This article should have what you need. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/reporting/reports/custom-view-samples/view-expanded-user-details

you'd pull in secondary roles using a collection. You can see in the API explorer in the collection tab, a collection of userRoles and when you click into that you can see the roleID in the userRole object. In your filter, it might look something like this:   userRoles:roleID=X userRoles:roleID_Mod=...

If you have fusion, you should go the fusion route. It would be better for the stakeholder and less work for you (since you seem to have to do it regularly).    Your other (easier) option is to just release them into the preview sandbox as a group admin or something, and make them go through it via ...

You can't group by a collection. If that is important to you, you should probably just include a custom field on the project's custom form to indicate who the project manager is. if this equates to the project's owner, you can definitely group by that field.   If there are supposed to be multiple pr...

sometimes when people say "project manager" what they really mean is the project owner. However, since you've given me the text mode you're using, I'll just mention that since you are on a task level report and not a project level report, you would need to add one extra word (and a period) to your l...

I submitted a similar ticket for tasks earlier today -- so it's definitely affecting others.

I'm not sure if I can word this clearly enough but I'll try, LOL.   The only thing that I can see that has a "hasNotes" field that is remotely close, is the Document itself. This means it would only work for the first version and if you stack a new file version on top, it would still show that it "h...

I don't think you'll be able to get a total of a subset of hours from tasks. Would you be open to switching to an hours report instead and grouping by task?

I just ran a quick test in workfront by typing in an update on the project updates section, then, clicking to the project's program, then using my browser's back button to get back to the project updates page. I also just tried refreshing the updates page (F5 the browser page). During both those act...

For condition -- I think there's always going to be a case for both. I've seen the majority of customers report this manually and only a minority are willing to allow Workfront to automate the decision.   The tipping point is always a combination of customers who: * use their failing timelines as a ...