Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
HiIn a Smart Campaign with a trigger like “Email is Delivered,” can I use the Program name instead of the email name so that I can reference all the emails in the program without having to add each email individually? Would that work?
We would like the ability to display specific dashboards at the project template level. Our projects are at the individual deliverable level (i.e. an individual print piece, email, web page etc.), and we have templates for the different medium types. We would like to be able to add custom dashboards that provides specific information for that particular medium type. So for the print template, we have the print dashboard, for the email template, the email dashboard, and so on. The source information for the dashboards will be from the project details, but the dashboard/reporting will allow us to highlight specific information.
I recently refreshed my SB01 and then discovered that all my Fusion scenarios connected to SB01 or Preview are broken. Has anyone else encountered this, and how do you restore the connections without having to rebuild the webhooks and api calls? 😭
Hi, I have a question regarding the 91-day criteria for journeys. We have batch evaluated journeys with read audience that are intended to be always on (evergreen) in the sense that we hope that profiles keep entering as long as the journey is live.My question is once the journey is published what would happen after 91 days. We have not set any end date for the journey. Will it automatically move to finished state or will it continue to be live after 91 days. Also, in some documentation it says that after 91 days reporting data is not available or it gets refreshed. Is that case?Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Here is the SOAP Call being used POST /nl/jsp/soaprouter.jspSOAPAction: xtk:queryDef#ExecuteQueryAuthorization: Bearer <access_token>Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soap:Body> <ExecuteQuery xmlns="urn:xtk:queryDef"> <sessiontoken></sessiontoken> <entity> <queryDef schema="xtk:schema" operation="get"> <select> <node expr="@name"/> <node expr="@namespace"/> <node expr="@label"/> <node expr="md5"/> </select> <where> <condition expr="@name='recipient' and @namespace='nms'"/> </where> </queryDef> </entity> </ExecuteQuery> </soap:Body></soap:Envelope> to get all details. The response is self-closing node <schema
Hello, I have a custom workflow created that will publish a page to the Preview instance. This workflow is using the TreeActivation process with the Handler Advance checked and the following arguments: enableVersion=true,agentId=preview,includeChildren=falseThis normally functions fine for content updates. But any asset updates are not picked up and pushed to the Preview instance. It displays a broken image. I attempted to create a Workflow Launcher but it is running multiple times on the asset before it finishes processing. I have a screen capture of the workflow launcher and the workflow models attached. As well as a log file that displays something about the jcr:content/metadata. 11.03.2026 15:31:19.071 [cm-p------e--------aem-author-668fd857c6-rrzjs] *ERROR* [sling-threadpool-8685bd4f-0ae6-48c7-b09f-bcbb858297cc-(apache-sling-job-thread-pool)-6-DM Publish queue(dam/scene7/asset/activation)] com.day.cq.dam.scene7.impl.utils.Scene7AssetPublishUtils Repository exception during Scene7
Idea: Enforce required fields on custom forms and do not allow a task to be completed before they are populated. There have been several of these ideas in the past but really wanted to bring this back up in a newer idea forum as this is a huge concern coming from a highly regulated industry. I would really anticipate that this impacts almost every organization that uses Workfront as this is really expected behavior when you indicate that a field is required. Idea option 1: Required * = field must be populated before status can be moved to complete. Idea option 2: Could we potentially add an option for “Required to close” checkbox when designing a custom form field; a second required checkbox option that drives different types of required action. This would mean you could leave the current structure as is, but simply expand to enforce required nature upon the task completion trigger. Current Functionality: If a form is not opened to edit mode, the application does not
A portion of our end users access Workfront via iPad. While testing, I confirmed that the time field within the date field is functional; however, it requires time to be entered in an exact XX:XX AM/PM format, which creates a poor user experience on mobile devices.Given the volume of iPad users on our team, I recommend Adobe revisit the time field input to support a more intuitive editing experience, such as a scroll selector or auto-formatting, to reduce friction and improve usability across devices.
Capping Business rules in Admin section is only applied for the highest-priority identity namespace. We have few identities with our Hybrid data modal and would like an option to be align capping with the selected identity.
