Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Als letztes aktiv
機能改善要求(RFE)概要: When editing a live-copied Content Fragment, please enable breaking inheritance directly in the New Editor. ユースケース: The author localizes the values of the live-copied Content Fragment. 現在/体験した動作: We have to switch editing modes to break inheritance, which is very inefficient. 改善/期待される動作: In the New Editor, I would like all the features covered by the traditional editor to be available, with additional new features added. 環境の詳細(AEM バージョン/サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細): AEM As a Cloud Services 顧客名/組織名 Kyocera スクリーンショット(ある場合) コードパッケージ(ある場合)
I have more than fifty activities to experiment with on my native mobile application. it would be helpful if all the activities could be fetched in a single API call.Expected Solution: at.js version 2.
Modern browsers use the back/forward cache (“bfcache”) to accelerate simple ⇦ and ⇨ navigation. Confusingly, the bfcache is different from both the classic HTTP cache and the new Cache API, and its impact on 3rd-party JS isn’t widely measured. The bfcache is dynamically managed and cleaned up by the browser: it doesn’t have user-tweakable settings and can’t be directly turned off. There are also lots of different reasons that the same page might be bfcache-able on one visit but not on the next. This all gives the bfcache a black-box vibe. But the bfcache usually leads only to Good Things™ so people don’t worry about it, aside from some devs trying to make sites as bfcache-able as possible. Interestingly, Munchkin’s backward compatibility (pageview and link tracking still work with old browsers) conflicts with the bfcache design. This wasn’t deliberate, of course, but the product of different goals. In this recording, check out when visitWebPage and clickLink events stop being sent to M
Are there release notes available regarding the latest adobe managed event forwarding extension upgrades on AEP?
AI is changing the way experiences are discovered, delivered, and optimized as people increasingly use AI to answer questions and even act on their behalf. As Adobe Experience Manager customers, you’re already building incredible digital experiences. Now, Adobe is helping you take them a step further. We’re excited to introduce five Adobe Experience Platform agents now surfaced directly in Experience Manager. These agents are designed to help your teams accelerate development, automate governance, and optimize content in real time — all while ensuring experiences remain human‑centered, brand‑safe, and discoverable by both people and AI systems. Why this matters These new agents bring Adobe’s agentic web vision to life by helping you: Move faster with automated experience creation and optimization Scale safely with built‑in governance and trustworthy guardrails Improve discoverability for both human audiences and AI agents Maximize impact by shifting from AI experimentation to measu
A HUGE thank you to @SamTaylor for sharing his Fusion expertise and highlighting some of the latest features! If you weren’t able to attend, a summary, links to the slide deck, recording, and resources are below.Senior Product Manager, Sam Taylor, shared new features, updates, and future roadmap plans. Key topics included design experience enhancements, chained scenarios for reusable logic, alerting/monitoring, event priorities, utilizing technical accounts, instance performance monitoring dashboards (releasing next week), and more. He also shared some upcoming capabilities to improve the developer experience, provide more governance, as well as integrate AI.Slide Deck PDF – there’s a slide of previous Fusion session recordings and other resources at the end! Webinar Recording Resources from the chat: Need a Fusion introduction? Check out this on-demand webinar, Fusion Decoded: What It is and Why Every Org Can Use It Looking for JSONata examples? Check out the on-demand webinar, Ma
I'm trying to install Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 on Windows Server 2022 on command with the following command C:\AEM\Author>java -jar AEM_6.5_Quickstart.jar -r author -p4502However the installation keeps getting stuck on "Press CTRL -C to shutdown the Quickstart Server:Loading quickstart properties: defaultLoading quickstart properties: instanceLow-memory action set to forkUsing 64bit VM settings, min.heap=1024MB, min permgen=256MB, default fork arguments=[-Xmx1024m, -XX:MaxPermSize=256m]The JVM reports a heap size of 2048 MB, meets our expectation of 1024 MB +/- 20Setting properties from filename 'C:/AEM/Author/AEM_6.5_Quickstart.jar'Setting 'sling.run.modes' to 'author' from command line.Verbose option not active, closing stdin and redirecting stdout and stderrRedirecting stdout to C:\AEM\Author\crx-quickstart\logs\stdout.logRedirecting stderr to C:\AEM\Author\crx-quickstart\logs\stderr.logPress CTRL-C to shutdown the Quickstart server...Java version installed is 21.0.9.Any idea
Hi everyone,I am migrating an AEM Forms (ICC) project to AEM as a Cloud Service. My bundle is failing to start and remains in the "Installed" state due to a dependency conflict.The Error: Looking at the bundle status in the Cloud console, I see the following mismatch:The Server provides: com.adobe.aem.forms.ic.print.api.PrintChannelRenderService My Bundle requires: com.adobe.fd.ccm.channels.print.api.service.PrintChannelServiceThe Blocker: I need to update my Java code to use the new com.adobe.aem.forms package names. However, I am unable to find the correct Maven dependency/library to include in my project. I have tried adding aem-forms-sdk-api to my pom.xml, but Maven returns a "Not Found" error for the artifact in the Adobe public repository (https://repo.adobe.com/nexus/content/groups/public).Questions:What is the correct Maven dependency and version to use for AEM Forms Cloud Service to access the com.adobe.aem.forms.ic.print.api package? Is there a specific repository I should be
Hi gang! Trying to figure out how many users we have associated with each job role (not just number, but names too). When I pull a user report with a filter of job role name is not blank, user is active and group it by job role name, evidently this only brings back primary job roles, it doesn't take into account any secondary job role. How can I also have visibility into secondary job role? So for example if I'm associated with A and B roles, I should show in the report under the A and B groupings.
