Product Communities

Business requirement is to use direct domain to send out transactional emails from Adobe Campaign V8. In Control Panel, it throwing a warning says its Apex domain and sub-domain should use.

Hi Real-Time CDP Community!Looking to sharpen your Adobe skills, discover new ways to work smarter with AI, and learn directly from Adobe experts and customers? Skill Exchange 2026 registration is officially open! 🚀  Adobe Real-Time CDP (alongside Adobe Experience Platform and Applications (Journey Optimizer and Customer Journey Analytics) sessions will be held on August 6th, with sessions across 7 Adobe products throughout Aug 5th-13th. A couple sessions you can expect to learn from: One Platform, One Customer From Insight to Impact: Building a Next-Generation Experimentation Program Building an Intelligent Activation Layer and Orchestration Drives Results See full Adobe Experience Platform and Applications session list here  Join us this August for: ✨ Expert-led sessions across 7 Adobe products 🤖 AI-powered tips and innovations 💡 Real customer stories 🎬 Live demos and practical takeaways you can apply right away 🤝 Opportunities to connect with fellow Experience Makers  Whether y

Hi Adobe Community,We are designing a personalization architecture for our company’s website and mobile app using Adobe Experience Cloud, and I would appreciate hearing how others have implemented a similar solution.Our current ecosystem includes:Adobe Experience Platform (Real-Time CDP) Adobe Experience Manager (Content Fragments / Experience Fragments) Adobe Target Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO)Our objective is to build a scalable content matrix that supports omnichannel personalization across website, mobile app, email, and push notifications.Our current thinking is:AEM serves as the central content repository where reusable Content Fragments/Experience Fragments are managed. Customer profiles, audiences, and behavioral data are managed in Real-Time CDP. Adobe Target delivers personalized website and app experiences. AJO orchestrates personalized customer journeys across email, push, SMS, and in-app messaging.However, we still have several architectural questions:How should the conte

Hi everyone,I'm working on a scheduled Data Distiller job that computes an eligibility flag for entities and writes the results to a Profile-enabled dataset.One of the output attributes is a timestamp that should represent when the entity first became eligible.The desired behavior is:If an entity transitions from not eligible → eligible, set the timestamp to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP. If the entity remains eligible in subsequent scheduled runs, preserve the original timestamp. If the entity becomes ineligible, reset the timestamp (or set it to NULL).Conceptually, the logic would be similar to:CASEWHEN current.isEligible = TRUEAND (previous.isEligible = FALSE OR previous.isEligible IS NULL)    THEN CURRENT_TIMESTAMPWHEN current.isEligible = TRUEAND previous.isEligible = TRUETHEN previous.EligibilityTimestamp    ELSE NULL ENDMy questions are:Is it supported to read the previous state from a Profile-enabled dataset and write the updated results back to the same dataset within a scheduled Data Dis

i have created the configuration to enable persisted queries for my endpoint but when I am in the query editor, there is a message stating that they are not enabled. What could I be missing?

 Previously, when using a Typehead field we were able to reference a child field of the Typehead within a calculated field.An example would be the Typehead field referencing a particular project, and then a calculated field being able to pull through the ID of that project using the notation: {DE:typeheadproject:ID}. This doesn’t seem to work for internal lookup fields which we have now been directed to use? Can you please let me know what the new notation is to reference these child fields from an internal lookup field?

Hi everyone,I'm exploring a Fusion use case and would love to hear if anyone has tackled something similar.When creating a proof, users often enter important instructions in Email Notification → Add Custom Message. The challenge is that once the proof is created, those instructions aren't easily accessible within the proof itself.Ideally, we'd like to build a Fusion scenario that:Detects a newly created proof. Retrieves the custom email message. Automatically posts that message as the first comment in the proof.This would preserve review intent and project-specific instructions directly within the proof, even if the original email is deleted or lost.My main question:Does the Workfront Proof API expose the value entered in Email Notification → Add Custom Message → Message?If so, has anyone successfully used Fusion to retrieve that value and create a proof comment from it? I'd also be interested in hearing what modules, API calls, or overall framework you used.Any insights or examples wo

I know you can upload a document currently in Planning and it creates a record, and it’s also visible as a brief.  But I’m wondering when will the AI feature be available?  

I'm building a report to track hours invested per portfolio per month and running into two issues. Would love to know if anyone has found a solution.Issue 1 — Portfolio chart in an Hour reportI built an Hour report with filters for the current month ($$TODAYbm / $$TODAYem) and groupings by Portfolio and Project. The monthly filter works perfectly, but when I try to build a chart, Portfolio Name doesn't appear as a Y axis option (only Project Name and Owner show up.)I switched to a Project report to get Portfolio on the chart, but then I lose the ability to filter hours by month since Actual Hours on projects are cumulative totals.Is there a way to have both a monthly hour filter AND a Portfolio chart in the same report?Issue 2 — Sort chart bars from most to least hoursIn my chart, the bars are sorting alphabetically by Portfolio name. I want them to sort descending by hours so the portfolio consuming the most hours appears first. I've tried adding sort order in the Groupings text mode

Description - While viewing all Project Tasks, having a dedicated Field/Column for logging Task HoursWhy This Feature is Important - Having the ability to log hours directly from the Project Tasks page and not needing to navigate to either the Task itself, or the Open Summary tab would be incredibly helpful. This would reduce User effort in logging time, while also removing any possible confusion for new Users navigating to the Task, and back to the Project, or navigation within the Open Summary tab.How the Feature Would Work - Added Field/Column to the standard Project View as a place for Users to log hours. This could be done via a button similar to the Status Icons that directly opens the ‘Log Time’ panel (without leaving the Project page). Alternatively this could be a Field where Users enter a numerical value that is then added to their Actual hours, and then removed from the Field. Current Behavior - Currently, Users need to navigate to the Task itself to log hours, or use the Op

We noticed one of our forms was getting several spam form fills, so we added “CAPTCHA = Trusted” as a constraint attached to the “Fills out Form” trigger for a handful of our smart campaigns.However, we realized this was causing form fills to not go through, even when I tested myself, as a human. After I removed the CAPTCHA = Trusted constraint, my form fill went through immediately. What is the best way to filter out spam/bot form fills on Marketo forms that live on Marketo landing pages or our website?   

