Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hi everyone,I'm brand new to Workfront Fusion and recently completed the Fusion training courses. Our team is trying to connect Workfront Fusion to our Workfront Preview environment so we can build and test scenarios before moving them to Production.I've successfully created an OAuth application and generated a Client ID and Client Secret, but I'm getting stuck during the authentication setup. When I use the Preview domain, I receive an error indicating the application can't be found, and I've also run into issues determining the correct domain and redirect URL to use for the Preview environment.I'm sure I'm overlooking something simple, but after spending quite a bit of time troubleshooting, I'm stuck and would appreciate any guidance from someone who has successfully connected Fusion to a Workfront Preview instance.Any tips, screenshots, or examples of a working setup would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help!
One of the challenges we're trying to address is the amount of manual effort required for users to complete and submit multiple intake forms in Workfront at a time. To help streamline this process, we are exploring a solution that would leverage a custom web service and Workfront APIs to help automate the completion and submission of custom forms. The goal is to enable users to submit multiple intake requests programmatically while still adhering to the business rules and user experience defined within the Workfront custom forms. As part of an enhancement feature, would it be possible to allow API access to the display logic (e.g., cascading rules/conditional visibility) and/or other methods to retrieve the display logic within the custom intake forms?
Under the Hood: Comparing the Official MCP Toolset to the REST APII’ve lived and breathed the Marketo REST API for years. In fact, I was so deep in the weeds that I actually built my own custom Marketo MCP before the official one existed. Back then, I was limited strictly to standard REST endpoints, since that was the only systematic way to work within in Marketo. So, when I finally got my hands on the official beta, I was dying to know: how does this new AI toolset actually stack up against the "old reliable" REST API?Whether you’re looking to supercharge an AI assistant for your team or just trying to figure out which integration path won’t break your workflow, understanding these gaps is huge. Let's dive into where they overlap, where the REST API still reigns supreme, and those cool spots where the MCP pulls off tricks the REST API can’t do at all.Just a heads-up: all of this is "as of now." Since the MCP is currently in beta, things can, and most likely will, change. Knowing the a
Canvas Dashboards are more than just another reporting option in Adobe Workfront. They offer a powerful way to visualize, understand, and take action on your work. However, since they function differently from traditional reports, many teams either avoid using them or never fully realize their potential.Join us on Wednesday, August 26, 2026, for an interactive, practitioner-focused session featuring Skye Hansen, Lead Functional Architect at Merkle, and Matt Mitchell, Principal Product Manager at Adobe. Discover how to use Canvas Dashboards effectively with clear, practical guidance, without getting bogged down in configuration details.Skye and Matt will explain how Canvas Dashboards fit into the broader Workfront reporting landscape, highlight their advantages over other report types, and show you how to build dashboards that people actually use. Specifically, you’ll learn:How Canvas Dashboards integrate with the Workfront reporting landscape and the unique capabilities they offer beyo
Hi Community,I have been exploring the Marketo Engage MCP (Model Context Protocol) server to automate and perform operations using AI assistants, and I ran into something worth discussing.I tried to perform operations using the following 14 tools that are officially listed on Adobe's documentation page:🔗 Marketo Engage MCP Operations: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/marketo-developer/marketo/mcp-server-operations Here are the 14 tools I attempted to use:📋 Forms1. delete_form2. delete_form_field3. delete_field_from_fieldset4. discard_form_draft 📋 Programs5. delete_program_tag6. unapprove_program 📋 Smart Lists7. delete_all_smart_list_rules8. remove_smart_list_rule_constraint 📋 Snippets9. delete_snippet10. discard_snippet_draft11. unapprove_snippet 📋 Tokens12. delete_token 📋 Static Lists13. remove_from_list 📋 Folders14. delete_folder❌ The ProblemI tried to perform all of the above operations with the help of these tools through Claude MCP and attempted to execute each o
Dear AEM Community, Can you please help with a query to find out which assets my users have ‘checked out’ of the DAM? I know there are quite a few but I don’t know what they are unless I randomly encounter them. The query I’m trying to run is:path=/content/dam&type=dam:Asset&property=jcr:content/jcr:isCheckedOut&property.value=true&p.limit=-1 However I get no results with this. I also get no results with if I replace the property with property=jcr:content/jcr:lockOwner What am I doing wrong? Many thanksChris
