Adobe Workfront

Hi - my users got a pop-up recently that shows the following:Support Ending for Intel-based AppsThis version of “Workfront Proof” will not open in a future release of macOS. Learn how to update to an Apple silicon version.  Will Adobe be updating Workfront Proof to ensure we can continue using the app?If yes, has Adobe shared timelines or any other info?Appreciate any knowledge that is shared. Thank you!

Yesterday we started seeing a new message when making comments/updates in requests and projects.  The message we’re getting is ‘This comment can’t be saved because it’s formatted content is too large’.  Is anyone else getting this message? We know this is new because we use the same script with some clients, and the script used to be able to be pasted in full.  Now we have to break it into two chunks. Why are they adding random limitations like this off-schedule?  We’re just trying to work, and this doesn’t help at all.    

Welcome to the second edition of the Workfront Wire!   This is your new monthly roundup built just for Workfront customers. Think of this as your one-stop-shop for the latest news, updates, events, and everything happening across the Workfront world. Each month, we’ll bring you what’s new, what’s next, and what you should know to get the most out of Workfront, without having to dig for it. Let’s get into it and be sure to check back next month for another edition of the Wire.  Roadmap Webinar: See What’s Next for Workfront on June 4  The Adobe CX Enterprise Roadmap bi-annual webinar series is here! This is your best opportunity to learn about the future of Workfront (and other Adobe solutions) and ask questions in real time with the team building it out.  Join the Adobe Workfront Product Marketing team for an inside look at how AI is shaping the next chapter of Workfront. In this 60-minute live session, you’ll see how upcoming capabilities like Workflow Optimization Agent, AI Collabora

We're currently using a request queue that creates issues by default. Our team then works with tasks, so we end up with both issues and tasks in our projects. This is causing confusion.Ideally, we'd like requests to come in as tasks only — no issues at all. We want to keep things simple and have one object type for the team to work from.I know routing rules can auto-convert issues to tasks, but the original issue still remains. Is there a way to either:Have the request queue create tasks directly, skipping issues entirely?Or is there another approach anyone has found that achieves a "tasks only" experience?

Hi everyone, this question is pretty simple yet pretty vague. I have noticed there is already a question (https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-discussions/workfront-planning-what-are-your-use-cases/m-p/776086#M4732 ) connected to the topic but would like to ask it and have it in a single place. Question is: what are some recommendations, and what are limitations that you have noticed while implementing Workfront Planning? Any input is appreciated.  Best regards,Ivan

Join Senior Product Manager, @Lilit Mkrtchyan for this deep dive into one of the most impactful innovations in Workfront Planning: Global Record Types. This session walks through how global record types enable you to standardize key data structures across workspaces while still supporting the unique needs of individual teams. If you weren’t able to attend live — or want to revisit any part of the session — you can access everything below: Intro Slide Deck with Resources & Event Links Lilit’s Slides Webinar Recording One of the requests we discussed was gaining access to the companion spreadsheets that support the Adobe Summit - Marketing Planning and Metadata Strategy Lab. We’ve attached them as links below:Taxonomies ActivitiesAs Lilit mentioned during the session, we’d love to keep the conversation going here in the community. What questions do you still have?  Are there any use cases you'd like to explore further?  What features are you most excited about? Drop your thoughts, fo

I’m looking for suggestions for validating an issue property against a list of valid values in Fusion.  I considered importing the valid list from a CSV file, but I haven’t been able to determine how to compare the property value to the list and confirm that it is valid.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

I’m parsing a downloaded CSV like I have done many times before but for this scenario I am getting bad encoding.  Any ideas what could be wrong?     

Hello, Hopefully a simple question but I am curious the most efficient way to make the elements from a collection within an array ‘mappable’. Say I have an array such as this: What is the most efficient way to map specific elements in a collection? Additionally, in a collection number that I also specify (in this case, #1). I am looking to filter later in the scenario based on these fields.  

I just created a report and shared access to it with two other (non-admin) users.  One user can view the report data without any trouble, but when the second user views it, the report just reads “no data to display.” I logged in as the second user and was able to reproduce the problem.  Has anyone else seen this issue?  I checked that user’s license and access level and don’t see anything unusual.  I also don’t see any filters applied in the report view when logged in as the second user.  I removed the user’s access and the regranted it, but the problem persists.

The previous version of the community page included a score bar displaying progress toward the next level. Following the UI update, this information no longer appears to be visible.Could you advise whether there is an alternative way to track current level progress and the points required to reach the next level?

Our migration experience has been challenging to say the least. Our assigned techs have tried their best to get everyone on the same page but we’ve had gaps in getting back to us over the past few months. We recently were told all users of the cloud have to backup their data before we migrate. We asked for directions to send out to our users and Adobe does not have any we are told. Support keeps kicking us back to our techs for the answer and our techs tells us to contact support...you get the idea. We’re 11 business days until Adobe will ‘force migrate’ us regardless if we’re ready. Any idea what happens when that happens? Trying to be positive but we’re on a three day streak of non-response to questions. I want to provide our almost 7K end users the best heads up on what is needed to be done in advance. Christina

Recently some of our documents attached to projects are giving an AWS error when opened.  This seems to be happening with issues that are converted to projects with fusion (convert to project module).  We have Preserve Issue noted so the document attaches automatically to the new project.  The attachment is fine on the request but corrupt on the project. I have a support ticket in but haven’t been able to resolve.  Anyone else running into this issue?

Has anyone been experiencing an issue where a (Proof HQ) stage deadline is removed from an automated proof after it has started? We have seen it sporadically over the past couple of months, but is hard to reproduce for me to place a ticket.Any insight into a cause or a possible solution would be appreciated.Thanks,

Now that we have to use the unified approval process, we are struggling with some aspects of the proofing approval process and workflow. Is there any training available for users? We would just like to understand how it works a little better. Example challenges:Stages moving forward based on due date vs. decisions Unable to delete stages or approvers in a stage  Automatic notifications going to approvers or reviewers 

I'm receiving an error when uploading documents. (Failed to upload file)This is happening to my zip file that is 1.77 GBI never used to get errors like this but for about the last month have been having this happen all the time.