Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Has anyone faced issues with the Adobe Analyzer during Cloud Manager pipeline execution? Our build fails during the "Code Quality" step with the following message:Severity: Major | Rule: CQBP-84 | Message: Avoid using deprecated Granite UI components.We have ensured most deprecated APIs are removed, but this keeps coming up. The error logs in Cloud Manager are not very descriptive, making it hard to trace the root cause.How can we get more detailed reports or pinpoint the affected files?Are there tools or local analyzers we can use to test code before committing?Any tips or shared experiences would be appreciated!
Hi all, We're working to report on the first time we respond to a request within Workfront (via update or status change). Does anyone use the 'first response' field for that? I came across that when I was working on the reporting but couldn't find much documentation on it.
DescriptionCurrently, in Adobe Experience Platform, the creation and editing of datatypes are restricted to the method by which they were created. If a datatype is created via the API, it can only be edited using the API. Similarly, if a datatype is created via the UI, it can only be edited through the UI. This limitation creates an inconsistent and fragmented user experience. The requested feature is to enable cross-platform creation and editing, allowing datatypes created via the API to be editable within the UI, and vice versa. Why is this feature important to youThis feature is crucial for maintaining a seamless workflow between the API and the UI. Different team members and projects may have varying preferences or requirements for using the API or the UI. Restricting editing to the creation method adds unnecessary complexity, slows down development processes, and increases the risk of errors. A unified editing experience would enhance productivity, improve collaboration, and
Hi , Need help in understanding these below issues . Not sure they are false positives. If anybody knows fixes for these it would be of great help. 1. granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/renderconditions/simple2. cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/richtext3. cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/fileupload4. datasourceIn BPA report it says "A custom coral dialog widget was found". Are there any coral 3 alternatives available for these resource types.
Hey there,I'm looking to add a note/reply to an existing projects (note/update/comment/reply) using the API. I am able to add a note to an existing project via the endpoint "/attask/api/v17.0/note" using a POST request. { "noteObjCode": "PROJ", "objID": <<PROJECT OBJ ID>>>, "noteText": "Test message" } And this successfully comes through with the same outcome as "New comment" in the Workfront online interface. I can't however work out how to add a note, to this note. i.e. The same outcome as "Reply". Published Notes don't appear to have their own ObjIDs, and I've tried various versions of the ID, threadID, topObjID, etc, to no avail.Any thoughts on how this can be achieved? e.g.
We don't worry about the time of due dates. We've always looked at end of the day as the deadline. Yes, sometimes we have to stay late to get it done on time. Now we have Workfront (in our 4th month) and the planned completion date has a time portion, which has cause some issues for us. Tracking On Time delivery, even 3 minutes past is considered late. We only worry about it going out on the date it was requested due. (We've worked around this with a custom field on a report, using the "cleartime" function, to get accurate reporting for our needs)We have two teams, one in Minnesota and one in Chile. We have a lot of issues with tasks and time off sliding up or down a day on the schedule because of the time zone difference. Makes for a scheduling nightmare! (we can work around this by setting every project and task due date to be ie. 5pm, but that's yet another tiny detail for our PM's to have to not forget) We'd rather not have to work around these iss
Hi, I would like to know how IP pools associate to dynamic subdomains. My use case is to have one email configuration for several countries instead of having one email configuration for each. This is also a typical use case stated in Adobe docs: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/channels/email/configure-email/surface-personalization However, I would like to have different IP pools for each country as this is already setup in the sandbox. Below screenshot shows that resource URL, Mirror URL and Tracking URL will be populate based on the resolved dynamic subdomain. What though will happen with the IP pool?According to the setting it seems that I have to choose one and same IP pool for the email configuration and thereby also the resolved dynamic subdomain. Is this correct? Thanks!/Mikael
Please help me with the integration of AEM as a Cloud Service with Campaign V8. Not able to find any relevant documentation for setting up the intgerations. The details integration steps found on web are for AEM 6.5. Please do not share the document links to authoring Delivery templates and syncing with Campaign
We've completed initial Adobe Mobile SDK configuration, including push notification setup, but still looking for how best to set/map our mobile app code as it is in a different language (C#) than any available documentation and sample code. Is there any available examples/documentation for Maui/.NET? Thanks.
Hi,I have a question regarding the https://analytics.adobe.io/api, specifically the /reports endpoint. We’re seeing a potential data discrepancy reported by one of our clients. They observe one set of values in the Adobe Analytics UI and another in the data fetched via the API and stored in their destination system, which is handled by Fivetran.The discrepancy is partial - out of 9 metrics being pulled and stored, 6 match the UI values exactly. However, the following 3 metrics show mismatched values:visitsunique_visitorsmkz_qualified_visitsWe don’t perform any transformations on these values - we request them from the API and write them to the destination as-is. I would appreciate any guidance or context around why such discrepancies might occur for these specific metrics, and whether there are any known limitations or caveats with the /reports endpoint that could explain this behavior.This is an example of the request performed by Fivetran:curl -X POST --data
Interested in how to implement Workfront Planning and scale the solution across your organization for a holistic view of every stage of work? Our Adobe Product Managers, @soniaespejo and @vazgen_babayan presented an in-depth introductory session on Workfront Planning, where they shared how this feature can provide comprehensive visibility into the operational details of your organization. NOTE: We had an issue with our event recording, but Vazgen re-recorded his demo for us. Linked below! The good news is that we have their slides, along with all of the fantastic Q&A and chat that was posted during the event: Slide Deck PDF (slides shared by Vazgen/Sonia) Generic slides with events and resources Chat engagement / Q&A Vazgen’s Excel Template Example – attached (this is just an example how you can import Record Types into Workfront Planning. For more information, check out the article on how to create Record Types
Hi All,What all the ootb objects available in granite rendercondition.I have browsed and few of the blog mentioned requestPathinfo is available so like this What other ootb objects available in granite rendercondition to use in component dialog.
