Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hi Team,We have successfully ingested data into the B2B Account and B2B Person datasets, and the profiles are visible in the Profile Store as expected. The profiles for these entities have been verified in the Profile UI and appear to be correct.However, after ingesting data into the B2B Account–Person Relationship dataset, we are unable to see the corresponding Account–Person relationship reflected in the Profile Store.For the relationship mapping, we followed the Adobe documentation provided in the link below:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/sources/connectors/adobe-applications/mapping/salesforce#account-contact-relationBelow are the dataset details used in this implementation:Datasets: B2B Account_IM_Dataset B2BLead_IM_Dataset B2BContact_IM_Dataset B2B Account Person Relation_IM_Dataset Environment Details: Sandbox: aepenablementfy26 Environment Type: Development Region: VA7 Although the data ingestion for the Account–Person Relationship data
Background:Working with AEP and connected tools like CJA and AJO for a while now, one thing has become painfully obvious lately: the lack of a useful documentation of the client setup. There may be great yet unofficial community tools out there, but let's be honest, in many cases people using the system may not have the required setup like programming languages (Python or NodeJS) to generate the documentation for themselves, so might require a developer to support them. What I am trying to say is:The Adobe tools are powerful and highly complex to set up, and creating and maintaining client-specific documentation on that is cannot possibly be a manual task. This is surely not sustainable. What I would like to pitch is:We need a Documentation section built into the UI AEP and connected tools, that lets you generate an ad-hoc, standardized documentation as downloadable Excel workbook.This you can then either keep in AEP to be accessible for everyone with access, or decide to download and
Please Ignore
Wjen i was trying to create n8n workflow for the task it always fails as forbidden credentials or 403
Hi all,We are working in a PoC over EDS but, following the aem.live tutorials and working on our sandbox (Cloud Manager) we have arrived to an issue we are not able to deal with: I created the project with my account (Cloud Manager, let’s say xxx@xxx.com) and obtained this (image attached) error: It’s a bit strange since I have access to Google Drive. Any help? Cheers,DGM.-
Hi everyone,I am facing an issue with an image picker inside a multifield in an AEM author dialog.Scenario:Inside a multifield, I added a fileupload component to allow authors to select an image asset.Dialog configuration example:<file jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" sling:resourceType="cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload" granite:class="cmp-image__editor-file-upload" enableNextGenDynamicMedia="{Boolean}true" class="cq-droptarget" fieldLabel="Image Asset" fileNameParameter="./fileName" fileReferenceParameter="./fileReference" mimeTypes="[image/gif,image/jpeg,image/png,image/tiff,image/svg+xml]" name="./file" title="Upload Image Asset"/>Issue:When the author selects or changes an image in one multifield item, the selected image is automatically applied to all other multifield items. So essentially, Selecting image in item 1, updates item 2, item 3, etc.Issue VisualizeAlso after submit the dialog the image is not saved in CRX.We are usin
Hi Community,We're experiencing an issue in one of our lead scoring campaigns in Marketo. The flow is set up as: Change Status > Wait 5 minutes > Change Score.Most leads follow this correctly, but a few records are skipping the wait step entirely. They enter the campaign, the status changes, and their score updates within seconds - no delay observed.I already reviewed there's no racing conditions. No one updated the campaign in between. I am assuming this can be a priority issue.Has anyone seen this before? What could be the possible reasons? Any insights, troubleshooting tips, or solutions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Hi! I'm trying to add Gmail Annotation into a token via email script and haven't had much luck finding any examples.I've added this script and token to the <head> of my email template, but I don't know what to add to the Email Script Token. Sanford W had mentioned a Velocity Token, which I have researched, but haven't found any documentation on. https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-discussions/has-anyone-been-successful-in-adding-gmail-annotation-to-a/td-p/315669 Can someone please assist? Script added to the email template: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> <html> <head> <script type="application/ld+json"> {{my.Gmail Annotation}} </script> </head> Gmail Annotation script added to Email Script token which needs to be converted to Velocity Token: [{ "@context": "http://schema.org/", &
I am trying to map an array variable to the Planning Module but no matter what I do, I get an error "Array of objects expected in parameter 'F6914a6c02f21335b7b794d35'." I have tried to just have the ID numbers, the "id: xxxxxxx" and plenty of other things to get this to work but I don't know what it wants and I can not find any documentation on Planning Module specifics. When I put the variables in one at a time in the without mapping, it works (but I will never know the set amount of objects so I need the array). If anyone has any ideas, I would appreciate it. My Variable Expression:The Variable Output:Planning Module Input: Error:
I’m thrilled to recognize @ravitejasurampu as our AEM Champion of the Month for March!As a first-year AEM Champion, Ravi has gone above and beyond to educate and enable the global community of AEM users. From publishing articles on Experience League Perspectives - to getting ready to speak at Adobe Summit's The Skill Exchange - to kickstarting our first-ever Bay Area AEM User Group chapter, Ravi has been a model AEM Champion from the start.Congrats, Ravi!
