Product Communities

Hosted in partnership with Ewan Hruska @ewanhof Field Engineering and Brian Haight of Professional Services, this session walked through 5 different tips you can leverage for automating naming conventions using Workfront Fusion: Tip 1: Establish consistent, long-term naming schemes avoiding frequent changes across related objects. Tip 2: Use unique identifiers (project reference numbers or custom incremental numbers) in naming conventions. Tip 3: Drive naming conventions through request form fields like business unit and region dropdowns. Tip 4: Limit total project name length using Workfront validation rules to prevent character overflow. Tip 5: Balance human readability with AI discoverability by starting names with most useful identifiers. Watch the on-demand recording HERE, download a copy of the slide deck HERE, and check out the .zip file with the Fusion JSON files HERE.  Fusion takes time and practice to learn, so if you're just getting started,

I have a Proof Approval report set up, and it has columns that show key information like Approver Decision, and the Decision Date, but I'm wondering if there's a way to pull in something like proof has notes/comments, comments exist = true/false, etc. Reason being is that we often have reviewer/approvers who will leave comments but forget to make a decision, thus the proof will sit there until the project owner manually reviews.  Is such a column possible? I've played around with several text mode options and for the life of me cannot figure out to achieve this. Any input is greatly appreciated!

Hi all, I have a question from the reporting side. When we share AT findings with the stakeholders, they want to know the accuracy of these models for every optimal experience identified for a segment. In AB activity, we have Confidence (pvalue T-Test) to understand the impact. Which accuracy score do we use in the case of Auto Target? 

Describe the bugAfter deploying Asset Share Commons (ASC) and the sample content package to the DEV environment, all assets (both sample and custom) appear in search results and the pages render correctly.However, asset thumbnails are not loading.All other functionality — search, filters, pagination, and design — works as expected.⸻Environment• AEM Version: AEM 6.5.21• Asset Share Commons Version: 3.11.4• Environment Type: Author and Publish⸻To Reproduce1. Install Asset Share Commons package on AEM DEV environment.2. Install the official ASC sample content package.3. Open /content/asset-share-commons/en/light.html (or similar page).4. Observe that all assets are listed properly.5. Notice that the thumbnail images are missing — broken image icons are shown.⸻Expected behaviorAsset thumbnails (from DAM renditions such as cq5dam.thumbnail.319.319.png) should display properly in the search results and asset cards, just like on the local AEM instance.Additional context• The issue occurs for

<enableCollasableText jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" sling:resourceType="granite/ui/components/foundation/form/checkbox" class="cq-dialog-checkbox-showhide" cq-dialog-checkbox-showhide-target=".button-option-enable-showhide-target-three" name="./show" text="Show Below Conatiner" uncheckedValue="false" value="true"/><collasableTextContainer jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" sling:resourceType="granite/ui/components/foundation/container" class="hidden button-option-enable-showhide-target-three" showhidetargetvalue="true"> <items jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"> <showFirstName jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" sling:resourceType="granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/textfield" fieldLabel="First Name" name="./firstName"/> <showLastName jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"

In case you missed it, here's a recording of the new Email Designer Office Hours on August 27th, 2025.   This session introduced the AI Assistant for content generation in the new Marketo email designer. We demonstrated how to create full email bodies, subject lines, and preheaders using uploaded brand assets (PDFs or content briefs). The walkthrough showed how prompts, tone, and persona targeting shape AI-generated content and how marketers can iterate, rephrase, and refine outputs. The team addressed questions on sending proofs, testing workflows, using brand guidelines for tone and style, inline CSS customization, and HTML editing. Upcoming features like spam scoring integration and background image layering were also previewed.    AI-Generated Timestamps  Introduction and AI Assistant Overview 1:31  Uploading Brand Assets and Context Files 5:00  Generating Email Body Content with Prompts 8:40  Editing Text, Images, and Iterating on

Hi, I’ve been trying to create a custom plugin for all the RichText XML configurations in my AEM components, but I haven’t been able to get it working. I’ve followed several guides, but I still can’t make it work. Any help? It would just be a simple select with options and a text field.We’ve added custom fields to components like the link plugin — that was quite easy by modifying only the JS. But in this case we would be creating a completely new property. https://www.bounteous.com/insights/2022/01/06/custom-rich-text-editor-plugins-adobe-experience-manager/#create_new_clientlib_provide_categories https://medium.com/globant/build-a-custom-rte-plugin-with-chatgpt-for-aem-4e373487a6fe 

I created a new AEM SPA project using archetypeVersion=36 with absolutely no custom code — it’s a completely clean, out-of-the-box project.The pages render correctly, but the AEM error log keeps showing this warning: GET /content/demoproject/us/en.model.json HTTP/1.1]org.apache.sling.models.impl.via.ResourceSuperTypeViaProviderCould not determine forced resource type for JcrNodeResource,type=nt:unstructured, superType=null,path=/conf/demoproject/settings/wcm/templates/spa-page-template/structure/jcr:content/cq:responsiveusing via value Is there any way to fix this warning or prevent it from appearing?

