Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
The Mention widget should automatically prioritize active conversations by moving any existing thread with a newly added comment to the top of the widget. This would improve visibility and help users quickly identify and respond to recent activity.Currently, users must scroll through the widget to locate new comments if the original thread was created some time ago, since thread placement is based on the thread's start date rather than the most recent comment. Reordering threads based on the latest activity would create a more intuitive and efficient user experience.
🚀 I’m excited to be speaking at the next Adobe Experience League LIVE session: Coworker Unlocked: Transforming CX Workflows with Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker!AI is evolving beyond helping us complete individual tasks. It's becoming a true teammate that can help organizations uncover insights, create audiences, optimize journeys, and automate work across customer experience workflows.Join the Product and Product Marketing team as we pull back the curtain on Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker and share:✅ How Coworker builds on the foundation of AI Assistant to help drive outcomes, not just tasks✅ The capabilities powering Coworker, including skills, plugins, and MCPs✅ Real-world use cases showing how teams can work smarter, move faster, and deliver better customer experiencesWhether you're a marketer, analyst, practitioner, or CX leader, you'll see how agentic AI is transforming the way work gets done!📅 September 24, 2026 | 8:30 - 9:30 AM PT👉🏻 Registration link here: https://engage.adobe.c
Make your mark at one of the biggest names in payments. We are looking for a Senior Marketing Operations — Growth & Acquisition is a business-critical role within the Revenue Marketing organization and will have a measurable impact on new customer pipeline and revenue growth. This person will own the end-to-end operational execution of acquisition marketing programs within a complex B2B2x sales model, working cross-functionally with Line of Business (LOB) stakeholders, analytics, creative, and sales teams to plan, deliver, and continuously optimize campaigns through the marketing automation system.This high-impact role requires a detail-oriented, results-driven marketer who thrives at the intersection of strategy and execution. The ideal candidate brings deep experience managing the full campaign lifecycle, from audience building and platform setup through launch, weekly performance optimization, and post-campaign debrief, and is equally comfortable driving day-to-day tactical deci
Has anyone else had issues with updating tokens where each time a token is updated the entire screen refreshes and jumps to the top of “My Tokens” view? When updating several tokens it is very difficult to keep track of each one.I’ve noticed this is Chrome and Safari. Is this a bug or a browser issue?
SUMMARYMake open tracking a per recipient decision driven by a person field, evaluated at send time, instead of an asset level setting. One email asset would then serve both consenting and non consenting recipients, and native Opened Email activity would still be generated for the consenting recipients only.TODAYThe only control over the open pixel is the asset level flag isOpenTrackingDisabled, exposed as the "Disable Open Tracking" checkbox in Email Settings and on the Emails Asset REST API. It is all or nothing for the asset.Adobe's own CNIL guidance therefore instructs customers to build two variants of every email, one tracked and one untracked, plus a Smart Campaign Choice step on a consent field to route recipients between them. Adobe Support has confirmed this is the only supported approach.Setting isOpenTrackingDisabled to true suppresses the pixel for every recipient of that asset, and Opened Email is a system activity that cannot be written back through the REST API, so ther
I found this old Idea that asked to be notified when the Desktop Proof App gets a new version released. Did this ever get considered? We have to get this app uploaded into our Self Service by our IT department and we don’t know when there is a new version out until someone has an issue. It would be great to get this processing as soon as a new version is released.
We are scheduled for the AWS data center migration in mid August. Can anyone that has already been through the migration give their feedback on how that went, issues they faced, gotchas to have in mind prior to the outage? We’ve gone through Marketo’s documentation but some of it is a little vague. In addition if anyone can answer any of the questions below that will be helpful:Does anyone have any screenshots of what the pages / forms (embedded or otherwise) look like during the outage?Did you get a notification when the migration was completed? They offer to cache embedded forms - what is the benefit of this? Would this allow the forms to stay visible and receive submissions to be processed later or does it just mean they would stay visible. Did the migration get completed within the window they gave or was it longer / shorter? Other than updating IP Addresses were there any changes that might impact webhooks, endpoints etc that we might be missing?We are also recaching out to Marke
We cannot seem to get the Value Distribution for Computed Attributes to show any non-zero values? We were recently informed by Ultimate Support that a minimum success rate of 30% is required for Computed Attributes. This is also where we learned that the 30% was not only a minimum threshold for the Value Distribution/Sample Profiles QA piece, but also for getting the Computed Attribute in and of itself to populate at all. This is an extremely high target threshold and unrealistic for many of our real-world applications. We did ask Ultimate Support if and how many clients have adopted Computed Attributes given those requirements and he shared that there have not been many Adobe clients to his knowledge who have, and confirmed that many other clients have expressed similar concerns as we have. Hence the idea & feature enhancement request raised here.
