Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hello, Could someone tell me what happens when a sequence ID reaches its maximum value and that sequence is not cyclic?What can be done when this happens? Best regards,
in graphiql explorer, the query works normally: but in postman, I get this error:
I want to add Adobe ID users from SSO-configured domains.The reason for this is that we use Marketo and AEM at multiple locations globally, and although we use a common domain, some locations do not support SSO.Users in SSO-configured domains cannot be added using Adobe ID, so new users cannot use Marketo and AEM.
This is what i have setup so far in order to view AC Tool in AEM Cloud:path: /apps/cq/core/content/nav/tools/security/actoolpermission: allowprivileges: jcr:readBut when i click on this link: http://localhost:4502/mnt/overlay/netcentric/actool/content/overview.html/actool, it shows error of "Resource at '/mnt/overlay/netcentric/actool/content/overview.html/actool' not found: No resource found" I was wondering if there is any ACL permissions needed in order to view this page?
when i want to open any adobe app a window open and write sign out but this time i have subscription plan, and on the adobe creative cloud app under any app write access Ended, please check it thanks.my email is (sy7657746@gmail.com)
Struggling to get this to work. I'm hoping to get a View column to be used on the Templates page that displays the total Planned Hours in teach Template for a specific roleID. Is this possible?
I have created a custom property and added it to the file properties (Metadata Schema Form Editor)The custom property list was added to /libs/fmdita/config/metadataListThis made the list available in the Map Console > Advanced > File Properties dropdown.I selected each of the property from the dropdown and generated an output.However, this selection does not seem to have any impact on the metadata that is available in the output. The list is simply not picked up! Can you help me understand the behaviour? And also, help me with the any configuration that needs to be set to get the custom metadata tags propagated to the output?
My manager exported some utilization data from Planner. The actual hours for a particular user seemed low, and we realized it was because this user had logged hours for tasks to which she had not been assigned. We're trying to determine how widespread this issue might be.I built an hours report, and I first tried filtering where the owner ID does not equal the assigned to IDownerID=FIELD:task:assignedToID ownerID_Mod=neThis did pull records we're looking for, but it also pulled records where the person logging the hours was an assignee on the task but not the primary assignee.Is there a way to filter out the latter records? I tried experimenting with different variations of my filter (including using assignmentsListString and assignmentsUsersMM), all without success. Does anyone know how to filter on hours logged by non-assignees?
We’re implementing AEP for real-time API-based data flows. Our identity model uses a composite key, for example:compositeId = field1 + field2The primary real-time source only provides field1, while field2 exists in another source system that is ingested separately. Because AEP relies on the complete composite identity for stitching and unified profile creation, this leads to incomplete or fragmented profiles.We’re exploring the best architectural approach within AEP to handle scenarios where only part of a composite identity is available in real time.
We're implementing a new request process and need to close out a request queue. If I archive it will the active requests remain active? Thanks Justin
Hi, We are using a Salesforce Commerce experience with a non-Marketo form, which creates leads in Salesforce, which then sync over to Marketo. However, no Marketo web visit data is being collected, so I'm looking to use the Push Lead to Marketo endpoint to send the submission to Marketo and tie it to the web visit data being collected by Munchkin (already installed on the commerce site). How do I do this to avoid conflicts with the same lead being created in both systems?Can I just associate the lead that is initially created in SF with the munchkin cookie somehow? Thanks!
Hello there!I wanted to check if you have any recommended post-migration tests from your experience with Hyperforce transitions to help ensure everything continues to run smoothly. Thanks!
Hi,We are trying the generate the Google Oauth2 token using the GoogleCredentials which reads authentication details using the json provided below in AEM as a Cloud Service:- test.json file (placed user project core module- core/src/main/resources/test.json)Note: Actual values are replaced with test for security reasons.{"type": "test","project_id": "test","private_key_id": "test","private_key": "test","client_email": "test@gmail.com","client_id": "test","auth_uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth","token_uri": "https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token","auth_provider_x509_cert_url": "https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/certs","client_x509_cert_url": "test","universe_domain": "googleapis.com"} We have included all the dependencies as mentioned below for the google oauth2. <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.auth/google-auth-library-oauth2-http --><dependency> <groupId>com.google.auth</groupId> <artifactId&
I realize from https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/using-cloud-manager/custom-domain-names/introduction that creating a custom domain in Cloud Manager is not possible for the authoring environment.Does anyone have a suggestion on an alternate option if we preferred to have a 'Vanity URL' for access to our authoring environment?(ie: author.company.com vs author-p000000-e0000000.adobeaemcloud.com)I have tried DNS CNAME records to point to author-p000000-e0000000.adobeaemcloud.com, but that of course does not work...My only other thought was to have the CNAME record point to a local web instance, and create an http redirect from there, but I'm trying to avoid the multiple hoops.Any other ideas appreciated.Thank you.
