Adobe Workfront

When subtasks have multiple assignees by role type, and the bulk edit tool is used to swap out a role for a name, it now removes an additional role types on those subtasks.Example attached - all subtasks with Digital Customer Experience are selected, edited to change for a name, but the subtasks that had multiple assignees (200, 202 & 203) have removed the other team despite ‘Remove all exisiting assignees’ not being checked on the edit screen.This has been the case since the new edit view was implemented. It has added considerable time to assigning projects, with lots of manual additions on individual lines being required where bulk assigning used to suffice. 

Hi all,  Has anyone experienced difficulties bringing non federated IDs, or IDs that are federated under a different organisation, into their admin console?We manage Workfront within our own admin console, but our parent company federates email addresses at the enterprise level. We now need to onboard additional users from a smaller company that also sits within our organisation, whose email addresses are not yet federated, and we are unsure what challenges this might create when trying to add them to our console.

Is there a way in Workfront to have one report subscription e-mail contain more than one report?Thanks.Brent

Hello all,We have several Request Queue Templates that our groups use to embed requests in their projects. These are configured to use the same routing rules as the corresponding “actual” Request Queues.However, none of the embedded requests are visible in the users’ Requests tab or in their Requests widget, even though the regular submitted requests from the main queues show up as expected.I’ve tried to find documentation of this or others in the community encountering the same issue with no luck.Is this a known/temporary issue tied to the new experience, or does this sound like a configuration problem/bug that warrants a Support ticket?Thank you for you input.

Hello,Is it possible to add the marked field as a column in any report? 

Hello,I have System Admin access, and I can see many projects that were not created by my group.Is it possible to make only the projects created by my group visible to me?Note: The unwanted projects are visible even though my ID was not added, and the project sharing option is set to "Only invited people can access."

Wondering if anyone has found a way / best practices to tie in the data from the Planning Record types to the Cards on Kanban boards.Would be great to configure Boards by Workspace, ability to see the name of the Campaign Or Initiative the task is related for starters.

Anybody know why a job from 2024 is showing up suddenly on my CMO’s approval list? To solve the mystery, I checked the filters in our Pending Approval Requests by Due Date report and would love to know how to exclude non-current proof versions.  Thank you!Jenny Williams

I want to create interactive proof using the URLs hosted under a website. Because proof hq is not allowing to view it since it says connection error.  what configuration should i do for that?Will allowlisting of specific urls help?

Hello, I was wondering, is there any way to combine/sum f few expense types and display that sum as a wedge in a piechart. I need to sum up a few different expense types and show those against one different expense type. So 2 wedges in a piechart, one of them is ths sum of a few expense types and the other is just one.

Hi all!I know this will probably get the standard response that nested lists cannot pull data in a specific order, but asking anyhow😅I’m pulling child tasks as a nested list like this:displayname=Child Taskslistdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(children).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=CONCAT({taskNumber},". ",{name}," (",{status},")")valueformat=HTML… can I then add something that sorts it alphabetically? I assume not, because I haven’t been able to find anything, but here’s hoping!TYIA!

 Turn Workfront data into polished, stakeholder-ready deliverables!  Hosted in partnership with Brian Haight and Pete Worth of Adobe Professional Services, this session focused how to use Workfront Fusion to pull existing data and automatically generate branded, templatized PDFs that can be attached directly to Workfront objects and shared with stakeholders - no manual copy-paste required. They walked through real-world use cases and best practices, so you can start automating with confidence.  Watch the on-demand recording HERE, download a copy of the slide deck HERE, and the.zip file shared during the session HERE.   Don't forget to connect with the Experience League Fusion Community, where other customers share their Fusion use cases and advice.  Be sure to check the Events page on Experience League for more sessions coming soon! 

Hi everyone,we have a client who wants a pie chart showing the breakdown of projects by one single-select field and multi-select dropdown field. Single-select field is straightforward. However, a multiselect field is a challenege as I can't use it for grouping in the chart.Has anyone dealt with a situation where a client wants to display report data based on a multiselect field?Your inputs are much appreciated!Best,Sara

Hi. I am unable to change or view the icons in my report's column cells. Although I added column rules to display specific colored icons when I select a particular option, the icons are not appearing. This may be due to an error in the column rules.

Hi everyone,We are currently having an issue with our dynamic boards where when we add a card from the board view, it defaults the date to the project start date. It will default it even if we have the date correct when we input the card - when we refresh it refreshes the date to the project start date. Obviously this is an issue. Has any one had a similar issue? If so, how did you fix it? Thanks!Sabrina

Hi WF Community!I’m looking to add red highlighting to values in a project’s task list, under the Planned Completion Date column, when the date is less than $$NOW and the task’s Status is not equal to “Complete”. I was working with leftmethod in text mode on the Planned Completion Date column, but still not getting the result I need.  Here’s my text mode: displayname=Planned Completion Datelinkedname=directnamekey=plannedCompletionDatequerysort=plannedCompletionDatetextmode=truevaluefield=plannedCompletionDatevalueformat=atDatestyledef.case.0.comparison.icon=falsestyledef.case.0.comparison.leftmethod=AND(({plannedCompletionDate}<$$NOW),({status}!=”CPL”))styledef.case.0.comparison.lefttext=truestyledef.case.0.comparison.operator=equalstyledef.case.0.comparison.operatortype=stringstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.name=bgcolorstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.value=eac6c9styledef.case.0.comparison.truetext= Anyone know where I might be going astray?  Thanks!Nick

I have a proof report that shows me everything I need except the planned routing due date. I have the field attached to all of our issues and projects, but I can’t find a way to get it to show on the report. Anyone have an idea how to do it?

I would find a great deal of value in a webinar/Q&A session with Adobe Product Managers tailored to understanding the pivot from the standard Proofing experience to the Unified Approvals experience. Seems to be a wide range of considerations and no hard deadlines on some required changes, but documentation seems “thin” and some of these changes need measurable documentation and process re-training in my organization. There is even documentation on how to use Unified Approvals and Proofing together https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/review-and-approve-work/document-reviews-and-approvals/manage-asset-review-and-approval/doc-approvals-and-proofing but not much that speaks to when existing Proofing functionality would be phased out completely. Can this type of information event be prioritized by the Workfront team? 

Hey hey Workfronters!I’m working on bringing a new team into Workfront and need your advice/expertise. What’s the best way to set up a task with a varying duration?For example: Task A has a fixed date. Task C has a fixed date. Task B needs to start on Task A’s due date and finish on Task C’s start date. The duration will flux as the fixed dates are edited. I’ve tried various predecessors and duration types but nothing is quite giving me what I need. 

I’m trying to identify Standard access users who are not involved as Assignee to any object except issue and Approval process and who haven't changed any object status.Goal:If a user with Standard access has never performed a Task or Project status change or not been an assignee (excluding comments, document uploads, or approvals), we’re considering moving them to a Light/Contributor license.

Hello,I have listed for my understanding from the “Mark as done” behavior. Please advice, it’s correct?“Work on It” and “Mark as Done” options are visible only to users with a Standard access-level license. These options cannot be configured at the access-level or individual user level; they can be configured only at the team level. Example:Arunachalam has a Standard access license, so she can see both options. However, when he clicks “Work on It” or “Mark as Done,” the task status does not change because the option values are not set or configurable at the individual user level.When the same user is added to a team where these options are configured, and that team is assigned to a task, the options will be visible and clicking them will update the task status based on the team-level configuration.