Hello, Workfronters! On October 29th, we're bringing a day built just for Adobe Marketo Engage and Adobe Workfront users to New York City, and we'd love to see you there. Spend the day with Adobe customers, admins, and practitioners sharing the real-world insights and best practices they've learned firsthand. Think brand and legal approvals, AI-ready governance, reporting with Workfront Fusion, smarter planning, and a bonus peek at the Agentic Marketing Garage. Plus lunch, a networking reception, and plenty of time to connect with people who do what you do. Here's a taste of what's on the agenda:How Qualcomm rebuilt brand & legal approvals in Workfront Getting your Workfront instance AI-ready Turning data into action with Workfront Fusion From PowerPoint calendars to real Workfront Planning Bonus: Agentic Marketing Garage Are you in the New York metro area? Come join us! Not local? Share this with a colleague in the area! Check out the full agenda and register today: https://reg.ad
Hi All, I ran the dispatcher utility in local and it auto-runs as part of web-tier in build stage too.Ideally one would expect same inconsistencies but there was a difference in my case. Local Validator - PS C:\Users\admin\Downloads\aem-sdk-dispatcher-tools-2.0.274-windows\bin> .\validate.cmd 'C:\projA\dispatcher\src'opt-in USE_SOURCES_DIRECTLY marker file detectedPhase 1: Dispatcher validatorCloud manager validator 2.0.892026/09/07 19:41:48 The following warnings were found: Did not find ServerAlias '*.adobeaemcloud.net' in any vhost file Did not find ServerAlias '*.adobeaemcloud.com' in any vhost file2026/09/07 19:41:48 The following suggestions are proposed: C:\projA\dispatcher\src\conf.d\enabled_vhosts\aem_publish.vhost: file is not a symlink, all files inside "enabled_vhosts" and "enabled_farms" should be symlinks2026/09/08 19:41:48 The following errors were found in the httpd config: C:\projA\dispatcher\src\conf.d\enabled_vhosts\aem_publish.vhost: link points to invalid lo
The Adobe Analytics API 1.4 is scheduled for decommissioning this summer, yet critical endpoints from this legacy API have not been integrated into API 2.0. This creates a significant gap in functionality that will impact many organizations relying on programmatic management of Adobe Analytics configurations.Missing Critical Functionality:The most important missing feature is the ability to programmatically:Create new Adobe Analytics variables (props, eVars, events) Modify existing variable configurations Delete variables when no longer neededCurrently, API 2.0 forces users to manually manage these variables through the Adobe Analytics interface, which is:Time-consuming for bulk operations Error-prone for complex configurations Incompatible with automated deployment workflows Difficult to integrate with CI/CD pipelinesBusiness Impact:Without this functionality in API 2.0, organizations will lose the ability to:Automate variable management across multiple report suites Maintain consiste
Hi Team,We are using:AEM 6.5 LTS Adobe Target AEP Web SDK (Alloy) AEM ↔ Target integration (activities are successfully created in Target)We have an AEM Targeted Parsys on a page to target the content based on the audience. The activity is successfully synchronized to Adobe Target and is Live.However, personalized content never displays. The component always renders the default content.ObservationsThe rendered HTML contains:<div class="mboxDefault" data-target-applied="fallback">and AEM generates maekup:mboxDefine(...)CQ_Analytics.TestTarget(...) Web SDK BehaviorThe page sends an Alloy request: {"decisionScopes": ["__view__"]} and Target returns propositions successfully.Returned activity IDs:xxxxxHowever, our activity:123456 is never returned in the proposition response.Activity DetailsActivity Type: XT Status: LiveAdditional FindingsThe browser does not have at.js loaded:typeof adobe?.targetreturns: undefinedbut Alloy is loaded:typeof alloyreturns:function QuestionIs the OOTB A
We're evaluating Ataccama and Celonis for metadata validation and asset completeness checks in our AEM DAM environment as part of our governance strategy.If anyone has experience integrating either tool with AEM, I'd appreciate insights on:Integration approach and any technical challenges encountered How you're leveraging these tools for metadata quality monitoring Any lessons learned or recommendations for implementationAny pointers or case studies would be helpful!
