no, don't go that way (with the OR:1) -- that never works.   Calculated fields and valueexpressions have a lot in common, so I would use this link here: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/reporting/reports/calculated-custom-data/calculated-data-expressions   I haven't tried b...

This column is calling up the issue's queue topic name. Projects don't have queue topic names, unless they have been converted from an issue. So if that's what you're asking, it would be the converted issue's queue topic name, or convertedOpTask:queueTopic:name (I usually just put "convertedOpTask:"...

if the project owner could work, just type in project owner name when you get to adding the grouping, and it should come right up if you are on a task report.

This article should have what you need. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/reporting/reports/custom-view-samples/view-expanded-user-details

you'd pull in secondary roles using a collection. You can see in the API explorer in the collection tab, a collection of userRoles and when you click into that you can see the roleID in the userRole object. In your filter, it might look something like this:   userRoles:roleID=X userRoles:roleID_Mod=...

If you have fusion, you should go the fusion route. It would be better for the stakeholder and less work for you (since you seem to have to do it regularly).    Your other (easier) option is to just release them into the preview sandbox as a group admin or something, and make them go through it via ...

You can't group by a collection. If that is important to you, you should probably just include a custom field on the project's custom form to indicate who the project manager is. if this equates to the project's owner, you can definitely group by that field.   If there are supposed to be multiple pr...

sometimes when people say "project manager" what they really mean is the project owner. However, since you've given me the text mode you're using, I'll just mention that since you are on a task level report and not a project level report, you would need to add one extra word (and a period) to your l...

I'm not sure if I can word this clearly enough but I'll try, LOL.   The only thing that I can see that has a "hasNotes" field that is remotely close, is the Document itself. This means it would only work for the first version and if you stack a new file version on top, it would still show that it "h...

I don't think you'll be able to get a total of a subset of hours from tasks. Would you be open to switching to an hours report instead and grouping by task?