Product Communities

We currently have users uploading their assets to the linked AEM folder in Workfront, which then syncs to AEM/Content Hub. If an error is identified on an asset, it must be manually deleted in AEM and then again in Workfront.Is there a report available that can identify whether users have deleted an asset from the linked AEM folder? Additionally, do teams typically have a governance process in place for when this occurs?

How do I rebrand and configure the default WKND search page?

For our dynamic xfa pdf forms that are created in AEM (LiveCycle), we have some fields where users need to be able to add formatting like bold, bullets, indenting, etc. Do you have any suggestions for doing this?

Dear AEP Community,Happy New Year 2026!Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Experience Platform.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for January 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEP. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEP-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating highly personalized digital experiences with AEP.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Artic

Dear Adobe Campaign Community,Happy New Year 2026!Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Campaign.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for January 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for Adobe Campaign. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any campaign-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating exceptional campaigns with Adobe Campaign.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top

 Stop Guessing: Visualize AEMaaCS Editor Activity with Splunk by @daniel-strmecki IntroductionWhen we talk about performance optimization in AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS), we usually focus on Dispatcher caching, CDN configuration, frontend performance, query indexing or backend refactoring. What often gets overlooked is the actual editor activity on the Author environment. Knowing how, when, and how intensely editors use AEM Author is critical operational information. Heavy editorial activity can significantly impact Author performance without proper optimizations in place, especially during peak hours. Conversely, periods of low editor activity present ideal windows for running content cleanup jobs, bulk imports, reindexing, or maintenance tasks that would otherwise degrade the editor experience.In this post, we’ll walk through how to build a Splunk dashboard to gain clear visibility into editor behavior on AEMaaCS Author. The goal of the dashboard is simple: to understand editor u

tl;dr: You gotta use the API to use the API. When browsing Marketing Activities, you’ll see the URL change to reflect Program IDs, Static List IDs, and Smart Campaign IDs:.../marketo-engage/classic/PG3350A1.../marketo-engage/classic/ST6331A1LA1.../marketo-engage/classic/SC9850A1ZN19In these cases, the first sequence of contiguous digits in the last path segment is the asset ID and can be used in the API. Above, you see Program ID 3350, Static List ID 6331, and Smart Campaign 9850. The structure works for Smart Lists as well. Other asset types like Forms and Emails also have their IDs in the URL. Not Campaign Folders, though!Selecting a Campaign Folder shows a tempting URL structure —.../marketo-engage/classic/MF2421A1— leading you to think the Folder ID is 2421. Nope, in this case 2421 is the “tree node” ID, which is a UI thing only. It’s not the same as the REST API Folder ID, which reflects the persistent structure in the database. Worse, the actual Folder ID 2421 can be located some

We are in the process of setting up an internal datalake which will receive a Data Feed from Adobe Analytics. The engineers need an example of what the Data Feed output will look like (ie. a sample version of hit_data.tsv).I cannot create and export my own test data feed because we don’t yet have a destination set up to send it to. I also cannot find a sample file anywhere in the Adobe documentation nor elsewhere on the internet(?!).Google’s AI Mode suggest it will look something like this (ie. tab-delimited and with a header row), however I want to confirm this as I don’t fully trust AI yet. Also what value appears if the column is empty - will it actually be empty of will something like NULL appear?hit_id    hit_source   event_list   post_evar1   post_prop1   visit_num   timestamp1234567   1            100,101      'home_page'  'banner'     1           16776576008901234   1            200          'product'    'sidebar'    1           1677657605 Can someone provide a sample file? (du

In reading through some previous questions/answers, I think I'm understanding that the actual pdf proof is compressed or flattened into an image in the proofing tool. This is causing a major issue for us with a company-wide campaign. Our design has layers of transparencies and once it's uploaded into Workfront Proof, that image is altered and looks terrible. That proof, in the proofing tool, is what our end user must approve and it's just not accurate. We spend a tremendous amount of time dealing with this. If you can't view the proof how it's intended to look, then what's the reason for using the proofing tool at all. Does anyone else struggle with this? I would love to hear what your workarounds are. Is there anything we can be doing differently for this to look accurate once uploaded into the proofing tool. Are there settings in the pdf output that our designers should be using to remedy this situation. Is there anything within the our instance that can be changed by Adobe support t

As of the October 2026 release, the Adobe Marketo Engage Email Designer possesses nearly all of the core capabilities of the old editor, while boasting powerful new features like AI assistance, Image to HTML, Brand themes, and more. This is a big milestone, as now all users can confidently utilize a Designer that expands email creation functionality, integrates with modern tools, and enhances collaboration. Shared capabilities Let’s take a look at what features can be found in both the new Designer and the classic editor.   Feature Description Classic editor Email Designer Starter templates Out-of-the-box templates to jumpstart campaigns. ✔️ ✔️ Saved templates Reusable designs for efficiency. ✔️ ✔️ Use/create emails in programs Create email assets for specific programs outside of the Design Studio. ✔️ ✔️ Preview/send sample See how emails render before sending. ✔️ ✔&

