Product Communities

The method appendVisitorInfoForURL returns in some situations a “|” character. When these urls are processed by some of our systems this character is causing problems.adobe_mc=TS=1781184368|MCMID=30298187359278372896471907409936339487|MCORGID=A174401053C92A7E0A490D4CWould it be possible to encoide this url without causing other side effects or losing the user journey?

Facing issue in sending qualified audiences  to facebook custom audience from adobe experience platform. I am getting is error as 404 , have done with all the prerequisites facebook connection mentioned in document. Still it’s not working."Permissions error","code":"400 BAD_REQUEST".Appreciate any help on this.

We are currently relying heavily on the Adobe Real-Time API 2.0 to retrieve near real-time readership data for our analysis. I understand that the API is designed for fast processing, which is likely the reason behind the current limit of 1000 on realTimeValuesPerPeriodparameter as mentioned here - https://developer.adobe.com/analytics-apis/docs/2.0/guides/endpoints/reports/real-time#limiting-the-number-of-dimension-return-values-per-periodHowever, this limit is proving to be too restrictive for our use case. At present:We fetch data at a 5-minute interval, where we observe peak volumes of almost 8,000 events per interval Even after increasing the polling frequency to 1-minute intervals, we still receive approximately 3,000 events per intervalDue to the current cap of 1000, we are consistently missing a significant portion of events, which impacts the completeness and accuracy of our analysis.We have explored the option of further increasing the fetch frequency, but this is not feasibl

Family-owned businesses are often built through years of hard work, trust, and dedication. Many of these businesses are passed down from one generation to another, carrying with them a strong reputation and loyal customer base. In many cases, the business name itself becomes a symbol of quality and reliability in the market. However, despite spending decades building their reputation, many family businesses overlook the importance of legally protecting their brand identity. Without proper protection, competitors can adopt similar names or branding, creating confusion and weakening the goodwill that the family has worked hard to establish. This is why Trademark Filing in India is an important step for family-owned businesses that want to protect their legacy and secure their future.How Trademark Filing in India Preserves Business Legacy and ReputationA family business is more than a source of income—it is often a legacy that represents the values and efforts of several generations. As t

Subject: Guidance Required – upsert_array_replace Support for Batch IngestionHi everyone,Good evening.I need some guidance regarding the behavior of upsert_array_replace with Batch Ingestion in Adobe Experience Platform.I am trying to update an array field in an existing Profile using Batch Ingestion (Upsert). However, instead of replacing the existing array values, the new values are getting appended.I have gone through the available Adobe documentation and tested different approaches, but I couldn't find any confirmation on whether upsert_array_replace is supported for Batch Ingestion.From the documentation, I could confirm that upsert_array_replace is supported for Streaming Ingestion, but I couldn't find any mention of Batch Ingestion.Could someone please help clarify:Is upsert_array_replace supported for Batch Ingestion?If not, is there any alternative approach to completely replace array/object-array values during Batch Upsert?Is there any official Adobe documentation that explic

Hi, We need to assign users to request queue issues, but don’t want them to add time on the issue or see the request/issue on their timesheet. Users will add time on a task in the project where the issue is. I see a 4 year old post about this topic- I was wondering if there’s been any updates since this post that would allow me to restrict users from adding time to issues. Currently, we’re exploring creating individual teams and assigning that to the issues, so issues won’t show on timesheets. But I wondered if there were any other ideas on this.Thanks

I have a new creative director and would love to provide him with a comprehensive dashboard to manage his three direct reports. I popped into Copilot what was the best Adobe Workfront Dashboard for Creative Directors would be, and it replied:  For a Creative Director in Adobe Workfront, the “best” dashboard is one that centralizes team workload, project progress, and creative deliverables in a clear, customizable view — ideally set as the home page so it’s the first thing they see when logging in Adobe Experience League. But when I tried to follow the “step-by-step” instructions, I get a bit lost. I will try to pop the same question into the Adobe AI Assistant to see if it can help me. But would LOVE anyone’s thoughts on a Creative Director Dashboard! I placed the image of the directions for reference. Thanks! ​

Hello ALL,I have a question regarding the new Dataset Lookup node in Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO).ScenarioI have configured a Dataset Lookup using the following lookup key:Lookup Key: 123Sample dataset:Column1 (Lookup Key) Column2 Timestamp 123 Yes 6/26 123 No 6/26 123 Yes 6/25 QuestionHow does the Dataset Lookup node behave when there are multiple records matching the same lookup key?Specifically:Does AJO return the first matching record, last matching record, most recent record based on timestamp, or is the behavior non-deterministic? Is there any documented logic or prioritization used when duplicate lookup key values exist in the dataset? Are duplicate lookup keys supported, or is the lookup key expected to be unique within the dataset?ObservationIn my test, when the lookup key 123 matches multiple records, the journey consistently evaluates to the "Others" condition rather than the expected paths.I would like to understand:Whether this is the expected behavior

