Product Communities

Context: We run an AEM Edge Delivery Services site (repoless, Configuration Service; content authored in AEM). Sitemaps are generated by helix-sitemap. We push the sitemap config to content/sitemap.yaml via the Admin API and generate per-language sitemaps. Multilingual: es, en, pt, fr.What we've confirmed: Per-language <urlset> generation works via a languages map with source: /{lang}/query-index.json. <lastmod> is emitted when we add a lastmod format to the config. We could not find any way to emit <priority> or <changefreq> per URL, and we don't see them in the config schema. helix-sitemap doesn't appear to generate a <sitemapindex> for multilingual — only the per-language <urlset> files. Questions: Supported per-URL attributes: What sitemap attributes can helix-sitemap emit per URL (<loc>, <lastmod>, <changefreq>, <priority>, hreflang alternates)? Is there a definitive list? priority / changefreq: Is there ANY suppo

Hi , I am currently learning EDS and wanted to get hands on repoless. Iread that it needs admin key and api access to configure the repoless.Is there any way that we can do some hands-on on our own without using organisational keys?

Hi, Not showing the create site from template option in the AEM trial version for EDS setup. Can anyone help me on this

Adobe's been promoting AEM Sites Optimizer as a GenAI-first layer on top of AEM as a Cloud Service, aimed at closing the gap between "the site is live" and "the site actually performs well." After checking it against Adobe's current docs, here's a practical breakdown of what it does and where teams should apply healthy skepticism.1. It's built around four pillars, not threeSites Optimizer identifies and diagnoses issues across:Technical SEO Core Web Vitals Accessibility Content engagementThat's a broader scope than most teams assume accessibility issues get flagged alongside performance and SEO problems, not treated as a separate audit process.2. It's not just "suggestions" , it follows an Identify → Suggest → Fix workflow, with one-click applyThis is the part that's easy to undersell: Sites Optimizer doesn't just surface a dashboard of recommendations for humans to manually implement later. It continuously collects and analyzes performance data, prioritizes opportunities by projected

Fellow AEM folks, The pressure to go "Headless" or "Hybrid" is real. Every client and every project seems to be asking for it. But is it always the right answer? The Good: For those who have made the leap, what was the biggest actual benefit you achieved? (e.g., developer freedom, faster site speed) The Bad: What was the most unexpected downside or complexity you faced? (e.g., content preview, author experience, cost) The Verdict: Is Headless AEM a must-have for future-proofing, or is it an overkill solution for most common use cases? When should a traditional AEM setup still be the preferred choice? Let's get past the jargon and talk about what really works (and what doesn't).

Does it bother anyone else how the versions are labeled in AEM? I have no idea which one is which. Instead of v1, v2, v3, etc they keep appearing as New Version 1.0, New Version 1.1, New Version 1.0.0. What on earth do any of those mean? Cant these be listed as Original, Version 2, Version 3, etc. and then show the date. they were uploaded and by whom? That is how the average human brain would read these things. Is that a setting I can change or is this the standard operating procedure of the system?  

Hi everyone,I don’t know if you can help me with this question abount Whatsapp Native Webhook: What we tested:We submitted a real Meta delivery callback payload (wamid + recipient_id + status read) directly to the AJO native WhatsApp webhook URL.The endpoint responded HTTP 200 – Webhook data processed successfully, but no event appeared in AJO Email Tracking Experience Event Dataset. Relevant docummentation (whatsapp-configuration) mention this points:"A profile must have at least one message sent from Journey Optimizer before incoming messages are captured in this dataset."Our interpretation: AJO requires having originated the message natively to register the wamid internally — without that record, it cannot correlate the Meta callback to a profile, so it accepts the payload silently (HTTP 200) but persists nothing. Questions:Is the AJO WhatsApp webhook designed exclusively for messages sent through the native AJO WhatsApp channel?   Is HTTP 200 expected even when AJO cannot correlat

Hi! a client is insisting that the whatsapp webhook URL is allowed to send any information to CDP, not only Inbound categories to tracking. They want to send whatsapp delivey logs using that webhook. I think that’s not possible, that webhook URL is only allowed for tracking logs, is that correct? thanks.

We are investigating an issue related to Unspecified values and are trying to determine whether we're encountering a configuration issue, a data collection issue, or a platform limitation.In the example below, some conversions are successfully attributed to the menu-details dimension using Link Position, while 68 other conversions appear as Unspecified and cannot be tied back to a dimension.Why would some conversions be attributable to a dimension such as Link Position or Link Name, while others remain Unspecified? Is it reasonable to expect that most click-tracking conversions should be definable and reportable against a link dimension, or are there scenarios where Unspecified is the expected behavior?More specifically, can Target users define click-tracking conversion metrics using link-level dimensions such as Link Position and/or Link Name, and are there any known limitations that would prevent these dimensions from being available for certain conversions? 

