Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Is the new Unified Approval with Frame.io capable of interactive proofs? We use Workfront Proof for review and approval of email coding before deployment. Is that possible from Workfront using the Frame.io viewer?
Hello -Need help to create task approval report with name who approved it, approval date and time, approval status, and any comments entered during the approval process, creating a complete audit trail.
Behavior (current)When a reviewer/approver opens a proof via the Proof HQ direct link, the decision buttons (e.g., approve / changes required) do not display. When the same proof is opened via the Workfront proof link, the decision buttons display correctly. Suggested feature ideaEnable the decision buttons in the Proof HQ direct link proof viewer whenever the user has decision permissions for that proof, so reviewers can complete approvals regardless of whether they access the proof from the Workfront link or the Proof HQ link.
Per this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/allow-machine-to-machine-oauth-app-credentials-to-establish/idi-p/773411#M27023 and this https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/having-trouble-using-oauth2-configuration-to-establish-fusion/td-p/658811 it does not really seem like this is something we can achieve at the moment. I just wanted to check was anyone able to establish Server to Server auth between Fusion and Workfront? Thank you in advance.
I’m currently reviewing the Adobe documentation about AI traffic in Analytics.Using this: Analyze traffic from AI chatbots | Adobe AnalyticsAccording to the documentation, hits are generated during AI Pretraining when our websites are scraped for training purposes. The documentation sates - You can use bot detection in Analysis Workspace to analyze AI traffic that comes from pretraining.However, there are no detailed instructions how to do it. Please advise, what are the steps?
I am attempting to search the system for any Updates/Notes that contain a certain hyperlink. When I run a Note report in Workfront, or do a search in Fusion, I am getting no results.How can I achieve searching for hyperlinks posted on Notes?
As I attended more webinars that include Unified Review and Approvals information, I have some concerns. One is about how we can turn it on slowly by portfolios UNLESS your company current uses Legacy Document Approvals.My question is how do I tell if we use legacy document approvals?ThanksMD
Hi! I am trying to create a parameter report showing both value and name.I saw a previous thread, which provided this that only showed values.displayname=Field Valueslinkedname=directlistdelimiter=<li>listmethod=nested(parameterOptions).listsnamekey=nametextmode=truetype=iteratevaluefield=valuevalueformat=HTMLIs there a way to show both a dropdown selection’s name and value?Thank you!
Hi All, We are migrating AEM Forms to Cloud from AMS.When setting up the local, we placed the .far file add-on in the install and then brought over our custom forms. 09.09.2026 21:04:17.714 *ERROR* [[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] [1788968057597] GET /content/forms/af/brandA/en/forms/contact-sales-form.html HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.aemds.guide.internal.impl.utils.rhino.RhinoScriptProcessor Failed to execute script 'parser': FAILED ASSERTIONjava.lang.IllegalStateException: FAILED ASSERTION at org.mozilla.javascript.Kit.codeBug(Kit.java:375) at org.mozilla.javascript.TokenStream.<init>(TokenStream.java:47) at org.mozilla.javascript.Parser.parse(Parser.java:568) at org.mozilla.javascript.Context.parse(Context.java:2533) at org.mozilla.javascript.Context.compileImpl(Context.java:2482) at org.mozilla.javascript.Context.compileString(Context.java:1486) at org.mozilla.javascript.Context.compileString(Context.java:1475) at org.mozilla.javascript.Context.evaluateString(Context.java:1231) at com.adobe.aemds.
Hi, Can anyone please help me how to implement the MSM with step by step and also the workflow with approval steps to publish with AEM, EDS and universal editor. Also need to add the seo metadata as part of the page. Thanks,Kalyan
Hi everyone,I am currently working on an EDS Xwalk project. According to the following Adobe documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/field-types#rich-text https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/configure-rte The RTE should support features such as indentation and image insertion. However, in our actual Xwalk project, these options do not appear in the toolbar.Our users need to use tables and images within the rich text field. Does the Xwalk project currently lack support for these features?Additionally, is there any detailed documentation, component definitions, or specifications specifically for Xwalk? Most of the resources we found so far seem to focus primarily on DA (Document Authoring). [Official Documentation Screenshot][Actual UI Screenshot]
I’m looking for some guidance on a requirement we are currently working on in an Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) / Universal Editor (Franklin) implementation.RequirementWe need to assign a unique and persistent identifier to every component instance on a page and use that identifier as a tracking attribute for Adobe Analytics.Example:Multiple instances of the same component can exist on a page. The identifier should remain unchanged even if the author reorders, moves, or updates the component. The identifier should ideally persist for the lifetime of that specific component instance.What We Have ExploredWe have evaluated multiple options, including: Generating UUIDs/random IDs in block JavaScript during rendering. Drawback: IDs are regenerated on page refresh and are not persistent. Generating IDs based on page structure, component sequence, or position. Drawback: IDs change when authors reorder or move components. Adding a hidden component-id field to the component model and at
The code side of my Edge Delivery site is working. Code Sync serves my blocks, stylesand 404 page from the repository. No document has ever previewed, because the contentbus cannot read the folder.Setup1. Site set up through the tools.aem.live configuration wizard.2. Content source is a SharePoint team site document library, the journal folder of the site's Documents library.3. The folder is shared with helix@adobe.com at Can edit. Manage Access lists it as an external user, and there is a matching entry under Links.4. The content source URL is set in Site Admin, Edit Sources, and verified by reopening the form after saving.What happensLoading the preview host returns my own 404 page with this banner: (404) Unable to fetch /index.md from onedrive (404) The sharing link no longer exists, or you do not have permission to access it.Running the same preview from Admin Tools, Bulk Operations, over seven paths returns0/7 in about half a second. The job detail is the useful part: "da
Does anyone know why ePub is listed as a default output in the XML Documentation Tools (Folder Profile), but isn’t listed in the default output list in Guides’ Map Console? How can I generate an ePub output using the DITA-OT? I can see from a previous post I made that the ePub output failed on all attempts 3 years, but now it isn’t even listed as an option in the Map Console.
