Product Communities

Does Workfront use PHP and if so has any remediation steps been taken?

If your DAM serves brand assets to other apps through delivery URLs, “approved” and “public” aren’t the same thing. Dynamic Media with OpenAPI capabilities now offers ways to limit who can fetch an asset. Here’s what Adobe’s documentation says, with the status and caveats marked.1. What it is (existing capability, not a 2026 launch)Dynamic Media with OpenAPI is a set of search and delivery APIs on AEM Assets as a Cloud Service. Each approved asset gets a delivery URL, and consuming apps reference that URL rather than copying binaries. Adobe says changes to approved assets appear in delivery URLs within a 10-minute CDN TTL. It supports on-the-fly image modifiers (width, height, crop, format, smart crop and others), WebP, and HLS/DASH video. DM Prime customers get only the basic image modifiers.2. Two ways to restrict deliverya) By time window (documented how-to). Set an On Time and/or Off Time under “Scheduled (de) activation” in asset properties. Before On Time, the asset stays inactiv

BackgroundFor testing, validation, and troubleshooting purposes, we need a supported and repeatable way to recreate or refresh our AEM as a Cloud Service INT environment with content that accurately reflects the current state of PROD.RequirementAdobe should provide a supported mechanism to independently copy each repository tier from PROD to INT, specifically:PROD Author → INT Author PROD Publish → INT PublishBusiness NeedOur production Author and Publish repositories do not contain the same content or the same content versions.As a result, refreshing only the INT Author environment and subsequently publishing all content to INT Publish does not reproduce the actual production state. This approach can introduce:Draft content that has never been published Unpublished authoring changes Content versions that differ from production Content intentionally absent from PROD PublishConsequently, test results, defect analysis, and production issue replication performed in INT may not reflect rea

Hello,I’m facing following situation:On WindowsOS: When I create a brand new instance with SP3, the folder “crx-quickstart/launchpad/felix/bundle35/data” is being created. This one contains two files “hmac” and “master”. On MacOS: When I create a brand new instance with SP3, “the folder crx-quickstart/launchpad/felix/bundle35/data” is not being created. Instead of physical files they exists as properties, under “/etc/key” On LinuxOS: When I create a brand new instance with SP3, sometimes the folder “crx-quickstart/launchpad/felix/bundle35/data” is being created sometimes not.My question is, when will the files “hmac” and “master” created as physical files and when they will be created as node property from repostory node “/etc/key”? Thanks in advanced 

EE88 la thuong hieu thuoc linh vuc nha cai, casino truc tuyen va giai tri ca cuoc, gan voi dia chi https://ee88ko.com/. Trang chu EE88 duoc gioi thieu nhu mot diem ket noi thong tin thuong hieu, giup nguoi dung nhan dien website, tim hieu nhung chu de noi bat nhu casino online, ca cuoc the thao, tai xiu, no hu, ban ca va slot game trong moi truong giai tri ky thuat so.Website https://ee88ko.com/ duoc gioi thieu la dia chi nhan dien thuong hieu EE88, huong den viec ket noi nguoi dung voi thong tin ve casino live, game bai truc tuyen va nhung xu huong giai tri ky thuat so hien dai.Website: https://ee88ko.com/Thuong hieu: EE88Ten day du: EE88 KOTen thay the: Nha Cai EE88, EE88 Casino, EE88 KOPhone: 0382519682Email: ee88ko.com@gmail.comDia chi : Tang 16, toa nha Golden Star, so 214 Dien Bien Phu, khu vuc Binh Thanh, TP. Ho Chi Minh.Linh vuc: Giai tri truc tuyen, the thao, casino online, no hu, ban caKhu vuc phuc vu: Viet NamNgon ngu: Tieng VietGio hoat dong: 24/7Hashtag: #ee88 #ee88ko #nha

Is there any way to pull proof comments by end user into a report

Hello ​@all Hope you’re doing wellMy name is Manideep D, working as AJO Developer for one of the financial organization.So here I have a conflict with one of the use case.NOTE: I’ve configured a journey entry capping rule,i.e, only one entry per day which has the highest priority. Use Case:When a profileA is qualified to both the read audiences(A,B) of journey_1,2. It should enter only Journey_1 because it has the highest priority for that day and avoids Journey_2 as per the capping frequency(one entry per day) and receives Email_1 and wait for the following 14days(initial wait). Until this initial wait period (14 days) profileA is not supposed to enter any other journeys, even if it’s qualified to other audience/journeys_1,2,.After completing the initial wait(14 days) and receiving the Email_2, it’ll enter into final wait (90 days). From that day profileA can eligible to qualify and enter into another journey which has the top priority for that particular day.During this final wait in

Hello - are any other organizations getting a error starting today (10/15/26) when trying to enter a partial hour on a timesheet? If so, is there a fix? 

