Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
When using Global record types to aggregate data from regional workspaces into a central, leadership-facing workspace, there is a consistent need to tailor field visibility at the workspace level. Specifically, certain fields that are relevant in the global context are not always appropriate for display in inherited regional workspaces.When using Global record types across inherited regional workspaces, admins need consistent control over which fields are visible to users.Today, fields can be hidden in Table view and the associated record detail panel, but Timeline view does not respect these visibility settings. Instead, the Timeline detail panel displays all fields by default, creating an inconsistent experience and exposing unnecessary fields to end users.The “Show all fields” toggle already exists in the Timeline detail view, but it is disabled and not configurable.Suggested enhancement:Enable the existing toggle in Timeline view Allow it to respect field visibility defined in Tabl
Hi Everyone, I’m new to Web SDK implementation, and I’ve noticed that an upgrade is available for the web sdk extension. If we proceed with the upgrade, will it have any impact on the existing rules and data elements?Also, could you confirm whether the extension needs to be upgraded separately in each environment, or if upgrading it in a lower environment makes it available in the library for validation across environments?I’ve gone through the release notes, but wanted to double-check—are there any potential risks or issues we should be aware of during or after the upgrade?
How can I map an array of date strings coming from the Adobe Analytics source connector into an XDM array field with dateTime datatype in AEP Data Prep? Since we cannot transform it upstream, does Data Prep support element-wise date conversion for array values, or is post-ingestion processing required?
Hi!Currently trying to work through a reporting question and have been researching and believe baselines might be my best option but having a hard time trying to figure out how to get to my answer.End goal: be able to identify the #, % and type of projects that have date changes to be able to track and better plan forCurrent understanding:Baselines capture dates (and more) in a certain time (either automatically or manually) Automatic Baselines are captured whenever status is turned to “Current” To capture routine automatic baselines would require FusionIssue: Currently, PMs will just change dates (without changing the status) and believe they won’t love the idea of asking them to remember to add a new baseline every time they doQuestion:Is there a way to make a project un-editable in certain statuses? For example, if a status is current, could it be locked so our PMs have to change the status to “planning” or something else in order to edit the dates therefore a new baseline is captur
בבית המודרני, איכות המים משפיעה ישירות על הבריאות והנוחות היומיומית. תבור טרייד מציעה מגוון פתרונות שתייה מתקדמים, עם עיצוב חכם, טכנולוגיית סינון יעילה וקלות שימוש. במרכז הקטגוריה תמצאו ברי מים המתאימים למשפחות, משרדים וחללים קטנים, תוך שמירה על חיסכון באנרגיה ואמינות לאורך זמן. כל מערכת נבחרת בקפידה, מגיעה עם אחריות מלאה ושירות מקצועי המאפשר בחירה בטוחה ושקט נפשי.
GIF images render as static JPEG in AEM Guides output (animation lost). GIF images added in AEM Guides are not rendering as animated images in the output. Instead, they are being converted to static JPEG renditions during rendering. @DivrajSingh I would appreciate a prompt response on this issue. Thanks
When using Tab or Accordion components in a page, an issue occurs where, after editing a component on the second or subsequent pages and then closing it, the view unintentionally returns to the first page.Expected behavior: When editing components on the second or subsequent pages, the user should remain on the edited page and be able to continue working without being redirected to the first page.
Hello, I am curious to know if there is a way to tell Marketo not to overwrite certain field values an a SFDC picklist field when syncing to Salesforce? Specifically, when it comes to records that already exist in Salesforce, but did not exist in Marketo prior to a form submission. This is consent related and we want to ensure an explicit opt-in or opt-out value is not overwritten with an “unconfirmed” value.For instance, a net new person submits a form and does not check the consent checkbox on the form, so the value pushed from the form to Marketo is “unconfirmed”. In Salesforce, a record already exists with this email address and the value on the SFDC picklist field is either an explicit opt-in or explicit opt-out value. How can we ensure the explicit opt-in/opt-out value in Salesforce is not updated to the unconfirmed value when the record is synced from Marketo to SFDC?
Created a question by mistake. Admin please delete this question.
