Product Communities

Welcome! 👋This Community thread is a space for everyone who watched (or is watching) this Experience League LIVE episode to connect, ask questions, and keep the conversation going. Share your takeaways, dive deeper into topics from the session, and help each other with real‑world tips and use cases. The Adobe team will be keeping an eye on the discussion and jumping in where helpful—so don’t be shy!

Within the smart list, under processors, I have a step to select a particular form as in the screenshot.This is currently manually chosen on the UI.I use an integration tool (Workato) to setup these campaigns. I would like to use an API , if any to setup this flow to refer the correct form i.e. form ID. is there any API for this?

Hi All, I am trying to set up universal editor in my local and usinig AEM Cloud Service SDK (aem-sdk-2025.9.22758.20250928T092442Z-250900) for local development.I have done below set upAEM - http running on port 4502AEM - https running on port 8443Local universal editor service running on port 8000Trusted the local certificate in the browser for self signed certificatesThe problem I am facing is,when I try to load AEM page running on https (port 8443) inside universal editor, it gives this error "Blocked autofocusing on a <input> element in a cross-origin subframe." I followed whats mentioned in this document - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/developer-overview?lang=en for same site cookie settings but it doesn't help and I continue getting the cross origin error. Has anyone come across the same issueThere is no Universal editor service related configuration available

For those registered for Understanding Unified Approvals: Direction, Reporting, and What’s Next, would you be interested in follow‑up working sessions to unpack the upcoming approval workflow changes? Looking to exchange implications, open questions, and practical change‑management strategies—comment or react if you’d like to participate or suggest discussion topics.

Hello AA / ARB Community - are Dependent Data Blocks not a thing in the new Adobe Report Builder?  I can only find very brief info about dependent data blocks for Legacy Report Builder.  Is there a new way to do this, or some new vocabulary around it? Thanks for reading and for any ideas.

This Marketo Engage New Email Designer Customer Office Hours session focused on discussing the upcoming Expert Code Editor capability and gathering early customer feedback. The session opened with an overview of the agenda and an emphasis on open dialogue rather than a product demo, followed by live Q&A.AI Generated TimestampsWelcome & Session Overview 0:08 Expert Code Editor :58 Troubleshooting & User-Reported Behavior 33:29 Publishing Unpublished Email Templates Issue 35:56 Wrap-Up & Next Steps 36:36 

I am running my AEMaaCS local SDK and I keep getting ERROR likecom.adobe.aem.wcm.dataplane.rewriter.MetaTagExternalPageIdTransformer authorSourceLocator is null. AEM_SERVICE env var is missing or malformedI am starting the AEM instance with java -jar aem-author-dev-p4502.jar -r author,dev,localI tried setting AEM_SERVICE = “author”environment variable (in addition to other vars I am setting), but it does not helpIt may be harmless, but its polluting my logs and is annoying when trying to find real errors.Whats the proper value to set, to silence this? 

I am testing out the interactive webinars with Adobe connect integration. I am using my own email accounts to test but after successfully registering with the email address once, I receive the "Registration Error" status for any consecutive registrations under the same email address. The status reason is 'Error registering with webinar provider. exception='Failed to get the data from connect'.  When trying new email addresses the registration works correctly. Is this an issue with duplicates being created in Adobe Connect or is it a connection issue between Marketo Engage and Adobe Connect? 

Hi all,I hope you are doing well! This is continution to while upgrading to AEM 6.5 LTS i’m facing challenges with guava library replacement/alternatives.as per the LTS analyzer guidance, “The `15.0.0.0002` bundle version of Guava is no longer available out of the box in AEM 6.5 LTS due to critical security vulnerabilities. Please update and use latest non-vulnerable version of guava.”, so started with using latest versions with no vulnerabilities.<!-- Source: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.guava/guava --><dependency>    <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>    <artifactId>guava</artifactId>    <version>33.5.0-jre</version>    <scope>compile</scope></dependency> This is working at Java side but not at AEM instance, because there is no such library provided by Adobe runtime, so we need to embed this ourselves in our application generated bundle, this is failed because ‘com.google.guava’ bundle is a multi-rele

Hi ,I am seeing below error since a week while creating a new product profile in the admin console.How do I resolve this? ​​​​ 

I just create this webhook, try to test in postman Wan to to see the information upload in AEPCan you help me with this , please

