Product Communities

Hi Everyone,We are currently developing sample components for the AEM Universal Editor. While editing works as expected on local using a local universal editor service, we are encountering issues on the Dev environment when switching to the Global Adobe-managed service endpoint.Specifically, we are seeing timeout and CORS errors related to the Universal Service, preventing the component from being configured. Since we are on AEM 6.5.23.we added all the domain in the cors policy configuration still we got the error.Has anyone successfully configured the global endpoint for AEM 6.5 ? Any insights would be appreciated.below is the tag added in the head.html<meta name="urn:adobe:aue:config:service" content="https://universal-editor-service.adobe.io"> ---pointing to globalfor local <meta name="urn:adobe:aue:config:service" content="https://localhost:8080"> ---pointing to local

We have a workflow that incorporates multiple rounds of reviews as tasks. We are trying to automate the closure of these tasks when rounds aren’t needed and approvals are obtained earlier than what we planned for. What I’m struggling with is the Parent Task status. Since the projects are set for the parent tasks to be a summary of the child tasks, when the child tasks are closed (status of not needed which equates with complete) the parent task is updated to Complete, which is ultimately fine but not the preference. We’d like it to update to “not needed,” which equates with Complete. Is there a way to edit this task status via Fusion? I’ve tried with a basic scenario without success, but not sure if there is any other option.  

I'm looking for suggestions on how to handle the 10TB of assets from a vendor base to AEMaaCS. As the data is huge and confidential, no feasibility to involve any 3rd parties like tools/http calls etc. It should be cloud(like AWS/AZURE/GCP etc) to cloud(AEMaaCS). Please share inputs if anyone handled such use-cases or in and around the same, would be very much appreciated.

Hi - I’m trying to create a report that lumps together project/task logged hours vs all other time. Our project and task time is under the preset hour type of general so I can’t use that to build the report. I basically want to see a pie chart with 1 color lumping project/task time together and the other color references all other logged hours (general, sick, corp meetings, etc).  Any ideas?

Is there a way in Workfront to have one report subscription e-mail contain more than one report?Thanks.Brent

I have multiple resources that have multiple roles within our organization.  The resources are setup with three separate roles within the user settings, but when I try to report on the actual or planned hours per each specific role, the report is only returning the primary role.  In addition, when assigning these users to the job role within the project, I am not getting a drop down list.  Has anyone run into this before and do you have any suggestions on accurate reporting per job role?Thanks!Sue

Hi,I’m trying to attach a template to the project, and when I’m doing it via Web interface it attaches template and all templates tasks. But when I’m using API, it assigns a template but doesn’t create tasks from the template. .../attask/api/v21.0/proj/{PROJECT_ID}/attachTemplate body -  {"templateID": "***"} I’ve tried a lot of variations for body, with "options": [], without, with "excludeTemplateTaskIDs": [] and without. Nothing helped. Is it possible to attach a template to the project and trigger template’s task creation?Thank you.

Hi everyone,I created a Customer AI instance where the goal is set to a specific event type. When I try to run the instance, it fails with the following error:Error Code: VALIDATION-400 NOT_ENOUGH_OBJECTIVERequire at least 50 users with qualifying events to build a model.I already have more than 50 users meeting the qualifying event criteria, but the instance is still not generating scores.Could someone please clarify what the actual minimum number of users required is to successfully generate scores? Also, are there any additional constraints or thresholds (such as training window requirements or minimum events per user) that must be met?Thanks in advance!

Hey, I’d have a need to exclude some attributes going from the hub to edge (profile). Suggested approach is to use data governance labels (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/data-governance/labels/reference). None of the ootb labels seem to be related to the edge case specifically. Anyone who have done this exercise and would know what labels to use?Attributes should still be usable for personalization cases that rely on data in the hub.

HIGH PRIORITY: Blocker – CASDK-0005 Error in Marketo. Dear Adobe Support Team, I hope you are doing well. We are currently experiencing a critical blocker issue related to Marketo API’s . We request your urgent assistance. Marketo Instance Details:Munchkin ID: 186-DAI-284 We are encountering error code CASDK-0005, and the following error appears in the logs: java.io.FileNotFoundException: https://developer.adobe.com/marketo-apis/swagger-mapi.json It appears that the adapter is attempting to access the above Swagger endpoint, which is no longer accessible. However, we were unable to locate the currently supported Swagger URL in the Adobe Experience League documentation. Could you please provide:1. The correct and currently supported Swagger JSON URL for the Marketo MAPI APIs2. Confirmation whether the below Swagger reference is the appropriate and supported file to use: Document: https://developer.adobe.com/marketo-apis/api/mapi#tag/ActivitiesSwagger URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.c

Greetings, I would like to create conditional loop behavior in my AEM workflow.  I have found two possible implementations in the documentation, but am having trouble getting either to work. The first method would be to use the built in 'GoTo' step.  However, I want the loop to execute conditionally based upon the value of a variable that must be calculated on the server.  My idea was to generate this value in a custom workflow process immediately before the 'GoTo' step and then pass the value to the 'GoTo'.  However, I have been unable to find a way to successfully pass the variable such that it will be visible in the 'GoTo' step's ECMA script.  Please let me know if there is a way to do this. The second method is to use the com.adobe.granite.workflow.exec.Route API.  When attempting to use this however, the workflow steps do no execute in the order I expected.  Consider the following workflow diagram:  Under my test cas

