Product Communities

I’m trying to look into send time personalization, but I’m not sure if I have RCE to see when the most optimal send time for my audiences are.

I'm trying to create a report that shows how many projects have a task planned date that is past due by project manager.So I either need to use the task-level report I already have and create a chart by unique value of project name, OR I need to create a project-level report that draws on task planned dates within that project. Has anyone created anything like this?

We have a Kanban Board, which is configured to automatically intake items to the board.Intake sources is a custom filter, which includesProject: Status > Is None of > Complete Dead Queue The board populated correctly, with a card in New for project PN1762400.Since then, the project status for PN1762400 has been changed to Dead.The connected card is still showing in the New column. Can/should cards be automatically removed in this situation?

Hello, I am trying to build a report that shows planned v actual hours on a milestone.  I built a task report.  Am trying to figure out how to create a variance column that calculates the difference between actual and planned hours to make this easier for the stakeholders to read.  I had a formula that was giving me a blank column.  simplifying it, i just put a column in there, and its giving me nulls.  See screenshot.   Can anyone advise me on what I need to do, or where there is documentation that explains how to do this?  AI got me this far and suggested using text mode, but there’s something I am missing here and I can’t figure it out on my own.  Thanks in advance! 

One of our groups wants to use the idea or planning project status without those projects being considered in the project condition. I can’t find documentation saying if these two statuses are included in this; does anyone have documentation or know the answer?Thanks!

when we execute a query, is there a away to find if query used regular QS vs data distiller ? 

🎉 The AEM Champion Program is thrilled to announce our inaugural AEM Champion of the Month for January, ​@KatieJu1!Katie has been an incredible asset to the AEM Champion Program for the last 2 years. A seasoned AEM expert, she has shared her insights via The Skill Exchange sessions, articles on Experience League Perspectives, webinars, Adobe User Group meetings, and more. She is also a joy to work with - speaking for myself and her peers.The Champion of the Month initiative aims to recognize and celebrate an AEM Champion each month who has exemplified exceptional thought leadership and engagement through the program. We are elated to be rolling out this program to recognize a member of our 2025-2026 AEM Champion cohort each month.Please join us in celebrating Katie for this remarkable achievement. Thank you, Katie, for your leadership! 

Hi Community,We’ve implemented Mobile SDK in React Native app connected to AEP dataset.Issue: From 20,000 profiles sending events, only 250 have push tokens registered (~1.25% success) from both iOS and Android.What we have: Firebase Messaging configured ✓ MobileCore.setPushIdentifier(token) called ✓ Events arriving to dataset ✓ Permissions requested ✓ Any debugging tips or similar experiences?Thanks!

How can i create a language copy from one language master to another programatically.suppose i have source as  /content/project/language-master/en/home/mypage/test1/test2 and i want to create kanguage copy of  /content/project/language-master/de/home/mypage/test1 so how can i do that so all the languagecopy jcr properties also get created.

As per a requirement in my work . I will need to export CJA report which contain , email , bounces , clicks and sends as a csv export to a sftp location. Can this be done natively within CJA or is it a complex procedureTIADaven 

Hello,I’ve been troubleshooting an issue with my nurture programs not sending emails on their scheduled cast dates. I’ve confirmed that the program is active, the stream is active, and all emails within the stream are approved and active.I also reviewed several leads who should have received the nurture emails, and I can see that they have received other emails on days when the nurture casts should have gone out.It appears that none of the emails within the 2025 Broan-NuTone Marketing → Nurture folder are sending. Could you please advise if there’s something I might be missing?

Hi All,I’ve successfully implemented the Google Ads global site tag (gtag.js) on all relevant pages using Adobe Launch. I verified that gtag.js is loading correctly, and I can see console logs confirming it's working on page load.Now, I’m trying to track a Google Ads conversion when a user clicks a specific button. I created a rule in Adobe Launch with the following setup:Event: Core - Click - with the correct CSS selectorAction: Core - Custom Code (JavaScript)Here’s the code I used in the action:function gtag_report_conversion() {var callback = function () {if (typeof(url) != 'undefined') {url = window.location;}};gtag('event', 'conversion', {'send_to': 'AW-00000000000/XXXXXXXXXXX','value': 1.0,'currency': 'EUR','event_callback': callback});}gtag_report_conversion(); Problem:The rule is firing (confirmed via Adobe Launch debugger)But the console statements are not appearingNo conversion hits are seen in Omnibug or DevTools > NetworkIt seems like the custom code is not executin

Hi,I am using AEM cloud and we have Guides, when we select an asset (dita), we are able to see a Open in Framemaker button which when clicked opens the asset in FM. Do we have anything as such for Adobe illustrator, if Yes how do we enable it?If No, how to we build one which works just like the Open in Framemaker button??  This is how to enable the Open in Framemaker button:ThanksSandeep

I’m facing an issue with AEM Guides on AEM as a Cloud Service while generating Sites output from a DITAMap that references Markdown topics using this documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-guides/using/knowledge-base/kb-articles/authoring/webeditor/markdown-in-dita-and-aem-guidesWhat I’m seeing: The DITAMap → Site generation runs Site pages do get created Page properties (sourcePath, UUIDs, map references, etc.) are all set correctly along with the hierarchy of nodes. However, the content is missing - the “injected-container” on the page is empty This preset works for normal dita topics. Error in logs:Markdown resource cannot be read as an XML Document org.xml.sax.SAXException This happens during the NodeJS-based publishing workflow, specifically while Guides is extracting dependencies / DTD rules. From the stack trace, it looks like the Markdown file is being attempted to be read as an XML document.Pages are created but the Markdown conten

Hey there, Part of the proofing process is our team verifying that the bookmark/layer names on the PDF are correct. However, you cannot see the bookmark names unless you download the file which unfortunately defeats the purpose of us using the viewer and also comparing files side-by-side. Could this be something that get added in the future? 