I'm sharing in case you run across this issue or have a solution. I've run across an issue with migrating classification rules containing custom text values. If the old rule contains a rule type of Regular Expression and a custom text value in the "To" field, the regex does not migrate. I open the rule in the new Classification Sets interface, go to Rules, then click Migrate. The migration completes but the rule screen is blank with the message “Drag and drop a function to get started”. The original rules are missing. (There is no "try and migrate again" option.) Ok. So, I needed to manually rebuild the rules. (If there had been a lot of rules, that would have been a burden.) I rebuilt the rule, saved the rule, and activated it. Some days later, I checked the report and the report did not show the expected custom value but showed "Unknown" instead. After a week, it still showed "Unknown". I then changed the new rule to use $1 instead of the custom value. I checked the report and that w
Thanks to everyone who joined today’s workshop, Own Your Impact as a Workfront System Admin! The session was led by Workfront Champion and Enterprise Workfront Platform Lead & Product Owner at TD Bank, Nuria Munguia @NuriaMunguia , who shared a compelling perspective on how System Administrators can translate their work into measurable business value and financial impact. Key Takeaways: The best work of System Admins is often invisible, so it's up to you to communicate a value story to leadership before someone else defines it for you. Translate technical work into business value. Focus on outcomes such as time saved, costs avoided, risk reduced, and capacity created rather than listing tasks or activities completed. Make your impact visible before leadership asks. Consistently track, measure, and communicate the business results of your work to demonstrate strategic value. Capture value at intake. When requests are submitted, ask users to estimate time, effort, or cost sav
Hi All,I am hoping someone across Application Design reads this, because it does not fall into the topics in the list, but is more across the whole Experience Cloud Product.Recent changes have made it so that ALL links pasted into applications, such as Email or Microsoft Teams, just say “Adobe Experience Cloud”. Previously when sharing an AA or CJA report - or a link to a Marketo program, it would be more definitive. This makes it hard for the receiver of links to know what each link is for. Screenshot from Microsoft Teams of a Marketo link. With recent changes, and I have especially noticed with migration of Marketo to Experience Platform, it is very hard to identify which browser TAB I have which application open in. I use multiple applications and have them all open at the same time - AA, CJA, AEP, Marketo, Admin Console. But the favicon is all the same. Can you implement different colours on the favicon, or some other visual identifier, to make it easy for me to switch between a
At this time, there doesn’t seem to be any good options for copying Report Builder requests from one file to another. There is a Copy / Paste request option built into the Add-On which is amazing, but this only works within the same file. You cannot copy a request from one file into another. I tested this by opening and logging into two Excel Reports, copying a simple request from Report A, then going into Report B and selecting a cell… there was no Paste option available. I can understand that this might be an Add-On scope issue, but what about adding an Export / Import function that can export out an XML or JSON formatted file that can then be imported into another Excel instance… and hopefully this would support bulk rules and not just one at a time, as this would make merging reports into one large report so much easier (than the current “rebuild all requests from scratch”). This feature would be a huge time saver to:make copies of common requests to other files merging reports tog
Thank you to everyone who joined us for our MEGA-WUG panel discussion on building and advancing a career as a Workfront Admin! We had a fantastic conversation with experienced Workfront professionals who shared their career journeys, lessons learned, and practical advice for anyone looking to grow their skills and expand their opportunities in the Workfront ecosystem. Let’s Keep the Conversation GoingHave a career question that wasn't answered during the session? Looking for advice on growing your Workfront skills, advancing your career, expanding your network, or incorporating AI into your role? Post your questions in the comments below! Our panelists will be monitoring this thread and jumping in to answer questions, and we encourage other members of the Workfront Community to share their experiences and perspectives as well. One of the greatest strengths of this community is the willingness of members to learn from and support one another.Whether you're just getting started as a Wor
The recording of today’s Experience League LIVE show is now available on Experience League:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/events/experience-league-live-recordings/episodes/exl-live-episode-06-24-26Target expert @drburnsTarget27 shared the latest ground-breaking innovations in Adobe Target as we embrace our new agentic era with a new Target MCP. We’ll share what it does, how to access it and show it in action. We’ll also showcase all of our new Adobe Target releases with demos showcasing expanded use cases and improvements in intelligence and execution!Jump in, ask your questions here, and connect with our experts.
