Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I would like to change the backend storage of assets based on its metadata while keeping the assets where they are in the DAM. Use-case: I would like to set up a property called Archive with a yes checkbox. When the box is not checked the asset is stored in active storage on the backend. When the status box is checked the asset is moved to glacier storage in the backend. So the asset stays in the same location in the DAM interface but the storage of it on the backend is dependent on the metadata in one of the properties. Current/Experienced Behavior: Archived assets are moved to a folder and all assets in that folder get moved to glacier storage on the backend. Improved/Expected Behavior: Backend storage is based on the metadata of an asset instead of what folder it is in. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Dario Mescia/Enterprise Mob
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Display jcr:score next to result path in Query Performance Use-case: When using Query Performance to analyze a query sorted by jcr:score, it would be very useful to display for each of the result its jcr:score generated during the query execution.That would allow better understanding of the final results whenever query results are sorted by jcr:score and also make index management and lucene boosting evolutions much more predictible. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, only the paths of the results are displayed. Improved/Expected Behavior: With this feature, there would be two, one for the asset paths and one for the jcr:score Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Benjamin Jacquet / Accor Hotels Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable customers to programatically create task for the Asset Essentials task board Use-case: Upon asset expiry, we want to automatically create a task to the asset creator's task board in Asset Essentials. The asset creator needs to take action (re-approval, retire, etc.) which will be performed through an App (built using App Builder). Current/Experienced Behavior: No API exists allowing us (customers) to create tasks programmatically which are available to users in their task board Improved/Expected Behavior: Have the ability to create tasks programmatically (through the internal Collaboration API) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Pfizer Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Due to the volume of assets, a search function is being requested to be added when viewing the Columns. Use-case: Destination Pet has so many assets loaded that users are unable to narrow their search when using the Columns view Current/Experienced Behavior: Search only exists in List view Improved/Expected Behavior: Be able to search in Columns view Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Destination Pet Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: All users, admin and non-admin, in the organisation are receiving multiple notifications based on activity in the Asset Contribution Folders within our Brand Portal environment. This has created a significant number of email 'notifications' and there is no way to disable this currently for non-admin users. Please refer to the previously raised ticket: E-001726839 Use-case: Due to the current process and not being able to disable these notifications for non-admin users, we have less control of what is being notified on or being sent to non-admin users. This is a risk for our external stakeholders also as we don't want to notify them of every update in our system. Current/Experienced Behavior: Current experience we have no control of notifications being sent to non-admin users Improved/Expected Behavior: Being able to have full control over what information and notifications are being sent to which users Environment Details (
Hi is there a way to get the count of profiles with 50+ identities. as these profiles are not available for segmentation and in profile lookup. a count will be much helpful to understand how big is the count of such profiles which were not available for segmentation and activation. also any way we can list the identities in such profiles for further analysis. Thanks
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: Composite metadata is needed for store information which follows a Map format. Like: - key1: val1, val2 - key 2: val2, val3, val4 .... key n Current/Experienced Behavior: Composite metadata is only available for Pages. Improved/Expected Behavior: Composite metadata should also be enabled for Assets Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Mondelez Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: Editors need the possibility of moving folders and removing in case of making a mistake. Current/Experienced Behavior: Folders in the new Content Fragment Editor can be created. They cannot be moved, copied, cut or deleted. Improved/Expected Behavior: Folders can be moved, cut, copied and deleted by editors. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