After the latest AJO release in January 2026 we have experienced some strange changes in the email designer. There is a feature in the designer that lists out all the links used in the email, allowing you to change the links from the list directly without going into the different content block to do the same work. Nice feature. In case we use fragments when creating emails. And in the fragments again we use variables to select your country and language. witch again decides what link that will appear based on your variable settings. Now we see that this list is listing out absolutely all links in the code, also those that is not been shown/used based in the variable settings. This is really confusing for the end users, that get lots of links in the list they don’t know what is. Can this be solved in an easy way, just showing the actual links that will appear in the email when it is sent.   

Overall, I am just trying to get a list of people who dont have any active assignments. I think I got most of the way there but I feel like this is not bringing in items that people may be actively on but have a planned completion date farther out.  What i have (user report) EXISTS:a:$$EXISTSMOD=NOTEXISTSEXISTS:a:$$OBJCODE=ASSGNEXISTS:a:assignedToID=FIELD:IDEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate=$$TODAYbwEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate_Mod=betweenEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate_Range=$$TODAYb+2whomeTeamID=682b957b0002e635c205140964bf4fe4    68263e760000b1d7ca24a3b6e5228b03    6532d3ca000df9c53a86ceac009cf030    66b0980f000d86a57d2968aa65dcdf38    63c8b4cd002c26378fd16b9e38d7e5e0    65fdbf8500153d4d1c01a9b6f877732f    6827a2c900045062834c7e844541a87f    682b943c00026e7376917ef3d94dff6c    682b94da0002a34ebc82c11ad099bdbe    68263ed50000d2da0cceaeaefe50d760    682b93e200024c738c45e2d4124a6dd1    682b439e0003f84d4ac7d6ebbbddc1b8    66d75f6000208bd5d2fcb2f570bdfadb    68263c2800003c30

I can't work out how to show different statuses to different groups for the same object - eg a project. As a project moves through different stages, we want to allow different user groups to be able to change the status - but only to statuses visible to that group. eg - to trigger an action in FUSION - that only that group can decide is appropriate. All I can find is that groups can be assigned to an object - and then the statuses available to that group will be available. Which means once I've assigned a project to a group - the statuses will apply to all groups seeing that project. This seems VERY restrictive. Has anyone managed to do something similar ? maybe FUSION changing the group assigned to the project as it progress through the stages ? Thanks in advance as always

Hello!I have a user who I recently had to update their email address. To do that, I had to deactivate him, update the email, then reactivate. In doing that, all the proofs he was a reviewer/approver on show him as (deleted). He can still see that he needs to approve the proofs in the widgets or through the email notifications, but when he tries to open the proof he’s told he doesn’t have access rights. Anyone know a work around? Justin

Hello, I'm having trouble about how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day tasks, use custom dates as start date and finish date.I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2”Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。  Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day. Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison) Same date but different end timeSet Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.

Hi, I’m having some difficulties determining the best way forward, as the Enhanced Connector appears to have a significant downside: assets must be uploaded to AEM manually. The main challenge is that, in order to upload an asset, users need to navigate through the full folder structure, which is unfamiliar to most Workfront users. On top of that, the volume of assets being created is simply too high to handle through manual uploads, making this approach impractical. Ideally, we’d like to automate this process so that once an asset is approved, it is automatically mapped to a consistent folder (e.g., content/dam/workfront) without requiring manual navigation. We’ve also explored the option of using linked folders, but this approach doesn’t align well with our project structure or data governance model. Our current project has two layers for both product and asset data, structured as follows:Product Code → Product data on taskAsset Created → Asset data on taskAsset Create

Hello, 你好,I'm having trouble understanding how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day items. I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2” Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。 Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。 Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day.实际显示：在周视图中，它的栏在视觉上也延伸到1月23日，跨越了额外的一天。 Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison)测试用例2：计划“Testlink3”（用于比较） Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日，上午12:00至2026年1月22日，晚上11:00。 Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.预期显示

Hello, I have an integration with Azure DevOps that creates Product Backlog Items when a WF Project goes Current.  Context:In the WF Project, there is a parent task named 'MarTech Development,' and varying subtasks underneath it that are all summed up. I can retrieve this information in a GET API Call; part of my QS is:Key: fieldsValue: ID, name, workRequired, plannedStartDateKey: nameMarTech DevelopmentRight after this API Call module, I have a Set Variable module that I reference as 'Planned Hours', with a value that effectively gives me the hours:round(body:data[1]:workRequired/60) I Create a Record (ADO module), set my Dev Hour Estimate='Planned Hours' and voila, my MarTech Task total planned hours is now the same as my PBI Dev Hour Estimate in ADOWhat I want to accomplish:I want a bi-directional communication of Dev Hour Estimates back to my MarTech Task. Assume that I have a link to the PBI and the PBI ID stored in the respective Workfront Project. What I

If you've tried to report on these Billing Record fields and can't, please upvote this idea Billable Hours Billable Expenses Billable Revenues All native fields should be reportable

Is it possible to merge multiple videos into one proof review?