Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Each time a new project is created, Workfront generates a new reference/form number. However, our business process requires different behavior based on project type:Revisions: Should retain the original form/reference number from the previous project/version Example: XX-1A-XX Variants: Should generate a new reference number using the same base identifier, but increment the alphabetical suffix sequentially Example progression: XX-1A-XX → XX-1B-XX → XX-1C-XX The core “XX” values remain the same; only the revision/variant letter changes based on the number of versions created Has anyone implemented a similar setup in Adobe Workfront?How are you handling reference number retention for revisions? What is the best practice for preserving prior reference numbers while allowing variants to create new ones?
Just a quick question - can someone help us to understand if Dynamic Datastream rerouting occurs after datastream transformations? or if this happens before? I assume its afterwards but I wanted confirmation. Thanks,Ty
Recently, deactivated users can now be assigned to things. Why this would be helpful escapes me. Why this would be harmful is obvious.Let's say I accidentally assign a really important task to a deactivated user, guaranteeing it will be ignored… and late. A great way to anger a client.I cannot think of a single good reason to assign anything to someone who does not work here anymore and will absolutely, 100% not fulfill the request.
we recently got beefree and are using it to push emails/templates into marketo. The one thing I am struggling with is using the beefree display conditions to work with segements/fields in marketo to show the correct content. Does anyone know or have expeience using the correct statements/syntax to get things to work?
I am struggling with saving the data on a custom form when I use an external lookup field with a webhook. I have successfully connected a webhook to a lookup field that returns results that match the user’s input. However, it sometimes saves the option the user clicks on and sometimes wipes the field back out when the user clicks away. From my searching, it may be that the form has nothing to “grab onto”, as in an id. I don’t know if that’s the cause of my issue or not, but I haven’t been successful creating a json path to return linked label/value pairs, only a single label or ‘all fields’. I also haven’t been able to pass the data somewhere else without it still being linked to the original field, so as soon as the original field goes blank, everything else does as well. I was toying with having a WF webhook listen for when the fields populate, but in my initial test, it doesn’t seem to see a change while the form is still being edited. Can anyone offer me some insight into how I c
I’ve tried everything to create a support ticket and keep getting the run around. I’m the only user on the account which means I’m also the admin. It either says I’m not entitled, or I’m not authorized to log into the various support tools. I’ve tried everything and am pulling my hair out to create a ticket. Please advise how I get my account setup as the admin so I can create a ticket. Steven
Problem Statement:Would need a mechanism to differentiate and track content processed via machine translation (MT) versus human translation. The primary need is to automatically label and manage content that is machine-translated only (i.e., not reviewed by a human).This labeling should update metadata and file attributes so that both internal teams and end users can easily identify the translation source for any given content.Current LimitationAEM Guides, via the AEM OOTB Translations project, does not provide an event or API to intercept the import of translation summary files.As a result, there is no straightforward way to update labels or metadata during the import process.Expectations:Automated Categorization & Labeling (or Translation Status)A clear mechanism to categorize and label MT-only content at the time of import.Metadata should reflect the translation source (MT vs Human) in a way that is visible and actionableIn short:When the Translation Status is “In sync” there is
Form spam is one of those problems every Marketo user eventually runs into. Bots fill out forms with nonsense data, junk email addresses pollute your database, and sales teams lose trust in inbound leads. The challenge is that most anti‑spam solutions trade security for friction—CAPTCHAs, extra fields, or aggressive validation rules that hurt legitimate conversion rates. The good news is that you can stop a large percentage of form spam without adding visible friction by using logic inside Marketo Forms 2.0 itself.One effective approach is to add lightweight screening criteria inside the Forms2 onSubmit function. This lets you evaluate a submission in real time before it’s officially accepted. You might check signals like suspicious email domains, mismatches between country and phone format, empty hidden fields that should contain values, or submissions that arrive faster than a human reasonably could. Instead of outright blocking these entries, you can quietly divert them into a secon
