Product Communities

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce property to hide toolbar display in pdf viewer Use-case: We are using pdf viewer component in our application. By default we see tools are displaying with file name. This is appearing for both Desktop and Mobile devices. But we don't want to show these tools in our component and looking for property to make it hidden if required. Current/Experienced Behavior: Tools, icons and file name displaying by default Improved/Expected Behavior: Make it option to show or hide Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM on Cloud Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Automation mechanism within Developer Console or Adobe I/O Runtime Action to automatically renew the technical account certificate (Case E-001849802) Use-case: We are using the service credentials JSON to get bearer token from IMS and then send payload over to AEM Author. The key concern is how to maintain this as the certificate expires after 1 year. Currently, we see the manual provision of generating a new certificate and then manually updating the runtime action with the service credentials. This approach is rather manual and crude. We would appreciate a solution that could automate this. Current/Experienced Behavior: As of now, Adobe does not provide an automated mechanism within the Developer Console or Adobe I/O runtime to automatically renew the technical account’s certificate. This means that certificate rotation must be triggered manually via the Adobe Developer Console. Improved/Expected Behavior: The certificate

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a configuration (e.g., max.children.per.folder) that defines the maximum number of child nodes (assets or subfolders) allowed within a given folder. Use-case: AEM currently allows more than 1,000 assets (child nodes) to exist within a single folder. However, it’s well known that exceeding this threshold leads to significant performance degradation. To help our administrators effectively monitor and control within our environment, we request the addition of functionality that provides both preventive and diagnostic controls related to folder child limits. This request covers two main objectives: 1) Prevent Adding Assets Beyond a Configurable Folder Child Limit 2) Expose a Method to Identify Overpopulated Folders Current/Experienced Behavior: None Improved/Expected Behavior: Requested Enhancements1. Prevent Adding Assets Beyond a Configurable Folder Child Limit Introduce a configuration (e.g., max.children.per

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add back the search field to the cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload component  Use-case: Back in AEM 6.5 the fileupload had a search field that made it easier to pick assets in core components such as Image v3 or Page v3. Now it's not supported and the "fix" is to use other components that lack the comprehensive UI of fileupload Current/Experienced Behavior: When you click on Pick you don't get a search field, it just says "Select Path" and you have to manually go to the image's path (which is troublesome in folders with over 100 files) Improved/Expected Behavior: Instead of the header that says "Select Path" add the search like in the pathfield  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service.  Customer-name/Organization name: Teladoc Health Screenshot (if applicable):     Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a confirmation pop-up asking “Are you sure you want to stop the execution of the pipeline?” when deploying through Cloud Manager. Use-case: When deploying a pipeline through Adobe Cloud Manager, users can accidentally click the “Stop Execution” button instead of “Resume” during the deployment process. If this happens, the pipeline stops immediately without any confirmation, forcing the user to restart the deployment from the beginning.Although the package is reused and some steps can be skipped, this still causes unnecessary delays and confusion, especially in production environments. Adding a confirmation pop-up (e.g., “Are you sure you want to stop the execution of the pipeline?”) would prevent accidental interruptions and help ensure smoother, safer deployments. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, when a pipeline is running in Adobe Cloud Manager, the “Stop Execution” button can be clicked at any time during the deplo

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Combined asset upload and meta data import with spreadsheet (e.g. csv) in one step. Use-case: Mass uploading assets will be faster and easier when meta data can be added in one step. Current/Experienced Behavior: To mass upload assets and apply meta data, you need to upload the assets first, then click "Create" again to add meta data with the help of a spradsheet.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Combined mass upload dialog where you can upload the meta data spreadsheet AND the files in one step, e.g. drag/drop the meta data spreadsheet, then the files. When the assets are in the asset bank, all meta data is already there, no additional steps needed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets Customer-name/Organization name: HBK Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM Cloud UE, I want to update language copies or create structure. I want to be able to select particular languages without having to check all 33 languages first and then uncheck the ones that are not needed so that I can work efficiently and without wasting time.   Use-case: Select a page, go to the left  Current/Experienced Behavior: The language copy update dialogue only shows after selecting all 33 languages at once. If I want to work with (a) particular language(s) only, I need to uncheck all languages that are not needed.  Improved/Expected Behavior: After the language copy rail opened, I want to be able to check the language layer I want to update immediately, without having the need to select all 33 languages first and THEN select my language Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud, Universal Editor, EDS Customer-name/Organization name: SAP