This customer office hours session focused on helping users transition from the classic email designer to the new email designer, with particular emphasis on migrating existing email templates. The session addressed a key adoption barrier identified through customer feedback: the ability to reuse years of investment in legacy email templates.Welcome & Session Purpose 0:08 Introduction to Email Template Importer 0:12 Audience Poll: New Email Designer Usage 0:42 Customer Adoption Insights 2:04 Introduction to Email Template Converter Feature 2:43  Navigating the New Email Designer 3:10 Template Conversion Workflow Overview 3:54 Marketo Templates & Out‑of‑the‑Box Options 4:36 

This New Email Designer Customer Office Hours session focused on addressing customer questions and feedback regarding the new Email Designer, with heavy emphasis on migration readiness, feature gaps vs. the old editor, Outlook compatibility issues, and brand/theme constraints. Customers expressed both interest in the new experience and concern about losing advanced capabilities. The product team reinforced that adoption will remain voluntary, with a strong commitment to closing critical gaps before broader migration.AI-Generated TimestampsIntroduction & Office Hours Purpose 0:08 Template Sharing & Brand Themes Across Workspaces 1:16 Outlook Compatibility Issues (Buttons & Background Images) 26:59 Brand Themes vs. Background Images Limitations 28:11 Migration Strategy & Custom Coding Gaps 28:47 Editor UI Feedback & Navigation (Columns Placement) 29:52 

 You should already know a non-default domainLevel (for example, an .io or .ai domain) requires customizing the Munchkin embed code. Easy on a 3rd-party site, where you already control the embed code; on a Marketo LP, you must disable Munchkin at the template level (Template Actions » Disable Munchkin Tracking) and substitute your custom version.[1] Another case for disabling auto-Munchkin and injecting it yourself is managing cookie consent.[2] And today’s case: if you’re using (as everyone should) a Redirector LP for email links to downloads, where the next-hop URL is passed via the URL hash, you must use custom Munchkin to see the logs you expect. Why use the hash, though?First of all, using the hash, like https://pages.example.com/download#https://assets.example.com/my.pdfoffers better caching than using a query param. The hash is never sent outside the browser, so a cached version of https://pages.example.com/download can be used.[3] But more important, Marketo defines the “web pa

Hello ,How to give an operator read only access in Adobe campaign classic v7?  

We are using Universal Editor with Edge Delivery Service, I would like to know how to customise the OOTB text styles available in Text Default content type. For this particular example I would like to add more options to add alignments.  It's not possible to apply any customisations inside RTE fields through the json model.Could you advise on the problem?

I am looking for best practices regarding environment promotion, specifically for Project Templates. Based on my experience, and confirmed by Adobe, you cannot edit a Project Template and promote those changes to Production IF any of your changes involve deleting tasks. For example, if, in Production, i have tasks 1-4 on my project template, and then i edit that template in SB to add tasks 5-6 BUT also delete tasks 3-4, upon promotion, my project template in prod will contain tasks 1-6 As a result, we cannot promote any updates to our project templates from SB to Prod without then needing to deactivate the template and making manual updates immediately after. Has anybody else had a similar issue? There are workarounds, but this feels like a serious shortcoming of the WF environment promotion process. Am I approaching this wrong? Any best practices/solutions/workarounds to reduce manual intervention?

Need to have better UI to upload documents currently when drag and doping the documents Its a small black box not very easy to do the upload when adding documents in bulk if go little below the black drop while drag the documents the document opens in a new tab instead of uploading.

What is the difference between these two?These are event propositions returned after Page View event. What is the difference between Decisions and Propositions? 

Hi! I am getting a lot of conflicting information about marking custom fields in-active once I move them to an Admin section of a request form. My end goal is to make sure all of these old custom fields remain in my historical reporting. By marking them in-active, am I inadvertantly removing them from my historical reporting? I thought in-active was just making sure these custom fields are no longer active. Any guidance or insight is greatly appreciated. I have a huge update next week that I am prepping for! I want to make sure everything is done correctly. :-)  As always, this community rocks. 😁

Hi team ,Issue OverviewWe recently encountered an issue in Adobe Workfront where users were unable to view a project, even though everything appeared to be configured correctly. ScenarioA project was created by a user who belongs to: Parent Group: International Subgroup: INTL MKT GROUP The user’s Home Group was set to INTL MKT GROUP The project was also created under INTL MKT GROUPThe project was shared with three users who were also members of the same subgroup.ProblemOut of the three users:✅ One user could see the project ❌ Two users could not see the projectThis was unexpected because:All users belonged to the same subgroup The project was correctly aligned to that subgroup Sharing permissions were applied No filters were restricting visibility ResolutionWhen the two affected users were additionally added to the parent group (International):✅ The project immediately became visible to them Key ObservationEven though:The project was assigned to the subgroup Users were members of the