Can anyone tell me what the 8% metric in the gray area of the CTO graphic is measuring? Same with the 1.6% gray area in the Clicks graphic.
Logged into Fusion this morning to see a new banner message: “Important Update: From April 15, your current login/password combination for Adobe Workfront Fusion will stop working as we complete our migration to Adobe IMS. Please contact your Adobe Admin Console administrator or your Support team to be assigned.”I currently use an email and password for a service account in our WF instance (created prior to our migration to Admin Console) to log into Fusion. Does this mean I will need to be provisioned under my own WF account? Also, most of my scenarios use a connection created for the service account. Will those continue to work unaffected? I’m assuming the change is purely for login purposes and would not effect existing scenarios or my ability to edit them?
Hi there. I’m pulling a Proof Approvals report, where I am grouping by approverDecision to know what proofs are still pending and which ones have been reviewed/approved. It turns out that if a proof was set up as interactive, the system will lowercase the field value for approverDecision and will capitalize it if the proof was set up as static. See example screenshot:I cannot find any string functions to use within valueexpression or something similar in text mode to normalize these fields. Any idea how to proceed here? Current text mode grouping:group.0.iscollapsed=truegroup.0.linkedname=approvergroup.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumngroup.0.namekeyargkey.0=approvergroup.0.namekeyargkey.1=namegroup.0.valuefield=approver:namegroup.0.valueformat=stringgroup.1.iscollapsed=truegroup.1.name=Approver Decisiongroup.1.valuefield=approverDecisiongroup.1.valueformat=stringtextmode=true
Hi, I’m configuring a Custom SMS provider in AJO.The provider requires:A login request using Authorization: Basic base64(user:password) to retrieve a short-lived token A second request to send the SMS using Authorization: Bearer {token}Since the token expires frequently, is it possible in AJO Custom SMS configuration to:Dynamically generate the Basic header? Handle the login call and reuse the returned token?Or is middleware required to manage token refresh externally? If Custom SMS config can’t manage this, can Custom Actions do that? Thanks!
I applied for the Adobe AD0-E608 exam on 13th March and later rescheduled it to 15th March. I received an email from Adobe confirming that the exam has been successfully rescheduled. However, I am unable to pay the $5 rescheduling fee.In the Purchases section, it shows that there is an amount payable, but there is no option available to complete the payment. I also have not received any email with instructions or a link to pay the due amount.
Hi Team,We have successfully ingested data into the B2B Account and B2B Person datasets, and the profiles are visible in the Profile Store as expected. The profiles for these entities have been verified in the Profile UI and appear to be correct.However, after ingesting data into the B2B Account–Person Relationship dataset, we are unable to see the corresponding Account–Person relationship reflected in the Profile Store.For the relationship mapping, we followed the Adobe documentation provided in the link below:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/sources/connectors/adobe-applications/mapping/salesforce#account-contact-relationBelow are the dataset details used in this implementation:Datasets: B2B Account_IM_Dataset B2BLead_IM_Dataset B2BContact_IM_Dataset B2B Account Person Relation_IM_Dataset Environment Details: Sandbox: aepenablementfy26 Environment Type: Development Region: VA7 Although the data ingestion for the Account–Person Relationship data
Background:Working with AEP and connected tools like CJA and AJO for a while now, one thing has become painfully obvious lately: the lack of a useful documentation of the client setup. There may be great yet unofficial community tools out there, but let's be honest, in many cases people using the system may not have the required setup like programming languages (Python or NodeJS) to generate the documentation for themselves, so might require a developer to support them. What I am trying to say is:The Adobe tools are powerful and highly complex to set up, and creating and maintaining client-specific documentation on that is cannot possibly be a manual task. This is surely not sustainable. What I would like to pitch is:We need a Documentation section built into the UI AEP and connected tools, that lets you generate an ad-hoc, standardized documentation as downloadable Excel workbook.This you can then either keep in AEP to be accessible for everyone with access, or decide to download and
Please Ignore
Wjen i was trying to create n8n workflow for the task it always fails as forbidden credentials or 403
