mobile apps using Adobe tools. Currently, we’re using Adobe Experience Platform Assurance to test on physical devices. While the tool is helpful for real-time validation, I’ve found the process to be quite slow—mainly because exporting the JSON payload for a session produces output that’s difficult to read or share with stakeholders. As a result, we’ve been manually screenshotting each event to evidence that page names, eVars, and other parameters are set correctly. This approach is time-consuming and not scalable. Is there a better way to evidence test data—either within Assurance or using complementary tools or workflows outside of it? Any suggestions or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
We're excited to unveil our most prestigious annual recognition - the Adobe Champion Program class of 2025-2026! This celebration honors expert practitioners worldwide, showcasing a diverse community of thought leaders who inspire innovation across our ecosystem. The Adobe Champion Impact Adobe Champions transcend product expertise to become true change catalysts. Our program provides exclusive opportunities to collaborate directly with product teams, shaping application futures while building global connections with fellow experts through knowledge-sharing and thought leadership initiatives. 2025-26 Program Expansion Achieving Adobe Champion status represents exceptional achievement, with record applicant numbers making selection increasingly competitive. Our expert judging panel carefully evaluates candidates for this prestigious recognition. This year marks our grandest expansion, adding three additional program classes to create our most comprehensive Adobe Champion c
Description : When large values are shown as long strings of digits it slows comprehension and increases the chance of misreading. Replacing long zeros with readable units like 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 and 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 for counts and 𝗠𝗕 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 for data size will make licence pages clearer and faster to use. Why is this feature important to you :𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 ✅Teams must validate entitlements at a glance during renewals audits and governance checks. Human eyes scan better with semantic units like 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 and 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 rather than counting zeros. This reduces review time supports accurate decisions and improves confidence across stakeholders 📊 How would you like the feature to work :Display large counts using compact units 𝗸 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 with hover or tap to reveal the exact numberShow data size using 𝗠𝗕 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 and allow switching to bytes when neededP
so I have a javax.servlet.filter class that does a lot of things. one of the first things it does is change the value of a cookie (example: cookieX was originally set to "ABC" and I changed it to "ABC,DEF"). Before the browser gets a response (the filter has completed already but a Sling model is running this time), another piece of code retrieves the value of cookieX and checks if "DEF" is in the cookie. When the cookie is retrieve via the request object, I still see the original value (which is "ABC") and not the new one.From what I can see, this is inherent to the nature of cookies? (that is the values will not change until the browser gets a response?)Is there a workaround/fix?Thank you.
Hey Adobe community, With AEM 6.5 heading towards End of Life (core support ends Feb 2027, extended support Feb 2028), a lot of us are asking: What’s next? Should we stick with Long-Term Support (LTS) or take the leap to AEM Cloud? Let’s dig into the real questions: Why Upgrade?Is it just about staying supported, or are there real benefits to moving forward? LTS vs. Cloud: Pros and ConsWhat’s working for you with LTS? What’s tempting about Cloud? Any pain points or unexpected wins? Who Should Go Where?Are there certain teams, industries, or use cases that make more sense for LTS or Cloud? How do you decide? End-State Business ValueWhat does success look like after the upgrade or migration? How do you measure the impact on your business or clients? Share your experiences, opinions, and advice—whether you’re deep in migration planning or just starting to think about it. Let’s help each other figure out the smartest path forward!
Hello everyone,I'm experiencing an issue with the VEC in the new Adobe Target UI and was hoping someone in the community might have a solution.When I try to edit an existing experience that is part of an activity with multiple experiences, the VEC gets stuck on an infinite loading screen with the message "Applying initial modifications," as shown in the attached screenshot.This issue seems to be specific to editing existing experiences. If I create a brand new activity, the VEC loads correctly. The problem only occurs when I go back into an activity to modify a specific experience.So far, I have tried the following troubleshooting steps without any success:Switching browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge).Using incognito/private browsing mode.Testing on different computers.Using different user accounts.The problem persists across all these scenarios, which suggests it might not be a local environment issue.Has anyone else run into this specific problem with the new UI? Is there a known bug or
So I am trying to standardize the way my company is trying to ready ab test results. The main question I want to know is: Do we read the overall significance OR the % given at the target experience level? 66% or 93% ?
