Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
In our organization, each business unit (BU) has its own portfolio. Within these portfolios, programs are organized and aligned to the respective BU. However, is there a solution for a program to span across multiple BUs—essentially, for a single program to be associated with more than one portfolio?
Hello,I have a question regarding Content Fragment permissions in AEM as a Cloud Service.A user can publish Content Fragments from the Assets console, but when opening the Content Fragment Editor, the Publish button is not visible.The user currently has: jcr:all on /content/site jcr:all on /content/dam/site Membership in groups such as Authors, Contributors, and AEM Sites Content Managers (author). The user can edit and save the fragment without issues.Is there any additional permission or group required for the Publish button to appear in the Content Fragment Editor (for example jcr:replicate or workflow permissions)?Thank you for your help.
In the past few months I noticed more maintenance updates for AEM Experience Cloud. What I also noticed and I see as a problem is that more and more maintenance updates are not being scheduled and appear out of nowhere. Example is of the maintenance release from today. Why is this problem?When the maintenance release happens, we noticed issues with deployment pipelines. Deployment either fails compeletly after running for over 1h30 mins, or gets stuck for over an hour This is becoming serious problem for us because if we have important release to be done, this impacts our release capabilities. I see here two issuesScheduling Maintenance release mid day More serious one, which is maintenance release mid day, out of nowhereI want to understand why this is becoming standard? Are there any plans to improve release process from Adobe side?
Hi everyone,Hoping someone can help me out here. I’ve been tasked to figure out how to create a multi-stage proofing workflow but if an approver in stage 1 rejects the proof, stage 2 and any subsequent stages will not be activated. I’ve tested this and it does not seem to work. In my stage 2, I’ve made sure to select “All decisions are Approved or Approved with changes on parent stage” in order to activate Stage 2. I had one approver reject and one approver approve in stage 1 and stage 2 was still activated. I had also tested using “All decisions are Approved on parent stage” to see if that would work but it did not. Stage 2 was still activated even when 1 approver rejects…. Any tips on what went wrong or how this should be set up differently? Any insights would be appreciated!Thanks!
We deal with students coming into our chat and like to “prank” us. Is there a way to block them from chatting back in besides taking them as a oneoff and adding them to a smart list. Also is there a way to upload canned responses that our agents can quickly select when they are in a conversation?
Add the ability to store Internal Link Click information on main domain level.AppMeasurement Activity map uses a cookie(s_sq) set on main domain level to store information about the click from previous page, page name, link, region. The corresponding feature with WebSDK, Internal Link Click, only offers to set this information in either local storage or session storage, both stores data on subdomain level. Result is that Internal Link Click tracking doesn't work across subdomains. If your site holds e.g. www.website.com and secure.website.com Internal Link Click tracking won't work across.Would be ideal to be able to use a cookie for Internal Link Click tracking with WebSDK too. Sending Internal Link Clicks immeadiately and not use a grouping would duplicate the server calls and not an option.
Hello,We are new to the web channel and have only started exploring using it within campaigns and journeys. When I tried to set up an experiment in the web action, I saw that the success metrics look a bit off:Are these really the options for web success metrics? Or is this potentially a configuration problem?
If we have duplicate email address but the title is different in the Marketo while the name is same and email address too is same so does this having any affect in Marketo or we can use. Please suggest.
Hello,Can you confirm?Connection Method: Adobe I/O API integration using OAuth 2.0 authentication Data Synchronization: Real-time push with 15-minute batch fallback for reliability Error Handling: Three retry attempts with exponential backoff (1min, 3min, 9min) Performance Requirements: <3 second response time for asset linking, 99.5% uptime
Use this thread to ask any questions related to the Experience League LIVE session titled, "Adobe Experience Platform Agents for Improved Marketing Efficiency and Better Business outcomes." Experts are monitoring this thread to ensure your questions are answered. Thanks and we hope to hear from you!
Include thh Adobe consulting plugin Get previous value as part of the default Adobe product and also make it work across subdomains as this now only works isolated per subdomain. Get previous value is setting information in a cookie e.g. Previous Page Name, but does so on a subdomain level which makes the previous page name to not work properly across subdomains e.g. www.website.com and secure.website.com
hi folks, I had to write a link rewriter but I get the above warning with it. So the jist is, I stored the resource Resolver in the init() and use it in the startElement() I don’t know any other way of doing a link rewriter except this :-)Any suggestions welcome.thanksFIoa @Component( label = "External Link Transformer Factory", description = "Rewrites external links by ...")@Service(value = TransformerFactory.class)public class ExternalLinkTransformerFactory implements TransformerFactory { @Property(value = "extlink", propertyPrivate = true) private static final String PROPERTY_PIPELINE_TYPE = "pipeline.type"; @Override public Transformer createTransformer() { return new ExternalLinkTransformer(); } private ResourceResolver resourceResolver; private class ExternalLinkTransformer implements Transformer { private static final String TAG_ANCHOR = "a"; private static final String ATTR_HREF = "href"; private ContentHandle
Hi! I created a query audience in an effort to test out the EXCEPT logical operator. I never have issues with adding or changing the AND or OR operators. However, when I add the EXCEPT, I can’t seem to figure out how to undo it and change it to a different operator again. Would love if someone could share how to switch it back, if at all possible. Thanks!
