Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Actividad reciente
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Scheduled Copy content activities to lower environments from Prod environment Using GenAI Models in AEM Cloud Manager Use-case: We request the development of a feature in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Cloud Manager that leverages Generative AI (GenAI) models to enable the capability of scheduled copy content activities to lower environments from Prod environment. This feature would allow DevOps/Support teams to trigger content copy activities to lower environments on specific dates and times through GenAI-based workflows in a scheduled manner. Key Benefits: Reduction in manual effort : The biggest advantage of this feature would be - a great reduction / savings of manual hours of the AEM support team/application team in the monitoring of Copy content activity , Greater efficiency and reduction in the waiting times during monitoring ( incurred by the support team while content is being copied in Stage and Dev ). Aut
In the asset metadata schema I have added a metadata field called lockedBy. In this field I will enter userId. I want to search assets using logged in user's Id from the asset management screen filter option. In the asset management screen I have added a filter option as LockedBy. In this field I can enter userId manually and can search assets by it.For example, If I search with the text "author" in the Locked By field then I get assets of which the metadata field "lockedBy" is set to "author".I want to make it an automatic search with current logged in userId rather than manually inputting it. How can I achieve this? I have added the filter property predicate like this And added the metadata schema like this
Cache Headers Every AEM Dev Should Knowby @daniel-strmecki OverviewAs an Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) developer, understanding HTTP cache headers is essential to optimize content delivery, enhance website performance, and ensure a seamless user experience. Cache headers play a critical role in controlling how content is stored and served by browsers, and intermediary caches like the AEM Apache/Dispatcher and CDN. Here are the most important cache headers every AEM developer should know how to use and apply:Cache-ControlDefines caching policies for browsers and intermediary cache layers (Dispatcher and CDN)Static assets like CSS, JS, and images usually have a longer max-age, while frequently updated pages and APIs might use no-cache or a short max-age to ensure fresh content is served to end usersIf we set the Cache-Control header on the AEM Publisher, it will be applied to the Apache/Dispatcher, given that TTL is enabled in the Dispatcher configurat
I have a graphql query which takes IDFilter! as parameter and this works fine in the graphql editor and when i try to request from postman i am getting "Variable 'paths' has an invalid value: Variable 'paths' has coerced Null value for NonNull type 'IDFilter!'"exception. My Graphql Queryquery ($expression:IDFilter!) {internetList(filter: {_path: $expression}) {items {_path}}}Graphql Variables{ "expression":{ "_logOp":"OR", "_expressions":[ { "_operator": "EQUALS", "value":"/content/dam/sample/content-fragments/internet/internet1" }, { "_operator": "EQUALS", "value":"/content/dam/sample/content-fragments/internet/internet2"
I've seen the best practices mentioned by Adobe. BUT are there other performance checks/enhancements I can make on my frontend/backend code? The ones that I can think of are:checking the logs/monitoring tools available in the instancelighthouse metricsAnything else? Thanks!
Hi Workfront Friends! I'm looking for some text mode assistance. We have a series of projects, all of which contain a task for "Initial Launch". When viewing a report of all of these projects, I would love to be able to have a column with the Planned Start Date of the "Initial Launch" task for each one of these projects. Any suggestions?
Description:Enable usage of Asset Request ID to allow us to group related assets and populate them as a single package to Bynder, improving our asset management process. Why is this feature important to you:As we enhance our asset management capabilities with Workfront and Bynder, we need a way to group related assets from a single task. This will improve efficiency, organization, and user experience, enabling easier tracking and management of assets. How would you like the feature to work:Introduce Asset Request ID to group assets. When assets are transferred, they should be sent as a package, utilizing Bynder's related functionality. The assets should automatically be marked as related and preferably show the actual user who uploaded them. If Asset Request ID is active in Bynder, Fusion can enable Workfront to bundle assets by leveraging subfolders etc when sending them to Bynder. Current Behavior:Currently, assets are transferred to Bynder individually
I'm hoping someone has a solution they can share! Right now, we are able to have some YoY summary change widgets along with YoY trended line charts based on a key metric summary table. Unfortunately, if someone were to select a different date range in the date selector, the comparison period changes. No longer is YoY the selected option, but it redefaults to "previous period" instead. This causes a lot of confusion if someone was previously looking at YoY but now looking at previous period comparisons after selecting different dates and unable to get back to that YoY comparison.I've included a video of what happens when i change date range from last 90 days defaulted to last 30 days instead. You can see the comparison period in the trended graph line changes to previous period. Any thoughts on a solution to default to YoY comparison regardless of what dates are selected? Any help would be appreciated!