I am working on use case where we are integrating SAML with our application , basically for new user login we are setting up createUser as false so that whenever user is logged in from IDP server , that user should not create in AEM .For existing user in AEM publish environment , it should redirect to our portal , here no group is being return in Assertion response .Below is my SAML config{"path": [ "/content/csc-aem-commons/us/en", "/content/ipg-asc"],"idpCertAlias": "$[env:SAML_IDP_CERT_ALIAS;default=certalias___1732570622676]","idpIdentifier": "$[env:SAML_IDP_ID;default=https://login.microsoftonline.com/d026e4c1-5892-497a-b9da-ee493c9f0364]","idpUrl": "$[env:SAML_IDP_URL;default=https://login.microsoftonline.com/d026e4c1-5892-497a-b9da-ee493c9f0364/saml2]","serviceProviderEntityId": "$[env:SAML_AEM_ID;default=https://publish-p135571-e1386830.adobeaemcloud.com]","useEncryption": false,"userIDAttribute": "","createUser": false,"userIntermediatePath": "ipg/idp","synchronizeAttrib
Hi Team,We want to block the Internal traffic coming on the website form the company employees browsing our company website. What will be the best way to block this traffic from coming to the website. Is it via IP Blocking? And how to get Bot Name, IPs, User Agents? Please explain the steps.
Requesting access / role to raise ticket for Adobe Target with Adobe Client Care
I am working on a use case in which I want to embed an image inside a PDF file. After that, I need to send it as a servelet response. I am using PDFBox library from Apache to do so. But, I am not able to resolve the dependencies. POM: <!-- Apache PDFBox Dependencies --><dependency> <groupId>org.apache.pdfbox</groupId> <artifactId>pdfbox</artifactId> <version>3.0.2</version></dependency><dependency> <groupId>org.apache.pdfbox</groupId> <artifactId>fontbox</artifactId> <version>3.0.2</version></dependency><dependency> <groupId>commons-logging</groupId> <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId> <version>1.3.2</version></dependency>error: In the image, the version which is mentioned in the bundles is 3.0.4 which does not exist.
Hi Y'all, My company has been using Cvent for our events and are looking to switch. I am hoping to find some recommendations for event software that is compatible with Marketo.
Hi, I am new to Form Designer app and I have a requirement to make fields in an XDP file accessible. Is there any way to make fields accessible on an XDP file and not using a tagged PDF file. Thank you.
If you are planning for Edge Data Collection and want to migrate existing Experience Cloud solutions to Web SDK, you have a few options when it comes to structuring the data you send. As discussed in a previous blog, data you send to Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) must be sent as XDM and aligned with a dedicated XDM schema. But what if you want to send data to Analytics or Target, but NOT to AEP? For that, you can use the data object, a sibling to XDM in your network call payloads. As described below, the data object has properties that allow for a smooth migration of existing Experience Cloud solutions without requiring that it be associated with an XDM schema. The data object can be passed with the Web SDK sendEvent and maps data directly to Adobe Experience Cloud services. This allows you to continue sending Adobe Analytics, Target, and Audience Manager parameters with their original values, maintaining continuity during migration. It also eliminates the need for an XDM schem
Hi there. I am looking for a mobile SDK function that returns the user's segments.I am looking in the documentation, but I can't find it. I understand that I can do it via an API call, but I would like to know if there is a way to do it with a function so it returns all the segments in an object that I can later refer in different parts of the app and I don't have to call it more than needed.
Hello, does anybody know with with setting or table field the default order of the Workflows in the Campaign box is defined?
While creating audience segments within the analytics platform, I encountered a constraint that prevents adding more conditions within a single definition container. This limitation severely restricts the ability to define complex and highly specific audience behaviors, which is critical for our use cases.When attempting to add more than one condition in a single definition container, the platform did not provide any option to add more condition, but earlier there was an option. Refer screenshot for different times. In 2023, there was a option to add more than one condition in container definition instead of that what I'm getting a nested container option.Can someone suggest is this something respective to platform updates or I'm missing anything to add.
HiI am trying to enable link checker in AEM, but somehow it doesn't show any urls, here's my link checker transformer: Link checker service: The link checker log keeps showing: "no link infos modified or deleted" Did I miss anything? Thanks!
Hi, For an Incremental Query with the 'History in days' value set to 0, how long is history kept? Thanks,Skyler
機能改善要求(RFE)概要: We would like to be able to set the SameSite=None,Secure=Yes options for the saml_request_path (Cookie) configured in the "Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler" ユースケース: I am performing SAML integration with the following configuration, but the value of saml_request_path (Cookie) cannot be obtained, so I am moved to the default destination after logging in. ・Uses "Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler"・Configures two sets of Dispatcher-Publisher・Logs in on the IDP login screen after a period of time・Returns to the Dispatcher that did not send the request 現在/体験した動作: Cookies that do not specify the samesite attribute will become samesite=lax a few minutes after the cookie is generated.Therefore, saml_request_path (Cookie) created by another Dispacher cannot be read. 改善/期待される動作: Set SameSite=None Secure=Yes to always read saml_request_path (Cookie). 環境の詳細(AEM バージョン/サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細): AEM6.5(SP19) 顧客名/組織名 TDEN スクリーンショット(ある場合) コードパ
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.