What We're Hearing? Since rolling out the new canvas experience, one piece of feedback has come up more than any other: connecting and rearranging nodes feels harder than it used to. "I'm unable to select and move a branch." · "Once I disconnect the in-between node, I cannot connect it again." · "Joining nodes is harder in the new experience." The common thread across these comments is drag-and-drop. In the previous canvas, you could grab a node and physically drag it onto a connection point to rewire your journey. The new canvas — rebuilt for better performance and a cleaner layout — replaces that single drag gesture with two explicit actions: Detach and Join.They're not hidden, but they also don't look like what you're used to, so it's easy to miss them. Here's exactly where to find them and how to use them. Journey The Two Actions You Need Action What it does Where to find it Detach Disconnects a node (or an entire downstream branch) from the chain it's in, without deleting
I wanted to check if anyone has experience using data exported from BigQuery and making it available in Adobe Target for audience segmentation.One approach I'm already familiar with is Customer Attribute Service, and we currently have an active CRM data ingestion process feeding Adobe Target through Customer Attributes.My question is:Can I create an additional Customer Attributes data source and upload another dataset (originating from BigQuery)? If yes, can I use the same alias ID / customer ID namespace that is already being used by the existing Customer Attributes integration? Are there any limitations or best practices when multiple Customer Attributes data sources are linked to the same visitor/profile identifier? Alternatively, has anyone implemented a different approach to bring BigQuery-derived attributes into Adobe Target profiles for segmentation?Thank you
It’s great to see Marketo finally getting a makeover to some degree.I’m keen to understand:will this makeover will be platform-wide - ie all areas of the UI will be refreshed/optimised? will there be a dark-mode? will we be able to expand the view of advanced filters or be able to view the logic next to each filter? will we be able to copy/duplicate filters?
With the announcement of the beta program to leverage an MCP server to your preferred AI tools, I was curious if any users have started to leverage this for their organizations yet? I am looking forward to trying the beta but need to receive signoff from our internal teams before we get the greenlight.
I created a custom destination using Adobe Experience Platform Destination SDK. The destination activates audience data from AEP to a Salesforce Marketing Cloud Data Extension.As part of the activation, we need to send the AEP audience/segment name displayed in the AEP UI to SFMC. We do not want to send the mapping ID or segment ID.I found documentation and examples for passing the segment ID, but I could not find a supported parameter for passing the segment name.Could someone clarify: Is the AEP audience/segment name available to a custom destination during activation? If so, which Destination SDK field or transformation macro should be used? Can the segment name be included as a column in each activated record sent to the SFMC Data Extension? If this is not supported directly, what is the recommended approach for resolving the segment ID to the audience name? Any configuration or payload examples would be appreciated.
Has anyone figured out a way to remove or hide the Frescopa Sample Workspaces from all users in Planning? Support is saying there is no way to delete and to submit it as an idea but I wanted to see if anyone had any workarounds. I can see it causing major confusion to our new users as we role this out when they try to add a new connected column and are overloaded with Frescopa Marketing fields.
We are using a common footer fragment across multiple email templates. The footer receives a variable (welcomeText) from the email template and renders it using triple braces ({{{welcomeText}}}).When the variable contains HTML tags such as <br>, <sup>, <b>, or <p>, the email validates successfully.However, when the variable contains an HTML anchor (<a href="...">...</a>), the email validation fails with the error:welcomeText of email variant is malformed Steps to ReproduceCreate a variable in an email template: {% let welcomeText = "<a href='https://google.com'>Google</a>" %} Render the variable in the email or fragment: {{{welcomeText}}} Validate or save the email. Actual ResultThe email validation fails with:welcomeText of email variant is malformed Expected ResultThe variable should accept valid HTML anchor tags in the same way it accepts other supported HTML tags such as <br>, <sup>, <b>, and <p>, allowing the
When I try to go the email’s testing dashboard, I receive an error message below: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading '_el') at n.value (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/common.07cca14cbfd578356713.js:1:770412) at n.value (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/common.07cca14cbfd578356713.js:1:767534) at vs (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/3862.76425bb29c10da775ad3.js:2:5907244) at Ol (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/3862.76425bb29c10da775ad3.js:2:5924050) at t.unstable_runWithPriority (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/3862.76425bb29c10da775ad3.js:2:7368331) at qo (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/3862.76425bb29c10da775ad3.js:2:5866239) at Ll (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/3862.76425bb29c10da775ad3.js:2:5920789) at yl (https://experience.adobe.com/solutions/meue-meue-spa/assets/386
I assume that I cannot create: custom dimension custom metric customer filter ?
