Product Communities

Does anyone know how to view analytics calls from a mobile device to see variables flowing into Adobe. 

Can anyone give a recommendation for how to display planned vs. actual hours variance in a chart format? It needs to be a simple visual as the final chart/report will need to be shared with leadership. Right now, the planned hours formatting is showing as crazy high because of the way the system calculates. See attached screenshot.Any advice?

We are working in a headless setup and i am trying to stay away from writing any custom JS functions for form field validations due to security reasons.For a simple rule example, prevent a Name field from accepting any special chars, i am unable to accomplish this entirely with rule editor. Tried many combinations and none worked. Have few similar use cases, where i need to use rule editor. i tried using “contains” but unable to find a way to concat multiple special chars.Any rule that i can pass a regex to validate, example Account Number (custom xx-xxxxxx). In foundation, we used to have a way to pass Regex. In core, i only see few OOTB example SSN, Phone number, Email, Zip etc. 

Hi team, We recently had a member of our team change her last name and she is now unable to create a proof out of documents uploaded in Workfront. She recieves the following error message, “Failed to generate proof - Unable to log into ProofHQ.” When I checked her proof profile I noticed her proof user type is now listed “guest.” Is there a way to edit the proof user type or has anyone found a solution to this issue?Note: We do utilize SSO, and the name change has been made to our directory.Best,E

Reaching out to the community to see if anyone has successfully automated the process of adding and deactivating users in Workfront, particularly when using Fusion alongside the Admin Console. We’re trying to understand what’s possible, what limitations exist, and any potential pitfalls to watch out for. If you’ve implemented this, did you require a developer, or were you able to accomplish it as a system admin? Did you partner with Adobe Consulting Services, or build it internally? Any tips, lessons learned, or best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

I have enabled the “add an alternative path in case of timeout or error” option for an email action in an event-based journey.When I triggered an event, one profile entered the email action. Due to an error (the email address was missing in the event payload), the profile moved to the alternate path (timeout/error path).However, I’m confused about the statistics shown on the End node:Entered: 2 Error: 1Since only one profile went through the email action, shouldn’t the Entered count in the End node be 1?Also, since the alternative path is enabled, the email action itself does not show any error count, and instead, the profile continues via the alternate path. The End node then shows Error: 1.Can you please confirm if my understanding is correct?  

SharePoint Integration with Adobe Workfront 🔍 ScenarioOur organization recently integrated Microsoft SharePoint with Adobe Workfront to streamline document management and project collaboration.During implementation, a key question came up:👉 If one user configures the SharePoint integration using their Microsoft account, will all other users automatically be able to use it?🧠 What We ObservedAfter testing the integration, we identified the following behavior: The SharePoint integration in Workfront is user-based (OAuth authentication) Each user must individually log in to their SharePoint account when accessing the integration Permissions are delegated per user, not shared globally ⚠️ Key Challenges Multiple User Logins Required Every user must authenticate separately with their Microsoft account. Approval Prompts Some users encounter an “Approval Required” screen depending on organizational Microsoft policies. Access Dependency Users can only access SharePoint files and folde

Are you heading to Adobe Summit in Las Vegas next week? A little prep goes a long way in helping you stay comfortable, organized, and ready to make the most of packed sessions and networking opportunities.  Here’s a list of things you won’t want to forget when packing: Dress in business-casual layers, conference rooms can vary widely in temperature  Pack sneakers or a pair of comfy shoes; you’ll be walking more than you think (expect 10,000+ steps a day) Bring a portable charger to keep your devices powered all day  Pack a reusable water bottle to stay hydrated and some chapstick for your lips  Carry a small tote or backpack for swag and daily essentials (like snacks!)   Have digital or physical business cards ready for networking  Toss in a light jacket or sweater for cooler evenings outdoors  We’re not saying you have to wear orange, but this is a great way to show your Workfront pride!  Once you’re onsite, a few simple reminders can help you navigate the event smoothly and make the

Hi everyone,I’m looking to connect pCon.login (by EasternGraphics) with Marketo Engage to automate lead flow and tracking. For those unfamiliar, pCon is a leading ecosystem in the interior design and furniture industry for 3D configuration and OFML data distribution (pCon.update).I would like to know: Has anyone attempted this integration before? If so, did you build it internally (API-to-API) or did you have to rely on middleware (like Zapier or Make)? We are trying to understand the best architectural approach to capture leads from pCon.update subscriptions and pCon.cloud configurations without adding unnecessary layers.Any insights or experiences would be highly appreciated!