Hi Community Members@AmitVishwakarma @Asheesh_Pandey @kautuk_sahni @akshay_kashyap @bjoern__koth Any suggestions would be appreciated thank you Is it possible to expose the ranking formula score in Code-Based Experience so it can be accessed by third‑party systems requesting offers via the Edge Decisioning APII understand that this is a runtime activity where in the system will calculate the offer priority and provide the score https://developer.adobe.com/data-collection-apis/docs/endpoints/collect/https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/decisioning/experience-decisioning/experience-decisioning-rankings/ranking-formulas Code based Experience Logic!--scriptorstartfragment-->We are able to retrieve the offers that are eligible for this decision policy.The ranking formula is available under subPropositions(base64 encoded values).However, we want to understand whether it is possible to send the ranking score as part of the response.If so, which attribute
Looking for some best practices on how to manage/contain all of our audiences. As more and more campaigns come through, our audience list gets larger and larger with some not being deactivated after the campaign is finished, duplicates, etc. Some questions about capabilities are below. Thanks for your help! Is it possible to look at inactive/deactivated audiences? For audit purposes, we would like to keep a list of audiences we are deactivating to show they aren’t in use anymore. Obviously we can use the UI tool and filter, but this might quickly become not enough. Looking into using a query/API but unsure if possible. Is there a way to see audiences that are being used in a live journey currently? With out large list of audiences, some might have been used in multiple journeys and before deactivating them, we would like to check if they are actively being used. I thought there was a safeguard in place that when you deactivate an audience, it would not let you if it was being used, b
After a recent upgrade of the OneTrust Consent Management for Cookies extension in Adobe Launch, we started encountering the following runtime error:Uncaught Error: [OptIn] Invalid category(-ies). Please use the `OptIn.Categories` enum.This error was not present before the extension upgrade and now occurs consistently after publishing the new build. Observations✅ Previous OneTrust Extension Version (working)In the older version of the OneTrust extension, the generated custom code configuration looked like this: JSON {"otConfiguration": {}}``Show more linesThere were no undefined Adobe categories, and Adobe Opt‑In worked as expected.❌ New OneTrust Extension Version (after upgrade)After upgrading the OneTrust extension, the generated configuration now looks like the following: {"autoLoadScript": false,"otConfiguration": {"adobeCat_0": "undefined","adobeCat_1": "undefined","adobeCat_2": "undefined","adobeCat_3": "undefined","adobeCat_4": "undefined","adobeCat_5": "undefined","adobeCat_6
I restarted my mac book and started AEM from terminal getting this error after AEM is started HTTP ERROR 404 Not FoundURI: /STATUS:404 MESSAGE:Not FoundSERVLET:org.apache.felix.http.base.internal.dispatch.DispatcherServlet-e31d7b5 Please help me resolving this issue, it is working fine morning , after my mac restart it I am getting this issue
Hi All, We recently signed an AI addendum to enable the new AI capabilities within Marketo, such as the AI assistant feature that can help generate email subject lines, email body text, ect. I checked our Roles settings in the Admin menu, and I can see that Access AI Assistant is enabled for our user accounts. However, I have not seen any artificial intelligence features available when I am building emails. Does anyone have any info on why these features wouldn’t be available for us? Any info is appreciated here.Thank you!
i need to create a profile script to identify the last visited bike pdp by a visitor in real time and using that create an audience accordingly for each bike models mutually exclusive
This is the second day in a row that Adobe express is not working for me. Yesterday when I tried opening files I got a 404 error over and over again. Last night the error message told me I was offline, I was not. Today I still cannot open my files and the error message says "something went wrong please wait” - I’ve been waiting for hours. Refreshing not worked.DownDector reports that Express is down… but Adobe says it’s up.What’s going on?
Hello ,My most of the emails who have gmail id’s sent to users show as failed due to the Gmail: 550 5.7.1 email likely unsolicited.How to resolve this? Should I use RESTART ?
