Product Communities

Hello,Since enabling some of the beta capabilities in Content Hub, we’ve noticed significantly slower load times than before. Are others experiencing this as well? If so, have you found any ways to address it?Thank you!

In our Adobe Experience Manager internal portal(Azure OIDC auth 6.5 instance) the homepage invokes a few APIs that fetch data from a database and store user-specific responses in Redis.We normally conduct performance testing with 18,000 concurrent users (2 publishers with ~9,000 virtual users each) over a duration of 30 minutes. Prior to the upgrade, all API responses were consistently under 1 second.Recently, we upgraded to AEM 6.5 LTS (SP21) running on Java 21. After the upgrade, under the same load conditions, the average API response time has increased significantly to around 11 seconds.There are no functional issues observed, and all APIs are working as expected. However, this performance degradation is only noticeable during load testing.Has anyone encountered similar performance issues after upgrading to AEM 6.5 LTS SP21 or moving to Java 21? Any insights or areas to investigate would be helpful.

I want to do audience segmentation with mutual inclusion values, example same customer will fall into multiple segmentation.How can we achieve this?

Hi,I been trying to setup Multilingual setup in Adobe campaign Web UI as that is a default OOTB function but, when I try to setup the delivery after adding the language and when I try to enter the content it is showing “400 - Error 16384: SDK-000009 Unknown method 'GetVariantContent' of schema 'nms:delivery'. Method 'GetVariantContent' of schema 'nms:delivery' not found”. When I check in the schema I can able to see the GetVariantContent is defined inside Method in delivery schema.Could anyone please guide in resolving this error. Thanks!

I have a question regarding an issue I am seeing with internal referrer data appearing in my marketing channels within Customer Journey Analytics (CJA).I am observing that the same site domain is being classified under the Internal Referrer marketing channel with a very high volume of traffic. This is unexpected, as I would expect traffic to be distributed across multiple internal domains within my organization.My current setup is as follows:The Internal Referrer marketing channel rule is based on Referring Domain contains any Internal Domain In the Internal Domain list, I have included all domains belonging to my organization This logic is implemented using a CJA Derived FieldMy concern is that a single site domain is contributing a disproportionately large amount of data to the Internal Referrer channel, instead of traffic being attributed across other internal domains within the organization.Could you please help clarify:Why the same site domain may be appearing with a much higher v

HiI'd like to know how to implement Adobe Analytics in an application developed in ReactJS.The application is basically developed in ReactJS. It will run on Samsung and LG Smart TVsWe're currently finalizing some features, and everything is working, but now we want to use Adobe AnalyticsThank you for your reply

Hello,I’ve been using the Data Insertion API so far, and i’ve been informed of the end of life for the Adobe Analytics 1.4 API.However, this guide indicates that the Data Insertion API is an exception.My client’s is adamant of the opposite, quoting the EOL date that they received from the support.Is the guide i’ve provided obsolete and the Data insertion API will be closed as well? Or was there a miscommunication somewhere?

I’m currently validating Adobe Analytics tags for a banking mobile app in the UAT environment. When I trigger certain events (tags), I can see the data firing correctly in the Adobe Analytics Debugger. However, the same data does not appear in Adobe Analytics Workspace. I’ve tested this across multiple devices and operating systems, but the issue persists. What’s puzzling is that when my colleague performs the same actions from her system (different device and setup), she is able to see the data in Workspace without any issues. It seems like the problem occurs only when I test it, despite not using the same device or environment as my colleague. I’m unsure what could be blocking the data visibility on my end. Has anyone encountered a similar scenario before? Any guidance or insights would be greatly appreciated.