Hi everyone,I’m encountering an issue related to “Registered Error” statuses in a Marketo webinar program.For one of our webinars, we see about 60 members with the status Registered Error in the Program Members tab. Most of these records were originally marked as Registered but later moved to Registered Error after Salesforce created duplicate records and merged them. The total number of registrants coming from Marketo aligns correctly with Adobe Connect data.However, when I try to pull these same members using a Smart List with the filter Member of Program → Status: Registered Error, only a small portion of those records appear. Many of the individuals shown in the Program Members tab are missing from the Smart List results.We need to locate these members to update their status to No Show, since they did not attend the webinar.Has anyone experienced this behavior before, and were you able to find a solution or workaround?Thanks in advance for any insights!
Hi all, I have a bit of an urgent question so would appreciate a quick response. We’re creating emails for AJO B2B and there is no option to add mirror links in email templates. How can we add mirror links in AJO B2B emails? Thanks
I’m using the Profile-based sample queries on the documentation to retrieve all successfully executed message actions for a specific profile but looks like it only return journey message. How can I get all emails sent to a profile from AJO Campaigns? Documentation link:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/reporting/reports/query-examples
I wanted to suggest an improvement regarding how we handle delegated issues in Workfront. As it stands, unless a delegate user takes ownership of a project, the delegated issue will only appear in their "my work" widget. This setup isn't quite streamlined enough for our needs. Could we request to have Workfront include delegated tasks in the "my task" widget as well? This adjustment would provide a more cohesive and efficient view, allowing us to better track and manage our responsibilities. Thank you for considering this suggestion. Looking forward to your thoughts on this matter.
We use Tealium as our CDP where Adobe Analytics tags and third‑party tags are implemented. One of our site environments experienced a Content Security Policy (CSP) issue that prevented the Tealium header and associated scripts from loading properly, which blocked analytics and third‑party tag requests from firing in the browser.After resolving the CSP in the current month, when we reviewed Adobe Analytics data from November through February, we noticed that only the 10th of each month (and March) shows significant data. Can anyone please explain the cause of this pattern.
What do we need:Create or update a user notification option that lets assignee(s) know when a task can start work! (Can Start = True = Notification) My Ask → Please Upvote this idea! There is currently not an option for users or admins to enable a notification to be sent to a user or team that is assigned to a task that lets them know that they can start working on a task; a trigger once the Can Start indicator on a task moves to True. Users do not receive notifications that let them simply know they can start working on their task. What’s available today in user notifications? There is an option for “All predecessors of my tasks are completed” located in the Information about Work Assigned to Me section, but this does not always work and is not always accurate. This runs simply off directly associated predecessors on a task. If you manage predecessors at a parent task level, notification will not be sent to your users and affect your tea
Usage of deprecated package found : org.eclipse.jetty.http : The Eclipse Jetty and Apache Felix Http Jetty packages are no longer supported. Deprecated since 2021-05-27 For removal : 2025-08-31The cloud build log shows warnings/errors related to org.eclipse.jetty packages, which indicates that we must remove all Jetty imports from the project.I reviewed the “Deprecated and Removed Features” page for Adobe Experience Manager and, based on its guidance, added all the recommended Jetty versions to the core POM. However, the issue still persists and the dependency conflict is not resolved. Since I cannot remove the Jetty‑dependent code, I need an alternative solution.