Hi all,I'm building an integration where Marketo sends a webhook payload (via Mulesoft) every time a lapse-related email goes out, and the payload needs several fields from a Custom Object called lapseDetails.From this thread I know CO field tokens don't resolve in webhook payloads — only {{lead.X}} and the standard namespaces do. The two known workarounds are: (1) copy CO data to lead fields via Change Data Value, or (2) have the webhook receiver loop back via REST.Where I'm stuck:Option 1 has a race condition. Producers can have multiple lapseDetails CO records insert concurrently (one per policy lapsing). Each insert fires its own campaign run for the same lead, and the flow needs a 1-minute wait (for an OAuth token). Both concurrent runs write to the same lead fields, so by the time the webhook fires, only the last CO's values remain. Both webhooks ship the same payload — one CO gets archived twice, the other lost.Question:Is there a Marketo-side pattern for sending the specific tr
Lets assume I have labeled data with labels: X , Z , K , A , DUser has only assigned labels: X , ZDoes this this mean that user only sees X , Z attributes in personalization window?
Hi, I am currently limited to custom form validation to test this out. I am attempting to ensure that only specific values are selectable from a multi-drop down control based on the queue topic. After testing it out, I saw that it seems the custom form validation is not returning the value of the queue topic ID, even though it is a field I can use in the formula. Has anyone seen this or tried it?
Allow for creation of a Document Approval Template that does not include a specific approver. We have generic templates in Workfront Proof today that sets the Proof Creator as the default reviewer. The approver(s) is added when the proof is created. We would use this template to pre-set multiple decisions/stages and due dates.
Description - Proof Deadline Date should not be blanked out on the most recently activated stage when the "Workfront stage" is added to the WorkflowWhy is this feature important to you - Reviewers are not seeing these proofs appear on their report and are missing proof deadlines.How would you like the feature to work - When a "Workfront stage" is added, it should not change/blank out a Proof Deadline Date in the recently activated stage. The Proof Deadline Date should retain.Current Behaviour -Proof Deadline Date is blanked out on the most recently activated stage when the "Workfront stage" is added to the Workflow This is related to:a ticket we have opened with Adobe Support: 00415119 [WORKFLOW-2900] Issue: Sync with Compliance Catalog is Blanking out Proof Deadline Date - Jira (atlassian.net)
Hello. I am attempting to run a report on users in sub-groups. Is it possible to group a report by Sub-group, and within that group show each user’s last login date? Also, is it possible to group by users who have logged in the last month, while having another grouping showing everyone else?The end result should be a report that shows all users, grouped by sub-group with their last login date displayed. Has anyone accomplished something similar to this? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Contributor licenses have considerably less restrictions than light licenses and allows our company to partner with some of our external partners on marketing campaigns without having to spend the resources to onboard them in Admin Console and our companies SSO. Unfortunately the 7 interactions per month is too restricting. We feel it would be beneficial if there is a way to expand that interaction limit. The following are a couple of options Assign limited interactions to a group/team in Workfront instead of an individual. So it can be used across profiles depending on the external partners needs. Add the ability for clients to negotiate increasing the limit in their contracts. Maybe treat it as another tier with the licenses.
Description - Create the option to schedule a send announcementWhy is this feature important to you - This will help manage a consistent cadence of communication while delivering at the best time each week, even if I'm OOO.How would you like the feature to work - Schedule send just like outlookCurrent Behaviour - There is no option for this currently.
It would be super helpful if we could schedule a date / time for the announcement to be sent out. I often find that I am preparing a draft announcement, saving it and then having to go back at the exact time I want it to be sent out. For example, I may want an announcement to go out every Monday at 9am when users log on, but instead I have to do this manually.
Hi, I am currently working AEM 6.5 on premise project. I would like to incorporate LLM visibility scans into our CI/CD pipeline.So far I have found LLM optimizer. Do you know if LLM optimizer provides some API that we can call during our automations tests?Alternatively there is AI Content Visibility Checker chrome plugin. Do you know how it calculate visibility metric?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.