Product Communities

Hi everyone,I’m looking to connect pCon.login (by EasternGraphics) with Marketo Engage to automate lead flow and tracking. For those unfamiliar, pCon is a leading ecosystem in the interior design and furniture industry for 3D configuration and OFML data distribution (pCon.update).I would like to know: Has anyone attempted this integration before? If so, did you build it internally (API-to-API) or did you have to rely on middleware (like Zapier or Make)? We are trying to understand the best architectural approach to capture leads from pCon.update subscriptions and pCon.cloud configurations without adding unnecessary layers.Any insights or experiences would be highly appreciated!

I am semi-new to Fusion and have built very simple scenarios of assigning individual assets to specific owners and while that is going well, this set up doesn't account for current workload, priorities or time-off. I was wondering if there is a way to pull in the Workload Balancer from Workfront into the Fusion scenarios to round-robin assign the incoming work based on workload vs. auto-assigning to one individual? 

Hi,​@Dan_Stevens_ I was browsing about custom activity setup and came across your comment here Could you share the code you used in the landing page for tracking custom activity for Brightcove video views? I’m trying to do something similar for Vimeo, but my code isn’t working. 1. I do not see anything in the activity history other than the option to filter custom activity “Watched Vimeo Video”2. Chatgpt said “Cross‑Domain / Hostname Mismatch in Marketo Tracking” is the issue. Does this affect a Marketo landing page if the video is embedded there?3. I see console logs firing, but there’s no “/munchkin/customActivity” showing in DevTools → Network.Also, Is my setup, fields, and API names correct? ​​​​​​​Anyone experienced in using Vimeo and tracking Analytics in Marketo, please share your insights and best practices. Thank you! 

Hi All , i have field named as ‘good data’ in schema with boolean type as 0 and 1 . I have few records in schema with key as “@abc”.there are cases where 2 records are present on same key with good data field values as 0{No}and 1{Yes} rest all field values are same. Now when i get new data file if record doesnot exist it should insert record with all field values(n number of fields)  passing in file and update good data field values as YES. and if record exist it should only update record in schema with good value as YES. It should not make any update changes to record with NO value.  As we are prioritizing record with YES value only in workflow targeting.  How i can implement this in single update activity

Can someone point me to documentation on the “Summarize” options in reports?When creating a chart in a Workfront report, the user is required to select an option for “Summarized By”. In most cases there are two choices: Minimum and Maximum. What do these mean and how are they different? What other options exist and what are their meanings? I’ve see Count, Sum, and Average on column settings as well. I haven’t been able to find anything in the Workfront documentation.

Hi everyone! I’m Dr. Margareth Legaspi, and I’ve spent over two decades working in education at both the local and state levels. I’m excited to be attending Adobe Summit for the first time and am looking forward to learning more about Adobe’s products and initiatives, especially those impacting the education space.If there are other education leaders attending, I’d love to connect, exchange ideas, and hear about your experiences. Looking forward to a great conference! 

I’ve been reflecting on how campaign execution has evolved in Adobe Marketo Engage — workflows are becoming more complex with advanced segmentation, dynamic content, and multi-step engagement programs.However, QA processes often still rely heavily on manual validation, checklists, and last-minute reviews.This makes me wonder:Are we underestimating the risk of QA gaps in campaign execution? How confident are teams in catching issues before launch (especially at scale)? Does manual QA still hold up for more complex engagement programs? How do you balance speed vs reliability in your campaign releases?We have built a solution that could reduce manual efforts and ensure quality campaigns. But before that just trying to understand how others in the ecosystem are approaching this and whether this is a growing concern.Would love to hear your thoughts and experiences.

In our SPA, we observed a specific behavior of Target activities: Even with renderDecisioning=false, some activities continued to trigger. The activities are present but not rendered. Since this is a SPA and there is no page refresh, in the subsequent Rule Page View we could not find the activities with the key expected by Target. Important: before user login, there were no Rule Page Views. Activities were therefore only processed after login, and everything worked correctly in that phase. Implemented SolutionTo properly handle the SPA flow without page refresh, the following was implemented: In the Rule Page View, after login, a custom code was added to handle view changes:   function onViewChange() {   var viewName = window.location.pathname || 'viewNamePage';   if (viewName.startsWith('/')) {     viewName = viewName.substring(1);   }   alloy("sendEvent", {     renderDecisions: true,     xdm: {       eventType: "view",       web: {         webPageDetails: {           name: view

