Product Communities

Hi everyone,I’ve created some audiences in Adobe Target using the API and noticed they appear as type “Adobe Target Classic”, which means they can’t be edited in the UI.Before I proceed with creating the rest the same way, I wanted to check - do these API-created audiences have any other limitations besides being non-editable in the Target UI?Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hi All, Need help with a few clarifications. I have an AEM 6.5.21 on prem instance running on RHEL VM. TarMK is being used as the node store and File System Data Store for datastore. The datastore size currently is ~ 260GB.Under Operations dashboard I can see:Under Daily Maintenance Task (Runs from 02:00 – 05:00): I have Lucene Binaries Cleanup and Revision Clean Up. Both Tasks currently have a green checkmark displayed next to it with a message succeeded, which makes me believe they successfully ran.Under Weekly maintenance task (Runs every Saturday from 01:00 – 02:00):I can see Data Store Garbage collection has successfully run previous Saturday and is scheduled to run upcoming Saturday at 01:00:00 . When I open the configuration for DataStoreGarbageCollectionTask, I can see the checkbox for  granite.maintenance.mandatory is not selected.The Workflow Purge is successful and AuditLog Maintence (Failed) tasks are also present.Under the  SegmentNodeStoreService confi

Discover project trends like never before  Are you ready to take your project insights to the next level? We’re excited to announce the release of the Baseline Dashboard Blueprint to help you do it! This blueprint is your launchpad for smarter, faster project decisions with its streamlined dashboard containing four powerful reports.    Why are baselines a big deal?   Baselines are more than just a project snapshot—they’re your time machine for project management. Whether you capture them at kickoff or mid-flight, baselines empower you to compare what was planned vs. what’s happened, letting you spot problem tasks, scope creep, and project trends at a glance. Use the in-progress reports to proactively catch projects and tasks that need attention now. Dive into the completed reports to learn from past projects and fine-tune your future plans for smooth sailing next time. Each report is laser-focused to help you celebrate efficiencies or illuminate bottleneck

Hi everyone,I have set up a demo app and initialized AEP Assurance. While reviewing the Assurance event logs, no errors are reported. In the Push Debug panel, I can see that the client is successfully collecting the ECID and device token.However, I’m encountering some issues in the App Store Credentials & Configuration section, where it shows an App Configuration Error. Additionally, under the Profile section, it displays the message "Couldn't Detect Sandbox."Kindly help me understand what might be causing these errors? Is there something specific I need to check or configure related to App Store credentials or the sandbox environment? Any guidance or troubleshooting tips would be appreciated.Thanks in advance for your support!

Hi, I have a report with 3 level of OR statements. Example below.Field1_Mod=isnullname=Task 1name_Mod=cicontainsOR:1:Field1_Mod=isnullOR:1:name=Task 2OR:1:name_Mod=cicontainsOR:2:Field1_Mod=isnullOR:2:name=Task 3OR:2:name_Mod=cicontains But on Field 1, I want to do an additional check to exclude the task if FIeld 1 contains 0 in it.  So I modified the code as below:Field1_Mod=isnullAND:1:Field1_Mod=cinotcontainsAND:1:Field 1_=0name=Task 1name_Mod=cicontainsOR:1:Field1_Mod=isnullOR:1:name=Task 2OR:1:name_Mod=cicontainsOR:2:Field1_Mod=isnullOR:2:name=Task 3OR:2:name_Mod=cicontains The code works find for Task 1, but I want to apply the same logic for Task 2 and Task 3.  I am not sure how to write the same AND:1: code but for OR:1 and OR:2. Is that even possible? 