We are planning our JVM configuration for an AEM 6.5 LTS on-premises environment and are evaluating whether to continue using G1 GC or move to Generational ZGC (JDK 21).Has anyone deployed AEM 6.5 LTS in production with Generational ZGC? If so:How has it performed compared to G1 GC? Did you observe any improvements in GC pause times, throughput, or overall system responsiveness? Were there any challenges related to AEM, Oak, workflows, indexing, replication, or large content repositories? Would Adobe recommend G1 GC or Generational ZGC for production AEM 6.5 LTS deployments on JDK 21?Any real-world experiences, recommendations, or Adobe guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Video is central to how organisations engage their audiences—personalised, accessible, and consistent across devices, channels, and regions. Adobe Experience Manager gives teams two ways to power those experiences: the proven Dynamic Media (Scene7) platform that thousands of organisations rely on every day, and Dynamic Media with OpenAPI, our API-first architecture for teams who want lightweight integrations and composable, developer-friendly workflows.Both are first-class parts of the Dynamic Media family, and we continue to invest in both. Which one a team chooses should come down to the architecture and integration model that fits them best—not a trade-off in what their content can do.That’s why this milestone matters. Over the past year, we’ve been bringing the rich video capabilities customers trust in Dynamic Media to the OpenAPI architecture. Today, we’re excited to share that core enterprise video capabilities have reached feature parity on Dynamic Media with OpenAPI.Rich Video
Hello,For my XT Activity in Target I assigned the Goal Metric to a calculated metric created in Analytics. When I use the A4T panel in Analytics conversions are always 0. When I view Reports in Target we see the conversionsAre calculated metrics unable to be used in A4T?Thank you
I’m in the midst of setting up Target Recommendations. We do not have an ecommerce site. Our use case is to recommend articles that visitors might want to read based on previous behaviours (e.g. previously viewed article categories, etc).I have reviewed the steps to set up the Catalog, i.e. Feeds, and currently working on that. This post is about the next step - Capturing user behaviour. I am using these instructions:How Do I Implement Recommendations Activities? | Adobe TargetHow Do I Use Adobe Analytics with Target Recommendations? | Adobe Targetproducts | Adobe AnalyticsFrom reviewing these and other instructions, I believe that I need to set up the products variable. We are using Wen SDK.Questions:I believe I need to add something to the schema to receive information about articles that visitors are reading. Which Field Group do I need to use?Commerce Details (Description: Commerce data such as product information (SKU, name, quantity), and standard cart operations (order, checkout
Hello Adobe Experience League team,I would like to submit an original Adobe Experience Manager case study for consideration in the Perspectives section:“When a new Oak index slows unrelated AEM queries”The article covers Oak index scope, unintended query-plan changes, SQL-2 EXPLAIN examples, and validation practices. It is written for AEM developers and administrators.Could you please share the correct editorial submission channel and preferred manuscript format? I can provide the complete DOCX or Markdown manuscript.Original reference:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-oak-index-doesnt-know-your-query-santhan-b-dqwte/Regards,Santhan Battina
What is the core difference? Field based works only in one specific dataset and graph based between datasets??
Hi All, Getting the below issue - C:\Users\admin\AppData\Local\@adobe\aio-cli>aio aem-migration:dispatcher-converter -t=ams********** Executing Dispatcher Converter **********Converting Dispatcher Configurations...Found usage of undefined variable:target/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/aem_publish.vhost:${PUBLISH_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME}Apache configuration uses non-whitelisted directives:target/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/aem_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projA_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projB_portal_publish.vhost:64 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projB_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projC_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandD_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandE_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandF_publis
Is there a way within fusion to check if a field is displayed or visible to a user? Scenario: Field 1 = “No”Field 2 has display logic if Field 1 = YesResult = Field 2 visible = false Looking for fusion to verify if display logic is showing or not.
We have a Fusion Scenario Watch Event module that filters in projects based on the category ID. We have recently discovered that, because the filter is set as “CategoryID Equal”, it’s only pulling in projects where that custom form is the first one on the project. Since the relevant custom form is not always listed first on projects, is there a way to update this filter to look through all of the custom forms on a project instead of just the first one? I’m not too well versed in Fusion but am not finding an option to manually change it to something like “CategoryID Exists”.
Is proofing down? I've got users saying they can't open any proofs.
I am trying to track videos on a webpage. if webpage has 1 video, its getting tracked, but more than 1 video, when i am clicking on 2nd video. Its not getting tracked.Scenario : When i click on 1st video, its tracked, but 2nd video is not tracked. when i refresh and click on 2nd video. Its tracked but now 2st is not tracked. (Whichever video i click first gets tracked) This is the rule for youtube playback enable tracking. I searched on AI tools and it suspecting that problem is in this rule onlyfor 2nd video...you tube start is not happening even though all seems correctNote : The above code is for pageload irc frame in events
Test age
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
