Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
One of the few concerns I have had with Workfront is that, for larger projects, there is nothing that I see that relates to a project charter that should be created in the Initation process group or the project management plans that are major parts of the Planning process group. The intake and custom form has been helpful for projects that require less detail or planning, but not for the major initiatives. For those projects I try to keep to PMI (Project Management Institute) standards. Are you able to develop or account for those needs within Workfront? Also, if you don't have a PMP professional or PMI professional consultant, I would recommend that you have one be heavily involved/ consulted in Workfront development.
I have done a Adobe Analytics tracking setup via DC Launch using the XDM web SDK schema. I have mapped the eVar, props and Events and the setup seems to working fine. I am also using a Data object specified for the “Adobe Analytics” which sends data directly to Analytics. I am concerned that if this will cause any Data duplicacy in Analytics. Since the AEP datastream we are using for XDM Schema is sending to Adobe Analytics service and the Data object also does. However, the official Documentation seems to be indicating this setup (Although I cant find right now where I read that). I also verified this for some Adobe sites and they also use both the data objects simultaneously so I am not sure if this affects anything or Analytics filters this on its end.
I changed the OSGI web console user and password following the guidelines below: During the startup process, when I restart the instance and try to access http://localhost:4502/system/console, I can still log on with the default username and password, even though these have been changed.
Hi All, Wondering if anyone has solved for capturing a url parameter or UTM in DynamicChat? This was posted as an Idea 8 months ago. Absolutely need to find a way to solve for it.
We are currently unable to capture url parameters when a user engages with a dialogue in Dynamic Chat. This is a big miss IMHO because it means we're unable to align dynamic chat engagement with campaign activities, or campaign costs. Many people user UTM parameters, and we currently use GCLID and CMPID as parameters to align user engagement to marketing activity, and marketing investment. Capturing these parameters is critical to showing DC value.
Marketo Dynamic Chat currently does not appear to support capturing UTM parameter values and updating them in Marketo fields. Having this capability would be valuable for campaign attribution, lead tracking, and downstream automation. We would appreciate Adobe considering this enhancement in a future release.
I have an old quickstart from several years ago that didn’t include the GraphQL feature. I’d like to add it to my local copy so that I can do some personal discovery and testing. Is there a chance that there is a package I could download without having a business cloud account?
Hello awesome community guys, I found one missing tool in AEM MCP arsenal. Ended writing a custom mcp server that runs on AIO AppBuilder as runtime action.Explained here https://medium.com/@bsaravanaprakash/one-missing-tool-in-aem-mcp-registry-and-how-to-build-it-on-aio-902cc13b1afaWith this learnt experience, I quickly identified couple more tools usecases on my custom mcp server.Optimized product image search - tool will first hit PIM to resolve to more accurate tags and then hits DAM querying customized tags. Returns accurate product images Taxonomy Resolver - our DAM is massive (3.4M) and taxonomy follows rules. freetext image search mostly timesout due to volume. So custom tool, that runs taxonomy rules, narrows dam folder path and then run Adobe MCP asset search using querybuilder. Is there any more usecases you are able to find? Tool example, that is difficult with Adobe MCP registry, and qualifies for its own custom server? Please do share, ready to flex my muscles.
Hi Team, Could you please provide your guidance on the following?We recently created an llms.txt file under DAM with some content in it. This file is accessible via the domain (for example: https://www.mycompany.com/llms.txt). URL shortening is being handled through the dispatcher, and the file loads successfully in the browser without any issues. However, when we try to access the same URL through Gemini or any gpt and request it to read the content, it returns an error stating that the file is not accessible or not available on the domain. Since we have Microsoft CDN and AMS WAF rules in place, could you please advise whether we need to validate this at the CDN layer, AMS App Gateway WAF rules, or the dispatcher level? Thanks in AdvanceRegradsVeera
Is it possible to set a default filter in Workload Balancer? I would assume you can do this in Layout Templates, but I do not see a way to do this? The problem I am having is users that are going to the WLB for the first time do not have a good default filter selected, so when they click on the WLB they’re inadvertently trying to load a ton of data and the page takes forever to load or times out.
Exited to host this even with Adobe AEP Product Manager.Join us for this virtual session where Adobe Product Manager will showcase the latest upgrades, features, and best practices for B2B use cases in Adobe Experience Platform and connect directly with Adobe experts and network with fellow professionals.Event is scheduled on June 24, 2026 at 3 PM CST.Register here: https://bit.ly/4g5Sp0r
I’ve been facing an issue in RTE where the links with .aspx extensions were flagged as invalid by linkchecker. Hence I added a override pattern in com.day.cq.rewriter.linkchecker.impl.LinkCheckerImpl.cfg.json with the below pattern:"service.check_override_patterns": [ "^system/", "^.*\\.aspx(?:$|[?#].*)"]Note: “^system/” was added as default.Even after this change, the .aspx links are still getting flagged as invalid in the linkchecker even though they are valid web pages. How can I fix this?
We are about 18 months into a mature AEP + RTCDP implementation and have crossed 400 active segments across business units. We are starting to see non-trivial evaluation latency on streaming segments during peak ingestion windows and our architecture review flagged segment sprawl as a likely contributor.Adobe's documentation sets technical limits but doesn't offer much guidance on the operational governance model to prevent getting there particularly in a large enterprise where multiple teams (CRM, digital, paid media, product) all have write access to the segment builder.A few things I'm genuinely curious how others have solved:Do you enforce a segment approval workflow before publish to production, and if so, is that a process control or is there a technical gate you've built? How do you handle segment ownership when the original creator has left the team? Orphaned segments with no owner are our single biggest hygiene problem. Have you seen a material performance difference between
Is such a dataset created for every specific merge policy created in the sandbox?