Hello Community,We're looking for suggestions and lessons learned from anyone who has performed metadata updates at a very large scale in AEM 6.5 On-Prem Assets.Our RequirementAEM 6.5 On-Prem ~5 Million Assets (50 Lakhs) Repository Size: ~40 TB Need to update ~20 metadata properties on existing assets The update source will come from a mapping/reference file Important: The requirement is to append/update metadata values without overwriting existing values. Existing metadata must be preserved wherever applicable.
If I have a email performance report that consists of 6 different emails. Is there a way to determine how many unique people received all 6 emails?
Summary: The meeting provided an overview of Marketo AI availability, access, and released capabilities, while clarifying how Marketo AI compares with MCP-based integrations. The discussion emphasized governance, permission controls, performance expectations, current product scope, integration trade-offs, and future opportunities to expand CRM visibility and cross-system orchestration.2:00 — Introduction and availability: Introduced Marketo AI office hours following GA launch, noting availability for eligible Marketo customers and admins with GenAI terms enabled.3:56 — Access and UI: Marketo AI is available as an admin tile in Marketo, with the beta UI expected to move to general availability soon.5:04 — Core capabilities: Released skills include Investigate Leads, Validate Programs, Import Leads, and Product Knowledge, supporting lead analysis, program validation, data insights, and documentation-based Q&A.8:16 — Safety, governance, and performance: Marketo AI remains permission-g
When creating a new Team, users are only required to complete a few fields. Once the Team Name and Team Members are entered, the Team can be created.However, when a user subsequently edits the Team for the first time—for example, to add or remove a Team Member—they may receive the error message:“You must select at least one status in each category.”This can be confusing because the Mark as done section, along with the other fields requiring status selections, is not available when initially creating the Team. These fields only appear when editing the Team.The user must then scroll down to the Mark as done section and manually select at least one status under each category before they can save their changes. This can lead users to believe they do not have permission to edit the Team.Suggested Improvement:Instead of requiring users to select statuses the first time they edit a newly created Team, automatically select a default Closed status under each object in the Mark as done section w
I’m troubleshooting a Champion/Challenger Whole Email test in a Marketo Engagement Program and would appreciate a sanity check before opening a support case.We have an Engagement Program with individual email assets inserted directly into the stream. Email 1 had a Whole Email Champion/Challenger test configured at 50/50.The stream cast successfully on September 10 at 10:05 a.m. EDT and sent Email 1 to 624 people. However, the Champion/Challenger testing dashboard shows 0 sends for both Champion and Challenger, and I have not been able to identify any recipients with Test Variant A or Test Variant B activity.I’ve verified:• The tested Email 1 is inserted directly into the Engagement Program stream, not inside a nested program.• Email 1 was active in the stream.• The test type was Whole Emails.• Distribution was 50% Champion / 50% Challenger.• Challenger 1 was created and approved.• The Whole Emails test itself was approved before the cast.• Audit Trail shows:7:55:41 a.m. EDT: Whole Emai
I need to add a new parameter to a Custom Action (it already works in live journey). The only solution is to create a new Custom Action and new version of a journey?
Assim como fazemos as artes para publicaçoes das redes sociais, podemos fazer para publicacaoes
Many content-rich websites with extensive knowledge bases are experiencing a significant increase in traffic from AI scrapers, crawlers, and data harvesting bots. In our case, this has been an ongoing challenge for several months. While the impact on reporting accuracy is already substantial, the more immediate concern is the associated increase in Adobe Analytics server call consumption, which can lead to unexpected overages and additional costs.What makes this challenge different from traditional bot traffic is that these are not a small set of well-known bots that can be managed through static signatures or conventional bot rules. The traffic is highly distributed, frequently changes behavior, and often originates from a large number of sources, making it significantly harder for customers to identify and mitigate on their own.Given the broad impact across digital analytics implementations, could Adobe consider a more proactive partnership model with customers? For example:Maintaini
When custom objects get data transmitted initially, this is “Added to Object” activity that gets logged; however, there was times where this information then gets updated; such as status changes or watch times updated. There are triggers for “Custom Object is updated” however, since update activities are not logged in the Activity Log, then trigger tokens get skipped and logic flows get skipped. I have this case E-002408984 from a Marketo program that I was trying to create logic on Samples orders and to create an interesting moment. If you are added to Sample Object as status shipped, then pull trigger tokens for PN, Qty and ship date into an interesting moment. I also added if Sample object is updated, status changes to shipped, then pull trigger tokens for PN, Qty and ship date into an interesting moment; however, these were failing anytime “updates” were done on a prospect. Sample items can come in daily as “processing” and then next API call can be updated as ‘shipped’ hence why I
TITLE EDIT: Rulesets at action levelhi ! is there a way to retrieve all journeys which are using a rule set? using API or query service? I already know that journey_step_events is handling those ruleset values but is there another way at action (communication) level? thanks
I am looking to track the timeline historic changes of status - (mainly Approved to Complete) of projects. I can see the day it happened, but not the time it spent in a single status. This needs to happen without the use of Fusion and preferable excel. I have been looking into the journal reporting with calculations and so far nothing.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.