Marketo’s hardcore rules for native Pre-Fill make sense, in particular stripping the mkt_tok query param so people don’t accidentally send their own personalized link to someone else. But there’s one hiccup in the native implementation — an inadvertent bug, since it has no privacy or security benefit — you can fix with a little JS. What’s the bug? Well, even when Pre-Fill works perfectly on an initial pageview:[1]initial landing: Pre-Fill works Just refreshing the page breaks it:after refresh: Pre-Fill disabled Now, the technical reason for this is clear: the always-added stripmkttok.js removed the mkt_tok for safety. (Which, again, is a good thing.) So upon refresh, the page no longer meets the prereqs for Pre-Fill. But the UX is a bit punitive. The person refreshing the page in their browser — the page that just included their data — isn’t expecting the data to be gone. Merely re-pre-filling the form after refresh doesn’t pose any risk, long as there aren’t any side effects. You may

Hello!  I am trying to pull together a list of MQLs who have opened an email (excluding confirmation emails unless they’ve opened a marketing email) and I would like it if someone can double check/verify that the logic is sound! (1 or (2 and 3)) Open email is not <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this year Open email is any this year Open email is <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this yearWe are trying to check and see how many MQLs this year have opened one of our emails this year so that we can report to leadership. My concern is that Open Email is Any would pull in people who have opened the confirmation emails only when what I am looking for are people who have opened a marketing email AND opened a confirmation email. 

Hi Adobe Community, Greetings! To support a new use case, we need to add few profile type attributes to an existing Individual profile class schema. To ingest the historical data for profile attributes, I know that we can create a new dataset and a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields so that existing profiles can sync in the values.  However, I wanted to check if we can do the same in the existing dataset without creating a new dataset for this exercise?And, If we create a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields and point it to the same/existing dataset - will it overwrite other columns with null values as other columns were not mapped in the dataflow? Thanks,Sambit

Hello - Has anyone else had a similar experience that when you made the transition to the MobileSDK your post_tnt_action field in your data feed no longer was populating?  Looking for any type of troubleshooting ideas -- checkboxes that we might be missing, a step that is often overlooked, something new that needs to be setup, etc.  Thanks!

Hi ​@Community I am working on AEP-SFMC API based destination connection. I have created a streaming type audience and activated it using SFMC API based connection. SFMC connection is set up successfully as I can see the target fields during mapping. On Audience activation profile get activated to destination.“Dataexport” is used as marketing action and no consent policy is used.Destination data flow runs and complete successfully but i get “Identities excluded” while profiles are received but none activated.“Identity excluded” comes with below description :  “The identities associated to some profiles cannot be exported to the destination due to missing user consent, or the consent provided by users does not match the consent settings applied to the destination. To respect user privacy, Experience Platform will not export these identities to this destination. For more information, refer to the Consent policy documentation: https://www.adobe.com/go/consent-policy-enforcement. “  I am n

I’ve been exploring how to better structure travel-related content so it aligns more closely with real user intent rather than just static destination pages.For example, users today are searching for very specific queries—like airline policies, visa requirements, multi-city routes, or realistic itineraries—rather than just “things to do” in a city.Some approaches I’ve been testing:Building query-first content instead of generic guides Structuring destination data (attractions, logistics, timelines) in a reusable format Keeping content modular so updates (like travel rules) don’t break the systemRecently, while working on a travel platform called Trekhops, I’ve been trying to implement this kind of structure more actively—focusing on how users actually search rather than how content is traditionally organized. It’s been interesting to see where this works well and where it gets challenging.For those using Adobe Experience Cloud or similar ecosystems:How are you handling dynamic, intent-

お世話になっております。現在、Marketo側でIPアドレス制御を実施しておりますが、Adobe Analytics側ではIP制御を行っていない状況です。そのため、Adobe ID上でIPアドレス制御を実施することを検討しております。この点について、以下の事項をご教示いただけますでしょうか。【確認事項】制御の重複時の挙動について 　Marketo側のIP制御とAdobe ID側のIP制御の両方が有効となった場合、 　Marketo利用ユーザーに対してはどのような認証・アクセス制御の挙動となりますでしょうか。 Marketo側IP制御の扱いについて 　Adobe ID側でIP制御を実施する場合、Marketo側のIPアドレス制御は不要となり、削除しても問題ないでしょうか。 　また、その際の注意点や推奨構成があればご教示ください。お手数をおかけいたしますが、仕様およびベストプラクティスについてご回答いただけますと幸いです。何卒よろしくお願い申し上げます。

