Solved

Hi,I´ve seen that this has already been raised some times in the past years, but I still wanted to ask if maybe now there´s a solution/update that i can fetch the Report Data via API call, rather then only Meta Data?Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone,I'm using Workfront Fusion with the Adobe User Management connector to create and update Federated ID users.I can update fields like first name, last name, and email, but I also need to set the user's language/locale automatically.I don't see a Language or Locale field in the Adobe User Management Update a User module.I also tried the Adobe User Management API, but I couldn't find a supported language or locale field in the user update request.Has anyone been able to update a user's Adobe/Workfront UI language through Fusion or another Adobe API/module?If so, what module or API endpoint did you use?Thanks!

In a workflow I set a variable, e.g. vars.contentId, in a Content Management activity.In a typology rule (JavaScript) I need this value, but vars.contentId is not available there.Questions:Can a typology rule access vars.xxx from the workflow if that value is not stored on the delivery (i.e. not mapped to a delivery attribute)? If not, is it possible to add a script field on the delivery Advanced tab that would be able to read vars.xxx, or do scripts there also run only in the delivery context (no vars)?What is the recommended way to pass a workflow variable into a typology rule?

I am sort of inheriting a Marketo instance, and I see this token in a LOT of workflows but cannot find the actual token anywhere. Is anyone familiar with {{my.1Program - Campaign Name}}? Any insight is appreciated!

Hi - my users got a pop-up recently that shows the following:Support Ending for Intel-based AppsThis version of “Workfront Proof” will not open in a future release of macOS. Learn how to update to an Apple silicon version.  Will Adobe be updating Workfront Proof to ensure we can continue using the app?If yes, has Adobe shared timelines or any other info?Appreciate any knowledge that is shared. Thank you!

A Custom Object shows 32 records in Admin - Database Management - Marketo Custom Objects but a Smart List that should populate these 32 users (Smart List = Has Custom Object) doesn’t pull in any Marketo persons. The CO link field is Salesforce Contact ID, dedupe uses GUID. A process purged the CO of data but 32 records were not purged in this process. Are these CO Ghost records common? If so is there a way to troubleshoot the CO to prevent these records from populating?  Purging the CO process via REST API.Step 1 runs a job to capture those custom objects into a static list.Step 2 captures the contacts/members within that list via a GET request.Step 3 gets the list of custom objects linked to the population in step 2 via a GET request.Step 4 deletes the custom object data.Step 5 clears the member list that was created in step 2.Step 6 confirms the member list was cleared. 

It might be that I am just missing something, but I want to see if there is an easier way to view the Document ID in the new Unified Approval setup. When I click on the file it gives me a menu, but the Details area does not provide the ID. The only way I have found to get the ID is to click on Share and then look at the link that is provided. Is there another way that does not involve creating a report? Or a way to customize the document table to add the ID column? Thanks! 

My triggered automated email can’t be “unapproved” when I click the unapprove option. What do I have to “turn off” in the automated routine to be able to unapprove and access/update my email? 

I want to be able to move tasks that are pulled into an Iteration (sprint) back to the Backlog by clicking a button.  This functionality does not exist.  

Setup: one Org, five Launch properties serving five subdomains under one registrable domain (www, oem, my, … .example.com). First-party collection via CNAME smetrics.example.com. ECID v5.5.0, AppMeasurement 2.27.Goal: each subdomain should start with no Adobe identity cookie before its own consent is given, and ideally identity should not be shared across the subdomains.What I've confirmed:The server (CNAME) sets both AMCV and s_ecid with Domain=example.com (registrable domain). These bleed to every subdomain. The ECID cookieDomain config scopes only the client-side AMCV to the subdomain; it has no effect on the server-set cookies. Setting it to the literal subdomain, the Set-Cookie response still returns Domain=example.com. (Adobe docs also list cookieDomain/cookieDomainPeriods as retired.)My open question:If I provision a per-subdomain CNAME (e.g. smetrics.oem.example.com as trackingServerSecure on the OEM property), will the collection server set the cookies on .oem.example.com, or

Hi,We are using aem 6.5 and aem forms as well. (running on windows servers)we have requirement from client to generate a file and not to save it on dam, instead if it can be copied to an external shared folder location. Do you know if this is a good practice to save a file on shared location from Production and how to achieve this (with respect to permissions) I have seen this link: Share assets using a link | Adobe Experience Manager, but I am not sure if this will be accepted, as the older systems are already using the shared location to access the file.