I am semi-new to Fusion and have built very simple scenarios of assigning individual assets to specific owners and while that is going well, this set up doesn't account for current workload, priorities or time-off. I was wondering if there is a way to pull in the Workload Balancer from Workfront into the Fusion scenarios to round-robin assign the incoming work based on workload vs. auto-assigning to one individual? 

Hi,​@Dan_Stevens_ I was browsing about custom activity setup and came across your comment here Could you share the code you used in the landing page for tracking custom activity for Brightcove video views? I’m trying to do something similar for Vimeo, but my code isn’t working. 1. I do not see anything in the activity history other than the option to filter custom activity “Watched Vimeo Video”2. Chatgpt said “Cross‑Domain / Hostname Mismatch in Marketo Tracking” is the issue. Does this affect a Marketo landing page if the video is embedded there?3. I see console logs firing, but there’s no “/munchkin/customActivity” showing in DevTools → Network.Also, Is my setup, fields, and API names correct? ​​​​​​​Anyone experienced in using Vimeo and tracking Analytics in Marketo, please share your insights and best practices. Thank you! 

Hi All , i have field named as ‘good data’ in schema with boolean type as 0 and 1 . I have few records in schema with key as “@abc”.there are cases where 2 records are present on same key with good data field values as 0{No}and 1{Yes} rest all field values are same. Now when i get new data file if record doesnot exist it should insert record with all field values(n number of fields)  passing in file and update good data field values as YES. and if record exist it should only update record in schema with good value as YES. It should not make any update changes to record with NO value.  As we are prioritizing record with YES value only in workflow targeting.  How i can implement this in single update activity

Can someone point me to documentation on the “Summarize” options in reports?When creating a chart in a Workfront report, the user is required to select an option for “Summarized By”. In most cases there are two choices: Minimum and Maximum. What do these mean and how are they different? What other options exist and what are their meanings? I’ve see Count, Sum, and Average on column settings as well. I haven’t been able to find anything in the Workfront documentation.

Hi everyone! I’m Dr. Margareth Legaspi, and I’ve spent over two decades working in education at both the local and state levels. I’m excited to be attending Adobe Summit for the first time and am looking forward to learning more about Adobe’s products and initiatives, especially those impacting the education space.If there are other education leaders attending, I’d love to connect, exchange ideas, and hear about your experiences. Looking forward to a great conference! 

I’ve been reflecting on how campaign execution has evolved in Adobe Marketo Engage — workflows are becoming more complex with advanced segmentation, dynamic content, and multi-step engagement programs.However, QA processes often still rely heavily on manual validation, checklists, and last-minute reviews.This makes me wonder:Are we underestimating the risk of QA gaps in campaign execution? How confident are teams in catching issues before launch (especially at scale)? Does manual QA still hold up for more complex engagement programs? How do you balance speed vs reliability in your campaign releases?We have built a solution that could reduce manual efforts and ensure quality campaigns. But before that just trying to understand how others in the ecosystem are approaching this and whether this is a growing concern.Would love to hear your thoughts and experiences.

