Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
It is pretty straightforward when using first known or last known allocation with session expiration in Adobe CJA. It is less clear when a custom lookback window is used, because of both the forward and backward nature of these allocation types. Example, if a user had the following sequence, what would be the first and last known values assuming the followingDay = the date in January Chart date range is Jan 1 - Jan 31 Custom lookback window is 7 days for both the last known and first known properties.Day Value on Event First Known Last Known 1 C C 5 C C B 9 B C B 14 B A 18 A B A Does custom lookback essentially work as custom look-forward for ‘last known’? Is the above correct?
how do i create a cohort segment for users who first came to the site on a specific date? SAy users who first came on 2 specific days in february. I want to know how often they return each month since then. (the date of my cohort would be from Feb until July)
I want to analyze the visitor journey from time of entry up until, and including, the point of conversion.Right now I have Visitor container where pageview exists THEN e3 (form conversion) exists.The conversion happened in visit 6. The issue I’m facing is that setting the segment to “Before sequence” only shows visits 1-5After Sequence shows the converting visit but everything after it which I don’t care about. How can I add logic to cap it at the point of conversion or the converting visit?
If i delete a folder in Fusion with contents, doe everything get deleted, or doed the content get placed in uncategorized?
Has anyone else had any issue with their Condition Presets resetting back to nothing selected in the preset? Sometimes it happens in the source language and sometimes in one of the target languages, but not the others?When it happens in the source language, it had existed and the settings were saved, then a few months later it is zeroed out.
When creating a user profile in Workfront, the option to automatically generate a proof when a document is uploaded should not be selected by default. Instead, this setting should be an optional, manual selection during user profile creation. Making this change would reduce confusion and help minimize troubleshooting tickets from end users who simply want to upload a document without initiating a proof.
We are on AEMaaCS, we are working on introducing msm in our experience fragment hierarchy, we have created an xf in language masters in /content/experience-fragments/myProject/language-masters/en/header, now as it happens in site pages when we roll out a page from language masters, it automatically creates a live copy in /content/myProject/en/en_US, but in case of xf we have to manually create a live copy using create button, is there a way to automate this like it is there in sites pages.
Hi all, I am relatively new to AEM. I apologize in advance for the long message. I am an admin/owner for our AEM account at my job. My question pertains to my users who aren’t admins themselves, specifically our design team. They are currently uploading folders from their computers to a specific folder in AEM and we need for them to be able to add an existing metadata profile to that folder they uploaded so they can then enter the appropriate metadata info. Are there ways for users to do this, or do they need to be admins?I have created a custom folder metadata profile in Tools > Folder Metadata Schemas. Through Folder Metadata Schema Forms I am able to select this custom profile I created and then apply it to any folder in our AEM space. When I ran some testing with one of my users, they were able to access Folder Metadata Schema Forms through Tools, however they didn’t have the ability to apply the schema to a folder (presumably because they aren’t admin level). Is there a way for
I have created the below config file and installed it into RDE:config/api.yamlkind: "API"version: "1.0"metadata: envTypes: ["rde"]data: allowedClientIDs: author: - "YOUR_APP_BUILDER_CLIENT_ID" This is working fine for Content fragment OpenAPI. However it seems to be throwing “IMS Client ID not allowlisted. Allowlist the Client ID using the Configuration Pipeline.” for Sites/Pages Management API (/adobe/sites/sm/ and /adobe/sites/pm/). Is there any API specific configuration that needs to be installed?Thanks in advance!
I’ve been spam blocklisted, what do I do?! 🫣Nobody wants that dreaded email from Adobe telling you that you are in violation of your agreement with them because you have hit a spam blocklist. In case that this unfortunate thing does happen, or for anyone trying to prevent this from happening, below are some tips to help out. It is worth noting, most of the points about mitigation and spam blocker removal apply to a dedicated IP address, but you can still be a bad actor on a shared IP address which Adobe will contact you about. The best practices and troubleshooting tips apply to everyone!There are different ‘rules’ depending on which spam blocklist you hit. Spamhaus is the most common one that requires an action plan to solve the issue, as well as to submit a request to be de-listed which you can do via their checklist tool. You will also want to check with your Adobe team if they will do this part once you complete the Adobe form with your action plan. It’s best to search and learn m
I’m looking to send an automated email to anyone who fills out a form. I want the email to be sent 2 days later (but only during the week), and I don’t want internal employees to receive the automated email.In the smart list is the trigger “Fills out form”, and below is what I have for the flow steps. Is this the right setup (of course with my company’s email domain filled in)? Should I leave “Do nothing” for the choice 1 section?