Introducing Adobe Experience Platform Agent Orchestrator Latest Updates  Customer experiences are evolving at a rapid pace, and static automation and rigid workflows are no longer enough to keep up. Practitioners need intelligent systems that can adapt, reason, and collaborate—expanding their team capacity and unlocking greater productivity and efficiency gains. That’s where Adobe Experience Platform Agent Orchestrator, the new agentic layer in Adobe Experience Platform, comes in. Designed to leverage the platform's rich data and customer knowledge, Experience Platform Agent Orchestrator powers the intelligence and reasoning behind expert Adobe Experience Platform Agents, enabling them to execute complex decision-making and problem-solving tasks at speed and scale — all with human oversight.   We’re excited to announce two major updates that make Experience Platform Agent Orchestrator even more powerful:  A next gen conversational interface designed for new and imp

Hi all, Wondering how Journey Canvas or Fallout visualization treats journeys with touchpoints that have the same timestamp? There is a use case to understand how many people open, click/unsubscribe after an email is sent, but the email events are timestamped to the disposition date--meaning each sent, open and click action (when it happens on the same day) has the exact same timestamp. When using these disposition elements in a Freeform table to count People or Events etc., the numbers are accurate and match the dataset; but when I try to build out a journey in Canvas or Fallout, the numbers on the sequential touchpoints after the starting point (e.g. Sent) are slightly off (oftentimes less) than the freeform table. I presume it's because it cannot consistently interpret one disposition after the other because they have the same timestamp, but wondering if there's any other ideas. Why is that, and wondering if there are any workarounds other than altering the dataset's times

Rename/Move an AEM Asset programmatically and Update References  by Aanchal Sikka   Overview Renaming or moving assets in AEM while keeping all references intact is a common challenge for developers. Basic APIs like AssetManager.moveAsset() can rename or relocate assets but do not update references across your site, often leading to broken links. This blog breaks down two approaches: Using AssetManager.moveAsset() for simple moves without reference updates. Alternate way with CopyMoveCommandBuilder, which renames assets and automatically updates all references, ensuring content consistency. The blog includes sample servlet code demonstrating how to implement the CopyMoveCommandBuilder approach.  Link to blog: https://techrevel.blog/2025/10/07/rename-move-an-aem-asset-programmatically-and-update-references/    Q&A Please use this thread to ask questions relating to this article

Use this thread to ask any questions related to the Implement Adobe Experience Cloud in mobile apps  tutorial on Experience League. Experts are monitoring this thread to ensure your questions are answered.

Is it possible to utilize the replication agents or a similar mechanism from an author instance to distribute content to an S3 bucket?  I don't intend to use S3 for the entire instance's datastore, I only need certain content directories.  My desire is to have a push mechanism in place rather than a side loaded script that will export data from my AEM instance and then push to downstream to S3.   Apologies for the vague nature of my query as I can only provide so much information due to the sensitive nature of the project.   Additional info : 6.5 SP18 On premise installation on RHEL

Hi All,We have written a small web application that displays a list of URLs on a single page.Our Web Development team loads the Page of URLs to Workfront as an Interactive Proof, to share a Project's Dev page URLs to internal reviewers/approvers.The reviewers/approvers sign-in to display the Page of URLs with session data stored in a persistent cookie.When the Interactive Proof of the Page of URLs is opened in the Desktop Proof Viewer, the reviewers/approvers are forced to sign-in every time as the Desktop Proof Viewer does not appear to have persistent cookies. QUESTION: Can the Desktop Proof Viewer be setup to have persistent cookies across sessions of Interactive Proofs?

Hello,I have a test workflow written in aem where i need to get the Assetwhere the java test case is written as:  import javax.jcr.RepositoryException;import org.apache.sling.api.resource.Resource;import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ExtendWith;import org.mockito.Mock;import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension; //import com.day.cq.dam.api.Asset;  //if i am using this import then its working fineimport com.adobe.granite.asset.api.Asset;  //but i want for this importimport com.adobe.granite.workflow.WorkflowException;import io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.junit5.*;@ExtendWith({ AemContextExtension.class, MockitoExtension.class })class ExampleTest{    AemContext aemContext = new AemContext();    @Mock    Resource resource;    @BeforeEach    void setup() throws Exception    {        aemContext.load().json("com/ex

I'm experiencing an issue with the Image Map editor in AEM as a Cloud Service DAM and would appreciate any insights.Is there a way for adding WebP support to the image map editor?Issue Description:Image maps are working correctly for JPEG images - the editor opens and allows me to create/edit image mapsFor WebP images, I receive the message: "Editing is not supported for this type of assets"The image map editor does not appear for WebP format  What I've Tried:Verified that WebP images display correctly in DAMConfirmed JPEG/PNG images work fine with image map editorEnvironment:AEM as a Cloud ServiceUsing DAM Asset Editor

Hi All, We are on AEM as Cloud Service and we are using CIF to connect to commerce.While authoring the products/categories, AEM is making an "IntrospectionQuery" call to commerce. This call gets the response but AEM is not making any more subsequent calls to fetch the products/category. Because of which, we are unable to author the products. Can you please help in what can be the possibility of this. NOTE: When we connect to different commerce instance, AEM is able to proceed further to product/category selection. On comparing, there are few field difference. Does the response of "IntrospectionQuery" need to have any specific field defined to proceed further or is there any limit on the response size.

