Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: It will be possible to set links from the same domain to open in a new tab. Use-case: When setting up a link within the same domain Current/Experienced Behavior: It's not possible to determine whether the `target=_blank` setting is enabled or disabled, so transitions within the same domain always result in transitions to the same tab. Improved/Expected Behavior: You can toggle the setting of `target="_blank"` for each link. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Experience Manager as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: asahi kasei Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I can find these from APIs may be, but I dont see any dataset which has this information.
Hi Adobe Community, Greetings! For AJO use case where streaming segment is one of the core dependencies, I wanted to check if we can potentially configure a trigger event journey that does not depend on streaming audience qualification? Due to our current architecture with AEP, we're unable to get streaming segments to work in our instance, because our current connect type is based on a batch type of connector. So, even though we have set the ingestion cadence to 15 mins and profiles + events update in the profile store <15 mins but still the streaming audience do not qualify in real/near-real time as the current connection type doesn’t supports it. All other factors necessary for streaming segment to qualify is satisfied, except the connection type. Creating a new connection would significantly delay our use case deployment. Hence we were exploring creating journeys that would trigger based on events. As am not aware about AJO (am an AEP dev), Just wanted to get expert opinion
When we audit all the campaigns couple of years later, its very difficult to two things:1. If someone has added or removed any custom forms. We have no audit trail on the campaign.On the copied campaign, we never come to know how the campaign was created. Either it was created by a user through converting into a template, or it was copied from an old campaign.Does anyone track that at your organisation?
Hello everyone,we are based in Germany and are active users of Adobe Real-Time CDP Data Collaboration. You can find us in Adobe Collaboration as a collaborator.Our current primary Match Key is hashed email addresses from our publishers’ subscriber bases.iq digital media marketing gmbh is the exclusive marketer for leading media brands in Germany, covering general news, business & finance, trade media, and millennial‑focused content. Our portfolio includes well-known websites such as DER SPIEGEL, FAZ.NET, Handelsblatt Online, SZ.de, WirtschaftsWoche Online, and many more.We just startet. So far, we are very happy with the ease of use of Collaboration - and what is further to expect on the timeline here. It is easy to use and straightforward to operate, which we really appreciate. Therefore, we would like to invite advertisers and data providers who are already working with Adobe CDP to start a conversation about this new product (available in Europe since 2026) and to explore potent
お世話になっております。現在、Adobe ID環境においてSSO(シングルサインオン)認証の導入を検討しております。当社の社内認証基盤はMicrosoftのEntra IDを利用しております。つきましては、以下の点についてご教示いただけますと幸いです。【確認事項】SSO適用範囲について 弊社はAdobe AnalyticsおよびAdobe Marketoを利用していますが、Entra IDとのSSO連携は可能でしょうか。 一部ユーザーの例外運用について Adobe Analyticsにおいて、SSO対象外のユーザー(ローカルユーザー)を作成し、運用することは可能でしょうか。 また、可能な場合は制約事項や留意点があれば併せてご教示ください。【背景】通常ユーザーはSSOで統合管理を行いつつ、外部委託先や緊急時対応用として、一部ローカル認証ユーザーの運用を想定しております。
Hi all, Currently facing issues with Marketo not sending any of the test eDMs and my recent eDM campaign that was scheduled has been sent but all the emails have been “soft bounced” Any issue why this is happening? Is there a glitch in the system? All Outlook and Gmails are getting bounced back.
Hey everyone — I built a free tool that might save you some time on your next AEP implementation.SynthAEP generates realistic XDM-compliant synthetic data for AEP sandboxes. Instead of manually crafting test profiles and events, you pick a scenario, set parameters, and download ready-to-ingest data.The multi-schema feature is what I'm most proud of: upload 2-5 schemas (mix of profile and event), choose batch or streaming format for each, and get a ZIP with unified data where identities stitch correctly across all datasets. Streaming exports come with Postman collections so you can POST directly to your DCS endpoint.Free tier available, custom/multi schema you can try once per day.aepsynthdata.comWould love to hear what would make this more useful for your workflows. What scenarios should I add? What field groups are missing?
