Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Feature Request: Timed & Milestone-Based Comment Access 💡 OverviewCreative reviews happen in stages. Early on, teams need private space to draft assets and give feedback without outside eyes. Later, final reviewers need to see past comments to understand why decisions were made—without gaining permanent access.This feature adds a smart visibility gate that automatically reveals past comments to later reviewers only when their turn begins, and locks access once their review is done.👥 Who Is Involved? Audience 1 (Core Team / Project Leads): Runs the project, manages review stages, and makes final calls. Audience 2 (Creative Partners / Vendors): Works privately with Audience 1 during initial creation. Audience 3 (Final Reviewers / Business Stakeholders): Steps in at the end to review the work and provide sign-off. ⚙️ How It Works Keep Early Work Private Audience 1 and Audience 2 work together in a private space. Audience 3 cannot see drafts or internal comments during th
I have several report builder reports that got out to many stakeholders. Anytime a change is made to one of the reports, it needs to be rescheduled so that the report will send with the changes. Simply going in to edit the schedule of the report and selecting “current workbook” does not actually update the file sent to the latest file with the changes. Because of this, the schedule needs to be set up from scratch again, which can be quite tedious when the recipient list is long and each individual needs to get re-entered because publishing lists are no longer an option.
We would like the ability to limit users from being able to delete a task assigned to them. We don’t log hours we we are unable to remove that ability from them in the Project Preferences. The issue is when we try to remove the delete functionality from them, it also removes the ability for them to complete the work on the task. We tried going a layout template route as well suggested by support. According to support, Layout Templates only control the Delete action in the task Details view; there isn't a way to hide that same action in the project's task list (grid) view, since that's tied directly to the Delete permission on the Access Level. Because unchecking Delete at the Access Level can also block completing multi-assignee tasks, there isn't a configuration that fully satisfies both goals (deletion blocked everywhere, completion always working) at the same time today.
After a marketer gives feedback on a piece of creative work, the designer should be able to open that proof and review the feedback and the markups that were made on the proof correct? Today, our designers reported that once they were notified of “Needs Work”, they can’t open the proof. Is that by design? Is there a different workflow they should be following to access that feedback?We are on Workfront with Adobe Cloud Storage and using the Frame Viewer for unified review and approvals. Any help would be appreciated.
From Audiences to Insight: Identifying Your Most Valuable Customers If you're running Adobe Real-Time CDP, you've already done the hard part. Your data sources are connected. Identities are stitched. Profiles are unified, and your team can build an audience and activate it across channels in minutes.So, here's the question worth sitting with: open your audience builder right now. Can you segment on how much each customer is actually worth to your business, ranked, current, and ready to activate today?Most Real-Time CDP teams can't. And the reason isn't a gap in Real-Time CDP. It's that the attribute you'd need to segment on doesn't exist on the profile yet.The limits you've probably already hitReal-Time CDP gives you computed attributes, a genuinely useful way to aggregate event-level data up to the profile. If you need a count of purchases in the last 30 days, that's exactly the right tool.But computed attributes work within the boundaries of the Profile Store. They operate on a pre-d
Many teams use fixed-date tasks such as launch dates, event dates, or email send dates. In these scenarios, predecessor tasks often need to be completed a specific number of business days before the fixed-date task and automatically adjust when that date changes.Currently, Workfront does not provide a reliable native way to maintain these offsets. While the As Late As Possible (ALAP) task constraint may appear to be a potential solution, using ALAP can create unintended impacts to the overall project timeline, making it difficult to support this type of scheduling without manual updates or custom automation.We would like Adobe to evaluate enhancements to ALAP and related scheduling capabilities to better support deadline-driven work. This would reduce the need for custom automation, simplify template maintenance, and make native scheduling functionality more effective for a broader range of planning scenarios.
Just checking if anyone using connecting Adobe analytics data to PowerBI via 2.0 API connector. We have already migrated our reports to use 2.0 implementation and data refresh works fine on powerBI desktop. However, we published to PowerBI, the refresh fails during user authentication throwing an error “ This API endpoint has been discontinued”. Tried deleting and republishing the data source but still fails.Anyone that has come across this? Thanks.