Since its launch in early 2025, Real-Time CDP Collaboration, Adobe’s easy-to use, interoperable, and privacy-centric solution has been enabling publishers to connect with thousands of advertisers at scale and power audience discovery, activation, and outcome-based campaign measurement. Capture incremental revenue and maximize advertiser value with Adobe. With signal loss and the focus on data privacy, reaching relevant audiences has become increasingly challenging for advertisers. This presents a unique opportunity for publishers to partner with advertisers and provide rich audience insights, new activation pathways, and measurement insights through privacy-centric data collaboration. But data collaboration solutions today can be hard to scale across advertisers, operationally inefficient, and difficult to use. There is a critical need to re-think data collaboration to unlock efficient commercialization and deliver advertiser value. Why Adobe Real-Time CDP Collaboration? Access to Top
Hi everyone,I’m working on a storefront project using Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) and wanted to clarify the expected behavior around Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and SEO.In particular, I'm reviewing how dynamic content (e.g., product names, links, headers fetched via GraphQL or similar APIs) is treated in the SSR output. Scenario:Some pages (like PLP and PDP) display content that is rendered client-side, and when inspecting the HTML source (view-source), this content does not appear to be present in the initial SSR response from the edge. Questions: What is the recommended way to ensure that critical content (titles, product names, links) is included in the SSR output for SEO purposes? Can this be addressed using enhancements in helix-markup.yaml, scripts.js, or other EDS configurations? Are there known strategies for SSR fallback or crawler-specific behavior in EDS to ensure search engines receive a fully rendered version of the page? My main goal i
Is there a purpose to mapping a variable to both eVar and prop? Or is it best practice to map to only eVar or only prop (not both)?
We are trying to make our web metrics more accurate in CJA by creating a filter that excludes our organization's VPN IP ranges. However, I just heard from our IT team today and they said our VPN has 100+ ranges and would be almost impossible to filter from metrics. Has anyone successfully filtered out a VPN like this from their web metrics?
Hi guys,Does anyone know how you can remove an overridden token?Trying to remove it gives me the following error: "Token is already in use and cannot be deleted". Since there is a fallback value this shouldn't matter.
Our first AEP Champions Office Hours session is complete! We appreciate everyone who attended and who participated in guiding the evolution of AEP Office Hours. Recording is here: https://youtu.be/aTExcbi_y5c. Please continue to share your ideas and feedback through this conversation or directly with Tyler or me. To ensure that you receive ongoing event notices, please join the Office Hours Chapter: https://aep-augs.adobe.com/adobe-experience-platform-champion-office-hours/ Based on the group that attended at 11am Eastern Standard Time (USA), that time works for them. If you were not able to attend and you would prefer another time like 5pm Eastern time, please let us know. Regarding future Office Hour topics, the group expressed interest in a wide range of future topics. For February 24th Office Hour topics, I will share some ideas later today. Again, thank you all for your engagement and support. Looking forward to continuing the conversation we started yesterday.David BarnesTyl
I have just had my first experience of the new experience for the first time. To say it is a retrograde step is an understatement. There now appears to be no option to remove all assignees from a task without manually removing everybody by deleting them and it doesn't have the option to assign a different number of hours to individuals on the same task, thus creating extra work in having to duplicate for each assignee if you want to give them different number of hours.This really breaks a huge part of our work and processes.
I’m implementing a new person-level boolean field (flag) to identify leads and contacts acquired via our Marketo programs.Our Salesforce instance is shared across multiple business units, so this flag is intended to identify only the leads acquired via our business unit’s Marketo activity.The intent is forward-looking only (no historical backfill). I want the flag to be set when someone newly engages with relevant Marketo programs going forward, regardless of when the person record was originally created.I’m trying to confirm the best-practice trigger setup for this.One option I’m considering is a trigger campaign based on Person is Created, where the acquisition program is a Marketo program (excluding records syncing from Salesforce), and then setting the flag to true.My goal is a clean, scalable approach that avoids manual maintenance and does not retroactively update legacy records.Would appreciate guidance from anyone who’s implemented a similar pattern. Thanks!