Hi everyone,I'm hoping someone has come across this before.We've built an email template using the new Adobe Email Designer with several 2:2 content modules (icon, headline and body copy). The template works perfectly in both light mode and dark mode as long as we don’t change the icons. We can create emails from the template and everything renders exactly as expected.The issue starts when we replace the icons.As soon as we update an icon (including using the Dark Mode image setting in the right-hand panel), dark mode starts behaving incorrectly. Instead of replacing the original icon, we see both the old and new icons rendered in dark mode, typically with one stacked directly above the other. In some cases the duplicate icon is also out of alignment with the headline and body copy, causing the layout of the 2:2 module to break.What's even more concerning is that once this happens, reverting the icon change doesn't restore the template. The duplicate/new icon behaviour persists, even a
Hello, I’m trying to create a Journey using a Read Audience going into an Email. I am trying to only have the profile continue if they click on a specific CTA in the email. I created an Rule Based Event where I look for a click and Label However when I run the Journey and Click the email, I do not get the desired result of the second Email. I’ve even tried adding a Reaction Event and then see if the above event triggers and I get nothing, But when I run a query in the ActionID - I can see clicks and Label. I need to have some assistance figuring this out since this is necessary for a few more reactions I will have in the Journey, What am I doing wrong? How can I correct this Journey?
Description - Before the migration to Adobe console, we were able to have two email addresses associated to each Workfront account. One email (FedID) is what our users used to login through SSO and the other (Username) is where their email notifications from Workfront went. With console this is now no longer possible and support has been unable to suggest a workaround. Would love to see this functionality restored! Why is this feature important to you - Some of our users need their notifications routed to a shared inbox for coverage purposes/so it is easy to jump in and help each other with workloads. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to have a field on the user profile again where I can input an email to send Workfront notifications to. Current Behavior - Functionality no longer exists.
Trade desk integration enhancements that connect paid to own.Adobe and The Trade Desk are helping brands bridge the gap between paid media and owned customer experiences by bringing advertising exposure data back into Real-Time CDP. By connecting paid media engagement signals with customer profiles, organizations can gain a more complete understanding of customer behavior and use those insights to improve audience segmentation, personalization, and future marketing efforts.Why It MattersToo often, paid media insights remain isolated within advertising platforms. By turning media exposure data into actionable first-party intelligence, brands can create richer customer profiles, improve customer experiences across owned channels, and make future campaigns more effective. This connected approach helps organizations move beyond campaign reporting to continuous audience learning and optimization.Learn MoreSee how Adobe and The Trade Desk are helping brands connect paid media performance wit
In your experience, what are the main reasons a Marketo lead scoring model fails to deliver expected results?
As a light/contributor/standard user (Reviewer and/or Approver), I want to be able to tag in a comment another user who is not in the workflow. This person should then be able to comment the proof but not make any decision
Adobe Express connector now available in Workfront FusionWe’ve added a new Adobe Express connector so you can automate common Express workflows—like listing tagged documents, creating variations, exporting renditions, and checking operation status—directly from Workfront Fusion integrations and automations.OverviewThe Adobe Express connector exposes the primary Express API surface so you can programmatically interact with Express documents and tagged elements from your Fusion scenarios. The connector maps the Express API endpoints into modules that make it easy to include Express operations in integration flows, automation canvases, and scheduled jobs.Connector capabilities (API endpoints)Tagged documents — List all documents that contain tagged elements so you can discover assets to process. Tagged document details — Retrieve metadata and the tagged-element structure for a specific document to inspect editable regions and element IDs. Generate variation — Create new document variatio
本日、メール配信をしたが配信保留のままメールの受信が確認できませんでした。色々とテストしたのですが、ZOOMと連携してイベント設定をし、ZOOMウェビナーの情報を受け取ってトークンで埋め込んでいるメールがどうやら保留になってしまうのかと思っています。一度調査いただけますでしょうか。
At present the brand theme for the new email templates is local to each workspace. Are there plans soon to make the brand theme it’s own component so it can be shared to select workspaces or an entire instance? If so is there a timeframe?We are keen to adopt the new email builder soon but don’t want to have to set up and manage 10+ versions given we have lots of workspaces.
We were hoping to utilise Marketo’s new picklist functionality so we can better control our data however we have identified some issues using picklist fields on forms. When editing forms users can still add or remove values from a field (with a managed picklist) however when the form is approved those additions or omissions are removed and all values that exist in the picklist are displayed to people viewing the form. Any changes to the values in the form obviously get removed when the form is saved. This seems a little counterintuitive to me because the form editor is allowed to make changes, but those changes are effectively ignored if they don't exist (or aren't complete) in the managed picklist. For example we have set a picklist on a field for persona, if we have a lead capture form in use at an event we may want to remove some of the persona options based on the event audience, with the current functionality we cannot do this. While the point of the picklist is to protect your d
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.