ProblemA custom product profile with the permissionsProgram AccessEnvironment Logs ReadRapid Dev Environment ResetRepository Code GenerateRepository Info Accessdoes not seem to grant a user access to see the "preview" tier in the dev-console UI.Users with these custom roles can see the Author and Publish options in the AEM Developer Console, but the Preview option (available via the “All Previews” dropdown) is not visible.Also refer to the documentation on how to set up custom product profiles with permissions.Fords Impact Statement:-Assigning the OOTB Developer profile grants visibility across all programs, which violates Ford’s security policy and they see it as a unknown security exposure
After sending incremental data to destination platforms (based on the referenced use case), we need to regularly delete the previous day’s batches from the destination dataset table. To automate this process, we explored the available API options, but it appears that the Batch Deletion API is deprecated.Could anyone confirm whether there is any supported method to programmatically delete batches?(Using the UI is not feasible since this needs to be fully automated.)Approaches We Explored but Could Not use:Deleting Records via Data Lifecycle Management - This does not work because the dataset is not Profile-enabled, so there is no primary identifier available to target records and we don’t want to make it enabled as well just to create duplicates in the profile store. Data Retention Policy - Retention policies apply only to event datasets, so they cannot be used for this dataset type.
Field Content Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow defining custom 404 pages per specific page or directory (path) so that only the designated scopes show a tailored 404, different from the site-wide default. Use-case: When users access 404s under landing pages (LPs) or other special sections, the site owner needs to show a section-specific 404 that provides targeted guidance (e.g., relevant links, promotions, or contact paths) appropriate to that section. Current/Experienced Behavior: It is not possible to create a dedicated 404 page for a specific page or directory. All 404 responses fall back to the global default, which cannot convey section-appropriate guidance. Improved/Expected Behavior: Enable configuration to display a unique 404 page only for the specified page/directory scope, while keeping the default 404 for other areas of the site. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Experience Manager as a Cl
Field Content Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide a Page List block that allows filtering by a specific path × specific directory, and supports listing non-HTML items such as PDF files and external links. Use-case: Content authors need to easily create lists such as news, column, and article indexes based on specific directories, and include non-HTML items (PDF files, external URLs) within the list. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. It is currently not possible to generate a page list filtered by a specific path × specific directory. 2. Authors cannot easily include PDF files or external links in lists such as news indexes without creating dummy pages and setting manual redirects. As a result, page lists cannot naturally contain mixed content such as pages, PDFs, and external URLs. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1. Enable authors to generate a page list by specifying a directory × tag (or equivalent filtering criteria). 2. Allow authors to add PDF files
Proper ETag Support Finally Arrives in the AEMaaCS Dispatcher by @daniel-strmecki IntroductionReducing unnecessary network traffic is a core goal of HTTP caching, and one of the most effective mechanisms for achieving this has been part of the protocol for decades. ETags allow different layers of the web stack to determine whether a resource has actually changed before transferring it again, making them a powerful tool for improving performance and cache efficiency.In modern architectures where browsers, CDNs, reverse proxies, and origin applications all participate in content delivery, ETags play an important role in enabling efficient validation of cached content. Instead of repeatedly sending the same payload across the network, each layer can simply verify whether the cached representation is still valid.Despite this being a fundamental HTTP capability, many AEM implementations have historically not been able to fully benefit from ETag validation across the entire delivery stack.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Improve the Columns block so that (1) opening Column properties immediately after adding a Columns block does not cause errors, and (2) components inside Columns can be moved freely between Columns blocks or between Columns and Section containers. Use-case: During authoring, editors frequently add Columns blocks and adjust Column properties before placing content. They also often reorganize page layouts by moving components such as Text or Button between Columns, or between Columns and Section containers. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. Immediately after adding a Columns block, opening the Column properties before adding any inner content results in an error. 2. Components placed inside a Columns block cannot be moved to another Columns block or to Section containers, limiting layout flexibility and forcing authors to recreate content manually. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1. Column properties should be accessible without error
Dear community from abroad of USA.For accountant reasons we need a 2026 Certificate of residency of ADOBE INC, usualy published on the company site. I would like to make a subscription. I found here the 2024 Certificate. It is issued by Department of Treasury Philadelphia. for taxplayer Adobe INC. The main text is: “I certify that the above-named corporation is a USA corporation, and a resident of USA for purposes of US taxation. “Can you please direct me how to obtain one ? The virtual assistant dosn’t understand my issue :).
I am an Adobe and (now also) ai consultant in the fashion industry for over twenty years. I am absolutely stoked about Firefly boards and teach all designers i meet to work on it. There are two potential features that would make Firefly boards unbeatable. 1: The possibility to add style-guide information on a specific board or maybe a ‘project folder would be even better’. This will make Firefly boards instantly the number one ai tool for brands (not only fashion). 2: Integrated LLM of choice. I now teach designers to use their favorite llm to create detailed prompts for generating images and video on a firefly board. How nice would it be if there would be a sidebar with an integrated LLM. Even better if the user can choose their own favorite llm (please include Mistral for the European market).
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.