Hi All,I’ve created a Custom schema and a dataset with a primary identity configured and enabled for lookup. The schema contains 20 attributes, of which 15 are marked as required.When I try to ingest data using the UI JSON upload, the UI throws an error with an empty message ("Add data is disabled because a required attribute is missing"). However, when I ingest the same data using other sources such as S3 or HTTP API ingestion, it works without any issues.Based on an AI search:Primary identity need to be correctly configured. This may be a UI-related limitation. The drag-and-drop JSON uploader seems to use a “simple ingestion” path, which does not support the same flexibility as dataflows (for example: mappings, transformations, defaults, conditional logic, or excluding empty keys). The platform may be performing a pre-validation and blocking the upload if it determines that required attributes cannot be guaranteed, even before actual ingestion.Is this a known issue, or are there spec

Hi all,Im trying to calculate YoY% metric using CUMULATIVE fx advanced function. Do you know the cirteria or formula to calculate it base on this type of fuctions? I did MoM% and its perfectly done (see image below) but a tried to do it for YoY (ex: march 2025 vs march 2026) and was not able to do it. Does anyone know it? Could anyone help me? Do I have to use other advanced fuction? Thanks in advance for your help and experience! 

Hi Guys, We have 2 types of Youtube Videos:iframe based youtubevideo which plays inline: Here Tracking works fine with Adobe extension “Video Tracking for YouTube”. iframe based youtube video which plays with a Modal Popup.: Tracking doesn’t work when user Clicks on Video, Modal opens and video starts playing in Modal. What recommendations do you have so that the tracking for Modal Youtube videos also starts working?  Thanks,Nitin 

I'm trying to retrieve Marketo assets (emails, forms, snippets, etc.) filtered by workspace. While the Folders API works for most assets using folder-based  filtering, I'm facing two issues: 1. Landing Page Templates: They don't appear in the folders API response and aren't folder-based. The /rest/asset/v1/landingPageTemplates.json?workSpace=<name>  parameter returns templates from all workspaces instead of filtering by the specified workspace.2. New Editor Assets: Folders with folderType: "Email Acrite" (New Email Editor) return "Invalid folder type" error (code 711) when queried via /rest/asset/v1/emails.json?folder={...}, even though these folders appear in the Folders API response. What's the correct approach to retrieve these assets filtered by workspace? Is there an alternative API endpoint or method I'm missing?  

Hi everyone,Is it possible to display the thumbnail for a specific version of a document (for example, the original upload - version 1)? Or does Workfront only support showing the thumbnail for the current/latest version of the document? This is not related to proofing at all, just a simple document/issue report. If anyone has experience with this or knows of a workaround, I’d really appreciate your guidance. 😃Thanks in advance!

In AJO, if a message is queued during quiet hours and contains a dynamic attribute (e.g, price) that changes during that time: Will the message use the value from when the event was triggered or the latest value at the time of delivery after quiet hours? Our requirement is in the night time, price of products change ($10 to $9) so we have to ensure that the profiles paused in quiet hours are getting sent the email with correct price ($10) -- approach for this. Will using “Discard” option in Business Rules in this requirement work?.   

I’m looking for a replacement for Drift Email that will integrate with Marketo and handles auto responders for out of office, left the company, and unsubscribes. Can anyone recommend a tool you’ve had luck with? Thanks,Tadia

I have created a note report to capture proof comments from proofs, thanks to ​@Kiersten_Kollins  previous post  - although I am hoping for no more than one round of amends, the documents are linked to the task status with some automation.My report is to report on rejected (tasks) proofs however, should V2 be rejected with comments, the comments from V1 are still visible on the V2 image.I understand now that notes do not ‘talk’ to versions of proofs and I have looked other ways to work around this:filter : exclude Locked (no relationship with proofs) filter using current version - again, no relatioship with proofs proof status document IDI thought that maybe a new column which shows V2 document entry date would help with some custom formatting, however this just shows V1 entry date. The versions are listed, so the information is sort of there, but wondered if anyone had a great idea in case V2+ gets rejected to decipher what comments related to which version/entry date.If V2 gets appro

In Workfront Planning, we’ve noticed the limitations for filters within records/views.Wishlist Items for Filtering in Planning:It would be great to be able to save filters that are used on a regular basis - admin to assign those to a universal access. It would be great to have the ability to create and save your own filters by user. It would be amazing to have these filters show to the users applying them ONLY - not all users in the record/view at that time.