Hi, In AEP identity stitching is not happening properly and not showing data in events when we create 1 individual profile schema and 1 experience event schema when we have same identity namespace in both the schemas. Can anyone please help me on the same

In plenty of spaces in Workfront, when you search a list of objects, it feeds you all objects (active and inactive). This is particurarly true for filtering. I understand why we get everything and the kitchen sink, however it can be confusing and overwhelming. It would be helpful to visually represent what is active versus inactive. Some options:Gray out the names of inactive objects Add a symbol like an asterisk to the beginning of the object name (but not the end because these dropdown windows sometimes truncate names)

I have implemented scroll depth bucketing in Adobe Analytics using the following bucket structure: {"0%": 0,"1–25%": 1,"26–50%": 2,"51–75%": 3,"76–100%": 4} The bucketing logic is working correctly, and I can see data populating in the expected buckets. The bucket values are being populated correctly, and when I use Page Scroll Depth Bucket Instances as the metric, all traffic is categorized into the defined buckets and no Unspecified values appear.However, when I use Visits as the metric with the same dimension, I see a significant number of Unspecified values.To reduce Unspecified values, I have also:Added a 0% bucket for no-scroll scenarios. Configured the scroll depth bucket to be passed into an eVar. Added a fallback value so visits without scroll activity are categorized into the 0% bucket.However, I am still seeing a percentage of traffic reported as Unspecified.Could anyone help clarify the possible scenarios where Unspecified may still occur even when all bucket ranges are con

Hello,I'm testing the Adobe Analytics Activity Map browser extension and I've noticed that some links/buttons are not showing any clicks in the overlay.For example, one standard Add to cart button appears in Activity Map, while another button (Add 2 items to cart) is displayed in the overlay (“Links On Page” Table from the extension) but always shows 0 clicks, despite being clicked during testing.I've already verified that:Both interactions send an Adobe Web SDK (/ee/v1/interact) request. Both send a commerce.productListAdds event. Neither request appears to contain webInteraction or Activity Map-specific data. The issue I'm referring to is only with the Activity Map browser extension, not the Activity Map dimensions in Analysis Workspace.Is there any known limitation or configuration required for Activity Map to recognize certain buttons (for example, JavaScript buttons versus standard form buttons)? Are there any specific Web SDK or Adobe Tags settings that should be enabled?I know

Adobe will stop supporting Batch Audiences in the Audience qualification start to a journey, and wants either streaming audiences (so 24 hour period max) or use of the read audience start. That means a read audience can’t determine which are new profiles in the audience and just sends to everyone in the audience, which just doesn’t work, or we need to define the audience in batch with very defined limits and have exclusions of people who have been messaged, which is not practical. Campaigns have an iterative type of read to process only new profiles entering the audience, journeys  dont. And campaigns arent an option for Whatsapp or logic around comms segmentation Are there any work arounds that anyone has put in place to negate the potential issues here? I really feel this is a very ill advised change to something that was working very well.

We are experiencing an issue in our AEM as a Cloud Service environment  where non-admin authors are unable to use standard publishing due to an implicit system path reference.When a user attempts to publish a content page, the replication payload automatically appends a reference to the legacy system path /libs/settings/wcm/designs/default/jcr:content. Because /libs is immutable and standard users lack crx:replicate permissions at the root/libs level, the replication engine blocks the direct publish and routes the payload to the default request_for_activation workflow.To isolate this issue, we created a dedicated test user and explicitly granted them jcr:all permissions on the following paths:/var  & /content/dam/mygps/en/pi  & /content/mygps/us/en/pi (Plus standard jcr:read on root /) Despite having full jcr:all (which includes read, write, and replicate) across all relevant content and variable directories, this test user still triggers the approval workflow. The replication

We are investigating unexpected email click-count behavior in Adobe Journey Optimizer and Customer Journey Analytics.For one email recipient, CJA displays:61 Total Clicks 1 Unique ClickThe profile’s email interaction data contains 20 message.tracking click events associated with the same profile, message execution, batch instance, campaign, and message.Here are some findings from within those records. Each click event has a different event _id. There are 19 distinct link labels and urlID values. The recorded links include buttons, ticket links, social links, app-store links, an Add to Calendar link, and other destinations throughout the email. All 20 events occurred between 22:38:45.166 and 22:38:46.383, a period of approximately 1.2 seconds. One link was recorded twice; the remaining events represent different links. Every event has "isBot": falseWe also reviewed the HTML used for the send. The links are represented as separate anchor elements, and the buttons reviewed do not contain

Hi,There was a task to publish the assets after property update. By mistake I published the assets that were deactivated before. Is it possible to get the list of assets that were deactivated before and activated now due to my automation. Does it store somewhere. Please help me if there’s any solution for this?Thanks