With the new Unified Approvals integration, when a Workfront project is created, a corresponding project is automatically created in Frame.io.Is there a native field or API-accessible reference that stores the associated Frame.io project URL?Our goal is to display a clickable link to the corresponding Frame.io project within a Workfront report. 

As SEO continues to evolve beyond keyword rankings, businesses are increasingly focusing on user behavior, engagement, and customer journeys to measure success. Adobe Analytics plays a critical role in helping organizations connect SEO performance with meaningful business outcomes through advanced reporting, segmentation, attribution, and real-time customer insights.I’ve been exploring how Adobe Analytics can support SEO teams by analyzing organic traffic behavior, identifying high-performing landing pages, measuring conversion impact, and understanding customer engagement across channels. Features like Analysis Workspace, custom dashboards, segmentation, and attribution reporting provide deeper visibility into how SEO contributes to overall digital growth.I’m interested in learning how others in the Adobe Analytics community are leveraging the platform for SEO analytics and optimization.What metrics or dimensions do you find most valuable for SEO reporting? How are you using Adobe Ana

I am interested in exporting a complete list of user comments as you can find under a User profile - Updates - Comments. Is that possible?

Hoping someone can help me understand why I am not able to set a start time on a particular task to 9:00am. The setting automatically defaults to the time that I am entering the task and the error message says I need to enter a time between 12:00am and 11:59 PM which I am doing. 

Our technology stack is : aem cloud / AEM Guides / java21We have migrated from ams to aem cloud few weeks ago. After content publish, aem author generate pdf asynchronously for the published content. Sling jobs to generate pdfs are taking 24hr’s. AMS environment used to take 5-10minuntes to generate pdf’s. Here is our  configuration:{ "queue.name": "MyGPS Generate PDF Queue", "queue.topics": [ "com/skylark/mygps/generatePDF" ], "queue.type":"ORDERED", "queue.retries":1, "queue.maxparallel":1.0}*********we have a custom servlet which prints all pending sling jobs and here is the snippet:   {    "user": "michael.abc@abc.com",    "Payload": "/content/mygps/us/en/pi/public/trading/trading-basics/account-and-trade-restrictions/handling-fraud-related-restrictions-081821-jh_ditamap/Phonebooka17b4efc-716b-49cd-a909-480703ef2a74",    "topic": "com/abc/mygps/generatePDF",    "id": "2026/10/8/16/4/7564fa83-ecaf-4986-a1fb-da04e8eae38b_427",    "state": "ACTIVE",    "queueName": "MyGPS Gen

In Workfront Workflow, we currently use several multi-select fields to define our project types.When someone submits a Campaign Request form, they first choose an overall element type—such as Digital, Social, or Email—and then select a more specific option tied to that category (e.g., Digital Type, Social Type, Email Type).I’m trying to determine how to replicate this setup in Planning for automation without resorting to one long, combined list of all element types. If we go that route, users would have to scroll through an extensive list just to find the correct option when generating a project.Any suggestions? 

Are we able to populate the text used in the call to actions as a value in the URLs for tracking?{CTA Text} is "Schedule a Tour", having the url populate in "schedule_a_tour" for the UTM_Content=so it would be utm_content=schedule_a_tour

Hello! Anyone have recommendations for Fusion training for someone who has zero technical experience? Any resources, YouTube channels, or guides that you recommend? For context, I taught myself the basics of Fusion out of necessity and it was very ugly.We may be looking to add to our team in the near future and I would like something more in-depth or more use case/providing examples of when you would use what functionality, etc. Thanks!KP