Hi Team,We’re currently implementing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) in our web application, and we’ve encountered an issue where Adobe Analytics scripts are being blocked unless we add 'unsafe-eval' to the script-src directive.However, our security guidelines specifically aim to avoid 'unsafe-eval', so this is not a viable option for us.at.js 2.11.6

I have created test profiles in AJO but was unable to use them in my audience set configuration. what could be the reason for this? Though i am using correct field names while configuring the audience set.   

Need help to write a Report to capture duration (planned v actual) from project start to a specific task name that contains "Design Lock".The task "design lock" is used in all projects, but it's used in different templates has different predecessors.I assume I would run a Task report, but can't find a way to capture a task name, or part of a name.I need to report on planned vs. actual durations from the start of the project to the design lock task.And then if the project is cancelled prior to Design Lock, I would report the actual days completed instead of returning an error.I am new to reports so any help is appreciated. 

Hi team, I'd like to know if there's a successful use case for an AJO B2B journey and buying groups. Official doc does not show any use case and I'd like to understand better how can I leverage the journeys in B2B for specific Buying Groups. Thanks.

Bonjour à tous, Je suis consultante digital , j'ai déjà utilisé par le passé Adobe campaign v6 pour paramétrer des trigger et emails commerciaux mais cela date de plusieurs années, j'avais appris sur le tas.Je suis à la recherche d'une formation en ligne de 2 jours pour me remettre dans le bain de l'outils afin d'être opérationnelle pour toute demande d'un éventuel client.est-ce que quelqu'un de la communauté peut m'aider ? Merci 

Hi Team, I’m currently working on an implementation to enhance the Asset Timeline displayed in AEM’s assetdetails.html view.The goal is to make the Timeline more informative, To extend the AEM Asset Timeline so that for each key asset action, it displays:1. User ID – who performed the action2. Timestamp – when the action occurred3. Comment/Remarks – associated workflow or operation comment4. Action Type – e.g. Submitted, Published, Approved, Archived, Workflow Retriggered  Example expected behavior:Action Fields to Display in TimelineAsset Submitted User ID, Date, CommentAsset Published User ID, Date, CommentEdit Approved User ID, Date, CommentDynamic Media Custom Workflow Retriggered User ID, Date, CommentArchived User ID, Date, CommentIf anyone had worked in enhancing the timeline need your guidance on :  1. What’s the recommended or best-practice approach to extend or customize the Asset Timeline in AEM 6.5? • For example, should it be customized via th

Dear Team  We are in process to implement ML & AI powered capabilities in Adobe target. (Auto-targeting, Auto - allocation, Automated personalization.  I am looking for guidance on the same. Looking for webinar recording, Tutorial,  documentation guide needed Any help regarding above will be much appreciated  Thanks 

Hi Team, I want to upload a lot of folders with many images into AEM DAM. Thanks,Syed Peer Vali Shaik.a

Hello,  We bill our clients monthly by using Fusion to sum the planned revenue of all tasks completed in the previous month (with some other criteria). The scenario then adds '666' story points to those tasks which essentially says they have been 'billed' so they don't then bill again the next month. This was set up when my company first moved over to Workfront.A few months ago I noticed some projects weren't billing correctly and it seems that tasks that have previously been billed (and therefore have '666' story points assigned) are being copied within projects, and so weren't billing again when they needed to. We've communicated this out to our users asking them to not copy tasks, but it still seems that this is happening each month. I have a report that I review each month that shows me the tasks that have '666' and were completed in the relevant previous month (and therefore shouldn't have '666' on them), but there is the chance that the tasks have been completed, b