Hi Team, Am sending to external vendor API request through ACS-GCM encryption and decryption method. API Request payload everything getting generated properly and RAW vendor response also getting while decrypting the vendor response to string it shows below mentioned error and GUID is not getting generated. Please advice what need to be done. DECRYPTED VENDOR RESPONSE = [{\n "ServiceExecutionStatus" : "ERROR",\n "Errors" : {\n "Error" : {\n "Code" : "AUF-ESB-Err-03",\n "Message" : "Native to XML nXSD translation failed for the nXSD XXXWhatsappIntegration/Resources/Schemas/AdobeReqSchema : Translation Failure.\nFailed to translate JSON to XML. ParseError at [row,col]:[-1,-1]\nMessage: Cannot read attribute: element has children or text\nThe incoming data does not conform to the NXSD schema. Please correct the problem.\n"\n }\n }\n}]
My organization manages dozens of SSL certificates across multiple AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS) websites and environments. Adobe notifications regarding certificate renewals do not identify the specific certificate that requires action, forcing administrators to manually search through the certificate list.I would like the SSL Certificates overview in Cloud Manager to support both ascending and descending sorting on the column headers, particularly the "Valid Until" column. This would enable administrators to quickly identify certificates that are nearing expiration and significantly improve operational efficiency when managing large numbers of certificates.The ability to sort certificates by expiration date would reduce the time spent searching for the affected certificate after receiving a renewal notification and help prevent overlooked renewals.
In a freeform table, I frequently want to put in a specific valued dimension, and then a second dimension.If you select a specific value from a dimension, you cannot put a second dimension side by side.Can you fix this?I know we could use breakdown. but I like the side by side.At the moment I use filter to filter on the value I want. So, there are work-arounds, but it is annoying.
Text in a Rich Text custom field in a custom form isn’t displaying when this field is added to a board card. The ask is that custom Rich Text fields are supported for direct display on Workfront Board cards.
I’m exploring options for using Unified Approvals to review Word documents stored in SharePoint. Since Unified Approvals doesn’t create approval workflows from linked documents—and Frame.io doesn’t allow native copyediting for Word files—I’m trying to figure out whether anyone has built a workaround.The workflow I’m aiming for looks like this:Author uploads a Word doc to SharePoint. Author shares the SharePoint link with reviewers/approvers via Workfront (names vary by project). Reviewers/approvers receive an approval request. A dashboard displays all pending approvals. Reviewers/approvers open the link and make edits in Word. Approvers log their decision in Workfront.If anyone has tackled something similar—or found a creative solution—I'd appreciate your insights.
I’m trying to create a project level report that captures issue “wait time” -- the time between when an issue was entered (convertedOpTaskEntryDate) and the date the issue was converted into a project. I cannot seem to find a way to do this. I can create a new field to time stamp the conversion date, but how would I do that? Thanks!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEMAACS Enhancement Request to automate reports sending to other AEM Users Use-case: In other Adobe Products (ACS,etc.) there is the ability to send reports to other users with a login. Would like this automated functionality in AEMAACS. When you Current/Experienced Behavior: Under Tools -> Assets -> Reports -> Create -> Upload (Report of uploaded assets) Unable to automate report to send to other AEM users. I realize this is currently not a feature that I would like included a future feature request. Improved/Expected Behavior: automate reports sending Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMAACS Customer-name/Organization name: Epsilon Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I am new to working with Captivate 13.1. Previously worked with Captivate Classic. I am not able to regenerate AI text to speech using new voices for testing and review purposes. I have tried to follow the online help instructions, but the images on the help instructions are from a version prior to Captivate 13. What are the steps to regenerate AI text to speech audio using an existing narration script?Link to Adobe Captivate help:Add and edit audio in Adobe Captivate | Captivate Category selected below as a best guess Thank you in advance
Hi, We currently have problem to install large package through SOAP call which contains our custom schema definitions - currently XML package definition is a little bit bigger than 1.2 MB. In logs we can find messages likeSRV-810019 The server process 'web@default' (pid=xxxxx) has unexpectedly crashed. It will be restarted. (iRc=-53) when package was a little bit larger than 1MB then we had no such problems Any advice ? Thanks in advance
Hello,I am wondering how to build a segment to identify visitors who added a product to their cart but did not place an order within a specific period, and subsequently placed an order after a certain date.For example, I would like to identify visitors who added a product to their cart but did not place an order between 2025/1/1 and 2026/7/30, but subsequently placed an order from 2026/7/31 onward.The following is what I built so far:I’d be grateful if any can enlighten me!