I am using AEM 6.5 (Cloud SDK) with the old Content Fragment editor view.In my Content Fragment Model, I configured a Fragment Reference field with the following settings: Render As: Multiple Field Min Number of Items: 2 Max Number of Items: 4 However, when I create a Content Fragment based on this model, I am still able to: Add only 1 referenced fragment Save the Content Fragment successfully Max items works as expected The system does not block the save operation even though the minimum number of items is set to 2.My Questions: Is this expected behavior in AEM 6.5 (classic/old editor)? Are Min/Max item constraints only UI-level guidance and not server-side enforced? Is there any way to strictly enforce the minimum item count without custom development? Does this behavior differ in the new Content Fragment Editor or in AEM as a Cloud Service? I also checked CRXDE under:/conf/wknd/settings/dam/cfm/models/wknd-content-fragment-modelThe minItems property is correctly set, b

February' 26 release notes Check out what's new and improved in the latest Adobe Journey Optimizer product release update: Release Notes New capabilitiesJourney arbitration: You can now use ranking formulas to automatically boost journey priority scores based on customer profile attributes and contextual factors, ensuring customers enter the most relevant journeys. This capability is only available for a set of organizations (Limited Availability). To gain access, contact your Adobe representative. Action activity in journeys: Journey Optimizer supports a new generic Action activity that enables you to configure both single actions and multi-action inbound action groups, allowing for streamlined action configuration within the journey canvas. In particular, this new feature allows for: A simplified native action configuration within the journey canvas. The capacity to create multi-action inbound action groups. The ability to add optimization to any built-in channel action. The abili

We want to cap the amount of personalised offers that a user is seeing in the webpage. We used custom code channel. We created a campaign with a ranking formula and a decision policy. Inside the policy we added the frequency capping and set it to 3 displays per user per day. We followed this documentation:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer-learn/frequency-capping-in-ajod/enable-cappingWe enabled the itemId and the trackingTockens and we are properly sending and collecting those in the web page and Tags. All the info is reaching AEP, this is a display event.  "_experience": { "decisioning": { "propositionAction": { "tokens": [ "/vCRDDlX6uR7PIti7nB11w" ], "id": "dps:689105eb84a0ad4b943aa2d8967e7f09b45b034ee8a9f539:1c1087fec9796bcb" }, "propositions": [ { "scopeDetails": { "rank": 1, "correlationID": "3fe24028-0466-4b29-a056-3f5ea8

I'm encountering an error when executing the code below within an HTML AJO file. {{executionMetadata key='CODIGO' value={%#if profile._cogna.cogna_student_profile_attributes.DS_ASSINATURA = "PITAGORAS" %}    '2'    {%else if profile._cogna.cogna_student_profile_attributes.DS_ASSINATURA = "UNIC" %}        '3'    {%else if profile._cogna.cogna_student_profile_attributes.DS_ASSINATURA = "UNIDERP" %}        '4'    {%else if profile._cogna.cogna_student_profile_attributes.DS_ASSINATURA = "UNIME" %}        '5'    {%else if profile._cogna.cogna_student_profile_attributes.DS_ASSINATURA = "UNOPAR" %}        '6'    {%else%}        '1'    {%/if%}}} The idea is to use the executionMetadata function, but with its value being a condition based on a field from a dataset.The error message is: Invalid syntax found: '{'. Error beginning at position: Line 1, Character 40How can I resolve this?

Can the Marketo administrator set the permission for non-administrator accounts to view the personal information of database users? When non-administrator accounts view the database information, only partial information should be displayed. For example, when viewing Zhang San's email, only the encrypted email should be shown.

Need to create a calculated field to count child task of a specific taskExample under the task “asset”, we have a list of assets such as “banner”, “Video”, “Print” etc.

Dear Adobe Experience Manager Team,I hope this message finds you well.I am reaching out to explore the possibility of obtaining a complimentary or developer-focused license for Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) to support hands-on learning, architectural experimentation, and solution prototyping.As a software professional actively working within the enterprise CMS and digital experience ecosystem, I am keen to deepen my expertise in AEM’s capabilities across Sites, Assets, and headless delivery models. Access to a licensed environment would enable me to evaluate core features, build proof-of-concept implementations, and strengthen my alignment with Adobe’s best practices and recommended architecture patterns.My objective is to leverage AEM for structured learning, innovation use cases, and potential enterprise solution design. If there are developer programs, sandbox environments, trial licenses, partner pathways, or community initiatives that support this, I would greatly appreciate guid

We have need to query GraphQL in AEM for specific content fragments with a title (for example) of X or Y. That’s easy enough to do with a query like this. This is the most common example I see.  query getAdventuresByActivity( $activity1: String! $activity2: String!) { adventureList(filter: { adventureActivity: { _logOp: OR _expressions: [ { value: $activity1 } { value: $activity2 } ] } }) { items { _path adventureTitle adventureActivity adventurePrice adventureTripLength } }} Then followed by a variable like this. { "activity1": "Surfing", "activity2": "Rock Climbing"}The issue is that we’d like to be able to query on n number of variables and there doesn’t seem to be a facility for this. You can pass in a dynamic filter expression to the persisted query, but this only works in Graphiql. I’m wondering what other folks out there are doing for a problem like this. Are you simply making multiple single filter calls t

Dear AEP Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Experience Platform.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for February 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEP. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEP-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating highly personalized digital experiences with AEP.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles! Take a look:St

Dear AEM Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for February 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles!Take a loo

 Dear Adobe Campaign Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Campaign.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for February 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for Adobe Campaign. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any campaign-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating exceptional campaigns with Adobe Campaign.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles! Take