Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Description Introduce the IP warming plan activation toggle natively within the Orchestrated Campaign Module (OCM) email configuration screen to match the functionality currently available in standard AJO Campaigns. Why is this feature important to you When migrating to Adobe Journey Optimizer and standing up a brand new instance systematically warming IPs is a foundational deliverability requirement. The absence of this feature in OCM forces architects to use complex workarounds like exporting OCM audiences into the AEP Audience Portal and wrapping them in segment definitions just to safely throttle email volume in a standard scheduled AJO campaign. This completely disrupts the unified orchestration workflow and adds unnecessary build time. How would you like the feature to work Include the standard IP warming plan activation toggle directly within the Email action configuration of the OCM canvas allowing the system to natively handle safe message throttling without forcing practition
Is there a way to display the legacy document approvals that are pending with the new unified approval process? We have reports (document approval) that are in play. And we have switched over to unified approvals on documents.I am hoping to combine it as one report, but wanted to check if it is possible.
Recently, I believe after the latest release, when you now go to Share a Project, you have to double click in the full share link to copy it.Previously you could just click the ‘Tick’ and it would copy it. Not sure if this is a bug or a change on the feature, but please revert it to how it used to work for efficiency.
Hi Community,I know written something disgusting here, which is returning 4 answers. In this example, the project holds 4 documents, and I’m only interested in proofs that don’t contain the word “Quote”. Two documents are not proofs (so want to ignore these), and the two proofs contain four proof versions between them.I’m not sure if I’m getting an answer per document. The actual answer I’m looking for with this example is “No”, as the first proof version was created after the estimate date. This proof doesn’t contain “Quote”. Screenshot, shows the results.Code:displayname=Within Deadline?listdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(documents).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF(IF(!ISBLANK({ID})&&!CONTAINS("Quote",{name}),{project}.{DE:C+D Creative Deadline},"")<=(IF(!ISBLANK({ID})&&!CONTAINS("Quote",{name}),{entryDate},"")),"Yes","No")valueformat=HTMLResultsIf you’ve read this far, thanks for your time 😊Matt
Please expose the Expense object type (EXPENSE / objCode: EXPNS) via the Workffont Claude connector, including fields such as description, amount, actualAmount, expenseType, plannedDate, billingRecordID, and projectID — this would allow us to pull full financial breakdowns programmatically rather than having to access the Workfront UI manually.Second, we need the ability to create and update Notes/Updates on projects and tasks via the connector — specifically, support for the Note object type with create and update operations, so we can post weekly status updates, comments, and log changes directly from the AI assistant without switching to the Workfront interface.
We are going to be relying heavily on the MCP connections so being able to have visibility of their status is key. Can you please check if their status can be included on the adobe status page.
adaptTo() 2026 takes place from 28–30 September 2026 in Berlin.The schedule for this year's conference is now available. Following a record number of more than 70 submissions, we have put together a program covering AEM, Edge Delivery Services, open-source projects, case studies, and technical deep dives.https://adapt.to/scheduleTickets for adaptTo() 2026 are still available. Loyalty Tickets for returning attendees remain available until 3 July 2026.https://adapt.to/ticketsTiming reminder: To allow arrival on Monday morning without missing content, we’ve adjusted the times this year.Registration starts Monday at 11:00.Conference begins Monday at 12:00.– adaptTo() Conference Team
We would like the option to customize standard and event emails in Workfront, similar to how reminder emails can be personalized. This would include editing the subject, body, and HTML, not just the subject line.
When I try and add an asset to a content template in AJO I get this red warning symbol. When browsing for the images we can see them but as soon as you choose it, it then fails. This is a new AJO instance and we cannot get it to work with any AEM Cloud assets. We also have Assets Essentials which works but don’t want to use that as all of our assets are in AEM. Steps to replicateAdd image block Browse asset Browse through AEM DAM (can see assets) Add asset Error I assume this is a permission issue somewhere but cannot find the root cause.