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I'd like the possibility to add default environment variables for cloud manager pipelines. Those variables would available and up to date on any new pipeline execution.We would still be able to override those variables at pipeline level. Use-case: I'd like to setup default version of NODE for FE pipelines as well as some tokens for private npm registry. Current/Experienced Behavior: Env variables needs to be set for each FE pipelines. When a secret token expires, every pipelines need to be updated. Improved/Expected Behavior: Set some variables at program level, that are automatically assigned during pipeline build phase. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Danone Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM Guides Content Authors face the issue of not able to use UI in Author to insert the new Attribute Value, instead they have to go to source view to add it. However, to make it come in Author view, the only option Authors find is to add in Folder Profiles, Conditional Attribute which seems difficult for Authors to understand and follow, Is there a way Authors can create new Value as they do in Source in Author view itself. Currently how it is handled:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-guides/using/user-guide/map-management-publishing/output-gen/conditional-content/generate-output-conditional-attribute-profilinghttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-guides-learn/videos/advanced-user-guide/folder-profiles#edit-conditional-attributes-in-the-global-profile  Use-case: AEM Guides Content Authors face the issue of not able to use UI in Author to insert the new Attribute Value, instead

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Option to edit the comment of a particular version of the Page in AEM as Cloud Service in AEM SITES. Use-case: When trying to add comment for each version of a page, if done mistakenly, there is no option to update the comment OOTB. Current/Experienced Behavior: When trying to add comment for each version of a page, if done mistakenly, there is no option to update the comment OOTB. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide an option to update the comment OOTB. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager 2025.10.23122.20251023T134343Z-251000 AEM Guides 2025.10.0.278 Customer-name/Organization name: Sub-Zero and Wolf Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When using private GitHub repo for our AEM code on Cloud Manager it always triggers FS code quality pipeline, even if the repo is actually meant for FE pipeline. Use-case: Use private github repo in cloud manager for FE pipeline. Current/Experienced Behavior: For each pull request, a full stack code quality pipeline is created automatically. Improved/Expected Behavior: Add the possibility to disable that check when not relevant, in that case for FE only projects. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Danone Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Asset Selector Microfrontend - Rule-based hiding of Assets Use-case: AEM is used to manage and host the website. Assets are delivered from Publish.A 3rd party, external, customer-facing application uses AEM as delivery system for their assets.  The according backoffice application uses the MFE to select assets.    Users of the 3rd party application must not see or select assets that are in a certain state (e.g. have not been published or approved or are expired or ...). Otherwise the app would store references that have not been approved (in this case "published") and cannot be served from Publish.IMPORTANT NOTE:"Hiding assets" is not the same as filtering for assets (which can be configured): "Filtering" always triggers a search, i.e. it would display all assets of the current and _all subfolders_. Also, this is a user action. "Hiding" in turn would a) not be a user action, but configured by the adminis

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Asset Selector Microfrontend MFE: Make Status field Configurable to display publication status Use-case: The Status indicator on the MFE seems to have been designed for an Assets-only installation, and with the new Asset view in mind, only.    On Enterprise installations, i.e. where one has an Author and a Publish system, tasks and the approval status are rarely used. Instead user would "publish" an asset, which implicitly means "approved" (otherwise why would you publish).Use Case: AEM is used to manage and host the website. Assets are delivered from Publish.,A 3rd party, external, customer-facing application uses AEM as delivery system for their assets.  The according backoffice application uses the MFE to select assets.    This application  needs to know which assets have been published. Otherwise it would store path references that have not been approved (in this case "published") and cannot be

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The "Assign to" selection dropdown menu within the AEM Guides review process does not filter results when a user's name is typed into the field. This requires users to manually scroll through the entire list to find and select a name.This issue significantly hinders workflow efficiency, especially in projects with a large number of registered users, making the process time-consuming and prone to selection errors.Steps to ReproduceNavigate to the AEM Guides interface and select content for review.Initiate a review process (Menu -> "Create Review Task").Click on the "Assign to" dropdown field.Begin typing the name of a known user into the field.Feature Request:Implement a type-ahead search or filter functionality for the user selection dropdown menu to allow for quick and efficient searching. Use-case: Ease of functionality Current/Experienced Behavior: Typing into the field has no effect on the list. The full, unfiltered list of u

