no, if it's a program report it would be more like   isActive=trueisActive_Mod=eqEXISTS:a:$$OBJCODE=PROJEXISTS:a:programID=FIELD:IDEXISTS:a:$$EXISTSMOD=NOTEXISTS   Lines 1 and 2 -- program is active Line 3 -- always required -- what are you looking for (projects) Line 4 -- always required -- a linki...

this question pops up from time to time, and there's not really a good solve for it at the moment. The solution tends to be like the one in this old post: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/highlighting-duplicate-values-in-a-report-column/m-p/747451#M67526   (group ...

hey Jon,   I know there are a few admins out there who have recently mentioned inheriting an instance so I think it's a great time to revisit this type of question with a new crowd.   I'm wondering if you can also share what knowledge base currently exists there (if any). It's ok if there's nothing ...

you can add to your filter. It doesn’t have to be just one thing. In addition to the edit, maybe you filter on the new text value as well, or the object scope? If you have these columns in your report you can see how they’re getting filled in?

there are four different types of issues--issue, bug, change order and request. Is it possible that you can work around this by just making your request queue issues "request" type, and make your project issues "issue" type?   Other ways of doing this that don't involve issue types are to indicate w...

I encourage you to keep going with the journal entry report!   1) You will find it easier if you test your report in the preview sandbox as nothing much should be happening there. Your initial filter is as simple as "entry date is today" (or if you've been in the sandbox for a few minutes, maybe loo...

I'd start with this link for your syntax. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/reporting/reports/calculated-custom-data/calculated-data-expressions   For example the ISBLANK syntax is "ISBLANK(value)" -- it's not "ISBLANK(value, value2, value3, and so on)"   Because I hate buil...

haha I hear ya. I think you should think about other dates that might serve the same purpose. Have you looked into using the current task's handoff date? I feel like the handoff date is the date it was handed off from the predecessors, and that would keep you on task without looking upstream into co...

that isn't possible at this time. 

I don't know that there's a way to do that. We usually get around it by converting the ppt to a pdf.