In our SPA, we observed a specific behavior of Target activities: Even with renderDecisioning=false, some activities continued to trigger. The activities are present but not rendered. Since this is a SPA and there is no page refresh, in the subsequent Rule Page View we could not find the activities with the key expected by Target. Important: before user login, there were no Rule Page Views. Activities were therefore only processed after login, and everything worked correctly in that phase. Implemented SolutionTo properly handle the SPA flow without page refresh, the following was implemented: In the Rule Page View, after login, a custom code was added to handle view changes:   function onViewChange() {   var viewName = window.location.pathname || 'viewNamePage';   if (viewName.startsWith('/')) {     viewName = viewName.substring(1);   }   alloy("sendEvent", {     renderDecisions: true,     xdm: {       eventType: "view",       web: {         webPageDetails: {           name: view

Marketo’s hardcore rules for native Pre-Fill make sense, in particular stripping the mkt_tok query param so people don’t accidentally send their own personalized link to someone else. But there’s one hiccup in the native implementation — an inadvertent bug, since it has no privacy or security benefit — you can fix with a little JS. What’s the bug? Well, even when Pre-Fill works perfectly on an initial pageview:[1]initial landing: Pre-Fill works Just refreshing the page breaks it:after refresh: Pre-Fill disabled Now, the technical reason for this is clear: the always-added stripmkttok.js removed the mkt_tok for safety. (Which, again, is a good thing.) So upon refresh, the page no longer meets the prereqs for Pre-Fill. But the UX is a bit punitive. The person refreshing the page in their browser — the page that just included their data — isn’t expecting the data to be gone. Merely re-pre-filling the form after refresh doesn’t pose any risk, long as there aren’t any side effects. You may

Hello!  I am trying to pull together a list of MQLs who have opened an email (excluding confirmation emails unless they’ve opened a marketing email) and I would like it if someone can double check/verify that the logic is sound! (1 or (2 and 3)) Open email is not <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this year Open email is any this year Open email is <Confirmation Email 1,2,3, etc.> this yearWe are trying to check and see how many MQLs this year have opened one of our emails this year so that we can report to leadership. My concern is that Open Email is Any would pull in people who have opened the confirmation emails only when what I am looking for are people who have opened a marketing email AND opened a confirmation email. 

Hi Adobe Community, Greetings! To support a new use case, we need to add few profile type attributes to an existing Individual profile class schema. To ingest the historical data for profile attributes, I know that we can create a new dataset and a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields so that existing profiles can sync in the values.  However, I wanted to check if we can do the same in the existing dataset without creating a new dataset for this exercise?And, If we create a new dataflow where we map the Primary Id + New fields and point it to the same/existing dataset - will it overwrite other columns with null values as other columns were not mapped in the dataflow? Thanks,Sambit

Hello - Has anyone else had a similar experience that when you made the transition to the MobileSDK your post_tnt_action field in your data feed no longer was populating?  Looking for any type of troubleshooting ideas -- checkboxes that we might be missing, a step that is often overlooked, something new that needs to be setup, etc.  Thanks!

Hi ​@Community I am working on AEP-SFMC API based destination connection. I have created a streaming type audience and activated it using SFMC API based connection. SFMC connection is set up successfully as I can see the target fields during mapping. On Audience activation profile get activated to destination.“Dataexport” is used as marketing action and no consent policy is used.Destination data flow runs and complete successfully but i get “Identities excluded” while profiles are received but none activated.“Identity excluded” comes with below description :  “The identities associated to some profiles cannot be exported to the destination due to missing user consent, or the consent provided by users does not match the consent settings applied to the destination. To respect user privacy, Experience Platform will not export these identities to this destination. For more information, refer to the Consent policy documentation: https://www.adobe.com/go/consent-policy-enforcement. “  I am n

I’ve been exploring how to better structure travel-related content so it aligns more closely with real user intent rather than just static destination pages.For example, users today are searching for very specific queries—like airline policies, visa requirements, multi-city routes, or realistic itineraries—rather than just “things to do” in a city.Some approaches I’ve been testing:Building query-first content instead of generic guides Structuring destination data (attractions, logistics, timelines) in a reusable format Keeping content modular so updates (like travel rules) don’t break the systemRecently, while working on a travel platform called Trekhops, I’ve been trying to implement this kind of structure more actively—focusing on how users actually search rather than how content is traditionally organized. It’s been interesting to see where this works well and where it gets challenging.For those using Adobe Experience Cloud or similar ecosystems:How are you handling dynamic, intent-