I’ve created an External Look up Field that pulls the names of individuals on a team “Information Managers” I would like from that field to get the User ID related to the individual selected so I can create a $$USER.ID report.I know I could create a calculated field that has each member with their corresponding ID but looking to do something so I don’t have to update everything each time a team member is added or removed.Is this something that can be done at the Workfront level? I do have access to Fusion if I need to go that route.All suggestions welcome.Thank you in advance,Dawnmarie
I want to use the split helper function in Adobe Journey Optimizer to separate a phone number coming from a journey event into multiple parts. The phone number is stored in the field context.journey.events.1278567881._floridapowerandlight.journey.additionalPhone, and my goal is to split this value using a delimiter (for example, -) so I can access each segment individually. However, I am encountering syntax errors when trying to use the split() function, which indicates that the field or context where I am applying it does not support PQL expressions.I need this result(234-456-7890)
In multi-brand Adobe Experience Platform implementations, consent information is often captured as event data, with each brand emitting its own consent events.These consent signals are then elevated to the profile level using Computed Attributes, so they can be reused consistently across audiences, consent policies, and activation use cases.However, Computed Attributes currently have a maximum lookback period of 6 months. If no qualifying events are present within that window, the computed attribute value is nullified, even when no explicit consent change or withdrawal has occurred.This behavior creates challenges when modeling consent, which is inherently a stateful attribute, not a time-bound behavioral signal. Suggested EnhancementProvide an option for Computed Attributes to retain the last known value beyond the lookback window, unless:A new qualifying event updates the value, orAn explicit revocation / change event is received.This could be implemented as:A configuration option su
We often run into all kind of problems with the email designer during a AJO upgrade/release. Created content disappears, variable settings used in fragments changes/disappears, Image sizes changes etc etc. All this things come back from the users as bug reports. When investigating the issues, we often need to conclude that the error/experienced behavior most come from hickup in the code during the code upgrade. Suddenly all is back to normal again, the day after, without changing anything. Out theory is that a AJO upgrade/code change possible has some impacted on the use of the email designer during the code upgrade. Maybe it is hard or difficult to store things at the same time the source code is been updated. At least we experience that it might be a challenge here. We would therefor like to have the option to “lock” the email editor and other components that creates things in AJO during an update . The lock could explain that this feature is temporary locked caused by an code upgr
Hi Team,Maybe it is nice to have an “Attach Template” function under the TASK. the same with Project. so the form that is associated with a template will go directly under “task details” instead under “Project details”Thanks,
Hi everyone, Using AEP Query Service, we have created a derived dataset by joining selected fields from the Profile dataset and the Event dataset, along with performing deduplication. The resulting data is stored in a derived dataset, which we then export to cloud storage destinations such as SFTP or a data landing zone in Azure.How can we perform this export action incrementally using Data Distiller and dataset export in Destinations?Currently, we do not have the option to export dataset files in CSV format. Can this use case be achieved by using Audiences instead, and exporting the audience in CSV format? The solution should also support incremental export. Could someone help us with the best option to achieve this?Data distiller or using Audiences Thanks!
Hello Adobe Community,I'm experiencing an inconsistent behavior with batch data ingestion in AEP and would like to understand the underlying technical reasons.Issue: When uploading data via the UI to a Profile-enabled dataset, I'm getting error INGEST-1211-400 with formatted JSON, but the same data succeeds when converted to JSONL (newline-delimited JSON).Error Details:Error Code: INGEST-1211-400 Description: "An error occurred while processing the batch. Please contact support." Error Code: 150 - "Parsing errors occurred when converting or validating the data" Records received: 0 Records ingested: 0 What works: {"_id":"/profile/0001","personID":"000000000001","person":{"name":{"firstName":"Luis"}},"personalEmail":{"address":"user@example.com"}} What fails: { "_id": "/profile/0001", "personID": "000000000001", "person": { "name": { "firstName": "Luis" } }, "personalEmail": { "address": "user@example.com" } }
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Assigning Product Profiles to IMS User Groups Use-case: We are currently assigning Product Profiles individually to IMS Users. These users are grouped under IMS Groups. These groups have access to different Adobe Cloud Products. Assigning Product Profiles to IMS Groups should be a quicker solution. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM currently does not support assigning groups to profiles. Users should be added individually instead. Improved/Expected Behavior: Adding User Groups to Product Profiles should be allowed to enable quicker access. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Release 2023.4.12142.20230526T152858Z Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): @kautuk_sahni
Sie haben bereits einen Account? Anmelden
Noch kein Konto? Konto erstellen
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.