Currently requestors can view their submitted requests in the Classic interface and then choose to copy their request allowing a new request to be edited and submitted as new. Our teams have many year/over year requests (i.e Open Enrollment, Events etc) so this prevents manual copying & pasting. I was informed the there is no official Adobe documentation confirming whether the Copy feature will be added to the New Workfront Experience in the future. Since this is a newly introduced feature, it may be considered for inclusion once the Classic interface is fully retired. I would love this feature to be included.
It might sound as a stupid question but, is there any way that can I track what visitors from Adobe Campaign did on the website without using UTMs? So far all I could get where the Campaign Dimensions, but I can't do much with those or maybe I'm doing something wrong.
When i try to delete the profile it gives me error in API [{"entityId": "GrCgAUFlhPLfJAIC","error": {"message": "There was a problem displaying the profiles. This profile has more than 2 cross-device identities and cannot be displayed.","statusCode": 422,"type": "http://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/UPSDK-112010-422","title": "There was a problem displaying the profiles.","error-code": "UPSDK-112010-422","error-message": "There was a problem displaying the profiles. This profile has more than 2 cross-device identities and cannot be displayed.","status": 422}}]
In AEM as cloud.Up until Tuesday, October 28th, all our custom workflows, including those with dynamic participant steps, were functioning as expected. However, starting from October 31st, we noticed that these workflows are failing to complete at the user-input steps in both the DEV and QA environments. Interestingly, we did not observe any project-specific errors in the logs.It's worth noting that this issue is not occurring in our Stage and PROD environments, where all workflows are running smoothly. After some investigation, we found a disparity in the SDK versions being used across the environments. In DEV and QA, the SDK version is 2025.10.23122.20251023T134343Z, whereas in Stage and PROD, the SDK version is 2025.10.22943.20251009T135918Z. Moreover, replicating the issue locally with the SDK version 2025.10.23122.20251023T134343Z yielded the same problem.Please suggest any quick actions from our side.
We have multiple development environments in AEM cloud. In the UI, they all show "dev" in the green icon at the top left.This can be easily confusing. How can this be changed to match the name of the environment, e.g. "qa" or whatever we use as a custom environment name?
Hi Folks, I invite you to save and use the following super helpful URL: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/search.html#q=doug_den_hoed__atappstore&sort=relevancy%2520descending&f:el_product=%5BWorkfront%5D I personally keep as a shortcut on my desktop, and whenever I want to search with Adobe Experience League for something that is related to Workfront I then simply: double click that shortcut edit the URL to replace the doug_den_hoed__atappstore default with whatever phrase is of interest (e.g. cautionary tale), then click enter to return the results, which (9 times out of 10) returns what I'm after within the first few results Regards, Doug NOTE: originally, this was the link, but it now fails, so I replaced it on May 14, 2025 with the version above https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/custom/page/page-id/GlobalSearch#q=doug_den_hoed__atappstore&sort=relevancy&f:el_product=[Workf
DescriptionBefore the migration, users who logged directly into Workfront without an existing account were automatically assigned a requestor account. This functionality is no longer working. Now, admins must manually create accounts for these users, which causes delays in our operations since requestors cannot submit tickets until access is granted.Why is this feature important to you?After the migration, the lack of this functionality has increased the workload for admins and slowed down ticket processing.How would you like the feature to work?Ideally, users who access Workfront without an account should be automatically provisioned with one and assigned to the appropriate product.Current BehaviorUsers receive an account, but they are not assigned to the product automatically.
I just love a good Paradox. Currently, Adobe gives us the following warning in the Classification Rule builder: However, when you go to view the following documentation in Experience League, you get the following message:http://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/components/classifications/sets/manage/rules To be perfectly honest, the newer process is not nearly as intuitive, so I have my reservations about how this will work moving forward. Also, there are no video tutorials I can easily find related to the newer process. Again, IMHO, if this process isn't fully baked, then it shouldn't be out here yet.Can we please get a good, clean, fully-baked process out here, with full tutorials to help those of us who like easy pictures AND videos to help; and. then can we actually put the process in place? It's not even supposed to happen until August 2026!
When an output is selected on a module, move that item to the top of the outputs list for easier access to those fields. It's painful to scroll through 100's of fields to find one that you selected as an output.
I have the following text mode working on a project report but I need to create a task report with the same column. If anyone can help adapt the text mode to work from a task report it would be much appreciated.aggregator.displayformat=currencyStringCurrency aggregator.function=SUM aggregator.valuefield=actualAmount aggregator.valueformat=doubleAsDouble descriptionkey=actualamount listsort=doubleAsDouble(actualAmount) namekey=actualamount querysort=actualAmount shortview=true stretch=100 styledef.comparison.leftmethod=double(actualAmount) styledef.comparison.operator=gt styledef.comparison.operatortype=double styledef.comparison.rightmethod=double(plannedAmount) styledef.comparison.truetext=font-weight:900;color:#990000; valuefield=actualAmount valueformat=currencyStringCurrency width=100
Hi, as per summary while sending SMS, the following characters ' and > < are not correctly sent. At contrary, the following characters are displayed receiving mobile phone: " ' "-> &#x27;" > " -> &lt" < " -> &gtHow this can be avoided? Thanks a lot for the help, Noah
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