As we know the External Lookup field fetches data using REST API and has been part of Workfront for some time. Although it can be game changer, the desired features are still not integrated.Authentication API Secrets manager Auto trigger the API.This post is to highlight one feature which would be great to have: auto triggering the API and showing the result. Why is this feature important to you?Many a times there are clients who ask for fields that are auto-populated based on other field selections. Other platforms offer this feature with their product but workfront is still tralling behind. With auto triggering enabled for External Lookup, it opens the door wide open for so many possibilities. How would you like the feature to work?In the custom form editor add a checkbox to say - Auto trigger A new field should show to select the desired output of this trigger. Since data can be an array, we would select first object (example) On a Workfront object, this would translate to auto pop
We need the ability when we set up automated scheduling of reports to have an expiration date of “NEVER”. Its very inconvenient to have reports from either analytics or the new adobe report builder to aways hit an expiration date that has to be kept up with.
Problem statement:Customers encountering blocking and duplicate-key failures during concurrent Update Data or registration-style operations currently have no Adobe-supported product feature to smooth write contention. Public guidance focuses on maintenance and scheduling, and product guidance does not recommend enabling SQL Server RCSI. ACC should provide native controls and diagnostics to reduce lock contention without requiring unsupported database isolation changes.Request:Provide native concurrency controls for ACC write-heavy operations on SQL Server so customers can reduce blocking and duplicate-key failures without changing unsupported database isolation settings.Possible sub-features:Queue/throttle mode configurable queuing/throttling for high-concurrency write paths, including registration or subscription-style calls Conflict-aware workflow scheduling/locking hints for Update Data activities targeting the same dataset; lock-aware diagnostics and admin visibility Application me
I am working with a customer who recently purchased Designer 6.5. When the log into https://licensing.adobe.com and go to the download section, that site is secure. However, when they click on the download button, it opens in a new window that is not secure and we get an error that says 'can't be downloaded securely'. Is there any way we can get a secure direct download link or some other way to down load the installer?
Can someone explain what a “Root Project” is and how they could be used? I’m working on a report and noticed values for “Root Project” as an option when I add a column. I can’t find any documentation on that value or any fields with that name. None of my projects have any value in any of those fields when I include them in a report. Our large campaigns use a project for concept development. We add a project for each type of deliverable and link them together in a program. It might be valuable to us to name the concept development project as a root project.
Summary A customer uploading 20 video files totaling 45GB (~1.8GB each) is experiencing Chrome out-of-memory crashes (Err Code 5). Potential root cause is that AEM browser-based asset upload functionality currently supports up to 7 concurrent uploads regardless of file size leading to browser memory exhaustion when uploading large files, particularly video assets.We are requesting an enhancement to dynamically adjust the concurrent upload count based on total active file size in memory.Fixed concurrency of 7 does not account for file size, leading to excessive browser memory consumption with large files Chrome does not gracefully handle memory exhaustion in this scenario — it crashes with Err 5 rather than exiting cleanlyProposed Solution Implement a dynamic concurrency model that uses total active upload file size as the throttling mechanism, rather than a fixed concurrent file count. The browser experience should be smart enough to do 7 for smaller files, or adjust down for larger on
Assume that I have multiple Data Views. If I want to switch between them in Workspace then corresponding metrics in Data Views have to have same Component ID?
I have implemented the Adobe Analytics MCP via oAuth server to server authentication and currently I am able to create connection and maintain sessions for this. However while using the call tools to request and fetch data from any reportSuite I am facing some kind of bug for the tool “findMetrics”.Even after using the “page” & “limit” params I am still getting a large set of data as a response.for e.g. I requested “page”:0 & “limit”:10 but still got returned 86 rows of metrics data, Not sure if this is any issue from server side under which “limit” is not recognized. If anyone else faced this error let me know. For now I have restricted the data by manually slicing the post my limit.
Hello everyone,I wanted to get your feedback and suggestions on steps to follow while starting on implementing analytics for AEM Adaptive forms in a headless setup.Since a JSON flows back from AEM, should AEM responsibilities just be restricted to maintaining standard field definitions and the rest of the tagging happens on the front end renderer (React) ?Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Personalization often starts with a simple customer moment, but turning that idea into working template logic can take time. You may need the right field path, helper, condition, date format, and fallback behavior.AI Assistant for Personalization Expressions helps reduce that friction by turning plain-language intent into AJO personalization template logic you can review, preview, and apply.Instead of starting with syntax, you can start with the outcome you want for the customer:Use the customer's renewal date, add one year, and format it as MM/dd/yy. If the renewal date is missing, do not show the date.It helps translate that request into template logic you can review, validate, and use in AJO. What AI Assistant for Personalization Expressions Helps WithIt is available from the AJO personalization editor through AI Assistant. It helps when you know the customer experience you want, but need help writing, understanding, or fixing the template logic.Generate new personalization expressi
In the first part of this series, we explored the essentials of Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO) error codes—why they matter, how to approach them, and how quickly understanding these signals can transform your troubleshooting experience.In this second installment, we go a step further and include more frequently encountered error codes. We’re presenting a curated, in-depth table of even more AJO error codes you’re likely to encounter as you build, test, and launch omnichannel campaigns. Think of this guide as your “cheat sheet” for campaign health: If the mysterious codes below pop up in logs or UI banners, you’ll know exactly where to look, what likely caused it, and how to get unstuck fast.Whether you’re facing backend 500 errors, validation problems, or puzzling runtime glitches, this list breaks down each code’s context, root cause, and practical steps to resolve or avoid it. Keep this resource handy—it’s designed to help your ops, technical teams, and marketers spend less time stari
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
