Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I am trying to set up an integration between AWS Quick and Adobe Experience Manager.To setup the MCP connection AWS requires a Token and Authorization url. Can you let us know what those values are for the following MCP server? https://mcp.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/mcpUsing MCP with AEM as a Cloud Service | Adobe Experience Manager
Hi all,We have a unitary event-based flow: streaming event → AEP → AJO journey → Custom Action (REST) → ACC delivery.We're currently using these methods for verification and debugging, and want to know if there's anything else we're missing:What we're using today:AEP Dataset Preview to spot-check ingested events AEP Identity Graph Viewer to verify identity stitching per profile AJO Test Mode to simulate the journey with test profiles before publishing AJO Journey Step Events dataset to see journey execution logs (entry, action calls, errors) AJO Live View / Journey Reports for monitoring journey activity ACC workflow logs and journal to trace incoming API calls through to deliveryOur questions:Are these the only native tools available for logging and debugging this type of flow, or are there others we're not aware of? Is there a way to see the exact payload and HTTP response of a Custom Action call beyond what the Step Events dataset provides? Has anyone implemented end-to-end traceabi
How to set up the storefront for Adobe commerce as a cloud service?
We are seeing a significant dropoff in open rates and we suspect there was a recent change to how AJO handles auto opens. AJO has always included auto opens, mostly from iOS mail protection, as part of the unique open metric. While this inflated open rates, it has been that way for quite some time. Now, we are seeing a new Estimated Email Opens metric which seems to no longer include auto opens. Can this be confirmed? This is a significant change to the optics of how open rates are reported. If this change was made, can we please understand how an open is classified as an auto open? Just because someone has mail protection enabled does not mean that every email they are opening is an auto open. We need to better understand the logic behind this change if it was made.
I’m having an odd issue when receiving translations back from our provider. Issue:When translations are accepted back into AEM from our translation provider, I'm seeing a variance in the metadata the assets end up with in the target folder. It's mainly one field: "cq:TranslationSourcePath" (needed for my purposes) Project 1: Results show the cq:translationSourcePath (along with other metadata) on the target (de_de) assets “jcr:content” node. Project 2: missing translation metadata, Note it’s a different project, same target (de_de) note one of the only fields that gets copied to the target asset.Please Note: I'm not convinced this is a translation provider-related issue, as the data already exists in the "staging" area that AEM creates when initiating translations. Please see the screenshot below for the temporary location created for the translation (this is before the translation was sent back to AEM, i.e., before it was deleted as part of clean up): Conclusion:Because the data ex
Description - It would be ideal if you were to specify, at project template level, that planned hours can be front or rear loaded (in addition to being spread evenly across the task duration) when assigned to a user. Why is this feature important to you - This would help our project managers to schedule resource more accurately, it will allow them to schedule tasks on the same day, get get the most for the available resource on a granular level. The assignees would also benefit, they can concentrate on one task at a time, moving onto the next once the fist has finished. How would you like the feature to work - If a task has a two day duration and 8 planned hours and is assigned to a user who has a capacity of 7 hours per day, WF would allocate 7 hours in day 1 and 1 hour in day two. The task would be set to start at 9am and finish at 5pm which is inline with our default schedule. If the assignee has 2 hours available on day 1 and 7 available in day 2, the task would be s
We are observing an issue in AEM Guides (Cloud Service) where the translation status does not revert after cancelling a translation job. As per Adobe documentation and earlier fixed issues, when a translation job is cancelled or deleted, the “In Progress” status should revert to the original state. However, in our environment, the status continues to remain “In Progress”. Observed Behavior: When sending a DITA topic/map for translation where the target language copy does not exist: A placeholder (empty) language copy is created. If the translation job is then cancelled: The placeholder file remains in the target language folder. The translation status of the asset still shows “In Progress”. The status does not revert even after some time or refresh. Expected Behavior: On cancellation of the translation job: Translation status should revert from “In Progress” to the original state. Placeholder language copies (if not translated) should ideally be cleaned up or
Hi Team,Can we deploy AEM Guide in AEM RDE environment Thanks
Hello, As you all know, now Google usually generates an AI result for any search, giving you the sources it used on the right. If you click on those, it will take you to your site URL appending something like "#:~:text" to it. I have created a Marketing Channel to allocate traffic coming from sites like Chat GPT and so to "AI traffic", and I want to send these AI generated results to this bucket. The problem is that I don't know how to capture this "#:~:text=" used by Google. Neither window.location.hash nor window.location.href worked :s. Any ideas? I would also appreciate if you shared any other tips regarding the use of AI as a Marketing Channel. Thanks!