I can successfully create a comment (as seen in Workfront UI Updates section) of an Issue with this REST API call using v20```curl --location 'https://SUBDOMAIN.workfront.com/attask/api/v20.0/note' \--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \--header 'Authorization: ••••••' \--data '{"objID": "68d2c7fe00911872fc05f2e559650090","objCode": "NOTE","html": "Hello <b>World</b> from Postman JSON 1","noteText": "Hello Plain from Postman JSON 1","noteObjCode": "OPTASK","json": "{}"}'``` The problem is updating a comment (with or without a nested comment). I can only update the plain text noteText, the HTML is not overwritten. Since Adobe Workfront UI only displays the HTML comment this update is not displaying!! ```curl --location --request PUT 'https://SUBDOMAIN.workfront.com/attask/api/v20.0/note/68d43bd6004d01abe8f85c5726e94108' \--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \--header 'Authorization: ••••••' \--data '{"objID": "68d2c7fe00911872fc05f2e559650090","objCode":
Description - Option to Customize Template when Converting Issue from a Template (and when creating a Project from a Template)Why is this feature important to you - This allows for flexibility on having more generic templates and minimizing the number of Templates to maintainHow would you like the feature to work - Just like it happens when a Template is attached after Project creationCurrent Behaviour - Customization only happens after project creation, but not during Project Creation from Template or Issue conversion
With another system outage/major access problems this morning, I'm going to start the conversation with our procurement team about how to get $$ back from Adobe given all the downtime and lost productivity that these problems have caused teams at my organization. I've been a system admin for Workfront for close to five years, and have never experienced as much inconsistency with access than I have in the last 6 months. Have others been successful in recuping money given actual down time being more than what the contract states we can tolerate?
Migrating from 6.5 to cloud and ran Analyzer for dispatcher module and committed suggested changes Used below command and added missing immutable files as welldocker_immutability_check.cmd srcAble to deploy dispatcher in local docker instance successfully, but when we try to deploy using adobe webtier dispatcher pipeline getting below error Cloud manager validator 2.0.89 2025/09/24 04:01:01 The following warnings were found: Did not find ServerAlias '*.adobeaemcloud.net' in any vhost file Did not find ServerAlias '*.adobeaemcloud.com' in any vhost file 2025/09/24 04:01:01 The following suggestions are proposed: /tmp/dispatcher/unzippedConfiguration/conf.d/enabled_vhosts/companybrand.vhost: file is not a symlink, all files inside "enabled_vhosts" and "enabled_farms" should be symlinks /tmp/dispatcher/unzippedConfiguration/conf.dispatcher.d/enabled_farms/companybrand.farm: file is not a symlink, all files inside "enabled_vhosts" and "enabled_farms" shou
I am really looking forward to the Adobe Analytics Challenge 2025 and noticed that the official calendar has already posted the following dates:Kickoff Call: September 16, 2025Submission Opens: September 16, 2025Submission Deadline: October 7, 2025Champions Announced: October 23, 2025Champions Event: November 10 & November 13, 2025One detail I could not find is when the registration window officially begins. Does anyone have any insight on whether registration has already opened, or when it will be available?