When looking at the flow Viz I know it shows number of path views for the previous/ next pages. But is there a way to switch it so that it displays the percentage? I know I can see the percentages if i hover over them but Id like to be able to export it so that the percentages are visible 

I have been having a hard time trying to understand what the difference between Eventual Path and Next hit on the Fallout Report means and as well why the Visits on the Fallout VS the total Visits remains different.The fallout report has 34799 Visits for a Page A and when they move to Page B they have 15.5k visits. However, when I look at the Visits of the Page A individually they stand at 39405. Also, the Page B visits are at 12K which eventually has to be 15.5k. The way page B KPI Card is made that row has Previous Page Name as A and Column has Page B as the name.  Can someone help me understand the difference why this is occuring?

https://s8media.com/ mang đến trải nghiệm cá cược chuyên nghiệp với hệ sinh thái trò chơi đa dạng, liên tục cập nhật xu hướng mới. Hệ thống thanh toán linh hoạt, xử lý giao dịch trong thời gian ngắn giúp tiết kiệm thời gian. Chính sách bảo mật nghiêm ngặt kết hợp đội ngũ hỗ trợ tận tâm giúp người chơi yên tâm khi sử dụng dịch vụ.

Go to https://da.live/, navigate to your site, update the organization permissions, and then publish the page from the console.

How to get all the notifications in the notifications tab for a user in her profile in Adobe Workfront

Hi everyone! I’m currently working on cleaning up and standardizing our project templates and I’d love to hear how others are managing this.When updates are needed to a template, do you typically:Update the active template directly, or Create a new version (copy), make updates, and deactivate/archive the old one?I’m leaning toward a versioning approach for better governance, but I’m curious how others are handling:Template version control Naming conventions Preventing users from selecting outdated templatesWould love to hear what’s working well for your teams or any lessons learned. Thanks in advance!

In the hierarchy the root object’s properties are no longer available to make changes to the settings.  This makes the pages objects under it unavailable in to the settings of the Pagination window.  Without these settings being usable then pages can’t be assigned to masterpages.

A user is unable to see the deadline in the report. I have raised this ticket multiple times, but the issue still persists.Upon checking, I found that this is related to how the stage deadlines are configured. For example, if there are two stages and the user is a reviewer only in Stage 1 (with no involvement in Stage 2), Adobe Workfront appears to consider only the overall (final) deadline rather than the stage-specific deadline. As a result, the relevant deadline is not visible to the user in the report.Could you please confirm:Is there an option to display stage-specific deadlines for users based on their assigned stage within reports?If not, is there any recommended workaround to achieve this?Looking forward to your guidance on this.

Hi ,I have a requirement related to Proof approvals in Workfront.I have assigned 3 approvers to a proof. Out of these, 2 users have already approved the proof, and 1 user has not responded.When the proof reaches its deadline, Workfront sends reminder notifications to all 3 approvers. However, my requirement is:👉 Only the approver who has NOT yet approved should receive the email notification👉 Approved users should NOT receive further remindersAs per current native functionality, reminders are sent to all reviewers regardless of their decision status.Is there any way to:Restrict deadline/reminder notifications only to pending approvers? Or achieve this using Workfront Fusion or any workaround?Any suggestions or best practices would be greatly appreciated.

Hi ,We are working on profile capping in a recurring journey. Profile capping should also work on a recurring journey which means the counter should get reset to zero .But from the adobe documentation i came to know that , When profile cap is defined on a recurring journey, the counter does not reset after each recurrence.The counter applies only to the selected journey version. The counter resets to zero when the journey is duplicated or when a new version is created. After a reset, the entering profiles take the nominal path again until the counter limit is reached.So, is it possible to reset the counter so that in a recurring journey profile limit will work . ThanksUsha

What are the best practices for managing graphics and ensuring the most recent copy uploaded to the repository is the current VERSION, not just a working copy?All documentation on version control I’ve found for Guides is specific to the DITA files, not graphics objects.When we upload/copy an updated graphic, the popup windows asks us if we want to create a version of the EXISTING working copy. It does not ask about creating a version for the correction we are uploading. It looks like whatever we last uploaded remains a working copy, not an actual version, which means graphics sent out for translation may not be the most recent and correction file.Does this mean any time we upload a corrected graphic, we have to drag/drop twice. Once to upload and force the system to create a new version of the existing working copy and the new graphic become the existing working copy. Then a second time to force that correction to be the newest version?I’m seeing graphics that I know have been changed/