Hi All,I need a help/clarification on feedback webhook data storage. I have enabled webhook option in API triggered campaign and setup streaming HTTP API endpoint to store the feedback in AEP custom dataset. I’m using custom identity type as per my requirement for API triggered campaign.Below documentation shows the payload triggered after message execution.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/configuration/feedback-webhooks Since I used custom identity during Campaign setup, I understand the identityMap in the payload will contain the custom identity and not email. If so, how do I capture the additional information like email address - to which email is triggered to - and if it sends email only in that feedback payload, then how do I get it work to send the custom identity which is the profile identifier for me.The webhook is working and I see the feedback data in the custom dataset but it is populating with neither email identity nor custom identity. I t
Excited to co-host with @DavidBarnes11 an open AEP / AJO community discussion on March 24 at 11 AM EST.This will be a fully audience-driven session - the challenges, blockers, and ideas we explore will come directly from the people who show up and share their experiences.If you work with Adobe Experience Platform or Adobe Journey Optimizer, bring your toughest questions:• What’s blocking you?• What limits are you hitting?• What do you wish the platform could do better?The goal is simple: learn from each other and tap into the collective knowledge of the community.🔗 Learn more & RSVP:https://lnkd.in/eYfJ8XWC💬 If you want to influence the discussion, message @Asheesh_Pandey or @DavidBarnes11 with the AEP / AJO challenge that’s keeping you up at night. @NimashaJain @Sukrity_Wadhwa @Stephanie Dam
I’m trying to create a new field in an already profile-enabled schema. I usually add fields to this schema without any issues, but today I’m encountering an error.The error indicates that there is an empty object in another schema that this one is referencing. I checked the referenced schema, but I’m not able to find any empty object there.Has anyone encountered this before or knows what might be causing it?Error:An object field has an empty 'properties' attribute. Field path: /definitions/customFields/properties/<field group
Hi folks!!What I want to do is have the total hours in a timesheet grouped up by a Team.Then have an average of that amount by the number of people in that team. So that it spits out something like, Team a 42 hrs, Team B 47 hours. Etc etc.I was trying to group the hours by home team, but then the average was calculating the average of the individual hours entered, so it was showing 2.66 and such as each individual input of hours was around 1-4 at a time.It may be something that it cant do as a native report. I got quite far in getting it to add up all the total hours in a timesheet for a team, but it cant average by the amount of users in the team, (at least it wasn’t a standard option).Any help as always appreciated!
Hi Workfront Community,Has anyone created functionality in Workfront that enables users to scope initiatives that are in the sales pipeline, but not yet converted to a closed deal?Currently, our Client Partners team puts together SOWs and scopes for various products and services we offer. They do this in scoping spreadsheets right now to get an idea of estimated hours, resources, teams and revenue that will be involved.In the past, we had “scoping” projects in Workfront, defined by a custom project status, where we created tasks, with hours and resources, and although this worked for a while, users wanted something with more flexibility and thus moved to spreadsheets.Just seeing if anyone has implemented solutions in Workfront for this, as this will help with my ideation process.Thanks!Nick
Good morning,Recently I’ve been trying to make a deep dive on the Time on Site users spend on my web and I noticed that I have a very big difference between the Time on Site we see on the Freeform table for All visits, and the time we see in the the Key Metric Summary, even though we have the same filters applied.I can tell it’s because of the days average but I would need you as experts to help me understand:Why such a big difference The meaning of each KPIThank you in advance!
We are trying to upload a new classification file (.tab) in Adobe Analytics - Admin > Classification Importer. When we upload the file the section with “Overwrite data on conflict” checkbox greyed out / not selectable. We need our data to fully update based on our new file. Is it going to update the data if that checkbox is not checked? Appreciate your help. Thanks!
Hello Team, Is there any way to access AEM Experience fragment in AJO ?@ManikSingla Could you please advice on any possible ways to do this as per this comment on a previous post - Thank you!
I have a report that totals the number of label jobs in a day, and each job has a quantity.The results are grouped by day, so the summary tab has the date, count of jobs for each day, and a total sum of labels produced (custom field - number format).the data displays properly on the summary tab, and the complete data shows up on a PDF export, but the Sum column has no data in the excel data exports. if i export tab delimited to notebook, the totals are also there. any help? thank you.
Currently in Adobe Analytics Analysis Workspace, combo charts provide limited flexibility when visualizing multiple metrics together. Users often need more control to better represent different types of data (e.g., trends vs. volumes) within a single visualization.We propose enhancing combo chart functionality to allow customizable combinations such as:2 line metrics + 1 bar metric 2 bar metrics + 1 line metric Ability to freely assign chart types (line or bar) to each metric independentlyUse Case:In many reporting scenarios, analysts want to:Show trend-based KPIs (e.g., conversion rate, CTR) as line charts Display volume-based metrics (e.g., visits, revenue) as bar chartsCurrently, the lack of flexibility limits effective storytelling and forces users to create separate visualizations or compromise on clarity.Proposed Enhancement:Enable per-metric chart type selection within combo charts Allow dynamic switching between line and bar for each metric Improve legend/UI controls to support
Hi I was hoping someone could help me understand how the binding works with fragments. We created a address fragment and used it on our Adaptive form. The Adaptive form is already bound to a .schema.json. The address exists as a panel under Personal Information. So, we replaced this address panel with a fragment and bound the fragment to “$.yourinformation.address” where “yourinformation” is the parent panel. The fields within the fragment are all bound to themselves like $.street etc.When we submit this form, the JSON shows the address outside of yourinformation. This is not matching with the .schema.json and so prefilling is failing on the XDP. Below are the screen shots i have attached.
I am trying to populate data from Custom Objects in Marketo into a data field in Marketo as well. I know I can’t use smart campaigns with flow step of Change Data Value but I would like to know if there is a way to do so.
In this session, Joe and Deepthi introduced the AI Assistant Brand Kit in Marketo Engage, a feature designed to help users maintain brand consistency across their digital assets. Deepthi detailed how administrators can define and manage specific brand guidelines for text and visuals, ensuring that all AI-generated content—including a new feature that extracts information directly from URLs—aligns with company standards. Beyond content creation, the session highlighted a brand alignment tool that scores both AI and manual content for quality and compliance, followed by a Q&A segment covering permissions, workspace scoping, and the commercial usage of generated images.AI Generated timestamps:Introduction & Feature Overview 01:01 Managing Brand Guidelines 03:34 Content Generation 11:10 Brand Alignment & Scoring 13:50 Q&A Session 16:49 Follow-Up Info 24:46 URL Content Generation 29:11
It would be good to have a Splunk Connector for Workfront and Splunk
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.