You can now access your Fusion objects from inside a scenario. The new Workfront Fusion connector lets scenarios call Fusion’s own API to create, inspect, modify, and operate Fusion resources.OverviewThis release introduces a first‑party Workfront Fusion connector that exposes Fusion APIs directly inside the scenario canvas. Use it to back up or clone scenarios, inspect dependencies, export activity logs, and gather operational telemetry — all as part of your automation flows.What’s newFull record lifecycle — Create, read, update, delete, list, and clone Fusion records from scenarios. Dependency insights — Retrieve a record’s dependencies so you can understand or safely update resources that are referenced elsewhere. Activity exports — Export activity logs for auditing, troubleshooting, or archival workflows. Queue and hook visibility — List hook queues, read queue items, and get queue statistics to monitor trigger backlogs and failure patterns. Connection & scenario mapping — List
Problem StatementCurrently, AEM Sites only supports tenant-level distribution lists for proactive notifications and communications. This creates operational challenges for global organizations managing multiple regional instances, as there is no capability to:- Configure separate distribution lists per AEM instance/program- Differentiate notification recipients based on regional responsibility- Manage admin-level notifications independently for different instancesThis limitation forces organizations to either:1. Include all regional users in a single tenant-level list (resulting in irrelevant notifications)2. Remove regional users entirely and rely on global admins to manually redistribute communicationsProposed EnhancementImplement granular distribution list management at the program/instance level within AEM Sites, allowing:1. Instance-specific distribution lists: Configure separate recipient lists for each AEM instance (e.g., Instance X recipients ≠ Instance Y recipients)2. Role-bas
I have an running AEM 6.5.1 LTS instance that contains a lot of own content and code packages, as well as own configurations. Now I want to upgrade this instance to 6.5.2. I download the release service pack and figured out, the “service pack” is a jar and not a single zip file.My current experience is when I execute this jar file I will get an instance with default and lose my content. Does not really exists another way?
Two new MCP connectors bring conversational, model-driven automation to Fusion. Instead of wiring together many individual modules, a single MCP module accepts an open-ended instruction and lets an AI model determine which Workfront or AEM operations are needed to fulfill it.OverviewThis release adds two first‑party connectors that speak to Adobe's Model Context Protocol (MCP) server: Adobe Workfront MCP and Adobe AEM MCP. Each connector exposes a single, flexible module you place on a scenario canvas and drive with natural‑language instructions (prompts). The MCP module synthesizes the required API calls, executes them, and returns a consolidated, human‑readable result — reducing the need to build long chains of Get/Filter/Transform/Write modules for many common tasks.What’s newSingle conversational module — One module accepts an instruction and lets the MCP model plan and run the necessary Workfront or AEM operations, returning a synthesized answer or structured output. Task examples
when date range is changed the display option is auto checking.I want to show data without percentage(red) and comparison trendline. Even though it’s unchecked, while changing the date range it is auto checked and comparison percentage(red) is shown
Im using the following query to consult ClientIDs that entered a specific action (Email action): SELECTDISTINCT identityMap['clientId'] [0] ['id'] AS node_enter_profilesFROMjourney_step_eventsWHERE_experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.journeyVersionID = 'd67b3772-71a9-4d4c-b78f-a7c5373f8034'AND _experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.actionID = 'b5a8420a-899b-437b-97fd-4a425f7a4e71'AND COALESCE(_experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.journeyNodeProcessed,false) = trueAND (_experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.dryRunID IS NULLOR _experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.dryRunID = '')AND COALESCE(_experience.journeyOrchestration.stepEvents.inTest,false) = false Is there a way to include in this query, the date of the start of the journey as well as tags related to the journey?
1. Content Fragments aren't a drop-in replacement for page componentsContent Fragments (CFs) model structured content well product data, article bodies, reusable content blocks but they're not meant to replace your entire page authoring model. Teams that try to force every page into pure CF + GraphQL often end up rebuilding layout/personalization logic that AEM Sites already gave them for free. Headless works best for content that's genuinely reused across channels (app, web, kiosk, partner feed), not for one-off marketing pages that only ever render in AEM Sites.2. GraphQL persisted queries are not optional in productionIf you're calling the GraphQL endpoint with ad-hoc queries from the front end, stop Cloud Service requires persisted queries for production use (arbitrary GraphQL queries against Publish are disabled by default for security/performance reasons). Every query needs to be registered as a persisted query via a content package or the endpoint. Teams that build their POC wit
Hi!I'm trying to understand why one of my Adobe Analytics alerts isn't triggering.My configuration is:"Any of these metrics" with 2 calculated metrics. An additional AND condition with a minimum number of visits. Segments applied to all the alert rules. Rolling time window and hourly alertThe alert works when I create two separate alerts—one for each calculated metric—while keeping all the other conditions exactly the same. However, it doesn't trigger when both metrics are included under "Any of these metrics", even when one of them clearly exceeds the threshold.Has anyone experienced something similar? Is there any limitation or known issue with using calculated metrics together with "Any of these metrics"?Thanks!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