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently when reprocessing assets, a popup displays and informs the users that they will be notified when their async job finishes. However, no notification is sent. Use-case: Content authors should be notified of successful job completions, especially if they are told they will receive a notification. Current/Experienced Behavior: Popup says a notification will be sent when the async job completes. No notification is sent. Improved/Expected Behavior: Popup says a notification will be send when the async job completes. Notification is sent. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM cloud  Customer-name/Organization name: Netjets Screenshot (if applicable):     Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In CloudManager label menu item "View current execution" when the execution is running Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: In CloudManager when the execution is running, the label in menu item says "View last execution" - this is semantically wrong/confusing.  Improved/Expected Behavior:  Current/Experienced Behavior: In CloudManager when the execution is running, the label in menu item says "View current execution"  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): latest Customer-name/Organization name: any Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: CloudManager: Status: Failed Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: In CloudManage, when the last pipeline execution failed, the status is "Running".  Improved/Expected Behavior: In CloudManager in the dashboard and on the Pipeline view, show Status: Failed when the last execution failed (as do other CICD systems)  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): any Customer-name/Organization name: any Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable): n/a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Migrate Content Hub configurations like Search Filters and Asset Metadata details across environments Use-case: Setting up of Content hub across program Current/Experienced Behavior: Need to configure all the settings including setting up of several custom search filters and asset metadata mappings manually across all environments.   Improved/Expected Behavior: Need a self service way to import and export configurations for each environment or a mechanism to migrate the configurations from one environment to the other.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   2025.10.22943.20251009T135918Z Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott  Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Improve multilingual content management in AEM by enabling a single content fragment to support multiple languages/locales through a tabbed or variant-based interface. Use-case: Our content authors manage over 500,000 content fragments across 12 languages. Currently, each language requires a separate content fragment, resulting in significant manual effort and complexity when performing routine tasks such as updates, moves, deletions, and publishing. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM requires a separate content fragment for each language or locale. Authors must manually replicate actions (e.g., move, update, unpublish, delete) across all language versions. Shared fields must be updated individually in each of the 12 language-specific fragments. This leads to a high risk of inconsistency, increased maintenance overhead, and a time-consuming authoring experience. Improved/Expected Behavior: Enable a single content fragment to

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The Preview environment should be in Sync with the Publisher, to be able to preview the changes and see only the needed modifications. At the moment, AEMaaCS relies on the publishers to replicate the changes to both environments (Preview and Publish) this could lead into errors, leaving the Preview environment out of sync and breaking the purpose of it. The request is to have a service running that triggers replication to the Preview environment as soon as one page gets published. Use-case: Improve usability of Preview instance since the publishers will see only the content modified Current/Experienced Behavior: The Preview and Publish instances relies on manual user input to be in sync (publish twice) Improved/Expected Behavior: Preview and Publish should be updated at the same time during replication Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM SDK 2025.10.22943.20251009T135918Z

  Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently, Cloud Manager and Splunk dashboards do not provide visibility into leader pod restarts in AEM as a Cloud Service environments. Identifying when and why a leader pod restarts is essential for understanding system stability and troubleshooting potential performance or replication issues. Having this visibility directly in Cloud Manager (or accessible via Splunk logs) would help operations and development teams proactively monitor environment health, correlate incidents, and improve root-cause analysis without needing Adobe support intervention. Use-case: Leader pod restarts can affect replication, workflows, or cache invalidation, but currently there is no easy way for customers to detect or audit these events. Providing this visibility would reduce investigation time during incidents, enhance transparency, and empower teams to maintain stable AEM Cloud environments. Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no visibi

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Added configurability for retaining applied filters when a user navigates away from a page where there are filters applied. Use-case: Improved user experience, greater levels of control/customisation over our environment. Current/Experienced Behavior: As a user on Asset UI/AEMaaCS/AEM Assets, when I apply filters for a search and navigate away from the page with filters applied and return to the search, the filters are cleared. This means that I have to reapply the filters to return the same search. Improved/Expected Behavior: I want the filters to remain applied so that I do not have to add the filters again. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Asset UI/AEMaaCS/AEM Assets Customer-name/Organization name: NatWest Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:  Cloud Manager: Move Pipeline Configuration from "Source" to "Configuration" tab.  Use-case: Configuring Pipelines Current/Experienced Behavior: Configurations are distributed randomly in unrelated tabs, Improved/Expected Behavior: The Pipeline Configuration is not related to the source code repository. Thus it is more intuitive to place it under  the "Configuration" tab rather then "Source". Even better would be to divide the tabs as  - General - Behavior - Source - Test and Experience Audit Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): CloudManager / all Customer-name/Organization name: all Screenshot (if applicable):     Code package (if applicable): n/a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Offer an option to disable the new Assets UI Use-case: Our users work in AEM and are used utilize the  AEM UI also to upload assets to AEM Assets Console. The new Assets UI should not be used as as e.g. important custom validation of file names or folders that we have implement as customizations are not effective. Current/Experienced Behavior: As new Assets UI is completely decoupled from AEM UI for Assets console, custom validations on file and folder names are not effective. Therefore unwanted file names and folder patterns are possible to create. Improved/Expected Behavior: We as a customer want to control if and when our users could see/use the new Assets UI.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Environment configuration copy between the environments. Example: Stage to Development Use-case: We have two Development environment and on a requirement basis we would like to have the similar configuration between the environments. Current/Experienced Behavior: We cannot copy the configurations between the environments Improved/Expected Behavior: Similar to content copy feature, having this configurations copy will be added benefit Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: McAfee Screenshot (if applicable): Ticket No: E-001871093 Code package (if applicable): Ticket No: E-001871093