Hi Everyone,We're investigating an interesting Marketo–Salesforce synchronization behavior and would appreciate any insights from the community.We have a Lead Status field that is synced between Salesforce Lead Status and the corresponding Person Status field in Marketo. The lifecycle progression is managed through Marketo lifecycle programs, while Salesforce users can manually update the Lead Status.Here's the sequence we observed: Marketo updates the Lead Status to New/MQL, which successfully syncs to Salesforce. A Salesforce user manually changes the Lead Status from New/MQL to Not Qualified. A Salesforce Flow is triggered, but it only updates the Lead Owner to the Marketo queue. It does not update the Lead Status or Status Reason. A few minutes later, during Sync Person Updates to SFDC, the Lead Status is changed back to New/MQL by the Marketo Integration User. We've reproduced this behavior on multiple test leads.Adobe Support has confirmed the following: No second Smart Cam

Question: I have been asked to create a report that identifies if users have downloaded a monthly report.The report is created outside of Workfront then added to Workfront and an update is sent to let the user know the report is now available. I created a Journal Entry report that identifies when and if  these documents have been downloaded. Mission accomplished. But then, I was asked if this included if someone clicked “Preview”. Well I thought because it was an Excel doc. and automatically downloads when Preview is selected I would be good. But low and behold that is not the case. Preview doesn’t count as a download even if the document is downloaded. Anyone have thoughts on how I might be able to deliver this information?

Has anyone, anywhere integrated Adobe Workfront with RegEd?Because Adobe Workfront is not FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) approved, we have to use RegEd for all of our compliance reviews.We use Adobe Workfront for our marketing internal and business partner reviews/approvals, but we are required to use RegEd for our compliance reviews.Has anyone done this? Costs? Pros? Cons?

Hi Everyone, I have recently started my learning for Marketo Business Practitioner Certification. As I haven’t used Marketo yet in my professional career, it is required to have Marketo instance for learning and complete this certification. If yet, how should I approach and study for this certification. If not, will the prep guide has everything we need for the exam. Thank you, Abhinav

If you're using Adobe Client Data Layer (ACDL) in Tags (Launch) and ordering of Rules is important to your setup, then setup your ACDL Events to listen to "All Events" only. Preface / Legend For the rest of this post, I'm going to use specific upper- and lowercase spellings to distinguish various items. Uppercase "Event", "Condition", "Action": these refer to the Events, Conditions and Actions in Tags that come from extensions. For example, the ACDL extension has an Event called "Data Pushed". Uppercase "Rule": this refers to Rules that are setup in Tags. A Rule can contain 1 or more Events (where each Event doesn't have to come from the same extension), 1 or more Conditions, and 1 or more Actions. Lowercase "event": any other event that occurs during your web page's runtime, i.e. when it is loaded and interacted with in the user's browser. "ACDL event": an event that got pushed into ACDL / adobeDataLayer. Background Tags, or Launch as is more commonly known, has a fantasti

I currently have two separate Excel workbooks containing Adobe Report Builder requests—one with 100 requests and another with 50. Right now, I am using standard Excel copy-paste and cell references to display the data from both in a single file.What is the best way to migrate the 50 active Report Builder requests directly into the 100-request workbook so they all run natively from a single consolidated file?"

Hi, We have a requirement in our project to delete, move, and merge tags. However, I’m facing some challenges in understanding how the taxonomy functionality behaves in these scenarios.1. Delete:When a tag is deleted, it is not removed from the associated asset properties. It appears that the tag must be explicitly removed from each asset, or handled through backend implementation.2. Move/Merge:When a tag is moved to a different folder or merged to a new tags, the changes are not reflected in the asset properties unless the tag references in the assets are manually updated.Could you please clarify why the system behaves this way? Is there any recommended approach to delete, move, or merge tags such that the changes are automatically reflected in asset properties, without requiring additional backend implementation?Thanks

Hi,We are trying to set new domain in cloud Followed the documentation and domain shows verified.In domain mapping section status is shown as deployed If I try access the domain with home page I am able to view it. The vhost header is resolved to publish.  I tried adding custom vhost for newly added domain and a farm file. My vhost is not picking up and x-vhost is always publish not the custom one. After checking found that domain mapping section has go live button to make domain available for traffic as mentioned in the docs. So my host file not resolved willbe causing because of domain not yet go live? But when the status is deployed how I can access the domain. Could someone help with the insights   