I have a site URL as https://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-print/cap-color/paper-ltr/vol-2501-10000/speed-36-50-ppm/brand-c-series/feat-airprintI want the dispatcher to do a PT and send it to publisher using selectors as https://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers.func-print.cap-color.paper-ltr.vol-2501-10000.speed-36-50-ppm.brand-c-series.feat-airprint.htmlSince the number of selectors are dynamic (currently max of 7) and can even increase over time, how should I handle the rewrite rule dynamically N times?Below are all valid URL’s for my site which I need to be formatted with selectors:https://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-printhttps://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-print/cap-colorhttps://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-print/cap-color/paper-ltrhttps://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-print/cap-color/paper-ltr/vol-2501-10000https://mycompany.com/en-us/office/printers/func-print/cap-color/paper-ltr/vol-2501-10000/speed-36-50-ppmhttps://

Hi,We have a Marketo Engage AWS migration scheduled for October 16 and are preparing for the migration.Could you please clarify the required actions around IP allowlisting?The migration guide says to “review and update IP allowlists for login, API access, email sending, web tracking, and integrations.” Which of these updates need to be made within Marketo/Adobe, and which need to be handled by our company IT/Network/Security team? The guide also says to “add new IP addresses and keep your current IPs as-is.” Should the three new AWS IPs for our data center be added only to our corporate/network allowlists, or are there any specific locations in Marketo Admin/Adobe Admin Console where we need to add them? Is there a pre-migration validation/checklist that Adobe recommends to confirm that our IP allowlisting and integrations are ready before October 16? After the migration, are there any post-migration validation steps we should perform to verify API access, web tracking, email delivery,

We have multiple campaigns and events that we’re sending emails for throughout the week. Our internal employees would like to receive all the emails, but the communication limits are blocking them from receiving if we send more than one email/day. Is there a way to get around the communication limits for certain contacts? If I create a separate distribution list (ex. mktg-team@company.com), will this still be a problem? How is everyone else dealing with this issue? I don’t have the time to upload all of our emails to a shared drive/Teams folder for our internal folks to access.

I’m being asked to research the potential benefits of using the Workfront integration for Microsoft Teams. Since we don’t currently have access to it in our Teams app store, we need to provide a use case for IT to authorize use. While reading through the Adobe Experience League documentation, I read that you could receive (certain) notifications through Teams that you would normally get in Workfront or Outlook, which would be an excellent use case for cutting down on emails or responding to notifications faster since our employees are in Teams 99% of their worktime. However, I noticed that the access requirements say that the article content applies to Standard licenses.  Does this mean users that are Light or Contributor will not receive any notifications in Teams from Workfront? They are the users who are primarily asked to approve work and are tagged when more info is needed for their requests, so it would be a bummer for our use case if they didn’t get the notifications. If you hav

We are investigating Brotli compression for static CSS/JavaScript assets on an AEM as a Cloud Service production environment.Fastly documentation confirms that Fastly supports Brotli compression. However, we would like to understand whether Brotli is officially supported and configurable when using the Adobe-managed CDN provided with AEM as a Cloud Service.Our current production testing shows:Accept-Encoding: gzip → Content-Encoding: gzip Accept-Encoding: br,gzip → Content-Encoding: gzip Accept-Encoding: br → no Content-Encoding header and the uncompressed response is returned Vary: Accept-Encoding is presentWe have reproduced this behavior with both CSS and JavaScript assets across multiple production AEMaaCS domains.Could someone from the Adobe AEMaaCS/CDN team please clarify:Is Brotli (Content-Encoding: br) officially supported by the Adobe-managed CDN for AEM as a Cloud Service? If supported, is Brotli enabled by default, or does it need to be enabled for a customer environment? Is

I’m looking for a non fusion solution. We are building a process where new requests will be submitted but we need to pull in certain fields from a previously related request. An example: A request was submitted to create a material and it gets mailed. Now we need to submit a new request but reference data from the old request so the partner teams have easy access to all of the data in that request. I did discover that I can create an internal lookup field so the requestor can key in the previous request and it provides a link to the request. I need to take this a step further and provide other key details so they don’t have to open the request and find the important information they need. Any suggestions?