Business Need: Stakeholders often require Year-To-Date (YTD) comparison of current year vs previous year on a daily/weekly basis to track ongoing performance trends. Challenge: Adobe Workspace does not support dynamic YTD vs YTD comparison directly. Users must manually change the date ranges or use limited preset options, leading to inefficiencies and inaccurate analysis. Adobe's Design Limitation:Workspace logic is snapshot-based, not dynamically contextual to today's date across years.Designed for fixed range comparisons (like Mar 1–Mar 31 this year vs same period last year) Current Gaps:No automatic rolling YTD comparison available.Static date ranges need to be updated frequently.Presets or Date Comparison help partially but fail when YTD is not the same number of days every year (due to leap years, weekends, etc.). Impact: Inconsistent reporting, increased manual effort, delayed insights for performance tracking and business decisions.
Hi all, just wondering whether it is possible to calculate a dynamic field like the Profile user's age based on his birthday and keeping the value up to date e.g., on a batch update? In other words, a field that is either preprocessed by a job or evaluated on the fly when queried.
Conditional formatting allows you to customize how information displays on a report. You can make information stand out by making the text bold or highlighting a field. You can use conditional formatting for a variety of things-for example, making a task appear in red when the progress status is late or highlighting in gray all of the project planned completion dates that fall in the current quarter. This week we discuss how to use conditional formatting, using the example of comparing dates. Learn more, here! ------------------------------ Kara Trapp Manager, Modern Work Enablement - Customer Programs Workfront ------------------------------
Thank you all for joining today’s Customer Success Workshop, Using Workfront Reports to Guide Your Spring Cleanup Efforts. While cleanup is not a one-and-done activity, hopefully this session provided you with actionable recommendations to get started or formalize a process to ensure it gets done! If you weren't able to attend live, no worries - watch the on-demand recording and download the slide deck below: Slide Deck PDF Workshop RecordingAnd here's a quick summary of what was shared in case you only want the highlights:Cleanup is critical for simplicity, compliance, performance and scalability Best practices for system cleanup - limiting the number of users who have access to create objects, turn off settings so that users can't create projects without a template or copy projects, form a governance group to meet and discuss things like naming conventions, policies around archiving or deleting work, and moreAreas to cleanup with example reports - projects, tasks
During our initial attempt at go live we imported several schemas from our Dev environment and enabled them for profile. During final validation a major issue was discovered, and we had to do a significant re-architecture. I am now attempting to migrate in the updated schemas but running into issues as we're overwriting schemas that already exist, so the import is throwing errors. What is the best way to either remove the existing schemas so I can pull in the new ones, or align the data so they overwrite properly and update to the new structure?
Hi All, 1)I am trying to expose all components on the page in JSON format. When I use OOTB feature pageUrl.model.json, I see a lot of unnecessary data being shown, such as allowed components and other irrelevant details. I want to expose a clean JSON and have already implemented Sling Models using jackson exporter, However, when I execute pageUrl.model.json, it doesn’t return the custom properties I've added in the Sling Model. On the other hand, when I use componentPath.model.json, it returns all the custom properties from the Sling Model.I'm trying to understand how to expose all component data as JSON via pageUrl.model.json. 2)Additionally, I attempted to create a custom Sling Model for the page component, but this doesn't provide the JSON for all the components within the page. I thought about traversing through each child node and adapting each resource to a Sling Model, but the code below always returns null. The model doesn’t re
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Reducing Stage/Prod deployment Pipeline execution Time Using GenAI Models in AEM Cloud Manager Use-case: We are requesting for the development of a feature in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Cloud Manager that leverages Generative AI (GenAI) models to reduce the execution time required for stage and production deployment pipelines in AEM Cloud manager. This feature would fast-track regular deployment tasks in the Adobe Cloud pipeline using GenAI models , including Unit Testing, Code Scanning, Image Building, Product Functional Testing, Custom Functional Testing, Custom UI Testing, and Experience Audits. Key Benefits: Accelerated Deployment: GenAI models optimize and expedite deployment tasks, significantly reducing the overall pipeline time. Enhanced Efficiency: Automate routine tasks such as unit testing and code scanning, allowing for faster and more reliable deployments. Predictive Analytics: Utilize GenAI to predic
if allow.empty is enabled BUT I have entries in allow.hosts.regexp, is my instance still limited to the hosts lin the allow.hosts.regexp list or will the instance accept any request coming from anywhere? Thanks!
