Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Workfront’s design excludes deactivated users from team-based report filters, which leads to missing historical hour data unless you manually include those users. The only way to include deactivated users’ historical hours in team-based reports is to manually add each former employee to the report filters. We can build custom reports that include deactivated users by filtering on user IDs or explicitly including deactivated users in the filter criteria, but this still requires manual maintenance. This is a known pain point for many organizationsIt would be a huge improvement if Adobe Workfront Production and Dev team select this idea and work on it for future releases.
HelloWe’ve identified a critical issue regarding how AJO campaigns handle Offer Decisions. Currently, it appears the Offer Decision is executed at the publish date rather than the scheduled delivery date.For example, if a client prepares and publishes a newsletter on Friday for a Sunday 9:00 AM send out, AJO captures the offer snapshot on Friday. Consequently, offers that are valid on Friday but expired by Sunday before the send out are still appearing in the newsletter. Is there a way to ensure offer logic is evaluated at the time of sending instead? There is no API to publish a campaign on certain date.In this document https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/orchestrate-journeys/create-journey/publish-journey is says that when something changes in offer decision then journey needs to be published/unpublished but i am not talking about offer decision changes instead the offer changes. Thanks,Arpan
Hello AEM Community,We have an AEM 6.5.21 setup (Author, Publish, Dispatcher) running in our digital platform to serve content. Today we’re using the default AEM user/group administration to provide access for developers and support teams. To improve security and streamline access management, we want to integrate Azure AD SSO and map Azure AD groups to AEM permissions.We’re evaluating SAML 2.0 vs OIDC for best compatibility with AEM 6.5.21, and we’re looking for guidance from anyone who has implemented this in a similar architecture.What we’ve explored so farMany available guides seem outdated. Our current draft approach is SAML: configure the TrustStore (certs) and set up the Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler.What we’re looking forRecommended approach for AEM 6.5.21: SAML vs OIDC (pros/cons, supportability, common patterns). Granular steps / configuration considerations for Azure AD SAML with AEM: TrustStore / certificate handling IdP metadata / SP configuration details t
Hi, We have a requirement to render PDF from Adaptive form on AEM 6.5.The rendered PDF should have the data from the Adaptive form as well. Currently I am using the below code window.guideBridge.getDataXML( { success: function(result) { var formData = new FormData(); formData.append("dataXml",result.data); var url = "servletpath?data=" + result.data + "&path="+path;to fetch the formdata from the adaptive form. This script is trigged on clicking a button in Adaptive form.A custom servlet is called from this script, which uses formservice.outputservice to render static PDFs along with data. The issue that we are facing is that the application is placed behind SI proxy and the request is then redirected from SI proxy server to AEM load balancer. In this case, the SI prxy server is appending url /abc/def/ to access all the pages on AEM.As a result, the AF are available on <SIProxydomain>:
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe provides monthly twice updates to AEMaaCS Environments. Even better, Adobe introduced Non-Intrusive Updates. But the updates are happening only to Prod and non-prod environments. No ability for RDE to update. Developers have to trash RDE and spin new RDE to receive latest updates. Use-case: Extend the ability to update AEM servers to RDE environments as well. Current/Experienced Behavior: RDE Environment cannot be updated to latest AEM version. Needs to be trashed and recreated new. This mandates redeploy to code, configuration, content and is time consuming. Improved/Expected Behavior: RDE provides Update option similar to Non-prod environments Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): RDE on AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: SGWS Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi Community,I’ve noticed that in Adobe Target I can no longer select Adobe Analytics as the reporting source, whereas I used to be able to in the past. I can’t figure out what has changed or how to restore this option.Could you please help me understand how to fix this?Thanks in advance!