Hi all,We are working in a PoC over EDS but, following the aem.live tutorials and working on our sandbox (Cloud Manager) we have arrived to an issue we are not able to deal with: I created the project with my account (Cloud Manager, let’s say xxx@xxx.com) and obtained this (image attached) error: It’s a bit strange since I have access to Google Drive. Any help? Cheers,DGM.-
Hi everyone,I am facing an issue with an image picker inside a multifield in an AEM author dialog.Scenario:Inside a multifield, I added a fileupload component to allow authors to select an image asset.Dialog configuration example:<file jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" sling:resourceType="cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload" granite:class="cmp-image__editor-file-upload" enableNextGenDynamicMedia="{Boolean}true" class="cq-droptarget" fieldLabel="Image Asset" fileNameParameter="./fileName" fileReferenceParameter="./fileReference" mimeTypes="[image/gif,image/jpeg,image/png,image/tiff,image/svg+xml]" name="./file" title="Upload Image Asset"/>Issue:When the author selects or changes an image in one multifield item, the selected image is automatically applied to all other multifield items. So essentially, Selecting image in item 1, updates item 2, item 3, etc.Issue VisualizeAlso after submit the dialog the image is not saved in CRX.We are usin
Hi Community,We're experiencing an issue in one of our lead scoring campaigns in Marketo. The flow is set up as: Change Status > Wait 5 minutes > Change Score.Most leads follow this correctly, but a few records are skipping the wait step entirely. They enter the campaign, the status changes, and their score updates within seconds - no delay observed.I already reviewed there's no racing conditions. No one updated the campaign in between. I am assuming this can be a priority issue.Has anyone seen this before? What could be the possible reasons? Any insights, troubleshooting tips, or solutions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Hi! I'm trying to add Gmail Annotation into a token via email script and haven't had much luck finding any examples.I've added this script and token to the <head> of my email template, but I don't know what to add to the Email Script Token. Sanford W had mentioned a Velocity Token, which I have researched, but haven't found any documentation on. https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-discussions/has-anyone-been-successful-in-adding-gmail-annotation-to-a/td-p/315669 Can someone please assist? Script added to the email template: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> <html> <head> <script type="application/ld+json"> {{my.Gmail Annotation}} </script> </head> Gmail Annotation script added to Email Script token which needs to be converted to Velocity Token: [{ "@context": "http://schema.org/", &
I am trying to map an array variable to the Planning Module but no matter what I do, I get an error "Array of objects expected in parameter 'F6914a6c02f21335b7b794d35'." I have tried to just have the ID numbers, the "id: xxxxxxx" and plenty of other things to get this to work but I don't know what it wants and I can not find any documentation on Planning Module specifics. When I put the variables in one at a time in the without mapping, it works (but I will never know the set amount of objects so I need the array). If anyone has any ideas, I would appreciate it. My Variable Expression:The Variable Output:Planning Module Input: Error:
I’m thrilled to recognize @ravitejasurampu as our AEM Champion of the Month for March!As a first-year AEM Champion, Ravi has gone above and beyond to educate and enable the global community of AEM users. From publishing articles on Experience League Perspectives - to getting ready to speak at Adobe Summit's The Skill Exchange - to kickstarting our first-ever Bay Area AEM User Group chapter, Ravi has been a model AEM Champion from the start.Congrats, Ravi!
Hi everyone,I’m encountering an issue related to “Registered Error” statuses in a Marketo webinar program.For one of our webinars, we see about 60 members with the status Registered Error in the Program Members tab. Most of these records were originally marked as Registered but later moved to Registered Error after Salesforce created duplicate records and merged them. The total number of registrants coming from Marketo aligns correctly with Adobe Connect data.However, when I try to pull these same members using a Smart List with the filter Member of Program → Status: Registered Error, only a small portion of those records appear. Many of the individuals shown in the Program Members tab are missing from the Smart List results.We need to locate these members to update their status to No Show, since they did not attend the webinar.Has anyone experienced this behavior before, and were you able to find a solution or workaround?Thanks in advance for any insights!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