While trying to sync a template in campaign console, we are getting the error below. Did anyone face the same issue ever? what could be the reason?
I have a list of 3,784 users that I want to target with specific data. To achieve this, I created segments in Adobe Analytics, where I defined the condition as User ID equals any of x, y, z, using approximately 500 user IDs per segment. These segments are visible in Adobe Target via A4T, and I have used them to create an experience. However, I am unable to see the experience being delivered to the intended audience. Could you help identify what might be causing this issue?
We’re trying to implement a server to server integration with AEM 6.5 AMS (not Cloud), and I’ve been trying to set it up locally.I got the OAuth2.0 client working (created the client in the OAuth Clients section of the Security Tools.Given the access to the oauthserver service users, created a ScopeWithPrivileges class giving read/write access to the /content/dam path for the service to use.I’m able to get the Bearer token correctly, but when I tried to upload an asset by posting to http://localhost:4502/api/assets/companies/product-staging/new_test.pngI’m getting a 500with a status.message "status.message": "Can't create child on a synthetic root",the same call using basic auth for the same user (admin), works correctly. Anyone ever done this with the AssetAPI or are we stuck using basic auth for this?I’m half guessing something isn’t right with the ScopeWithPrivilege class, if anyone succeeded knows what we’re doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.
Hi everyone,I'm trying to create a nested block structure in Universal Editor using the following JSON definition:{ "definitions": [ { "title": "Tabs", "id": "tabs", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block", "template": { "name": "Tabs", "model": "tabs", "filter": "tabs" } } } } }, { "title": "Tab", "id": "tab", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block/item", "template": { "name": "Tab", "model": "tab", "filter": "tab" } } } } } ], "models": [], "filters": [ { "id": "tabs", "components": ["tab"] }, { "id": "tab", "components": ["teaser", "carousel"] }
I’m looking to enable the AI capabilities in Adobe Target. If you’ve already done this, I’d be interested in learning which use cases you tried.
Hello, We have several jobs that fetch data from the Adobe warehouse using the FTP server (ftp2.omniture.com). However, since March 7, we have been unable to connect to the Adobe server and retrieve files from the ftp2.omniture.com host.This is a critical job for us as it is used to obtain daily data from Adobe, and the issue is currently impacting our client data as well.We would appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue on an urgent basis. Thank youShubham
Description - Slack module/addonWhy is this feature important to you - AlertsHow would you like the feature to work - Allow workflows to trigger alerts to slack, an extra option in the workflow properties to configure under which state an alert will be triggered, also, enhance current workflow "Alert activity" to choose between email or slack alert or both.Current Behaviour - non I've seen clients developed their on integration with slack for monitoring purposes, but it would be nice to have a native module.
Hey everyone!Sharing a couple of quick security hardening tips for AEM as a Cloud Service that I recently worked on:Blocking the form selector at dispatcher level Restricting anonymous access to sensitive JCR metadataBoth are small changes, but they significantly reduce attack surface and prevent unintended exposure.I’ve written a short Medium article with the details + configs here:👉 Hardening AEM as a Cloud Service: Two Simple Fixes That Close Big Security Gaps Would love to hear if others are doing something similar or have additional hardening tips!
Hello Community,I have a clarification question related to datetime formatting in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) using Data Prep.From the source file, we receive the datetime value as a string in the following format:2026-04-10 14:23:56My requirement is to ingest this into AEP as a datetime/timestamp field, but with the date represented in MM‑DD‑YYYY order, for example:04-10-2026 14:23:00The primary concern here is whether AEP allows transforming and storing the datetime in MM‑DD‑YYYY HH:mm:SS format, instead of the default YYYY‑MM‑DD.I understand that AEP standardizes timestamps internally, but I would like to confirm:Is it technically possible in AEP Data Prep to store a datetime with the MM‑DD‑YYYY date order? If not, is this format strictly limited to parsing at ingestion ? What would be the recommended best practice in this scenario?Any guidance or confirmation from the community would be very helpful.Thank you!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.