Learn more about Adobe Marketo Optimizer.The Lighthouse Program gives a small group of Marketo Engage users the chance to try Adobe Marketo Optimizer for free during a focused testing period. Adobe Marketo Optimizer helps you engage customers across every channel and continuously improve results with AI at the core. With AMO, you can:Optimize with AI - let AI-powered decisioning and insights surface what's working, recommend next best actions, and continuously improve campaign performance  Engage across channels - reach customers with connected, coordinated experiences across multiple channels Build journeys visually - design, adjust, and orchestrate customer journeys on an interactive journey canvas, no guesswork requiredWhat you'll get access toDuring the program, you'll be able to test person journeys, emails, and forms, plus a wealth of agentic skills that help you investigate your Marketo data and optimize your workflows.As a Lighthouse participant, you'll: Get early, hands-on acc

When we open a record in full-screen mode or in a new tab, the Record Type “Features” is displayed at the top, as highlighted in red in Screenshot 2. However, when we open the record directly in the minimized view, as shown in Screenshot 1, the Record Type “Feature” is not displayed at the top. Could we also display the Record Type in the minimized view? This record is a connected record. 

I have been testing with the AI Assistant and I have been able to have it fill out a Request Form from  an excel file. I am finding that it will not fill out the Typeahead fields, assuming the problem is that it needs something manually entered to get the choices to populate. Wanted to see if anyone else has tested this and found a workaround? 

Is the new Unified Approval with Frame.io capable of interactive proofs? We use Workfront Proof for review and approval of email coding before deployment. Is that possible from Workfront using the Frame.io viewer? 

Hello -Need help to create task approval report with name who approved it, approval date and time, approval status, and any comments entered during the approval process, creating a complete audit trail.  

Per this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/allow-machine-to-machine-oauth-app-credentials-to-establish/idi-p/773411#M27023  and this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/having-trouble-using-oauth2-configuration-to-establish-fusion/td-p/658811 it does not really seem like this is something we can achieve at the moment. I just wanted to check was anyone able to establish Server to Server auth between Fusion and Workfront? Thank you in advance.

I’m currently reviewing the Adobe documentation about AI traffic in Analytics.Using this: Analyze traffic from AI chatbots | Adobe AnalyticsAccording to the documentation, hits are generated during AI Pretraining when our websites are scraped for training purposes. The documentation sates - You can use bot detection in Analysis Workspace to analyze AI traffic that comes from pretraining.However, there are no detailed instructions how to do it. Please advise, what are the steps?

I am attempting to search the system for any Updates/Notes that contain a certain hyperlink. When I run a Note report in Workfront, or do a search in Fusion, I am getting no results.How can I achieve searching for hyperlinks posted on Notes?

As I attended more webinars that include Unified Review and Approvals information, I have some concerns. One is about how we can turn it on slowly by portfolios UNLESS your company current uses Legacy Document Approvals.My question is how do I tell if we use legacy document approvals?ThanksMD

Hi! I am trying to create a parameter report showing both value and name.I saw a previous thread, which provided this that only showed values.displayname=Field Valueslinkedname=directlistdelimiter=<li>listmethod=nested(parameterOptions).listsnamekey=nametextmode=truetype=iteratevaluefield=valuevalueformat=HTMLIs there a way to show both a dropdown selection’s name and value?Thank you!

Hi, Can anyone please help me how to implement the MSM with step by step and also the workflow with approval steps to publish with AEM, EDS and universal editor. Also need to add the seo metadata as part of the page. Thanks,Kalyan

Hi everyone,I am currently working on an EDS Xwalk project. According to the following Adobe documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/field-types#rich-text https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/configure-rte The RTE should support features such as indentation and image insertion. However, in our actual Xwalk project, these options do not appear in the toolbar.Our users need to use tables and images within the rich text field. Does the Xwalk project currently lack support for these features?Additionally, is there any detailed documentation, component definitions, or specifications specifically for Xwalk? Most of the resources we found so far seem to focus primarily on DA (Document Authoring). [Official Documentation Screenshot][Actual UI Screenshot] 

I’m looking for some guidance on a requirement we are currently working on in an Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) / Universal Editor (Franklin) implementation.RequirementWe need to assign a unique and persistent identifier to every component instance on a page and use that identifier as a tracking attribute for Adobe Analytics.Example:Multiple instances of the same component can exist on a page. The identifier should remain unchanged even if the author reorders, moves, or updates the component. The identifier should ideally persist for the lifetime of that specific component instance.What We Have ExploredWe have evaluated multiple options, including: Generating UUIDs/random IDs in block JavaScript during rendering. Drawback: IDs are regenerated on page refresh and are not persistent. Generating IDs based on page structure, component sequence, or position. Drawback: IDs change when authors reorder or move components. Adding a hidden component-id field to the component model and at

The code side of my Edge Delivery site is working. Code Sync serves my blocks, stylesand 404 page from the repository. No document has ever previewed, because the contentbus cannot read the folder.Setup1. Site set up through the tools.aem.live configuration wizard.2. Content source is a SharePoint team site document library, the journal folder of the   site's Documents library.3. The folder is shared with helix@adobe.com at Can edit. Manage Access lists it as an   external user, and there is a matching entry under Links.4. The content source URL is set in Site Admin, Edit Sources, and verified by reopening   the form after saving.What happensLoading the preview host returns my own 404 page with this banner:  (404) Unable to fetch /index.md from onedrive  (404) The sharing link no longer exists, or you do not have permission to access it.Running the same preview from Admin Tools, Bulk Operations, over seven paths returns0/7 in about half a second. The job detail is the useful part:  "da

Does anyone know why ePub is listed as a default output in the XML Documentation Tools (Folder Profile), but isn’t listed in the default output list in Guides’ Map Console? How can I generate an ePub output using the DITA-OT? I can see from a previous post I made that the ePub output failed on all attempts 3 years, but now it isn’t even listed as an option in the Map Console.