Hi! In my company we have set up the marketing channels in the best way, but the results I see from workspace do not convince me and I think there are errors in the processing rules, but I do not know how to solve them. The main anomalies I see in the data are: The main anomalies I see in the data are:- 55% of the audience of the marketing channel "direct" is from Referrer Type "Search Engines", specifically the majority comes from Google.In the Processing Rules "direct" is my last rule, and above it are the rules for the "search" channels. I share the configuration of the rules: Here you can see the order of the rules: Here the configuration of both "Search" channels: "Direct" Marketing Channel: Why if we have specified in the "Search" rules to collect the data "Matches Natural Search Detection Rules" not all "Search" traffic is collected in the corresponding channels and falls into "Direct"? Thank you!
Hello,I’d like to isolate first-time purchasers in Adobe Analytics — users who made their very first transaction during a specific time period.Is there a recommended way to do this using segments or calculated metrics?Any guidance or examples would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Assuming I have an evar1 on my site which triggers on every product page to capture the color of the product. And assuming I had 2 visits to my site. Let’s say that the evar1 is a regular evar, expires on visit, allocation last touch, and assuming the following scenario: Pages visited User A - Visit #1 product page 1- color = blue evar1 is set. value = blue proudct page 2 color = red evar1 is set. value = red product page 3 color=green evar1 is set value = green home page evar1 is not set Pages visited User B - Visit #1 home page evar1 is not set product page 3 color=green evar1 is set value = green marketing page A evar1 is not set marketing page B evar1 is not set Question:s:based on the above, if i build a report like the one below, what should i see and why? evar1 visits evar1 instances page views unspecified blue green red
Summary:I am using dataset lookup in AJO personalization, but it is returning empty values. My dataset has a primary identity and data is present. I have tried both approaches — with fields nested under the tenant namespace and also without nesting — but still getting empty results. Not sure what is causing the issue or how to fix it.AEP configuration:schema : {tenant : {offerID (primary id),title ,description}}Dataset is enabled for lookup Identity is marked as primary Data exists in dataset (e.g., "IC121") Using hardcoded ID in lookupNote: Schema and Dataset is not profile enabledIn AJO (Campaign - CBE based), I am trying to access this data using personalization:Code:[ {{ datasetLookup datasetId="Dataset" id="ID121" result="offer"}} {“title” : “{{offer.tenant.title}}”,“description” : “offer.tenant.description”}] Issue:The response is:{title :””,description : “”} It seems like the lookup is not executing. Can anyone help me what i am missingThanks in advance
What conditions need to be met in order to set up one to many relationship?It has to be experience event schema?
Ever see this in a Smart List filter?The 2 options look the same to the naked eye. And whichever one you choose, you get the same results on the People tab. Yet records with the first value will prevent the person from syncing to SFDC because it’s not in the corresponding picklist! See, due to a malformed CSV import, there’s an extra U+2060 WORD JOINER before the G in the first option. That character is by definition invisible, so it makes sense that they look the same in the UI. (Though note several visible whitespace characters have the same behavior.) They also look the same in the person detail:I call this Schrödinger’s whitespace (or whitespäce to be more metal): it’s either absent or present depending on how you look for it.in Smart Lists, Marketo trims whitespace when creating the underlying database query, which is why the People results are the same but the character is still there in the database, so when you sync to SFDC — and this is absolutely, 100% appropriate! — the att
Are you passionate about AEM and eager to share your expertise with the community? The Adobe Champion Program recognizes our most knowledgeable and passionate practitioners—those who help drive product adoption by: Sharing technical expertise, best practices, and strategies with the broader customer community. Collaborating with Adobe teams through product feedback, beta testing, and roadmap discussions Each year, 40 AEM Champions are selected through a rigorous application and review process. Will you be amongst the 2026-2027 class? Join our live webinar to learn more about the program, benefits, selection process, and how to make our application stand out. Whether you're a seasoned expert practitioner or an aspiring leader in the AEM space, this is your opportunity to unlock the Adobe Champion advantage. Date: Thursday, May 14, 2026 Time: 9am PT | 12pm ET | 6pm CET Register here: https://engage.adobe.com/adobe-dx-unlock-champion-advantage.html?trackingid=4SC98SFY&m
Hello community - I am new to Fusion and looking to use Fusion to create a report (or notification if report isn’t an option) that is a list of a users current proofs they are a “reviewer” only on. I don’t see any templates remotely close to this so starting here to see if anyone has done something similar or has any recommendations to get this to work. So far looking to do the following: watch event for new proof Read the record of the proof to pull role filter by the role “reviewer” Create report (or notification) What am I missing?