SetupAJO B2C Landing Page with a native Form (appType=AJO_B2C). The form's target dataset uses an XDM ExperienceEvent‑class schema (capturing email opt‑in / consent). The streaming inlet behind the form is XDM pass‑through (no Data Prep mapping stage).GoalCapture each form submission as an ExperienceEvent. Since ExperienceEvent requires _id and timestamp, I've added both as hidden fields on the form.ProblemThe hidden _id / timestamp fields still require a value, but the form designer only lets me set a static "Default value" (optionally sourced from URL parameter / cookie / referrer). There's no native generator, so I'm stuck between two bad states:No default → the form doesn't render/submit correctly. Static default → every submission carries the same _id (events overwrite each other in the dataset/Profile) and the same timestamp (frozen, doesn't reflect the real submission time).I also confirmed that a timestamp default in MM/DD/YYYY format fails form validation — it must be ISO‑8601
Add the ability to pin or favorite linked SharePoint files or folders within Workfront (Documents area) to enable quicker access to frequently used external items, improving efficiency within the Workfront–SharePoint integration.
Current BehaviorThere is no auto-number or sequential ID field available when configuring a Planning record type. Unique identifiers must be entered manually or generated externally and written back via automation.Desired BehaviorA native auto-number field type in Workfront Planning, with configuration options for:Number of digits (e.g. zero-padded to 5 digits: 00001) Format: numeric only, alphanumeric, sequential, or random Optional prefix and/or suffix (e.g. NRD-00001 or 00001-PRINT) Starting count (configurable, not locked to 1)The field value would be system-generated on record creation and read-only after assignment.Business ImpactAuto-generated sequential identifiers are a baseline requirement for any operational record-keeping use case — job ticketing, production requests, vendor orders. Without this, teams either maintain a manual counter (error-prone, breaks under concurrent edits) or build a Fusion scenario to replicate what should be a native field configuration. We’ve encou
When using Global record types to aggregate data from regional workspaces into a central, leadership-facing workspace, there is a consistent need to tailor field visibility at the workspace level. Specifically, certain fields that are relevant in the global context are not always appropriate for display in inherited regional workspaces.When using Global record types across inherited regional workspaces, admins need consistent control over which fields are visible to users.Today, fields can be hidden in Table view and the associated record detail panel, but Timeline view does not respect these visibility settings. Instead, the Timeline detail panel displays all fields by default, creating an inconsistent experience and exposing unnecessary fields to end users.The “Show all fields” toggle already exists in the Timeline detail view, but it is disabled and not configurable.Suggested enhancement:Enable the existing toggle in Timeline view Allow it to respect field visibility defined in Tabl
Hi Everyone, I’m new to Web SDK implementation, and I’ve noticed that an upgrade is available for the web sdk extension. If we proceed with the upgrade, will it have any impact on the existing rules and data elements?Also, could you confirm whether the extension needs to be upgraded separately in each environment, or if upgrading it in a lower environment makes it available in the library for validation across environments?I’ve gone through the release notes, but wanted to double-check—are there any potential risks or issues we should be aware of during or after the upgrade?
How can I map an array of date strings coming from the Adobe Analytics source connector into an XDM array field with dateTime datatype in AEP Data Prep? Since we cannot transform it upstream, does Data Prep support element-wise date conversion for array values, or is post-ingestion processing required?
Hi!Currently trying to work through a reporting question and have been researching and believe baselines might be my best option but having a hard time trying to figure out how to get to my answer.End goal: be able to identify the #, % and type of projects that have date changes to be able to track and better plan forCurrent understanding:Baselines capture dates (and more) in a certain time (either automatically or manually) Automatic Baselines are captured whenever status is turned to “Current” To capture routine automatic baselines would require FusionIssue: Currently, PMs will just change dates (without changing the status) and believe they won’t love the idea of asking them to remember to add a new baseline every time they doQuestion:Is there a way to make a project un-editable in certain statuses? For example, if a status is current, could it be locked so our PMs have to change the status to “planning” or something else in order to edit the dates therefore a new baseline is captur
בבית המודרני, איכות המים משפיעה ישירות על הבריאות והנוחות היומיומית. תבור טרייד מציעה מגוון פתרונות שתייה מתקדמים, עם עיצוב חכם, טכנולוגיית סינון יעילה וקלות שימוש. במרכז הקטגוריה תמצאו ברי מים המתאימים למשפחות, משרדים וחללים קטנים, תוך שמירה על חיסכון באנרגיה ואמינות לאורך זמן. כל מערכת נבחרת בקפידה, מגיעה עם אחריות מלאה ושירות מקצועי המאפשר בחירה בטוחה ושקט נפשי.
