Adobe Workfront

Will the current workflow of proofs (making mark-ups, sending for approvals, etc.) be discontinued and the new workflow of the document approvals be the new process soon? We really use proof approvals because it's the best process for us instead of one-off approvals. Thanks so much!

We track the number of projects for KPI. Is there a way to filter for when a project status is changed to complete  so we know the date that was done.

I would find a great deal of value in a webinar/Q&A session with Adobe Product Managers tailored to understanding the pivot from the standard Proofing experience to the Unified Approvals experience. Seems to be a wide range of considerations and no hard deadlines on some required changes, but documentation seems “thin” and some of these changes need measurable documentation and process re-training in my organization. There is even documentation on how to use Unified Approvals and Proofing together https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/review-and-approve-work/document-reviews-and-approvals/manage-asset-review-and-approval/doc-approvals-and-proofing but not much that speaks to when existing Proofing functionality would be phased out completely. Can this type of information event be prioritized by the Workfront team? 

Wondering if anyone has found a way / best practices to tie in the data from the Planning Record types to the Cards on Kanban boards.Would be great to configure Boards by Workspace, ability to see the name of the Campaign Or Initiative the task is related for starters. 

Thanks to everyone who joined today’s workshop, Your Workfront Success Toolkit: Resources to Accelerate Adoption, to learn about the people, platforms, and tools available to support you in your journey with Workfront! We realize this may have been a firehose of information, but hopefully you were enabled with at least one new resource you can take advantage of today!  Highlights of the workshop included:Experience League for on-demand training, documentation, release notes, and community engagement through discussion groups, AMAs, and product idea submissions. Adobe teams are available to assist you from Customer Support and Account Teams to Customer Success, Adoption Marketing, and Professional Services.  Advocacy programs to share your expertise with others like Community Advisors, Workfront Champion Program, Experience Makers Awards, and Workfront User Groups.  The value of attending Adobe Workfront events, user groups, and Summit for networking and peer-to-peer collaboration.  Dow

Hi WF Community!I’m looking to add red highlighting to values in a project’s task list, under the Planned Completion Date column, when the date is less than $$NOW and the task’s Status is not equal to “Complete”. I was working with leftmethod in text mode on the Planned Completion Date column, but still not getting the result I need.  Here’s my text mode: displayname=Planned Completion Datelinkedname=directnamekey=plannedCompletionDatequerysort=plannedCompletionDatetextmode=truevaluefield=plannedCompletionDatevalueformat=atDatestyledef.case.0.comparison.icon=falsestyledef.case.0.comparison.leftmethod=AND(({plannedCompletionDate}<$$NOW),({status}!=”CPL”))styledef.case.0.comparison.lefttext=truestyledef.case.0.comparison.operator=equalstyledef.case.0.comparison.operatortype=stringstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.name=bgcolorstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.value=eac6c9styledef.case.0.comparison.truetext= Anyone know where I might be going astray?  Thanks!Nick

It is just me or do the log files seem to be even slower to process and post? I am looking at a history screen with 9 runs that have yet to process the history - all of them are at least 15 mins old. Makes it hard to diagnosis issues... just sayin

I want to recreate a production scenario in sandbox for some changes and testing. I imported the production json into a new scenario with sandbox connections, removed the production scenario custom webhook and added a new custom webhook for the sandbox connection scenario. The new webhook is activated but errored out on the first send since the request ID and all other data wasn’t received.The production webhook is triggered by new, unconverted request creation and creates old and new state data fields. Many of the webhook data fields are used throughout the scenario. When I create a new unconverted request in sandbox, the new scenario doesn’t run through the webhook. I know I’m missing something here, but can’t figure this out. Thanks for any help with this.

Grok and I have been trying to crack this nut for an hour now. (I asked the AI Assistant and….let’s just say there were many 👎🏻s) Figured I’d ask the hive mind and--if I figure it out before anyone else does--I’ll post it here for everyone else.The ask: I want to be able to determine the ID of an approval attached to an issue. The only pieces of data I have are the approvalProcessID (which I know because I have Fusion apply an approval process to these issues) and currentApprovalStepID. No matter what I do with that currentApprovalStepID, I just cannot get to the approval. If I try to use that to search for the APPROVAL object, I get a 400. If I try searching via the ARVSTP object, I get scolded that it’s “...not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal”There has to be something that both Grok and I are missing here. Any thoughts?

Here record count for bottom x axis is default name or we can change this ( no of projects) by any method. 

One of our teams would like have their task start and end dates update based on the predecessor task completion. If the predecessor task is completed late, they’d like to see the start and end dates for their task update to reflect the completion date of the predecessor task so that they can prioritize their tasks accordingly. For example, if the predecessor task is due 2/9 but not completed until 2/11, they’d like the start date of their task to be 2/12 instead of 2/10 (when the task constraint is “As Soon as Possible”). This would not be a universal rule but only applied to specific template tasks and/or for specific teams based on the way that they work. They do have a report that sorts tasks by Handoff Date, but this does not fully meet their needs.

Verifying On-Time Delivery logic in Workfront: same-day date comparisonsWe are implementing an On-Time Delivery KPI where work is considered on time if the Actual Completion Date is the same day or earlier than the Planned Completion Date.However, even when both dates appear as the same day in the UI (with different times), comparisons using <=, DATE(), DATEDIFF(), and DATENOTIME() sometimes return late.Is this expected due to Workfront storing DateTime values in UTC?What is the officially recommended approach for calendar-day-based SLAs in Workfront?What is the way to compare only date without time ?

I need to see a report of Tasks and Requests that do not have hours logged by every assignee on each task/request so that we can see what Tasks/Requests are missing hours for which assignees.There’s a thread here that identifies a way for an individual user to see their own Tasks that have not been assigned hours, but I can’t seem to find anything that shows how to see multiple users who do not have assigned hours. Any advice is appreciated.