Would the community consider if having the ability to break down marketing planning activities into %age attributions for tactics as something that would be useful for WF Planning to be able to do. As an example If a campaign is planned to be target various industries, or effect specific geographies, or to support a subset of your companies products, to be able to show what your %age split across those attributes. I.E. and event is planned to be held in London but is aimed at specific industries where you expect attendance to be split Industry A = xx% Industry B = yy% industry C = zz% Where XX+YY+ZZ will always = 100% Being in London you may expect a split in attendees to come for various geographies the largest being Local and from the UKUK = 60% of audience France = 15% Germany = 20% Nordic = 10% Benelux = 10%There is no method currently in WF Planning to split attribution in Marketing Planning. Could the community see a benefit in having this type of capability within the tool?
I want to ingest data for orchestrated campaign: Should I enable dataset for Campaign Orchestration after or before ingestion? Using Data Landing Zone Can I use JSON , CSV ??? Why I do not see that dataset while setting up dataflow??
Hi Team,there is one dummy link appearing (like the below highlighted one) in all the link performance report which skews the report. any idea where it’s coming from? please share your thoughts!
We are building a solution in AEMaaCS to notify 3rd party system whenever a DAM asset is created, updated, or deleted — covering all asset types including images, documents, Content Fragments, and videos.Our approach uses AEM Eventing (Adobe I/O Events) with an Adobe I/O Runtime Action as the processor, which then forwards the event payload to 3rd party log monitoring system.One key question before we finalize the design:Will DAM asset events fire consistently from both the new Assets View console and the Classic Admin View (/assets.html)? Since both UIs share the same underlying DAM repository, we expect events to trigger regardless of which console is used — but would appreciate a confirmation.Any inputs from the community are welcome!https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/cloud-service/aem-eventing/examples/event-processing-using-runtime-actionhttps://developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/experience-manager-apis/api/stable/assets/author/#operation/asset_p
Why is that? What I need to do additionally? Or the components might be only shared in one Connection?
¡Hola a todos!Estoy configurando una campaña de Nurture en Marketo y busco optimizar la frecuencia de envío según el nivel de compromiso (engagement) de los leads. Mi flujo actual es el siguiente: Email 1 (22 de mayo): Si abre pero no hace clic: Recordatorio en 14 días. Si abre y hace clic: Segundo envío en 30 días. Email 2: Se asigna un puntaje de 10 puntos por interacción. Los leads con mayor interés alcanzarán un acumulado de 20 puntos tras este segundo correo. Mi duda es: ¿Es posible cambiar la cadencia del tercer email a una frecuencia semanal, únicamente para aquellos que hayan alcanzado el puntaje ideal (20 puntos)?Me gustaría saber cuál es la mejor práctica para lograr esto: ¿Debería usar una Smart Campaign adicional para moverlos a un Stream con cadencia distinta o hay una forma de gestionarlo directamente dentro del mismo Engagement Program?
Hey everyone, I wanted to see the logic behind the already existing shared metrics & dimension; however, I am unable to open the items under this. Curious to know if someone has any answer to this.
Hi Team,In ACC v7, I am trying to upload image and video files (JPEG/MP4) by generating Base64 data and storing it in the schema.The process works fine for image files, but when I try to upload a video file, it does not work. I am currently using the web app for this.Could you please help me understand what might be causing this issue and suggest a possible solution?its give me error like this :WEB-530007 Error relaying '/webApp/getBase64Data' to URL 'http://localhost:8080/webApp/getBase64Data?_uuid=ertf-4567-0987-2345-42kh986C86k8&_lastModified=2026-05-05%2005:29:50.183Z&_debug&lang='. Regards,Navin B
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.