Hi, I am working on a task report and I want to remove tasks (filter them out) if the task has a specific predecessor on it. It filter seems to work well if the task has only 1 predecessor (the specific predecessor in question), but if the task has that specific predecessor and any additional predecessors, it is not filtering it out. I tried the below:predecessorsMM:name=Name of predecessor predecessorsMM:name_Mod=cinotcontains
In Workfront, the Templates we build for our teams tend to fall into two major categories. The first is the standard end-to-end workflow for every project type. These come pre-configured with many other settings/features to streamline creation and work management; standard folders, internal queue settings, custom forms etc. The second type of templates are setup as collections of ad-hoc tasks meant to be appended after a project is created for things that aren't done very often (custom legal approvals) or needed repetitively (extra client edit rounds). The second template has minimal additional features, expecting the project they'll be added into already including them. Inevitably, someone creates fully new projects from them by mistake, and this creates reporting discrepancies and trouble tickets later. I have long wished for a way to block creation of new projects from those templates, while still allowing the person to append the tasks when needed. With the implementa
Hello Team, Anyone has implemented OKTA integration with AEM running on AMS? I am fine with this configuration steps on Author: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/foundation/authentication/okta-saml-integrationBut, wanted to know about publish env. Sample scenario:End user has created account in Okta. Then, the user logs in to my AEM live site(consider AMS has multiple publish env.) How to maintain the server session in sync with all publish env? Note: This user is not an author. Will not get access to author env. cc @arunpatidar @aanchal-sikka @veenavikraman @sureshdhulipudi @lukasz-m Thanks in advance.
Getting Started with Adobe Real-Time CDP Collaboration Adobe Real-Time CDP Collaboration enables advertisers and publishers to safely and efficiently collaborate on audience data, powering more effective and privacy-centric marketing campaigns. If you're new to Real-Time CDP Collaboration, this guide will walk you through the first steps and provide helpful resource links so you can hit the ground running. 1. What is Real-Time CDP Collaboration?Real-Time CDP Collaboration is a platform that provides brands and publishers a secure environment to:Discover, activate, and measure high-value audiences,Collaborate with partners without exposing underlying customer data,Create joint marketing campaigns that deliver shared messages,And always operate with privacy best practices.Learn more about Real-Time CDP Collaboration’s capabilities and benefits in the official overview here. 2. Access and Permissions: The PrerequisiteBefore you can begin, system administrators must grant ap
I built a form having rows, where there is item numbers for each row such as 1 / 2 / 3 ... I use following to add a new instance: form1.Button.Button1::click - (FormCalc, client)Table1._Row1.addInstance(); I use following to delete the last instance: form1.Button.Button2::click - (FormCalc, client)var nCount = Table1.Row1.instanceManager.count ;//remove instanceTable1.Row1.instanceManager.removeInstance(nCount-1); Below script is to show row numbers at the first column. form1.Table1.Row1.ItemNo::enter - (FormCalc, client)var rowCount = this.parent.instanceManager.count;form1.Table1.Row1.ItemNo::calculate - (FormCalc, client)this.rawValue = this.parent.index + 1; these above works great; however lately I needed to delete a random instance which is not the last row using: form1.Table1.Row1.#subform[0].del_button::click - (JavaScript, client)_Row1.removeInstance(this.parent.parent.index); Now there is such a bug when I delete another inst
Hi team, I'm using Workfront for all my work. If any stakeholders mention a certain date in Workfront to follow up on, is there a way to set a reminder in Workfront to track that? Please let me know if you have any suggestions. Regards,Vino
Workfront is down for my team today, getting this message:An error occurred while processing your request.Reference #221.7abdb17.1754918151.2e772449https://errors.edgesuite.net/221.7abdb17.1754918151.2e772449
Hey guys! Quick question: How do I know what region is my instance located? I want to subscribe to the Marketo System Status, but I had no idea where is our instance/data center located.
Field Mapping between CRM (Salesforce) and Marketo currently remains in perpetuity, disabling the Marketo Admin's ability to remove (or merge) a field if it has ever been mapped to a Salesforce field. A client of mine was just informed on a support call that this field mapping cannot be deleted from Field Mapping, and once a Salesforce field has been mapped it must remain. Salesforce admins consistently over-permission fields to the Marketo Sync User, which creates incredible amounts of technical debt and sync backlog issues for Admins. Our current solution is to get our Salesforce admins to remove Field Level Security (FLS) permissions from within Salesforce, which addresses only part of the problem. However, we have no means in Marketo of removing the field association within Marketo Admin so that we can remove the technical debt (the field that was errantly created) on our side. Please allow Marketo Admins, either via Support or via a UI mechanism, to
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.