Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Can you give the solution to customize and create the RTE plugin for external link builder experience in RTE for AEM to add the anchor tag and have data-link-attrs for modal popup inside the a tag?
I have a task report where I have a text mode column that is showing the assigned to name of a different task than what I’m reporting on which is why it’s in text mode. But as we know with text mode, if the project has more than one task that meets the criteria, it’s going to pull two names into that column. Is it possible to expand on my existing text mode to only show one name in the column based on another field I’m using called “related invoice date” so for example, my current text mode is: displayname=Report Writerlistdelimiter=<div>listmethod=nested(project.tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({name}='Report Writer Allocation',{assignedTo}.{name})valueformat=HTML and I want the value expression to be: if the name contains report writer AND the related invoice date is last year, then show the assigned to name. Is this possible? If so, can someone help me with the text mode?
Does these also works for event journeys?
Does anyone knows the API for converting an issue to a project in postman?
I can find these from APIs may be, but I dont see any dataset which has this information.
Hi Adobe Community, Greetings! For AJO use case where streaming segment is one of the core dependencies, I wanted to check if we can potentially configure a trigger event journey that does not depend on streaming audience qualification? Due to our current architecture with AEP, we're unable to get streaming segments to work in our instance, because our current connect type is based on a batch type of connector. So, even though we have set the ingestion cadence to 15 mins and profiles + events update in the profile store <15 mins but still the streaming audience do not qualify in real/near-real time as the current connection type doesn’t supports it. All other factors necessary for streaming segment to qualify is satisfied, except the connection type. Creating a new connection would significantly delay our use case deployment. Hence we were exploring creating journeys that would trigger based on events. As am not aware about AJO (am an AEP dev), Just wanted to get expert opinion
When we audit all the campaigns couple of years later, its very difficult to two things:1. If someone has added or removed any custom forms. We have no audit trail on the campaign.On the copied campaign, we never come to know how the campaign was created. Either it was created by a user through converting into a template, or it was copied from an old campaign.Does anyone track that at your organisation?
お世話になっております。現在、Adobe ID環境においてSSO(シングルサインオン)認証の導入を検討しております。当社の社内認証基盤はMicrosoftのEntra IDを利用しております。つきましては、以下の点についてご教示いただけますと幸いです。【確認事項】SSO適用範囲について 弊社はAdobe AnalyticsおよびAdobe Marketoを利用していますが、Entra IDとのSSO連携は可能でしょうか。 一部ユーザーの例外運用について Adobe Analyticsにおいて、SSO対象外のユーザー(ローカルユーザー)を作成し、運用することは可能でしょうか。 また、可能な場合は制約事項や留意点があれば併せてご教示ください。【背景】通常ユーザーはSSOで統合管理を行いつつ、外部委託先や緊急時対応用として、一部ローカル認証ユーザーの運用を想定しております。
Hi all, Currently facing issues with Marketo not sending any of the test eDMs and my recent eDM campaign that was scheduled has been sent but all the emails have been “soft bounced” Any issue why this is happening? Is there a glitch in the system? All Outlook and Gmails are getting bounced back.
Does anyone know how to view analytics calls from a mobile device to see variables flowing into Adobe.
Can anyone give a recommendation for how to display planned vs. actual hours variance in a chart format? It needs to be a simple visual as the final chart/report will need to be shared with leadership. Right now, the planned hours formatting is showing as crazy high because of the way the system calculates. See attached screenshot.Any advice?
We are working in a headless setup and i am trying to stay away from writing any custom JS functions for form field validations due to security reasons.For a simple rule example, prevent a Name field from accepting any special chars, i am unable to accomplish this entirely with rule editor. Tried many combinations and none worked. Have few similar use cases, where i need to use rule editor. i tried using “contains” but unable to find a way to concat multiple special chars.Any rule that i can pass a regex to validate, example Account Number (custom xx-xxxxxx). In foundation, we used to have a way to pass Regex. In core, i only see few OOTB example SSN, Phone number, Email, Zip etc.
Hi team, We recently had a member of our team change her last name and she is now unable to create a proof out of documents uploaded in Workfront. She recieves the following error message, “Failed to generate proof - Unable to log into ProofHQ.” When I checked her proof profile I noticed her proof user type is now listed “guest.” Is there a way to edit the proof user type or has anyone found a solution to this issue?Note: We do utilize SSO, and the name change has been made to our directory.Best,E
I have enabled the “add an alternative path in case of timeout or error” option for an email action in an event-based journey.When I triggered an event, one profile entered the email action. Due to an error (the email address was missing in the event payload), the profile moved to the alternate path (timeout/error path).However, I’m confused about the statistics shown on the End node:Entered: 2 Error: 1Since only one profile went through the email action, shouldn’t the Entered count in the End node be 1?Also, since the alternative path is enabled, the email action itself does not show any error count, and instead, the profile continues via the alternate path. The End node then shows Error: 1.Can you please confirm if my understanding is correct?