I want to trigger listener which which further sends email whenever any async job is completed on AEM Cloud.But whatever event I am trying is not hitting the listenerorg/apache/sling/event/notification/job/FINISHED Orcom/adobe/granite/async/job/SUCCEEDED. or I have the 2nd approach where I can check /var/asyncjobs where if any new node creates I can trigger listener but in that node I see no property to differentiate between jobs( like I only want for assetimport or zip unarchive). can someone please help here.  

Hello, I am trying to integrate the Adobe web SDK via the AEM; however, alloy calls are encountered, indicating that the currently configured Datastream ID does not exist. How do I enable the data stream ID for my AEM?

Currently, if I update metadata that already exists in the standard path /jcr:content/metadata, everything works correctly with this payload:json{ "class": "asset", "properties": { "metadata": { "pruebanumber": 22, "singleline": "Value from API" } } }The ProblemThe problem occurs when I try to update metadata that belongs to a child node named default, whose path would be:/jcr:content/metadata/default/myFieldIf that node does not already exist in the asset, the API returns a 403 Forbidden error.Example of the payload that fails when the default node does not yet exist:json{ "class": "asset", "properties": { "metadata": { "pruebanumber": 22, "pruebasingleline": "Value from API", "default": { "indefault": 1234 } } } }If I manually create the node or update a field from the asset's Properties in the UI, the defau

Does anyone know whatever happened to the Campaign Object beta from 2022? https://solutionpartners.adobe.com/solution-partners/news/2022/08/the-adobe-workfront-campaigns-beta---get-involved-.html Was that ever pushed live or was it put on hold? Any update is helpful.

In case you missed it, here's a recording of the new Email Designer Office Hours on Sept 10th 2025.   This session focused on content locking and governance in the new email designer. We demonstrated how to control edit permissions using fragments and templates, showing how admins can lock logos, headers, and footers while allowing limited edits to text or URLs. We detailed the difference between fragments (reusable modules) and templates (master layouts), explained governance options like “editable content only” vs. “read-only,” and clarified how changes propagate. The Q&A covered module migration, dynamic content rollout, HTML component locking, and upcoming reporting and cloning improvements.    Chapters  Introduction and Poll on Adoption 0:40  Creating Fragments and Enforcing Governance 2:30  Editable Fields and Locked Components 9:00  Publishing and Reusing Fragments 13:00  Creating Templates with Conte

In case you missed it, here's a recording of the new Email Designer Office Hours on Oct 8th 2025.   This session introduced two major enhancements: dark mode support and the new collaboration workflow in the Marketo email designer. Product development demonstrated how users can preview and define custom dark mode styles, toggle between light and dark mode, and adjust individual component colors. We clarified client compatibility (Outlook, Gmail, Mac clients) and best practices for logo visibility. The collaboration workflow demo showed how to tag teammates, add threaded comments, resolve discussions, and receive notifications via email and Marketo Pulse. Additional Q&A covered A/B testing timelines, dynamic content rollout, known Outlook bugs, and deprecation timing for the classic editor.    AI Generated Timeline  Welcome and Agenda Overview 0:09  Poll on Editor Adoption 2:32  Dark Mode Feature Overview 5:44  Editing

In case you missed it, here's a recording of the new Email Designer Office Hours on Nov 5th 2025. The session walked through the newest capabilities in the Marketo Engage Email Designer, including a live demo of Conditional Content alongside updates like Template Converter, A/B testing support, Brand Themes, and Image-to-HTML generation. See how these features streamline personalization, speed up production, and improve governance for modern email workflows.   AI-Generated Summary:   2:30 – 16:30 | Conditional Content (live demonstration) Walkthrough of how to enable Conditional Content on an email block and create multiple variants. Demonstrated selecting segments for each variant, adjusting images/content per variant, and understanding top-to-bottom execution order with a default fallback. Emphasized parity with V2 Dynamic Content but redesigned in a new, more intuitive UI. 16:30 – 23:30 | Conditional Content Q&A Covered how variant testing works through

Hello! We've seen this raised a few times here, but never with a resolution. So I'm going to try again!As we're a "hosted service", we have no front-end access to our Message Center instances. We have two instances, RT1 and RT2, load-balanced under RT-LB. I'm trying to update the quarantine status of a given email address on both RT1 and RT2, and I'm using this code:// RT instance connection details var remoteInstanceUrl = 'https://<rt_instance_host>.campaign.adobe.com'; var authHeaderName = "Authorization"; var authToken = "<auth_token_from_IMS>"; var authHeaderValue = "Bearer " + authToken; // Create HttpSoapConnection and inject auth bearer token into the header var rtConnection = new HttpSoapConnection(remoteInstanceUrl + '/nl/jsp/soaprouter.jsp', 'utf-8', 0); rtConnection.setHeader(authHeaderName, authHeaderValue); // Create session write proxy service, based on xtk:session.Write WSDL definition var sessionSoapSrv = new SoapService(rtConnection, 'xtk:session'); sess