Please help me to understand pros/cons between MSM site structure options as below:Option 1:/content/mysite/language-masters/en → /content/mysite/us/en/content/mysite/language-masters/fr → /content/mysite/fr/fr Option 2:/content/mysite/language-masters/en_us → /content/mysite/en_us/content/mysite/language-masters/en_gb → /content/mysite/en_gb
Hi All, Adobe Analytics is not listed as a reporting source. Kindly share the steps to enable it. Thank You.
Hi Community, We are currently using com.day.cq.wcm.msm.impl.actions.ContentUpdateActionFactory.cfg.jsonto exclude certain properties from being updated during the rollout process.This configuration is working as expected.However, while this exclusion behavior is acceptable for content pages, authors do not want the same behavior to apply to Experience Fragments. In other words, the excluded properties should continue to be ignored during rollout for content pages, but should still be updated for Experience Fragments.Is there a way to control or customize the rollout process separately for Experience Fragments and content pages?Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance,Praveen KM
Description -Adobe Workfront allows for setting up complex webhook trigger conditions, including "OR" comparison. This allows for triggering webhooks for cases like "Field 1 OR Field 2 Changed". The "Watch Event" module in Fusion, however, only allows for "AND" conditions. This results in cases where we either need to (1) duplicate scenarios for each of the "OR" cases so that our admins can see the actual trigger conditions or (2) setup the complex webhook trigger using the Workfront API but lose visibility into the conditions within Fusion, meaning our admins are in the dark. Why is this feature important to you -We want to both ensure our admins have (1) clarity on each of the scenarios' setup and (2) not duplicating effort and (3) are empowered without specialty knowledge like having to use Workfront APIs via Postman/curl/etc. How would you like the feature to work -Whatever filter criteria expressions are supported by the Workfront API should be reflected
Description - Until very recently the Auto-Align button was on the main screen. Now it is hidden under the More (...) button.Why is this feature important to you - When I'm building I use this button dozens of times per day...possibly even hundreds of times. Now with it hidden underneath the More (...) button it is doubling my mouse-clicks....very frustrating.How would you like the feature to work - Please put it back on the main screen.
UI Description:The current Fusion UI does not prompt for confirmation before deleting a scenario. Additionally, there is no visual indication of which scenario is selected for deletion, and deleted scenarios cannot be restored via the UI.Why this feature is important:Accidental deletion of scenarios can result in lost work and require significant time to rebuild. Without a confirmation prompt or a visual highlight, it’s easy to misclick and remove the wrong scenario. Since the UI offers no recovery option, this can lead to irreversible loss.How this feature would work:When a user clicks the delete icon for a scenario, a confirmation modal should appear asking, "Are you sure you want to delete this scenario?" The scenario line item should be highlighted when hovered over or selected for deletion, so the user clearly sees which scenario is being targeted. Optionally, an "Undo" notification or a soft-delete feature (trash bin or restore option) would add an extra layer of protection.Curre
The Fusion tab and filter for Active/Inactive scenarios was recently removed for Workfront Ultimate users. This filter is a key indicator for companies on whether or not their complete Fusion environment is functional. Regardless of if an org has an unlimited license, they should still be able to filter between their active/inactive Fusion scenarios and know at a glance the state of their environments.
Description - Enable a module that can call another scenario directlyWhy is this feature important to you - This would enable a more modular design of our workflow by having common functionality in one scenario that can be called by other scenarios without having to duplicate the functionality across all of the scenarios.How would you like the feature to work - A simple module that provides the input of the scenario name to call and the inputs to pass.Current Behaviour - Have to code custom webhooks to call scenarios
Description - While using the HTTP Fusion module with the Basic Auth feature, the system creates a key (in the Keys section) for the credentials added. There is no option to update an existing key which was created in a case where the credentials were changed. We use many such connections to our internal services where the credentials are rotated periodically and to update them in Fusion, someone needs to find the usage of the credentials in the whole list of scenarios and update them manually after creating a new key.Why is this feature important to you - It takes a lot of manual effort to find and update every scenario, even with the use of the connection switch tool within the Fusion dev tools where a person needs to look through all the scenarios and update the HTTP modules.How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to have an option to update an existing key from the Keys section where the users cannot see the existing credentials but are able to provide and save ne
There is no easy way to know if someone has deleted a scenario and who deleted the scenario ...or a way to restore it back. There is also no easy way to run a report or even copy/paste the scenario names into a spreadsheet to try and compare against. This is an urgent need, because someone could really mess things up the way the product works currently.