Hi everyone,I hope you are well. I have a question on the Adobe Analytics products variable.We currently use our products variable (s.products) for our site's retail journey. However, a separate journey is currently being worked on for a different part of the site/business area. This journey also allows users to purchase multiple different items together, each with their own attributes.I want to keep everything in the same report suite for pathing/attribution purposes. As far as I'm aware Adobe Analytics only gives us one products variable per report suite. I'm curious if anyone has experience of using the products variable for multiple separate journeys in the same report suite. If so, are there any recommendations/best practices to avoid the data becoming a horrible mess.For info: We are running a "traditional" Adobe Analytics deployment (not CJA) using App Measurement (not Web SDK) through a third party Tag management system (not Launch). Any advice on this would be hugely appreciat

We have 4 forms within MarketoWe wanted to find out when was the last time someone submitted these formsTried the Smart List way of “Form Fill” selected the form nameBut is there any other way via admin or any built in section with analytics which shows us top performing forms based on fills, and when was it last filled out. Or showing us stats like most used/popular forms, last date of submission Thank you

How can we implement Adobe Target Recommendations where the initially displayed common products dynamically update based on the applied filter—for example, when a user selects a specific production function/gender/attribute, the recommendation results update accordingly?

Hi, I went through varies posts from accessRules to EXISTS filter to see if I can find projects where certain groups do not have manage access to the projects. 

Is it only because Adobe wants the customer to buy additionally AT? Totally not understandable :) 

Hi Team, I was trying to create an email subject for an API Triggered Transactional Campaign (all the values are received from JSON payload for personalization) using the language attribute that exist in the payload with values EN and FR. I wrote this code as shown in image, but it didn’t work.. Can anyone guide me how can I create a conditional email subject line with personalization fields using context variable from the Payload. 

I have more than fifty activities to experiment with on my native mobile application. it would be helpful if all the activities could be fetched in a single API call.Expected Solution: at.js version 2.

Modern browsers use the back/forward cache (“bfcache”) to accelerate simple ⇦ and ⇨ navigation. Confusingly, the bfcache is different from both the classic HTTP cache and the new Cache API, and its impact on 3rd-party JS isn’t widely measured. The bfcache is dynamically managed and cleaned up by the browser: it doesn’t have user-tweakable settings and can’t be directly turned off. There are also lots of different reasons that the same page might be bfcache-able on one visit but not on the next. This all gives the bfcache a black-box vibe. But the bfcache usually leads only to Good Things™ so people don’t worry about it, aside from some devs trying to make sites as bfcache-able as possible. Interestingly, Munchkin’s backward compatibility (pageview and link tracking still work with old browsers) conflicts with the bfcache design. This wasn’t deliberate, of course, but the product of different goals. In this recording, check out when visitWebPage and clickLink events stop being sent to M

Are there release notes available regarding the latest adobe managed event forwarding extension upgrades on AEP?

AI is changing the way experiences are discovered, delivered, and optimized as people increasingly use AI to answer questions and even act on their behalf. As Adobe Experience Manager customers, you’re already building incredible digital experiences. Now, Adobe is helping you take them a step further. We’re excited to introduce five Adobe Experience Platform agents now surfaced directly in Experience Manager. These agents are designed to help your teams accelerate development, automate governance, and optimize content in real time — all while ensuring experiences remain human‑centered, brand‑safe, and discoverable by both people and AI systems.  Why this matters These new agents bring Adobe’s agentic web vision to life by helping you: Move faster with automated experience creation and optimization  Scale safely with built‑in governance and trustworthy guardrails  Improve discoverability for both human audiences and AI agents  Maximize impact by shifting from AI experimentation to measu

A HUGE thank you to ​@SamTaylor for sharing his Fusion expertise and highlighting some of the latest features!  If you weren’t able to attend, a summary, links to the slide deck, recording, and resources are below.Senior Product Manager, Sam Taylor, shared new features, updates, and future roadmap plans. Key topics included design experience enhancements, chained scenarios for reusable logic, alerting/monitoring, event priorities, utilizing technical accounts, instance performance monitoring dashboards (releasing next week), and more. He also shared some upcoming capabilities to improve the developer experience, provide more governance, as well as integrate AI.Slide Deck PDF – there’s a slide of previous Fusion session recordings and other resources at the end! Webinar Recording Resources from the chat: Need a Fusion introduction? Check out this on-demand webinar, Fusion Decoded: What It is and Why Every Org Can Use It  Looking for JSONata examples? Check out the on-demand webinar, Ma

I'm trying to install Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 on Windows Server 2022 on command with the following command C:\AEM\Author>java -jar AEM_6.5_Quickstart.jar -r author -p4502However the installation keeps getting stuck on "Press CTRL -C to shutdown the Quickstart Server:Loading quickstart properties: defaultLoading quickstart properties: instanceLow-memory action set to forkUsing 64bit VM settings, min.heap=1024MB, min permgen=256MB, default fork arguments=[-Xmx1024m, -XX:MaxPermSize=256m]The JVM reports a heap size of 2048 MB, meets our expectation of 1024 MB +/- 20Setting properties from filename 'C:/AEM/Author/AEM_6.5_Quickstart.jar'Setting 'sling.run.modes' to 'author' from command line.Verbose option not active, closing stdin and redirecting stdout and stderrRedirecting stdout to C:\AEM\Author\crx-quickstart\logs\stdout.logRedirecting stderr to C:\AEM\Author\crx-quickstart\logs\stderr.logPress CTRL-C to shutdown the Quickstart server...Java version installed is 21.0.9.Any idea