機能改善要求(RFE)概要: Regarding the replication process when a page is locked and a deletion process is executed ユースケース: If the deletion process is executed while the page is locked, the replication process (private) is not executed, and the page is deleted in the Author environment, while the page remains published in the Publish environment.From the user's point of view, the deletion process is considered private, so it appears as if the process has ended normally, and errors caused by locks cannot be detected. Can you please improve the behavior so that the deletion process on Author cannot also be executed when locked? 現在/体験した動作: An event occurred in which a page was not actually private, even though we thought we had deleted the page and made it private.Upon investigation, it was determined from the log that this was due to the fact that the page was locked. 改善/期待される動作: The deletion process on Author cannot be executed while locked. 環境の詳細(AEM バージョン/サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This ticket addresses issues with the AEM asset timeline and revision tracking not displaying all changes, focusing on understanding limitations and potential solutions. Use-case: Karen Barton (AWC Librarian) reported that asset overwrites by Jeff Hess were not shown in the timeline, causing tracking frustration. Sainikhil Reddy (Bounteous Dev) explained AEM timeline shows workflow/publication events but not all low-level edits without custom versioning or audit listeners. Sarah Scalia (Bounteous) noted implementing such custom workflows in AEM as a Cloud Service is complex, estimated as a 15-point effort. The asset metadata like "Modified" and "Modified By" is visible in column and list views but not in card or insight views. Current consensus is that timeline limitations are due to AEM core behavior; custom solutions would require significant development effort. Current/Experienced Behavior: timeline does not show all l
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Users should not be able to download the assets from Brand Portal, if they have reached expirationDate. Use-case: To maintain consistency and compliance. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently its not blocked in brand portal Improved/Expected Behavior: Non admins should not be able to download assets from brand portal, if it has reached expiration date. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Signify Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable Full PDF Preview in Brand Portal "Link Share" Mode Use-case: Brand and Creative teams frequently share CI guidelines and marketing documents with external agencies, vendors, and regional partners using Brand portal share link. Current/Experienced Behavior: Manually resending files or explain partial previews which in results in: * Slower collaboration and review cycles * Suboptimal brand experience for external stakeholders * Inconsistent experience between internal and external user Improved/Expected Behavior: Providing a complete in-browser preview of multi-page PDFs is critical for: * Ensuring brand consistency without needing to download files * Reducing redundant back-and-forth communication * Avoiding re-sharing or clarifying partially visible content * Maintaining a seamless, professional experience for partners Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets
I have a user who is working on one of my projects on Workfront.She needs to be assigned 2 roles which have different internal rates start/end dates.Role 1 - Was already created in Workfront last year and is supposed to active only till 3rd June 2025Role 2 - The internal rate is different from role 1 and needs to be effective from 4th June 2025.This has to be done in such a way that does NOT affect all projects which the user was assigned to until 3rd June 2025. Please advise on how to do this? Thanks for your help in advance 🙂
The only fields we can currently show on a card at a glance without clicking into the card is Due Date, Estimation, Assignees, and Status. Is there any way to get around this? Plenty of software on the market enables you to customize this view so I'm curious to why Workfront doesn't offer this. Wondering if anyone in the community has any ideas or resolution for this?
HI All,I am trying to test this 'Retrieving a segment job result using API' from this link - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/segmentation/api/segment-jobs#retrieve-listI see multiple query params for the API. One of then is SORT. How is this Executed '[attributeName]:[desc]' ?. what is attribute name here? any attribute from the response?.let say I want to sort by updateTime from the output as I wanted I latest Job details. Will that be '[updateTime]:[desc]' or '[children.updateTime]:[desc]'Sample output without the sort functionality here/In link Neither is working. Let me know the correct format to use. Thanks in advance
It would be great to allow administrators to set specific and unique error pages when a login error happens. I have two types of users in my system. Those who authenticate with SSO and those who do not and use the mydomain.my.workfront.com/login page to log in directly and manage their password. Unfortunately, any user who errors out of SSO authentication bounces to that /login page which then causes an error loop for many users who do not realize that they can't log in through that page with their SSO credentials.It would be better if I could set a specific error page that directs them to help articles on how to resolve their SSO error and get to log in again rather than redirecting them to the /login page. But I need to keep that /login page as the error page for my users who do NOT use SSO. I need both options available because I have two separate use cases here.
