Currently, my reporting philosophy is to have fewer reports and allow them to be modified and filtered through pre-defined sets of Filters, Views, and Groupings. This allows us to have only a few reports of each type to track and maintain. To clarify:If I have one project report with 10 pre-defined ...
The relatively new text field with formatting is fabulous, but the fact that we can't convert existing text fields (paragraph field in particular) is preventing me from using this field, we have a handful of key fields that are on hundreds of projects that I want to migrate to this, but can't withou...
1 - I'm seeing all these weird duplicates in Proof that have to be cleaned up. There is some notice about duplicate problem being fixed last week, but no other information.2 - People aren't getting their notifications when they are tagged, sometimes yes, sometimes no, inconsistent.3 - The T tool sto...
My company is utilizing HTML5 banners and other interactive elements more and more these days, so I was curious if anyone knew of an easier way to proof interactive elements outside of the ZIP function? It can be a bit tedious at times, so I'm hoping for a simpler process if possible. Thank you!
I have a workflow what should the proof owners, role be set toI have tried a number of options with no differenceif he is set to Author, or moderator or reviewer & Approver he still gets a task to make a decision on the proof he has just uploadedAny help appreciated
Is it possible for me to create a report to show me information across several custom fields that all have a yes/no possible response? See screenshot - I created a Task Report, where for 5 locations we can answer yes/no for each day... I want to somehow aggregate that yes/no data for an exception re...
M-F days CT, Full Time, Contract work until late summer or early Fall. 100%remote. Looking for a seasoned creative project manager, fluent in WF and able to manage all types of creative promotions; emails, print projects large and small, web, social, ads, video, podcasts, etc. Must be a self sta...