Hi All,I have upgraded to 6.5 LTS SP2 from AEM 6.5 Service pack 22. Now, I wanted to use AEM Forms Core components for Adaptive forms. After install of forms Addon as per software distribution portal, I can see the components in CRXDE. But, I am not able to resolve the error like - com.adobe.cq.forms.core.components.models.form.FormContainer cannot be resolved to a typeI have the below setup - AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 on-premiseAEM Core Components package - 2.30.4Forms Addon package - adobe-aemfd-linux-pkg-6.1.206.zipUber Jar version - 6.6.2 /apps/core/fd/components/form/container/v1/container/container.html<form class="cmp-formcontainer"     data-sly-use.formContainer="com.adobe.cq.forms.core.components.models.form.FormContainer"     data-sly-use.template="core/wcm/components/commons/v1/templates.html"     id="${formContainer.id}" Also, when i check on depfinder, i don’t find any imports for com.adobe.cq.forms.core - screenshot added for more details.Do I need to install any new package or

Tired of maintaining versioned custom indexes in AEM as a Cloud Service?In this blog, I explore Simplified Index Management using Diff Index, a powerful feature that allows developers to maintain only index differences instead of full index definitions.✅ Migrate existing custom indexes✅ Create brand-new custom indexes using only diff.json✅ Validate and verify migrated indexes✅ Understand limitations and best practices A must-read for AEM developers looking to reduce index maintenance overhead and simplify upgrades.  Want to Read more :- https://www.aemcq5tutorials.com/tutorials/simplified-index-management-aem-cloud-service-diff-index/ 

Hi all,struggling a little bit to set up the Visitor ID sync between parent frame and iFrames by configuring whitelistParentDomain and whitelistIframeDomains. Background: we have two domains, domainA.com and domainB.com .both domains run their own Launch property both use the same AdobeOrgID both track into the same Adobe Analytics Report Suite third-party (demdex) cookies are disabledNow, we want to make sure the ECID is synched across outer frame and iframe for a stitched view on the visitor.Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (whitelistParentDomain is added, so it should be able iframes from the same domain, open for discussion if needed)Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config Data Element “whitelistIframeDomains”:return [ "www.domainB.com"]; iFrame Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (note that the consent is disabled by default / for testing, but don’t work with consent enabled for both, either)iFrame Launch property Experi

Hi everyone,We're trying to understand the best approach for making Salesforce Opportunity Product (Opportunity Line Item) data available in Marketo.Currently, Opportunity information is available in Marketo only when there is an Opportunity Contact Role associated with the Opportunity. In our Salesforce org, this is typically the Logistics Contact, but that contact is not relevant for our marketing use case.Our goal is to make Opportunity Product information available in Marketo, such as:Primary Product Product 2 Product 3 Solution Group Other Opportunity Product fieldsso that Marketing can build Smart Lists and Smart Campaigns based on these values.Our questions are:Is there any way to sync or expose Opportunity Product (Opportunity Line Item) data to Marketo without relying on the Logistics Contact or another Opportunity Contact Role? Does Marketo support syncing Opportunity Product data directly, or is a custom solution (such as Salesforce Flow, Apex, or Custom Object Sync) require

Là nguồn tham khảo thời tiết dành cho cộng đồng Việt Nam, ThoiTietHomNay.org cung cấp các bản tin dự báo chi tiết, dữ liệu môi trường và những thông tin hữu ích liên quan đến khí hậu. Website hướng đến việc hỗ trợ người dùng đưa ra quyết định phù hợp trước những thay đổi của thời tiết. 

Hi ​@Asheesh_Pandey , ​@jachlt , ​@Parvesh_Parmar , ​@SantoshRa5 I’m looking for guidance on how to backtrack and analyze excluded identities during exports in  AEP. Currently, we don’t have any mandatory fields or consent labels configured, so I’m unsure what might be causing these exclusions.Are there other factors or checks we should be considering that could lead to identities being excluded? Additionally, how can we effectively trace back and understand why certain identities are not included in the export?Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciatedhttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/dataflows/ui/monitor-destinations#dataflow-runs-for-batch-destinationsThak​​​

Hi All, I am getting the below issue - For the same commit id in Adobe Git, I got the deployment failed the first time but succeed the second time. Build #1 - 22:27:04,861 [main] [INFO] Downloading from digital-mvn-build-dependencies: https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/cantire/_packaging/digital-mvn-build-dependencies/maven/v1/io/netty/netty-bom/4.2.15.Final/netty-bom-4.2.15.Final.pom22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:[ERROR] Non-resolvable import POM: The following artifacts could not be resolved: io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final (absent): Could not transfer artifact io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final from/to central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): status code: 429, reason phrase: Too Many Requests (429) @ line 1169, column 25 @ 22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR] The project com.projA.aem:projAweb:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (/build_root/build/projA-aemcs/pom.xml) has 1 error22:27:05,127 [main] [ERROR] Non-resolvable import POM: The foll

The new CDN rules are blocking anything that ends with .php, contains /wp-content, or contains /wp-config.We want to extend the ACS-Commons Error Handling currently being used for 404. 404 and 500 friendly pages are being redirected but the 406 is not working.