Hi, I will apply utm_source, utm_medium, utm_campaign to my landing pg link that will be converted to a QR code for people to scan.Do I have to create new field values in Marketo for each of these utm parameters to support these efforts?Will be hidden fields in the form. If so, would it be best to create those in our CRM system and then they'd sync down as new field values into Marketo? (using Microsoft Dynamics)Wondering: does Salesforce have those parameters already built in? Thank you.
Hi Everyone, We need to generate akamai token. For token generation we are using EdgeAuth and need to added the dependency mentioned below. <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.akamai/edgeauth --><dependency><groupId>com.akamai</groupId><artifactId>edgeauth</artifactId><version>0.2.0</version></dependency> Deployment is successful but bundles are in satisfied state. I have also updated dependency in all/pom.xml and embedded in. But getting compile time error.Content Package Converter Exception Content Package Converter Exception Jar file can not be defined as a valid OSGI bundle without specifying a valid 'Bundle-SymbolicName' property.
Hi Everyone,I am trying to use AEM Groovy Console to add a new tag to a page's existing cq:tags property.Below is my code:def page = getPage("/content/mysite/en/sample")def modifiable = page.nodedef tagToAdd = "myproject:custom/tag"def existingTags = modifiable["cq:tags"] ?: []if (!existingTags.contains(tagToAdd)) {existingTags << tagToAddmodifiable["cq:tags"] = existingTags} I expect this to add the tag only if it's not already present. But it doesn't work in some cases - especially when the page already has one tag.Can anyone tell what is wrong?
Hi , All of sudden my team can't authnitcate to Workfront
Does anyone know if there is any risk to data loss if we move projects from one portfolio to another? Currently our setup is that most projects live under one portfolio and we would like to move projects into portfolios that make more sense (e.g move a project from the Information Services portfolio to the Marketing portfolio). Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you
I have created a report and added a value expression on a couple columns to truncate the results. The goal is to have less 'scroll' for the user since it a project dashboard with three reports visible. Is there anything I can do that will allow the user to see the full result in the truncated columns if they hover over it? I would like the same experience as when you are hovering over the Project breadcrumbs and it shows you the full Portfolio, Program, etc...name. Thanks!
Description - The native fields of Portfolio and Program do not work the same as they should in the custom form as they do in the Overview. Why is this feature important to you - We need our PMs to select the Portfolio and Program for each project, so we added the native field to our custom form and made it required for them to fill out. Otherwise they miss doing this in the Overview of the project.How would you like the feature to work - Having the native fields of Portfolio and Program to work exactly like they do in the Overview. When you select a Portfolio, only the Programs for that Portfolio will be shown to select from. Current Behavior - Right now, when you select the Portfolio in the custom form, ALL of the Programs are listed. The PMs have to then search and scroll for the right Program. They can also select the wrong one, which they won't know that they did since it allows them to select any Program instead of the ones that are associated with the Portfolio.
Hello, We are performing A/B testing on a pair of deliveries and trying to generate a winner delivery for the remaining population after a wait period for feedback. We have followed along with the solution in other Experience League posts, and can generate the delivery within the JS code activity as a copy of the winning test delivery via Duplicate(), post winner decision. The issue that we are encountering is that we happen to use targetData as a source of a number of Target Mappings into broadLogRCP and substitutions into our emails. We haven't had issues with this in the few years that we have been using Adobe Campaign, but this is the first time that we have tried any deliveries from code. All others have explicitly been defined in Delivery activities. In this case, none of the targetData is recognized (we can see it in the transitions) so our broadLogRCP records are mostly empty, aside from Recipient and Delivery references, and our emails are produced with missing conte
Hey everyone, If you're managing a large database and running a high number of active triggered campaigns, you might have experienced something we’ve had to learn the hard way: Marketo becoming significantly slower, especially when complex automation setups are involved. In our experience, and according to other sources from on the internet, having too many active trigger campaigns can lead to latency and performance issues across your instance. This is particularly true when combined with a large volume of leads or complex Smart List logic. In fact, some of the biggest contributors to slowdowns include: A high number of active trigger campaigns High lead volume Complex Smart Lists , especially those using nested conditions Having campaigns with multiple layers of executable campaigns These elements, when used together, can introduce artificial wait times in campaign processing and cause global system slowdowns that affect everything from email sends to Smart List c
¿Ya tiene cuenta? Iniciar sesión
¿Aún no tienes una cuenta? Crea una cuenta
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.