Description - Currently, when you share a document folder on a project template with a group / team / individual, or choose to not allow inherited permissions, when you create a project those same permissions set do not carry over. However, part of the purpose of templates is determining permissions to be on the created projects, so this setting not carrying over doesn't make sense...Why is this feature important to you - We need the ability to restrict access to certain document folders and should not have to do it on each project, but rather at the project template levelHow would you like the feature to work - Created projects should receive the same folder permissions set on the project templateCurrent Behaviour - Projects created from templates do not retain the same folder permissions set on the project template when created
When a custom object that is part of a CRM sync has been changed, it needs to be disabled and reenabled in Marketo to recognize those changes. However, the system requires the objected to be disconnected from everything it is used in. This makes it impossible to change an object when it is used widely as we not only have to disconnect it from everything, but then reconnect it once the object is re-enabled. Ideally the object could be disable and re-enabled without disconnecting it, and then any conflicts created by the changes to the object could be highlighted.
Does anyone know how to view analytics calls from a mobile device to see variables flowing into Adobe.
Can anyone give a recommendation for how to display planned vs. actual hours variance in a chart format? It needs to be a simple visual as the final chart/report will need to be shared with leadership. Right now, the planned hours formatting is showing as crazy high because of the way the system calculates. See attached screenshot.Any advice?
We are working in a headless setup and i am trying to stay away from writing any custom JS functions for form field validations due to security reasons.For a simple rule example, prevent a Name field from accepting any special chars, i am unable to accomplish this entirely with rule editor. Tried many combinations and none worked. Have few similar use cases, where i need to use rule editor. i tried using “contains” but unable to find a way to concat multiple special chars.Any rule that i can pass a regex to validate, example Account Number (custom xx-xxxxxx). In foundation, we used to have a way to pass Regex. In core, i only see few OOTB example SSN, Phone number, Email, Zip etc.
At my organization, we have several shared tasks within project schedules. The users on these tasks are half individual assignments and half team queues. When teams assign users from their team queues, it will remove the original “primary assignee” on the step. I would love to see this logic removed from shared tasks as it causes many issues for the way that teams operate.
Hi team, We recently had a member of our team change her last name and she is now unable to create a proof out of documents uploaded in Workfront. She recieves the following error message, “Failed to generate proof - Unable to log into ProofHQ.” When I checked her proof profile I noticed her proof user type is now listed “guest.” Is there a way to edit the proof user type or has anyone found a solution to this issue?Note: We do utilize SSO, and the name change has been made to our directory.Best,E
Reaching out to the community to see if anyone has successfully automated the process of adding and deactivating users in Workfront, particularly when using Fusion alongside the Admin Console. We’re trying to understand what’s possible, what limitations exist, and any potential pitfalls to watch out for. If you’ve implemented this, did you require a developer, or were you able to accomplish it as a system admin? Did you partner with Adobe Consulting Services, or build it internally? Any tips, lessons learned, or best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
I have enabled the “add an alternative path in case of timeout or error” option for an email action in an event-based journey.When I triggered an event, one profile entered the email action. Due to an error (the email address was missing in the event payload), the profile moved to the alternate path (timeout/error path).However, I’m confused about the statistics shown on the End node:Entered: 2 Error: 1Since only one profile went through the email action, shouldn’t the Entered count in the End node be 1?Also, since the alternative path is enabled, the email action itself does not show any error count, and instead, the profile continues via the alternate path. The End node then shows Error: 1.Can you please confirm if my understanding is correct?
