Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
There is not at the bottom of this pagehttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/sources/connectors/adobe-applications/analyticsYou can use Data Prep to filter out secondary identities coming from Analytics, such as AAID and AACUSTOMID. If filtered out, these identities will not be ingested into Profile if they are available in the incoming Analytics data. Unfiltered data will continue to be loaded into the data lake. Is this correct statement ? How can we filter something for profile-store and have unfiltered data getting ingested into dataLake , is that even possible ?
In documentation its said that development sandboxes are: slower, have its own limits Both types of sandboxes might be resetWhat are the advantages of Development sandboxes in that case from your experience?
We are not seeing any way to enter notes about new versions of images in the repository. Is there no way to track version changes to images and other non-DITA assets?
We are in the process of migrating from a SOAP-based implementation to a REST-based approach for fetching programs and their associated tags. Previously, with SOAP, we were able to retrieve all relevant data — including tags, tokens, and costs — in a single API call. However, with the REST API, retrieving tags now requires a separate request. According to the documentation, the endpoint for fetching programs does not return additional information such as "Tag", "Token", or "Cost". Tags must instead be retrieved using either the Get Programs by Id or Get Programs by Name endpoints.Is there a bulk REST API available that allows us to fetch tags for all programs in a single request?
On any given page, I track the following interactions:Video viewsAsset downloadsInteraction with page navigationInteraction with body componentsEngagement with the chat bot50% and 75% page scrollTo evaluate the performance of any page, I want to create a single metric that incorporates all of these interactions. I am considering a straightforward approach as follows:Create a segment that includes visits (visit container) with video views, asset downloads, interactions, engagement with the chat bot, or a 50% page scroll. Let’s name this segment "Page Engagement."Create a calculated metric:(Page Views where Page Engagement Exists) / Total Page ViewsAdded screenshots for reference. I would appreciate any recommendations or alternative approaches and would welcome suggestions on how to improve or refine this setup.
Hi team, We are implementing a new event-driven data layer and I'm using the Data Layer Manager extension to capture the push events in Adobe Data Collection. When the event is a link that leads to a new page (wipes the DOM), I can see the event being added to the data layer before the page unload, but the beacon is not sent every time (can't see the event in the debugger), hence data is not captured every time even if the data layer is updated. It seems like a timing issue since it does work sometimes, just not consistently. Any idea how to fix this and make sure the data is sent every time before unloading the page and going to the next? Cheers!
Hi Experts,Could you kindly suggest if deployment independent for more number of pages ( more than 25 pages) same kind of lighthouse report can be generated? It will not be dependent upon AEMaaCS pipeline or deployment.If yes, kindly share in little details.Thanks in advance !!
Why I do not see that available in AJO?
Hello, Reaching out here for help on a report.We have a task approval which has 1 stage assigned to Project owner role (wildcard) by default. When users send it for approval, they edit the approval path and add the user name in approval and remove the Project Owner name from there.We want to build a report of all such tasks where the approval was triggered but the user did not remove Project Owner from the approval.In the screenshot below, I want the report to only show the 3 tasks. Can anyone suggest on how this can be done?
Hi all,I'm currently working on a customer implementation where Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is integrated with Adobe Target. We have a workflow that automatically exports Experience Fragments (XFs) to Target in JSON format using the standard “Export to Adobe Target” process step provided in the workflow.However, I’ve run into an inconsistency:Sometimes the exported payload appears in Target as a "JSON Offer"Other times, it appears as a "JSON XF" (Experience Fragment)I’ve checked the workflow configuration and it’s always using the same OOTB process step (com.adobe.cq.target.integration.process.ExportExperienceFragmentToTargetProcess). I wasn’t able to identify what conditions or configurations lead to the difference in export type.❓ My questions are:What exactly determines whether AEM exports an XF to Target as a JSON Offer vs. JSON XF?Is there a setting in the Experience Fragment configuration or workflow metadata that drives this?Has anyone else experienced this inconsisten
What is the difference when it comes to workflow with authentication and without?WIth we needs to generate beforehand token?
How is it done? Using IP address? Then using external provider?
I wanted to track the fallout rate between two pages: a homepage and a conversion page. Easy peasy. Then I decided to dig a bit deeper and trend the touchpoint. It doesn't work. If I do a fall out for any given day in the range, it is lower than the one reported by about 10%. Not a trivial difference. What am I missing, or is there a bug? Which data point is the reliable one? Note that if i break down a day by hour, there is a similar impact. Averaging the elements manually, does not equal the average displayed.