I followed this link to access the GSK pro login and registration metrics. However, I see that the data only runs through December of 2024. Can we get this updated to reflect the available dates in 2025? I selected the This year option under DATE RANGES option but it only reflected data as recent as December of 2024. Leadership is asking for updates by Thursday morning (Eastern Standard Time) so any guidance would be helpful. Thanks!
Hi Team, We are using Optimizely as a CRO Tool but we have Adobe Analytics implemented on the website for tracking purpose. We have one CRO experiment and want to send its Original and Variant data in Adobe Analytics. I am using below code in Original and variant so that I can use the custom link item to identify the user behaviour of both original and variant in Adobe Analytics. if (window.s != undefined && typeof s.tl === "function") { s.tl(true, 'o', 'defaultOffersLayout');} else { console.warn('Adobe Analytics is not initialized: window.s is undefined');} So wanted to ask if I use this code on the load of original and variant experience, would be there any issue since custom links are used for click tracking but here we are using them for page load.
We are using SPA react based components. Need to track link clicks authored in RichText fields used in multiple components and push them to adobeDataLayer . Please advise, how to target and trigger those events
Hi there, I am launching an email campaign that requires some links to direct to a partners personal portal. I am using velocity scripts to populate this and am pulling in the partners ID through their person record and inserting that into the url. For some reason when I preview it in Marketo and click the link, it works, but when I send myself a test or an actual email send, it just goes to the login page and not the personal portal of the test record. I have attached some screenshots. It seems like the actual ID isn't rendering in the url when it's sent out? Does anyone know a workaround for this?
I'm trying to find a way to hide information from stakeholders that is only visible to the users of a project.For example, a status update to let my leader know the stakeholder isn't providing x and is blocking the project.What would be the best way for this? I also want to keep these updates for auditing purposes later on. Thanks
Hello community, I’m planning an implementation of Adobe Commerce on Edge Delivery Services and have some specific questions that I hope you can help clarify: Unsupported "drop-in" components : In the documentation, some components listed under "Commerce drop-in components" are not marked as supported. What approach does Adobe recommend for addressing these cases in a project? Is there a public roadmap detailing when support for these components is planned? If so, where can it be accessed? Storefront Services and Live Search: Is Live Search mandatory in Storefront Services? If Live Search is not implemented, what key functionalities would be lost or limited? Is it possible to use alternative solutions like OpenSearch to meet these needs? API Mesh for integrations: According to the note in the documentation, API Mesh for Adobe Developer App Builder allows aggregating multiple APIs. Is it feasible to implement thi
Our company is using AEM and it works great for Photoshop and InDesign, and great for storing assets for Illustrator, but if the illustrator file has links in it, I haven't figured out an easy way to link those assets. Before AEM, we had a server where all assets lived and links would not break if someone else opened your doc to edit it because we were all connected to that server. But with AEM, the links do not stay linked once you put the doc and the associated links on the DAM (we file linked assets in different "folders" than the actual illustrator/InDesign project docs). The only way I know to relink is this process, which is very convoluted and time consuming: Open the illustrator file that the co-worker createdWrite down the names of all the files that come up missing (because they all will if they have not been previously linked)Connect with the DAM desktop app (server)Go find asset #1 in the online DamGo back to your illustrator fileClick on asset #1Navigate to the folder
I wrote an article on LinkedIn about our experience with using AEM Edge Delivery Services. Do these still hold true? I think they do. I also might add a 6th consideration, which is DA Live (Document Authoring, fka Dark Alley). Link to the article: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/aem-edge-delivery-services-consider-5-things-raf-winterpacht-t6t2c/
EM jar version: 2025.7.21570.20250715T080514Z-250600I tried updating my AEM local instance to the latest jar version, downloaded it and renamed it to cq-quickstart.jar. Replaced the old jar file, deleted the crx-quickstart folder and run: java -jar cq-quickstart.jar Once it's done, I got this: I use IntelliJ and Docker, I stopped all running instance before I triggered the java -jar command.I tried checking the logs, but couldn't find anything that makes sense. Anyone experience the same? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.