Per conversation during Summit:When your converted issue is linked to a resolving project, here’s the link to the information about what happens.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/manage-work/issues/convert-issues/resolving-and-resolvable-objects#synchronize-statuses-when-the-resolving-object-is-a-task-or-a-projectIn summary: changing to specific project statuses will trigger a change to the issue status. I had at least one admin asking me about this over breakfast -- when a project is set to Planning, this is equivalent to issue status NEW which is why your actual start date keeps getting overwritten. [MATT E -- please make sure you look at your project preferences to set a default status for your new projects -- maybe on hold rather than Planning?] The “better” thing to do is to set up a set of custom statuses for a better linkage between project and originating issue -- and then hide the custom issue statuses so that your users are not able to manually select

Hello,I am looking for guidance on how to correctly configure the JSON payload for the SMS channel when using the Adobe Campaign Classic action in Adobe Journey Optimizer / Journey Orchestration.Our setup is the following: Adobe Journey triggers an Adobe Campaign Classic action Adobe Campaign Message Center then sends the communication We have already successfully implemented email deliveries with this method The payload we currently use for email works correctly:{ "channel": "email", "eventType": { "toBeMapped": true, "dataType": "string", "label": "eventType" }, "ctx": { "firstName": { "toBeMapped": true, "dataType": "string", "label": "firstName" } }, "email": { "toBeMapped": true, "dataType": "string", "label": "email" }}We then tried to adapt the payload for SMS using the following structure:{ "channel": "sms", "eventType": { "toBeMapped": true, "dataType": "string", "label": "eventType" }, "mobilePhone": { "toBeMapped": tr

As mentioned in session:Sample System Audit -- dashboard+report kickstart:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zUjJxHVB-gRMaMXTVyLZfYEmD1fcKJmB/view?usp=sharingthis is a combined dashboard and report kickstart, and should be downloaded and uploaded into your Workfront kickstarts area as  a zip file [feel free to try it out in your preview sandbox]. Do not unzip unless you particularly need to make edits to the files before uploading (if you do need to make edits, you need to unzip, edit the file, and then rezip) when you upload it, it should create a dashboard and 14 reports in 3 columns across it. The dashboard is called Sample System Audit, and the 14 reports all start with "zz" so you can easily locate them. (please rename) these reports are suggestions only and do not contain everything reportable. (specifically these reports are a great start for beginner to intermediate admins) past week vs last week: in the last instance I was in, we reviewed the last 7 days. So we weren't intereste

As the Workfront Second Quarter Release is scheduled for next week (April 16 - Quarterly Release, April 15 - Monthly/Fast Release), this webinar highlighted a handful of enhancements coming to Advanced Enterprise Operations, Unified Approvals (the future of proofing in Workfront), Reporting, Fusion, and Workfront Planning. There are several demos in the on-demand recording, so it’s a bit longer than usual - plan for 75 minutes unless you watch on 2x speed.  If you weren't able to attend - no worries! The links to the slide deck, recording, and Q&A are listed below. Be sure to review the release notes on Experience League, as not all feature enhancements were covered in the webinar today!  Webinar Recording  Slide Deck PDF - note that the videos cannot be replayed in the slide deck PDF, so I’ve included links to those below  All videos from the section, Advanced Enterprise Operations Enhancements, can be found here - Financial Management (slide 18), Enhanced Layout Templates (sl

I'm struggling to find an efficient way to debug Recommendations. With at.js, I used mboxTrace, which provided a very clear "Recs Box" showing exactly which criteria were used, which entities were returned, and why certain items were excluded.Now that I'm using Web SDK and the AEP Debugger, I find the debugging process much more difficult. I can see the network calls, but I miss that high-level summary of the Recommendations logic.What I've tried: Using the AEP Debugger Extension to look at Edge Traces. Digging through the interact response payloads in the Network tab. My Questions: Is there a way to get a visual "Recs box" similar to the old mboxTrace functionality in at.js? In the AEP Debugger, where exactly should I look to see the Criteria details and Exclusion reasons for a specific Recommendations activity? Are there any third-party tools or specific "Edge Trace" configurations that make the JSON output more readable for Recs-heavy implementations? How do you effectively

Hi,I am looking to download a specific version of doucment using the workfront api. I was able to download the latest version using the downloadURL on document but wanted to check if it is possible to download specific version throught Workfront apis.Thanks