I am trying to create a dashboard for a director who wants to see not only the info of those she manages, but also the ones below her. For example:Director manages A and B. A manages person 1 and person 2. B manages person 3 and person 4.The director wants to see info about A, B, as well as person 1, 2, 3, and 4.Right now, I am only able to see those she manages directly, using the User > Manager ID = $$USER.ID.I would also like this report to be use-able with other directors down the line.Is there a way to show in reports (both reports and calendar reports) not only her direct manages, but those below?It might be a common need so if there’s a plethora of existing resources for this, please let me know!Thank you!
Description - Update the dimension operator in Annotations from AND to OR. Why is this feature important to you - Currently, if an annotation includes multiple dimensions, it only appears on a Workspace dashboard when all of those dimensions are present. If the dashboard contains only one of the specified dimensions, the annotation won’t be visible.For example, if I create an annotation using both eVar1 and eVar25, I must include both in the dashboard for the annotation to appear. To work around this, I have to create separate annotations for each dimension. How would you like the feature to work - Change the annotation logic so that it uses the OR operator. This way, the annotation will appear if any of the specified dimensions are present in the dashboard. Current Behaviour - Annotations use the AND operator, requiring all listed dimensions to be present for the annotation to display.
Workfront Administrators should be granted system permissions that allow them to configure, control, and govern notification behavior across the Workfront domain for their system users. This would help to ensure consistent system communication, reduce notification fatigue, and support enterprise standards for how and when users are informed of Workfront activity.
Anybody know why a job from 2024 is showing up suddenly on my CMO’s approval list? To solve the mystery, I checked the filters in our Pending Approval Requests by Due Date report and would love to know how to exclude non-current proof versions. Thank you!Jenny Williams
Anyone else notices that proportional column resizing is not working in the last day or too? Dragging the left hand column of a table used to resize all columns equally but this isn’t happing at the moment and now I’m having to resize each column separately. Is this a bug?
SUMMARY FOR WORKFRONT FUSION detailed Observability requirements.We are working on offloading the Workfront Fusion logs to Splunk and have explored the recently shared Workfront fusion activity log api . Below are the enhancements we are looking to get from Workfront Fusion platform._______________________________________________________________________1.Fetching Notification Logs (Execution State/Errors/history)• Currently Fusion maintains execution logs for each scenario, and you can view these logs in the Fusion UI under the scenario’s execution history.• Enhancement: Is there a way to fetch notification logs or see where they are stored (e.g., scenario stopped, execution errors)?________________________________________2. Enhanced Message Field for Module Actions (Create/Delete/Modify/etc.)• Currently, Fusion logs actions such as module creation, deletion, and modification, but the log messages are not highly descriptive about the specific changes made.• Enhancement: Is
I have a license to Adobe Acrobat on the web. I have an existing PDF and want to add fillable fields with copying information among the fields. What license / app / software do I need? How to get started?
Is it possible to retain the original intra-project ID on a Request that has been routed to a Request queue?We have Requests that are intra-project Requests. These Requests route to a certain Request Queue. We want to find a way using a calculated field or use Fusion to determine the Project that this Request originated from. When we use a calculated field or use Fusion, the Project info for the Request is always showing the Request Queue that the Request has been routed to.Please advise.
Hi, I am having a field which is present in the Union schema and it has values for a number of records. I can see it all right in the profile:Profile/Browsein Union Schema:Union SchemaBut if I run this query on the profile snapshot:SELECT to_json(_myTenantName)FROM profile_snapshot_export_66aefd28_7113_489a_a40f_b7fa9efe34e5 AS pWHERE p._deloittellpcanada.partyIdentifier.CID= '111613'I get this - no SuppressionID_List:Any idea why is that and how can I get all fields into the Profile Snapshot?
Hi Adobe community, Greetings!@_Manoj_Kumar_ @nnakirikanti @dhanesh04s @an1989 @renatoz28 @brekrut @ccg1706 @somen-sarkar @saswataghosh @NickMannion I had a doubt regarding a segment. The requirement was to build a segment of – “Investors who bounced from the website i.e., made no hits after the initial page view” preferably in last 90 days. And to verify this we know that Bounce rate is about 56% of the page view traffic. For this I went through two approaches –Approach A - – Building a sequential audience where the first rule will determine Investors who have had a page view and then did not have any link click value/event. This sequence would happen in Last 90 days. Approach B – - Building two audiences where 1st audience will be Investors who have had a page view event/value in last 90 days. - 2nd Audience will be Investors who have had a page view followed by having a link click event/value in last 90 days (Sequential Segment). - 3rd Audience contains above two audiences
Hi all, How is “HTML caching” different from “Aggressive HTML caching”?For me, HTML caching or for that matter any caching should be done as long as possible for performance. How differently are these two achieved in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)? Both use Dispatcher and CDN? Probably not for just “HTML caching”.What configurations are done where for these two? Also is there a difference between achieving these two in AEM On Prem and AEMCS? Appreciate all your responses. Thanks,RK.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.