Hi.I've created a free-form table with metrics in the rows and different time ranges in the columns. I would like to add a third column showing the % change between the two time ranges.Is this even possible? I´ve tried to scribble it on the screenshot. Many thanks for your effort in advance.BR
Hi Team, Could you please guide me on this? I want to apply different policies for a single editable template. I’ve created pages under two separate projects using the same template, but I want to allow only specific components in /content/myproject1 and different components in /content/myproject2, each governed by separate policies. Thanks in Advance,Veera
We have created a journey activity in our development environment and created a package with journey and audience. We see below error whilst importing the package in our pre-prod environment. Can anyone help?
AEM Guide when users select a element in the current open DITA file below a breadcrumb shows the path of the selected elementmy question how can i get the xpath of the selected element or even better how to get the active (selected) element in the tcx.activeEditor.xmlDocI need to know which xml element is selected in the editor and bind that to the element in the tcx.activeEditor.xmlDocBo, BJ Dita
There is a bunch of data-aue attributes that we can retrieve in custom Universal Edtitor extenstion. For example given html markup like this<div class="MuiBox-root mui-ifmqwy" data-aue-resource="<resource_path>" data-aue-model="myapp-component-model" data-aue-label="Component Label" data-aue-type="component" data-aue-prop="<some_prop>"></div>We can obtain attributes values using editorState.editables obejct in custom UE extensionconst editorState = await guestConnection.host.editorState.get(); let editable = editorState.editables[0]; console.log('editable: ', editable) // outputs { "id": "<some_id>", "type": "component", "resource": "<resource_path>", "prop": "<some_prop>", "rect": {}, "label": "Component Label", "parentid": "<parent_id>", "selector": "<some_selector>", "isComponent": true, "model": "myapp-component-model", "filter": "", "component": "", "content": "", "c
need to write expression in journey condition to check if we have any sent email status for specific journey id ?
Building an AEM Custom Authentication Handler for Okta OpenID Connect by Lars AuffarthOverview🔐Unlock the secrets of customizing secure authentication in AEM as you're guided through building a custom authentication handler for Okta OpenID Connect. From understanding the OpenID Connect authentication flow to implementing the handler with detailed code snippets, this blog provides a comprehensive roadmap. Learn how to create a demo account on Okta, extract required information, and deploy your custom Authentication Handler for testing. Don't miss the GitHub link for the complete code and try it out yourself!Q&APlease use this thread to ask questions relating to this article
Hi Team, Please suggest a solution for this. I have a single component and single template used in both projects — project1 and project2. Now, I want to apply different styles: white and grey for myproject1, and purple and blue for myproject2. Thanks in AdvanceVeera
Hi, we are facing an issue where while trying to send a proof, a delivery ID is getting generated but no delivery is generated for it. What could be the reason?
The Initial Problem:We have Youth Education Webinars/Seminars that have specific criteria (Age, Membership, etc) to qualify due to incentives. We host the registration form on our website, and it pushes entries into Marketo. There are no criteria requirements tied to registration and in theory we can have multiple students register under the same Email Address since sometimes we have families with multiple children all under the same Email Address. Marketo Data:The majority of the data that the Lead needs to qualify is in a Customer Profile Marketo custom object. The one data point outside of this is house in a Deposits Marketo custom object.There is a "Customer ID" field that exists for each unique record and is carried across all objectsIn order for qualification, essentially the Lead/record has to meet certain Customer Profile criteria and a specific Deposit criterion for that same Customer IDSo, if we had a Record with the Customer ID of 12345, this data point exists in both C
Hi all!Trying to add a list of all issues in a project, onto a project report. What I currently have is:displayname=Issues listdelimiter= listmethod=nested(opTask).lists type=iterate valueexpression=CONCAT("• ",{opTask}.{name}) valueformat=HTML and in the place of "opTask" I have also tried opTasks, resolvable, resolvables... The idea is to have a bulleted list (ideally with each issue name hyperlinked to the issue in question).
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Cloud Manager Deployment: Enabling Rollback from Previous Build Snapshots Use-case: The customer is trying to roll back the deployment after a successful production deployment. Currently, the only way to roll back is to re-deploy the code in Cloud Manager, which takes 2 to 3 hours. Given that they are supporting 24 websites (with more to come in the future), they need to reduce the build time for any rollback operations. The best way to achieve this is to enable re-deployment using an earlier stable built image. Current/Experienced Behavior: The production deployment is completed. After the deployment, the customer discovered blocker issues on one of the 24 websites. They decided to roll back the deployment. They reverted the change that caused the issue and pushed the revised changes to Cloud Manager. They restarted the Stage/Prod build, which took 2 to 3 hours. The customer is trying to minimize this 2 to 3-hour downtime as much
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.