SharePoint Integration with Adobe Workfront 🔍 ScenarioOur organization recently integrated Microsoft SharePoint with Adobe Workfront to streamline document management and project collaboration.During implementation, a key question came up:👉 If one user configures the SharePoint integration using their Microsoft account, will all other users automatically be able to use it?🧠 What We ObservedAfter testing the integration, we identified the following behavior: The SharePoint integration in Workfront is user-based (OAuth authentication) Each user must individually log in to their SharePoint account when accessing the integration Permissions are delegated per user, not shared globally ⚠️ Key Challenges Multiple User Logins Required Every user must authenticate separately with their Microsoft account. Approval Prompts Some users encounter an “Approval Required” screen depending on organizational Microsoft policies. Access Dependency Users can only access SharePoint files and folde
Are you heading to Adobe Summit in Las Vegas next week? A little prep goes a long way in helping you stay comfortable, organized, and ready to make the most of packed sessions and networking opportunities. Here’s a list of things you won’t want to forget when packing: Dress in business-casual layers, conference rooms can vary widely in temperature Pack sneakers or a pair of comfy shoes; you’ll be walking more than you think (expect 10,000+ steps a day) Bring a portable charger to keep your devices powered all day Pack a reusable water bottle to stay hydrated and some chapstick for your lips Carry a small tote or backpack for swag and daily essentials (like snacks!) Have digital or physical business cards ready for networking Toss in a light jacket or sweater for cooler evenings outdoors We’re not saying you have to wear orange, but this is a great way to show your Workfront pride! Once you’re onsite, a few simple reminders can help you navigate the event smoothly and make the
Hi everyone,I’m looking to connect pCon.login (by EasternGraphics) with Marketo Engage to automate lead flow and tracking. For those unfamiliar, pCon is a leading ecosystem in the interior design and furniture industry for 3D configuration and OFML data distribution (pCon.update).I would like to know: Has anyone attempted this integration before? If so, did you build it internally (API-to-API) or did you have to rely on middleware (like Zapier or Make)? We are trying to understand the best architectural approach to capture leads from pCon.update subscriptions and pCon.cloud configurations without adding unnecessary layers.Any insights or experiences would be highly appreciated!
I am semi-new to Fusion and have built very simple scenarios of assigning individual assets to specific owners and while that is going well, this set up doesn't account for current workload, priorities or time-off. I was wondering if there is a way to pull in the Workload Balancer from Workfront into the Fusion scenarios to round-robin assign the incoming work based on workload vs. auto-assigning to one individual?
Hi,@Dan_Stevens_ I was browsing about custom activity setup and came across your comment here Could you share the code you used in the landing page for tracking custom activity for Brightcove video views? I’m trying to do something similar for Vimeo, but my code isn’t working. 1. I do not see anything in the activity history other than the option to filter custom activity “Watched Vimeo Video”2. Chatgpt said “Cross‑Domain / Hostname Mismatch in Marketo Tracking” is the issue. Does this affect a Marketo landing page if the video is embedded there?3. I see console logs firing, but there’s no “/munchkin/customActivity” showing in DevTools → Network.Also, Is my setup, fields, and API names correct? Anyone experienced in using Vimeo and tracking Analytics in Marketo, please share your insights and best practices. Thank you!
Hi All , i have field named as ‘good data’ in schema with boolean type as 0 and 1 . I have few records in schema with key as “@abc”.there are cases where 2 records are present on same key with good data field values as 0{No}and 1{Yes} rest all field values are same. Now when i get new data file if record doesnot exist it should insert record with all field values(n number of fields) passing in file and update good data field values as YES. and if record exist it should only update record in schema with good value as YES. It should not make any update changes to record with NO value. As we are prioritizing record with YES value only in workflow targeting. How i can implement this in single update activity
Can someone point me to documentation on the “Summarize” options in reports?When creating a chart in a Workfront report, the user is required to select an option for “Summarized By”. In most cases there are two choices: Minimum and Maximum. What do these mean and how are they different? What other options exist and what are their meanings? I’ve see Count, Sum, and Average on column settings as well. I haven’t been able to find anything in the Workfront documentation.
Hi everyone! I’m Dr. Margareth Legaspi, and I’ve spent over two decades working in education at both the local and state levels. I’m excited to be attending Adobe Summit for the first time and am looking forward to learning more about Adobe’s products and initiatives, especially those impacting the education space.If there are other education leaders attending, I’d love to connect, exchange ideas, and hear about your experiences. Looking forward to a great conference!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.