SharePoint Integration with Adobe Workfront 🔍 ScenarioOur organization recently integrated Microsoft SharePoint with Adobe Workfront to streamline document management and project collaboration.During implementation, a key question came up:👉 If one user configures the SharePoint integration using their Microsoft account, will all other users automatically be able to use it?🧠 What We ObservedAfter testing the integration, we identified the following behavior: The SharePoint integration in Workfront is user-based (OAuth authentication) Each user must individually log in to their SharePoint account when accessing the integration Permissions are delegated per user, not shared globally ⚠️ Key Challenges Multiple User Logins Required Every user must authenticate separately with their Microsoft account. Approval Prompts Some users encounter an “Approval Required” screen depending on organizational Microsoft policies. Access Dependency Users can only access SharePoint files and folde
Hi everyone,I’m looking to connect pCon.login (by EasternGraphics) with Marketo Engage to automate lead flow and tracking. For those unfamiliar, pCon is a leading ecosystem in the interior design and furniture industry for 3D configuration and OFML data distribution (pCon.update).I would like to know: Has anyone attempted this integration before? If so, did you build it internally (API-to-API) or did you have to rely on middleware (like Zapier or Make)? We are trying to understand the best architectural approach to capture leads from pCon.update subscriptions and pCon.cloud configurations without adding unnecessary layers.Any insights or experiences would be highly appreciated!
I am semi-new to Fusion and have built very simple scenarios of assigning individual assets to specific owners and while that is going well, this set up doesn't account for current workload, priorities or time-off. I was wondering if there is a way to pull in the Workload Balancer from Workfront into the Fusion scenarios to round-robin assign the incoming work based on workload vs. auto-assigning to one individual?
Hi,@Dan_Stevens_ I was browsing about custom activity setup and came across your comment here Could you share the code you used in the landing page for tracking custom activity for Brightcove video views? I’m trying to do something similar for Vimeo, but my code isn’t working. 1. I do not see anything in the activity history other than the option to filter custom activity “Watched Vimeo Video”2. Chatgpt said “Cross‑Domain / Hostname Mismatch in Marketo Tracking” is the issue. Does this affect a Marketo landing page if the video is embedded there?3. I see console logs firing, but there’s no “/munchkin/customActivity” showing in DevTools → Network.Also, Is my setup, fields, and API names correct? Anyone experienced in using Vimeo and tracking Analytics in Marketo, please share your insights and best practices. Thank you!
Hi All , i have field named as ‘good data’ in schema with boolean type as 0 and 1 . I have few records in schema with key as “@abc”.there are cases where 2 records are present on same key with good data field values as 0{No}and 1{Yes} rest all field values are same. Now when i get new data file if record doesnot exist it should insert record with all field values(n number of fields) passing in file and update good data field values as YES. and if record exist it should only update record in schema with good value as YES. It should not make any update changes to record with NO value. As we are prioritizing record with YES value only in workflow targeting. How i can implement this in single update activity
Can someone point me to documentation on the “Summarize” options in reports?When creating a chart in a Workfront report, the user is required to select an option for “Summarized By”. In most cases there are two choices: Minimum and Maximum. What do these mean and how are they different? What other options exist and what are their meanings? I’ve see Count, Sum, and Average on column settings as well. I haven’t been able to find anything in the Workfront documentation.
In our SPA, we observed a specific behavior of Target activities: Even with renderDecisioning=false, some activities continued to trigger. The activities are present but not rendered. Since this is a SPA and there is no page refresh, in the subsequent Rule Page View we could not find the activities with the key expected by Target. Important: before user login, there were no Rule Page Views. Activities were therefore only processed after login, and everything worked correctly in that phase. Implemented SolutionTo properly handle the SPA flow without page refresh, the following was implemented: In the Rule Page View, after login, a custom code was added to handle view changes: function onViewChange() { var viewName = window.location.pathname || 'viewNamePage'; if (viewName.startsWith('/')) { viewName = viewName.substring(1); } alloy("sendEvent", { renderDecisions: true, xdm: { eventType: "view", web: { webPageDetails: { name: view
Hello! I am trying to pull together a list of MQLs who have opened an email (excluding confirmation emails unless they’ve opened a marketing email) and I would like it if someone can double check/verify that the logic is sound! (1 or (2 and 3)) Open email is not <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this year Open email is any this year Open email is <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this yearWe are trying to check and see how many MQLs this year have opened one of our emails this year so that we can report to leadership. My concern is that Open Email is Any would pull in people who have opened the confirmation emails only when what I am looking for are people who have opened a marketing email AND opened a confirmation email.
Hi Adobe Community, Greetings! To support a new use case, we need to add few profile type attributes to an existing Individual profile class schema. To ingest the historical data for profile attributes, I know that we can create a new dataset and a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields so that existing profiles can sync in the values. However, I wanted to check if we can do the same in the existing dataset without creating a new dataset for this exercise?And, If we create a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields and point it to the same/existing dataset - will it overwrite other columns with null values as other columns were not mapped in the dataflow? Thanks,Sambit
Hello - Has anyone else had a similar experience that when you made the transition to the MobileSDK your post_tnt_action field in your data feed no longer was populating? Looking for any type of troubleshooting ideas -- checkboxes that we might be missing, a step that is often overlooked, something new that needs to be setup, etc. Thanks!
Hi @Community I am working on AEP-SFMC API based destination connection. I have created a streaming type audience and activated it using SFMC API based connection. SFMC connection is set up successfully as I can see the target fields during mapping. On Audience activation profile get activated to destination.“Dataexport” is used as marketing action and no consent policy is used.Destination data flow runs and complete successfully but i get “Identities excluded” while profiles are received but none activated.“Identity excluded” comes with below description : “The identities associated to some profiles cannot be exported to the destination due to missing user consent, or the consent provided by users does not match the consent settings applied to the destination. To respect user privacy, Experience Platform will not export these identities to this destination. For more information, refer to the Consent policy documentation: https://www.adobe.com/go/consent-policy-enforcement. “ I am n
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.