We are currently evaluating migrating our AEM 6.5 implementation to the Cloud Service. However, we’ve encountered a few issues and would appreciate input from organizations that have gone through similar transitions: 1. AMS and Cloud Service - Tech Parity Adobe is recommending AMS, but it means additional operational and development costs.  AMS has not received new features at the same pace as AEM Cloud. If our organization wants to adopt new features, especially at a global scale, AMS would not have tech parity. So, features may not be available for China. Has anyone faced this situation? How did your organization overcome these limitations? 2. Asset Share Commons and Content Hub User Limits Currently, we use Asset Share Commons (ASC) with no user limits. Migrating to Content Hub imposes a 250-user limit, which seems highly restrictive. For those who migrated from ASC to Content Hub, what other challenges did you face besides the user limit? Any advice on scaling Content

Dear All, I’m working on digitizing our product specifications (currently managed offline) and I’m testing custom forms to see what can replace our existing workflow. One key part is that I’m trying to centralize raw material characteristics and similar data within specific project/s, then have the custom forms elsewhere to pull in that data dynamically when required.  I’ve built the following TEST setup, and it’s very close to what I need but it still has a few issues. Project 1 contains a form consisting of a Single line text field “Product Code”.  Users enter “Product Code” value manually, for example 12345ABCDE Project 2 contains a form consisting of:Typeahead field “Project Name v1” returning Project 1 among other projects within the same portfolio/programExternal lookup field “Project Name v2” returning Project 1 among other projects within the same portfolio/programExternal lookup fields returning “Product Code” value based on project selected

Hi, We need to fetch the personalized subject line for Message Center broad Logs nms:broadLogEventHisto. Currently its is stored in the field [delivery/mailParamters/subject]. But it is storing as Hi <%=rtEvent.ctx.firstname%>, where as the expected value is "Hi Lakshmi".Could any one please let me know the better approach to use activities instead of Javascript, since JS is taking so long time when tried.  

Hi,I have to schedule a campaign in Adobe journey optimizer for specific date on hourly basis. For ex. On 20th November I have to start sending campaign from 1 PM to 5 PM on hourly basis. How do I do that? 

Hi All, I seem to recall that typeahead fields used to display as Clickable link / Hyperlink to the referenced object on the custom form, similar to how they appear in reports. It looks like this behaviour has been removed or changed. I was trying to find some information about this in the documentation and release notes, but couldn’t locate anything. Could someone refresh my memory on this? Kind regards,Lukasz

Hi everyone,We’re in the process of configuring the Snowflake → AEP streaming connector (using Snowflake Streaming. Before we proceed further, I’d like to confirm a few details:What we understand so far:Similar to batch ingestion, we’ll be creating a dedicated Snowflake service account/user for AEPWe’ll need to coordinate authentication for that user (preferably key-pair)We’ll also need to set up the warehouse, database, schema, and target table/view for AEP to read fromAccess privileges needed: USAGE on warehouse, database, schema + SELECT on the target table/viewQuestion for the community:Are these steps exactly the same as what’s required for the batch Snowflake connector, or are there additional/different requirements specific to the streaming connector?Are there any best-practices or checklist items you’d recommend specifically for the streaming setup?Any gotchas or configurations that differ for streaming versus batch when using Snowflake → AEP?Thanks in advance for any insights.

Do you know of any validation of JS code put into AT activity in the area of security?

I’m working on a use case where multiple user groups need different levels of data access within Adobe Analytics.One group should have access to all available data.Other groups should be restricted to only the subset of data relevant to them (for example, their own accounts, locations, or entities).There could be hundreds of such restricted groups.I’m looking for guidance on the best way to implement this type of multi-group, role-based or attribute-based data access. Specifically:How can I restrict another user group to only the data tied to their assigned entity or scope?How can I efficiently manage permissions for a large number of groups?Should this be handled via report suite permissions, segments, user roles, or another method?How do we scale this approach to hundreds of restricted groups?Any examples, strategies, or guidance would be very helpful.Thanks!

Hi everyone,I’m looking for real-world use cases or examples that highlight the differences between Adobe Analytics and Google Analytics 4. Specifically, I’d like to understand how both platforms compare in terms of:Ease of useFeatures and capabilitiesIntegration with other tools or platformsData privacy and securityScalabilityPerformance and reliabilityIf you have insights, experiences, or practical examples from your work with either tool, I’d really appreciate your input!