GIF images render as static JPEG in AEM Guides output (animation lost). GIF images added in AEM Guides are not rendering as animated images in the output. Instead, they are being converted to static JPEG renditions during rendering. @DivrajSingh I would appreciate a prompt response on this issue. Thanks
When using Tab or Accordion components in a page, an issue occurs where, after editing a component on the second or subsequent pages and then closing it, the view unintentionally returns to the first page.Expected behavior: When editing components on the second or subsequent pages, the user should remain on the edited page and be able to continue working without being redirected to the first page.
Hello, I am curious to know if there is a way to tell Marketo not to overwrite certain field values an a SFDC picklist field when syncing to Salesforce? Specifically, when it comes to records that already exist in Salesforce, but did not exist in Marketo prior to a form submission. This is consent related and we want to ensure an explicit opt-in or opt-out value is not overwritten with an “unconfirmed” value.For instance, a net new person submits a form and does not check the consent checkbox on the form, so the value pushed from the form to Marketo is “unconfirmed”. In Salesforce, a record already exists with this email address and the value on the SFDC picklist field is either an explicit opt-in or explicit opt-out value. How can we ensure the explicit opt-in/opt-out value in Salesforce is not updated to the unconfirmed value when the record is synced from Marketo to SFDC?
Created a question by mistake. Admin please delete this question.
I'm sharing in case you run across this issue or have a solution. I've run across an issue with migrating classification rules containing custom text values. If the old rule contains a rule type of Regular Expression and a custom text value in the "To" field, the regex does not migrate. I open the rule in the new Classification Sets interface, go to Rules, then click Migrate. The migration completes but the rule screen is blank with the message “Drag and drop a function to get started”. The original rules are missing. (There is no "try and migrate again" option.) Ok. So, I needed to manually rebuild the rules. (If there had been a lot of rules, that would have been a burden.) I rebuilt the rule, saved the rule, and activated it. Some days later, I checked the report and the report did not show the expected custom value but showed "Unknown" instead. After a week, it still showed "Unknown". I then changed the new rule to use $1 instead of the custom value. I checked the report and that w
Thanks to everyone who joined today’s workshop, Own Your Impact as a Workfront System Admin! The session was led by Workfront Champion and Enterprise Workfront Platform Lead & Product Owner at TD Bank, Nuria Munguia @NuriaMunguia , who shared a compelling perspective on how System Administrators can translate their work into measurable business value and financial impact. Key Takeaways: The best work of System Admins is often invisible, so it's up to you to communicate a value story to leadership before someone else defines it for you. Translate technical work into business value. Focus on outcomes such as time saved, costs avoided, risk reduced, and capacity created rather than listing tasks or activities completed. Make your impact visible before leadership asks. Consistently track, measure, and communicate the business results of your work to demonstrate strategic value. Capture value at intake. When requests are submitted, ask users to estimate time, effort, or cost sav
Hi All,I am hoping someone across Application Design reads this, because it does not fall into the topics in the list, but is more across the whole Experience Cloud Product.Recent changes have made it so that ALL links pasted into applications, such as Email or Microsoft Teams, just say “Adobe Experience Cloud”. Previously when sharing an AA or CJA report - or a link to a Marketo program, it would be more definitive. This makes it hard for the receiver of links to know what each link is for. Screenshot from Microsoft Teams of a Marketo link. With recent changes, and I have especially noticed with migration of Marketo to Experience Platform, it is very hard to identify which browser TAB I have which application open in. I use multiple applications and have them all open at the same time - AA, CJA, AEP, Marketo, Admin Console. But the favicon is all the same. Can you implement different colours on the favicon, or some other visual identifier, to make it easy for me to switch between a
At this time, there doesn’t seem to be any good options for copying Report Builder requests from one file to another. There is a Copy / Paste request option built into the Add-On which is amazing, but this only works within the same file. You cannot copy a request from one file into another. I tested this by opening and logging into two Excel Reports, copying a simple request from Report A, then going into Report B and selecting a cell… there was no Paste option available. I can understand that this might be an Add-On scope issue, but what about adding an Export / Import function that can export out an XML or JSON formatted file that can then be imported into another Excel instance… and hopefully this would support bulk rules and not just one at a time, as this would make merging reports into one large report so much easier (than the current “rebuild all requests from scratch”). This feature would be a huge time saver to:make copies of common requests to other files merging reports tog
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.