Hello, I am Have kept collect user agent and client headers settings in datastream. Assuming this will collect device type information correctly forexample desktop vs mobile or tablet. However I do not see that. I have more no-values and I believe the desktop is falling into this, not sure why or what additional settings needs to be done in either datastream or data view
Grok and I have been trying to crack this nut for an hour now. (I asked the AI Assistant and….let’s just say there were many 👎🏻s) Figured I’d ask the hive mind and--if I figure it out before anyone else does--I’ll post it here for everyone else.The ask: I want to be able to determine the ID of an approval attached to an issue. The only pieces of data I have are the approvalProcessID (which I know because I have Fusion apply an approval process to these issues) and currentApprovalStepID. No matter what I do with that currentApprovalStepID, I just cannot get to the approval. If I try to use that to search for the APPROVAL object, I get a 400. If I try searching via the ARVSTP object, I get scolded that it’s “...not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal”There has to be something that both Grok and I are missing here. Any thoughts?
Here record count for bottom x axis is default name or we can change this ( no of projects) by any method.
One of our teams would like have their task start and end dates update based on the predecessor task completion. If the predecessor task is completed late, they’d like to see the start and end dates for their task update to reflect the completion date of the predecessor task so that they can prioritize their tasks accordingly. For example, if the predecessor task is due 2/9 but not completed until 2/11, they’d like the start date of their task to be 2/12 instead of 2/10 (when the task constraint is “As Soon as Possible”). This would not be a universal rule but only applied to specific template tasks and/or for specific teams based on the way that they work. They do have a report that sorts tasks by Handoff Date, but this does not fully meet their needs.
Verifying On-Time Delivery logic in Workfront: same-day date comparisonsWe are implementing an On-Time Delivery KPI where work is considered on time if the Actual Completion Date is the same day or earlier than the Planned Completion Date.However, even when both dates appear as the same day in the UI (with different times), comparisons using <=, DATE(), DATEDIFF(), and DATENOTIME() sometimes return late.Is this expected due to Workfront storing DateTime values in UTC?What is the officially recommended approach for calendar-day-based SLAs in Workfront?What is the way to compare only date without time ?
I need to see a report of Tasks and Requests that do not have hours logged by every assignee on each task/request so that we can see what Tasks/Requests are missing hours for which assignees.There’s a thread here that identifies a way for an individual user to see their own Tasks that have not been assigned hours, but I can’t seem to find anything that shows how to see multiple users who do not have assigned hours. Any advice is appreciated.
Does anyone have any links to what the various graphs in the Fusion performance dashboard actually mean? I can interpololate some of them, and others are obvious, but it would be nice if there was some explanation, I’m hesitant to use them to do any evaluating of anything without it.Executions waiting to be processed: Feels obvious, scenarios with data that are waiting to startPool Utilization: No ideaExecutions per scenario: Feels obvious, tracks the number of times a scenario was ranDuration of executions: Feels obvious, length of time that scenarios were running
Does anyone have any experience using the Dry Run mode in AJO with either events as a condition within a journey or as an entry point? I’ve been using it recently and whilst it works fine for batch qualified audiences, I’ve not seen any results when using events?Thanks,Paul
I’m trying to permanently Stop a journey that is currently in a Paused state, as we have no intention of resuming it. However, the 'Stop' button is disabled/greyed out in the UI.Is this a permissions issue (e.g., lacking some permission as I have publishing rights), or does the system require a journey to be Live before it can be stopped? Additionally, is it possible to force a termination via the AJO API?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