Hosted by the Adobe Customer Success team, the Workfront Fusion Wednesday Forum is a monthly roundtable discussion for Workfront admins and Fusion builders (and learners!). If you were familiar with Workfront Collectives or Admin Chats, think of this as the same open-discussion format, but with a Fusion-specific focus. There’s no formal agenda, just a space to ask questions, share ideas, and learn from others about topics like documenting Fusion scenarios, choosing the right triggers, testing and error-handling best practices, and connecting Workfront with other tools.  Bring your challenges, successes, and curiosity, and connect with fellow Fusion enthusiasts in a fun, collaborative environment. Registration Link

We are loading marketo scripts that include PHP.Is anyone aware of Adobe or Marketo Engage patching their product? 

Use this thread to ask any questions related to the Experience League LIVE session titled, Coworker unlocked - Harnessing the next frontier of agentic intelligence with CX Analytics in Coworker. Experts are monitoring this thread to ensure your questions are answered. Thanks and we hope to hear from you!

Given how WF timestamps comments, it would be helpful to have a “delay deliver” feature much like outlook.  I tend to require focus when working in WF (therefore am working at off hours).  I would like to give the impression that i am working within standard business hours 

Hello Workfront Community,Our organization is currently evaluating how best to use the native Risks and Issues functionality in Workfront, and I would appreciate learning from others' experiences.I'd be interested in hearing how your PMO or project teams manage risks and issues, including:Do project managers actively maintain Risks and Issues in Workfront? Do you use the native Risk and Issue objects, custom forms, or another approach? How do you distinguish between a risk and an issue within your project governance process? What is your process for escalating a risk into an issue? Who is responsible for updating mitigation plans and resolution activities? How do you report risks and issues to project sponsors, leadership, or portfolio governance groups? Have you encountered any limitations with the native functionality, and if so, how did you address them?We are particularly interested in feedback from organizations with a centralized PMO, standardized project templates, and portfolio

Enable a client into a journey. A journey in this case could be serious of steps a client has to taken to complete an action. Taking an action is supported in multiple channels like web, mobile in app, email and push notifications. How would one should think of creating an omni channel journey that helps us visualize end to end client move through the journey? Question: How can Adobe Journey Optimizer support an omnichannel client journey today and in the future?I’m looking for guidance on how to model and orchestrate an end-to-end, omnichannel client journey using Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO).In this context, a journey represents a series of steps or actions that a client needs to take to accomplish a specific goal. These interactions may happen across multiple channels, such as:Web Mobile/in-app Email Push notificationsFor example, a client may start an action on the web, receive an email as the next step, continue the process in the mobile app, and then receive a push notification

I am not able to access my access token to make the configuration of Bring your own git. I want to work with github enterprise which is from my organization. This is the error I am getting 

Hi guys,                 We have a use case where we need to perform bulk updates on assets in AEMaaCS. For example, when we update around 100 assets in bulk, we expect the corresponding events to be triggered and received by our webhook.Events for ref - Asset Delivery Ready, Asset processing completedTo support this, we have configured a project in the Adobe Developer Console (Adobe I/O) and registered an event for our development AEM as a Cloud Service environment, with a webhook configured to receive the events.However, during bulk asset updates, we are encountering the following issues:The webhook requests are returning HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) The response body contains the following error: “Too many webhook requests from this IP, please try again later” The response also includes “retryAfter: 15 minutes” Adobe I/O displays a warning that the webhook has been disabled because it is either unreachable or verification has failed   Our questions: Is there a rate limit on Adobe I

In Workfront Hour reports, is there a way to show who entered/created the hour entry? I can see who edited/updated it, but I can’t find a field for entered by.

Hi, I’m facing issue with the access, here’s the screenshot. the page keeps spinning,  

Hi,I am currently showing a calculated field of Active Milestone(s) on a project report.  I have had a request to only show the first Milestone that is active if there are more than one.  Could someone help with the syntax for that?   My current syntax to show the active milestones is:Edit=Text Modedisplayname=Active Milestone(s)listdelimiter=<div>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({project}.{status}='CPL'&&{taskNumber}=1,"Complete",IF({canStart}&&{status}!='CPL'&&!ISBLANK({milestoneID}),{name}))valueformat=HTML Thanks!Heather

In Data Collection, I have (the usual) Target Page Load Rule, configured like this for reference-Extension: Adobe Experience Platform Web SDKAction Type: Send eventUse guided events: checkedRequest personalization: checkedThis will load Target and render any matching personalizations. For Analytics (for every page load) I have a separate Rule with two actions; the Update variable action to set variables, and the Send event action, configured like this for reference-Extension: Adobe Experience Platform Web SDKAction Type: Send eventUse guided events: checkedCollect analytics: checked Question: Is it advisable or good practice to combine the Target send event, the Analytics Update variable, and Analytics Send event all into one Rule? The Target send event action would be fired first, then the Analytics Update vars, then the Analytics send event. I have an issue where I’m using two separate Rules, one for Target and one for Analytics. However, the Analytics rule is firing first and the Ta